I've shared PeerPoint |
Next Net group members: I've shared a Google Doc called "PeerPoint" with the group. Members have edit permission but please follow the two simple procedures mentioned at the top of the document.
Efficiency is going to dictate that some peers are going to serve different distribution roles in the network. How and why they do this is critical to acceptance of any system.
Each peer class might have several sub-classifications:
On another topic, I suggest that all the PeerPoint applications (email, social chat, project spaces, wiki pages, etc.) need to have common elements in the user interfaces to set and override default privacy and security settings at a fine level of granularity (e.g. individual emails, files, documents, comments, links, etc.).
User-configured Security settings (by content categories and by individual data items) might include:
Finally, the extreme nature of some of the privacy and security options mentioned above raises the danger of 1) provoking government reaction against otherwise legal and benign private network activity and 2) potentially attracting the use/exploitation of PeerPoint technology by anti-social actors, which would exacerbate danger #1. For these reasons PeerPoint networks would need mechanisms for policing themselves against anti-social uses, perhaps including methods for segregating high and low risk activity on separate networks, and perhaps some way of trying to satisfy the minimum national security requirements of liberal democratic states as far as possible.
I've shared PeerPoint
Next Net group members: I've shared a Google Doc called "PeerPoint" with the group. Members have edit permission but please follow the two simple procedures mentioned at the top of the document.
Let's combine user-owned housing and agriculture and basic health-care
with a user-owned network so that we can pay workers by
cross-committing skills with each other without the need to use money
within that production arena.
by Geert Lovink, founding director of the Institute of Network Cultures, June 6, 2012
I was asked by an Italian newspaper to submit 96 words on the future of internet. Here they are:
Instead of further going down the corporate lane of Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Google and Facebook, I propose to go back to the original architecture of Internet as public infrastructure with decentralized nodes. It may be romantic to insist on the distributed nature of networks but it is a necessary political demand. Net criticism is a toothless project without a utopian dimension. Even if internet itself had a military origin in the Cold War, and is now dominated by equally destructive force of greedy venture capitalists, backed up by libertarian gurus. Let’s rethink the public sphere: another internet is possible!
Patrick, you're not alone. I work on bringing permaculture, free/libre/opensource + p2p networks and the occupy movement together everyday.
Patrick, you're not alone. I work on bringing permaculture, free/libre/opensource + p2p networks and the occupy movement together everyday.
How can we collaborate? What do you want to do?
I've shared PeerPoint
BTW as far as I can tell, there is no online forum dedicated to the general topic of p2p application software architecture for free/open source software designers, developers, engineers, etc. Discussions of p2p architecture tend to be found mostly in the discussions of specific p2p networking projects like freenet and FreedomBox and they tend to apply to the lower-level network routing and file-sharing issues instead of the higher application software level for real-time, interactive collaboration. If anyone knows of a general p2p application architecture group or forum, please let me know.
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 07:45:55PM -0500, Mark Janssen-Rosenbluth wrote:
Hi Mark.
I was just at arc 38(.org) where a core team of 6 and an extended group of 30+ occupiers are rehabbing the barns, building camps on the 100+ acre mountain, putting gardens together, and collaborating with other farms in the area. It's the only farms composed almost entirely of occupiers. There are other activist run farms in our network that I'll be visiting in the next few days. What are you up to? What are you looking for? Want to get on the phone/skype/mumble and discuss opportunities?
. They are our primary land project. I'll be touring a few other farms where
Mark Janssen-Rosenbluth wrote:
Greets, p2p peeps!
PeerPoint is an evolving crowdsourced design specification for a suite of integrated peer-to-peer applications to include (but not limited to) social networking, real-time project collaboration, content management, database management, voting, trust/reputation metrics, complementary currency, crowd funding, etc. This specification overlaps with many existing p2p infrastructure and social networking projects but also goes substantially beyond anything yet existing. Members of other projects are encouraged to participate in further developing the open PeerPoint specs and to adopt any part of the specs that they can use.
To participate in developing this specification, please join the Next Net Google Group and read the PeerPoint topic.