This contains:
- lots of fixes to the URI implementation
- fixes to the async server implementation
- addressing nagging failures with SSL and Asio error reporting
This was tested on Mac OS X Lion using GCC 4.2.
Note: this is the last release for the 0.9 line and I'll basically be
merging the deanberris/cpp-netlib repo into the official
cpp-netlib/cpp-netlib repo and will be developing exclusively with the
1.0 release in mind.
I'll send more details on the plan later on. In the meantime, please
use 0.9.4 instead of 0.9.3.
Thanks to everyone who's contributed to getting cpp-netlib in better
shape across the board.
Now we can start on the C++11 features and making cpp-netlib more awesome!
Cheers
--
Dean Michael Berris
Technical Solutions Engineer
Google
Hot off the presses, you can get it here:
https://github.com/cpp-netlib/cpp-netlib/downloads
This contains:
- lots of fixes to the URI implementation
- fixes to the async server implementation
- addressing nagging failures with SSL and Asio error reporting
This was tested on Mac OS X Lion using GCC 4.2.
Note: this is the last release for the 0.9 line and I'll basically be
merging the deanberris/cpp-netlib repo into the official
cpp-netlib/cpp-netlib repo and will be developing exclusively with the
1.0 release in mind.
I'll send more details on the plan later on. In the meantime, please
use 0.9.4 instead of 0.9.3.
Thanks to everyone who's contributed to getting cpp-netlib in better
shape across the board.
Now we can start on the C++11 features and making cpp-netlib more awesome!
Cool news! I was kinda crossing my fingers for that one.
> I don't have a lot of time this weekend, could you also update the
> documentation? Just what's change (whats_new.rst) and make sure that the
> version number is updated in index.rst.
>
I can change the RST but I won't be able to update the live docs just
yet. I'll leave that one for you if that's alright?
>>
>>
>> Note: this is the last release for the 0.9 line and I'll basically be
>> merging the deanberris/cpp-netlib repo into the official
>> cpp-netlib/cpp-netlib repo and will be developing exclusively with the
>> 1.0 release in mind.
>>
>> I'll send more details on the plan later on. In the meantime, please
>> use 0.9.4 instead of 0.9.3.
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who's contributed to getting cpp-netlib in better
>> shape across the board.
>>
>> Now we can start on the C++11 features and making cpp-netlib more awesome!
>>
>
> Looking forward to it!
>
+1
> Thanks Dean,
My pleasure. :)
Cheers
--
Dean Michael Berris
www.deanberris.com
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Glyn Matthews <glyn.m...@gmail.com> wrote:Cool news! I was kinda crossing my fingers for that one.
> Thanks Dean!
>
> On 20 April 2012 19:54, Dean Michael Berris <dbe...@google.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hot off the presses, you can get it here:
>> https://github.com/cpp-netlib/cpp-netlib/downloads
>>
>> This contains:
>> - lots of fixes to the URI implementation
>> - fixes to the async server implementation
>> - addressing nagging failures with SSL and Asio error reporting
>>
>> This was tested on Mac OS X Lion using GCC 4.2.
>
>
> It all works on my side too (Ubuntu 11.10, GCC 4.6).
>
I can change the RST but I won't be able to update the live docs just
> I don't have a lot of time this weekend, could you also update the
> documentation? Just what's change (whats_new.rst) and make sure that the
> version number is updated in index.rst.
>
yet. I'll leave that one for you if that's alright?
How do you guys define works?
>
> It all works on my side too (Ubuntu 11.10, GCC 4.6).
For test purposes I compile and run the contents within the test
folder (albeit I dont think I can claim 100% success on Win7 yet) so
I'm assuming that's what you and Dean did? I have dual boot setup
( MSVC 2010 on Win 7 Redhat 5.6, GCC 4.7) on a machine with ccp-netib
so I'd like to mirror your approach on Win7 and Redhat.
An aside:
When I access the (recommend for forks and pull requests) upstream
respository at http://github.com/mikhailberis/cpp-netlib I get 404
errors. What upstream repository are you using?
> All tests pass (although we can argue about the comprehensiveness and
> quality of the tests - we're working on that). We also use a CI server
> which checks the 0.9-devel branch - http://173.255.250.89:8080/ (Matt, could
> you set it put use the master branch on the cpp-netlib repo)?
OK, I've got the master branch building successfully now. I take it
this is effectively mainline development?
Are we using the 0.10-devel branch any longer?
Thanks,
Matt