On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 09:47:22AM -0700, leaking pen wrote:
> You... won't believe in it without a model? We have several
> LENR cells
Yep, a model, what is used to make a theory. It's just an hypothesis,
but proof are lacking…
> that have shown anomalous heat, and at the end of the run different
> elements have appeared that were not in the cell at the start. Just
> because we have no idea HOW it happens, doesn't mean you shouldn't believe
> it happens.
If you bring me your method, your results and that it can be repeated,
I could believe it happenned. You see strange results every day when
you do science, and most of these results are only related to poor/not reliable
methods and/or a poor/tired/lazy/incompetent/cheater/whatever experimenter.
Yep, decay rate can be influenced by the environment ! (look at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_decay#Changing_decay_rates)
Some have made the hypothesis that solar activity can have an
influence too…
However their X-ray spectroscopy results are rather poor (in term of image
quality), and only one per condition is shown, without any statistics
on them and without scales (it seems they are looking in the bottom of
the scale aren't they ?)
> I'm trying to find the article I read, but I also saw one a few years back
> where a fungal mat that had palladium in solution showed after three weeks
> a lower amount of palladium, and nickel showing up in solution.
As a mass-spectrometry user, I keep cautious with metal analysis ;)
But anyway, if you have publications and/or results to share, I'd be
happy to read, share and learn more about all of that.