SWAT CUP SUFI2 Error

[Adam Freihoefer]

Greetings,

I using SWAT CUP (version 4.3.7) and have successfully run the SUFI2 procedure for a single discharge point. When I execute the SUFI2_post.bat to export my results (get my best parameters, the best simulated flow, etc) I get the following error: Could not find C:\SWAT\...\SUFI2.OUT\beh_*.* All that is in my SUFI2 output folder is the FLOW_OUT.txt.

Anyone have any ideas why this would occur?

Thanks,

Adam Freihoefer

TMDL Modeler

Wisconsin Dept. of Natural Resources

[Soni]

Hi Adam,
Are you able to solve your issues with SWAT_CUP sufi2. I am having similar problems when executing post-batch files. Please let me know if you are able to fix this problem. Thank you.

Best,
Soni

[Srini]

This is not an error. This means that based on your behavior threshold criteria, there were no simulations that met the criteria.

Hope this is clear.

Srini

R. Srinivasan Director and Professor
r-srin...@tamu.edu Spatial Sciences Laboratory
http://www-ssl.tamu.edu Texas A&M University

---

From: Soni <soni.pr...@gmail.com>

Sender: arc...@googlegroups.com

Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 06:00:33 -0700 (PDT)

To: <arc...@googlegroups.com>

Subject: [ArcSWAT:4489] Re: SWAT CUP SUFI2 Error

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ArcSWAT" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/arcswat/-/K-5vJyJb9fMJ.
To post to this group, send email to arc...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to arcswat+u...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/arcswat?hl=en.

[Woonsup Choi]

Does it mean that the initial simulation was too poor so that subsequent runs were not made properly? I have a SUFI2 output txt file looking like the below. The project was set up from a successful SWAT run, but the SUFI2 run did not produce anything meaningful.

---

   1
1  -1.#QNAN0e+000
2  -1.#QNAN0e+000
3  -1.#QNAN0e+000
4  -1.#QNAN0e+000
5  -1.#QNAN0e+000
6  -1.#QNAN0e+000
7  -1.#QNAN0e+000
8  -1.#QNAN0e+000
9  -1.#QNAN0e+000
10  -1.#QNAN0e+000
11  -1.#QNAN0e+000
12  -1.#QNAN0e+000
13  -1.#QNAN0e+000
14  -1.#QNAN0e+000
15  -1.#QNAN0e+000
16  -1.#QNAN0e+000
17  -1.#QNAN0e+000
18  -1.#QNAN0e+000
19  -1.#QNAN0e+000
20  -1.#QNAN0e+000
21  -1.#QNAN0e+000
22  -1.#QNAN0e+000
23  -1.#QNAN0e+000
24  -1.#QNAN0e+000
   2
1  -1.#QNAN0e+000
2  -1.#QNAN0e+000
3  -1.#QNAN0e+000
4  -1.#QNAN0e+000
5  -1.#QNAN0e+000
6  -1.#QNAN0e+000
7  -1.#QNAN0e+000
8  -1.#QNAN0e+000
9  -1.#QNAN0e+000
10  -1.#QNAN0e+000
11  -1.#QNAN0e+000
12  -1.#QNAN0e+000
13  -1.#QNAN0e+000
14  -1.#QNAN0e+000
15  -1.#QNAN0e+000
16  -1.#QNAN0e+000
17  -1.#QNAN0e+000
18  -1.#QNAN0e+000
19  -1.#QNAN0e+000
20  -1.#QNAN0e+000
21  -1.#QNAN0e+000
22  -1.#QNAN0e+000
23  -1.#QNAN0e+000
24  -1.#QNAN0e+000
   3
1  -1.#QNAN0e+000
2  -1.#QNAN0e+000
3  -1.#QNAN0e+000
4  -1.#QNAN0e+000
5  -1.#QNAN0e+000

[Charles Ikenberry]

I've never seen that.  If I have an error in CUP, I usually get no output at all.  Most of the time, the trouble is in the extraction files.  Sorry I can't help you.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to arcswat+u...@googlegroups.com.

To post to this group, send email to arc...@googlegroups.com.

Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/arcswat.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

[ali yimer]

Dear Brother, If you come across with the solution, please  help me how to fix the following problem.
I run swat-cup (SUFI2) for a single variable, flow at the watershed outlet for  cal, val. uncertainty and sens analyses.I encountered wto problems: 1. In the cal model output, "new_par.txt" does not exist. 2. In the chart layout, Three legends: 95ppu, Observed. and Best simulations are labeled whereas, in the data series (graph), 95PPU doesn't appear. I tried, so many iteratons upto 750 runs, I modified (widen) parameter ranges (par inf.txt), I reduced OF threshold value to 0.0, and i alternatively used FLOW var column # as 6 and 7. The results are the same shit. Would you advise me how to fix the problem.

Thank you so much.

Ali

[Charles Ikenberry]

After hitting “Overlay” in the HRU Analysis process (using ArcSWAT 2012.10_1.14 released 3/5/14), I obtained the following error:

Unexpected Program Error

 

! An error has occurred in the application.  Record the call stack sequence and the description of the error.

 

Error Call Stack Sequence

           overlayLUSoilsfunctions.vb Line:1080

 

Error Number

                -2147467259

 

Description

                Error HRESULT E-FAIL has been returned from a call to a COM component.

 

Has anybody seen this before?  All the reclassifications were completed successfully with no problem during LU, soil, and slope definition, so I’m not sure what the problem could be.  It may be that my model exceeds the number of HRUs allowed.  Is there a limit?  Prior to getting the error I described, a small window pops up that says:

SWAT_HRUs

VALUE=9596

Thanks,

Charles

[jcjaimes]

Same error here. Could you finally solve it?