running on cores more than number of atoms

21 views
Skip to first unread message

Chetan Mahajan

unread,
Jan 26, 2012, 2:16:21 AM1/26/12
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Hi

Is it scientifically ok to run cp2k on number of cores more than total number of atoms in the system? If ofcourse problem scales well with that many cores, which is perhaps happening in my system 

Thanks
Chetan

--
Chetan V Mahajan
PhD candidate, Ganesan Group
Department of Chemical Engineering
The University of Texas at Austin

Matt W

unread,
Jan 26, 2012, 8:25:24 AM1/26/12
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Should be fine.

Of course there is an easy way to test if it works ...

Matt

Axel

unread,
Jan 26, 2012, 2:12:59 PM1/26/12
to cp...@googlegroups.com


On Thursday, January 26, 2012 2:16:21 AM UTC-5, Chetan Mahajan wrote:
Hi

Is it scientifically ok to run cp2k on number of cores more than total number of atoms in the system? If ofcourse problem scales well with that many cores, which is perhaps happening in my system 

please keep in mind that for quantum chemistry
calculations, in the crudest approximation, the
basic unit of work is an electron, not an atom.
atoms are for the most part just providing an 
"external" field for the electrons to be in.

axel.

Chetan Mahajan

unread,
Jan 26, 2012, 10:31:53 PM1/26/12
to cp...@googlegroups.com
Thanks, Matt and Axel. 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cp2k" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/cp2k/-/iAhTC8Fgy8EJ.

To post to this group, send email to cp...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cp2k+uns...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cp2k?hl=en.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages