The WashPost location seems to accommodate alcohol consumption more
readily while the PBS space (with its outdoor area) seems to
accommodate cannabis consumption more readily.
At the last sprint, it seemed to me that coffee and cannabis were
consumed during the day and people switched to alcohol at night.
Thus, the PBS space seems to more readily accommodate the
neurochemical configuration of the Portland sprint. :-)
Also, the proximity to the conference is pretty important, and the
existing tables and chairs seem to seal the deal.
Are we still exploring other spaces? I haven't even put out feelers
yet, but my friends in the nonprofit crowd may know an awesome area.
--
Justin Holmes
Head Instructor, SlashRoot Collective
SlashRoot: Coffee House and Tech Dojo
60 Main Street
New Paltz, NY 12561
845.633.8330
A few things here:First understand that regardless of any personal opinions on the subject, possession and consumption of cannabis is illegal in our host city, state, and country (I'm really not looking for debate on any technicalities relating to this, for all practical purposes this is not even remotely OK). Accordingly we as the organizers of a professional conference should not, can not, and will not do anything to support or condone such activity. We're certainly not going to go around searching peoples bags or give anybody a drug test but we will not, without question, support any illegal activity during any events related to the conference.Second thing to understand is why we ask about alcohol polices at our potential venues. We ask so that we understand the rules going in and so that we can do everything in our power to respect our hosts' wishes and needs. While it might be nice to have a beer or two at the end of a sprint, it's really not the purpose of the exercise. Providing alcoholic beverages is a nice perk that we can some times offer, but it is not a primary criteria for selection. To be perfectly clear, the primary reasons we ask for and report this information is so that we don't a) upset our hosts b) don't violate any local laws. Getting somebody's liquor license revoked is a really terrible way to say "thanks for supporting us!"To drive the message home, here's my criteria for successful sprints, some of which shouldn't need to be mentioned but clearly need to be included given this post:
- Abide by all local, state, and federal laws. We really don't need to have the big news of Djangocon to be arrests and/or deportations.
- Treat our sponsors, hosts, supporters with the respect they deserve. This includes not violating the law on their property and more significantly being courteous and respecting any reasonable request, guidelines, and rules they ask us to follow while using the resources they provide us with.
- Providing an environment where all attendees feel welcome and comfortable working.
- Having a fun event where we all make some awesome progress on Django and related project.
If anybody has questions, concerns, or would otherwise like to speak off-list about this post, please feel free to contact me at se...@seanoc.com.At this point I'd suggest rebooting this conversation and starting over with Jackie's original post. I think we have two awesome possible venues for the sprints and our time and energy will be best spent selecting one and moving on to planning the rest of the conference.If you have opinions about which venue may better support our goals mentioned above (not getting arrested, respecting our hosts, everybody's welcome, awesome code) please share them with the group.To that end I'd say I am +1 for the WaPo space. Considering that sprint attendance peeked at 125 last year, the extra space for more people will almost certainly be used. Additionally while being a bit of a trip from the hotel isn't great, there's mass transit access that everybody can use and it can be nice to have a bit of a change of scenery between the main conf and the sprints.With that, have at it. Let us hear what venue you'd like to see and why.
Normally, I'd be against moving the sprint space away from the
conference space, but in this case, I'm leaning towards the WaPo
space.
1. It's September in DC. Outside space may be close to useless.
2. Handicapped access is a win.
3. The 150 cap sounds like it could be tight. Even if we don't have
400 sprinters, it sounds like we'd have more room to break out into
smaller groups.
We may want to tip-toe around the alcohol issue right now, given the
current debate about cons being a culture of drunks.
Katie
Let's please avoid alcohol fetishism at DjangoCon. This is a
conference about Web programming, not about getting drunk.
Read this blog post for plenty of examples of what NOT to do,
regarding alcohol at tech conferences:
http://ryanfunduk.com/culture-of-exclusion/
By making alcohol consumption a priority, you're sending a clear
message that you need to drink alcohol to be part of the community.
No, no, NO.
Adrian
> Let's please avoid alcohol fetishism at DjangoCon.
+1.
--
Christophe Pettus
PostgreSQL Experts, Inc.
christop...@pgexperts.com
I think the main thing that we need to figure out is if we are planning to have over 150 people.