On Monday, 13 October 2014 20:33:29 UTC+11, Peetee Aitchei wrote:
> 1983-10-22 Harold Klemp Speech and Q & A with High Initiates - GROSS v ECKANKAR
>
1983-10-22 HK HI Meeting MISSING Q & A Comments - GROSS v ECKANKAR
There were some missing sections in the recording of the speech by Klemp
and the Q & A among the High Initiates meeting.
A handful of these redactions have been obtained from an article written
by Darwin Gross in 1990, and are listed below with some additional comments
made by Darwin.
This complete article of comments by Darwin will be reproduced separately.
See:
1983-10-22 HK High Initiates RESPONSE by DARWIN 1990 - GROSS v ECKANKAR
--- --- ---
Original article:
1983-10-22 Harold Klemp Speech and Q & A with High Initiates - GROSS v ECKANKAR
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.religion.eckankar/__qCBEHPPBQ/apPfU4vYRaEJ
High Initiates Meeting - ECKANKAR World Wide Seminar
GROSS vs ECKANKAR
US District Court - District of Oregon - Civil No. 84-228
EXHIBIT B - PLAINTIFF'S SUR REPLY
---
Quoting extracts from pages 1 - 10:
This recording is from the higher initiates meeting, Saturday morning,
October 22, 1983 at the World Wide Seminar held in Los Angeles, CA.
[...]
The 8th Initiates were introduced:
Comment by Darwin Gross:
Four "eighth initiates" demanded Harold takeover the Eckankar Corporation in a
letter to certain Trustees (concealed from myself, Alan Nichols and Bob Brant).
The letter was signed by four women, most or all of whom were grandmothers.
It was used by the conspirators to cover-up the takeover power grab.
---
[ A large section is cut from the document ]
Info from Pages 3 & 4
Q.
"Um. I would of liked to have seen Darwin here to answer questions 'cuz
we're going to hear one side of it, but I'd like as best as you can to
tell us what Darwin's explanation of his actions were." ("Rick", p. 3.)
Comment by Darwin Gross:
a. This is obviously another "planted" question. I was not present because I had been
threatened by takeover leadership with legal action if I tried to attend.(16) The idea
that Skelskey and Klemp can speak for me, the same two men who have stolen my life work
and destroyed my reputation for selfish gain is insanity, but what's new? The entire
takeover is spiritual insanity.
The shocked audience possesses only superficial information. The audience is deceived into
believing deceptive reports and appearances. The assumptions are accepted because they are
not explicit, not out in the open. No warning flags are flown.(17)
The audience is "blind-sided."
It is led to believe that both Skelskey and Klemp are friendly to me! Ambition and greed
have turned both men into deadly enemies but only a handful are in the know. It is a sneak
attack, a day of infamy in a year of infamy.
---
4. "How can you become the spiritual leader and have no say in the physical
organization?" (Skelskey, p. 4.)
Comments by Darwin Gross:
a. This is a plant, an "all-or-nothing" fake choice. In truth, members write and call for help
constantly. It is a full-time job, day and night. The office operation is likewise a full-time
job. One detracts from the other. That is why Paul wanted a smooth business organization, to
relieve the Master of that pressure for more important things. The master only needs to attend
Board meetings and make an occasional office visit.
The board meetings are where the decisions are made and the Master has every opportunity to
coordinate with the business side in that manner.
The fake choice is a cover-up for Skelskey's seizing total power with and through Klemp.
By convincing Harold he should be the only voting member on all corporation's boards, he
overloaded Harold. Also, Harold had no business experience. As a result Skelskey gained
working control as reward for destroying me. The proof is in his becoming president of all
corporations and a note in the house publication explaining that Harold has "stepped aside" to
finish his work".
[...]
The physical organization is not what they think it is. It is only a shell. The spiritual power
is not in a material shell or human organization. It is in the Mahanta consciousness Itself,
the spiritual vehicle established by Sri Twitchell for hundreds of years to come.
I must continue to carry that responsibility in the physical because Harold was so eager
to be taken in by his supposed buddy, sneaky Pete Skelskey. If Pete cannot have it for himself,
he is determined to destroy it for everyone else, Aesop's dog-in-the-manger personified.
b. Skelskey knows the work load. He sat on the board for two years prior. What he is
proposing is impossible for one person to handle. He also knows the audience will not realize
this. He is angling for personal power under the guise of securing "responsibility" for Harold. The
way it worked out is proof Skelskey was looking out for Skelskey, period. The audience doesn't
know Skelskey's hidden agenda of grabbing power for himself. They have been deliberately kept
in the dark, from 1983 forward. That is why I was refused a mailing of my side of the story to the
membership; why my address was not listed in the house publication, and why I have been
repeatedly sued in a total abuse of membership trust and their funds.
c. Klemp and Skelskey know that if the membership ever gets wind of events as they really
occurred, how the wool was pulled over their eyes, and how the big lie technique was used to
render them powerless, they will leave in droves. Klemp and Skelskey want to keep every paying
member on the hook, except those who ask embarrassing questions that is. The latter are
ruthlessly expelled, before others around them get wise to what is happening.
---
5. "There was, uh, a movement of money unbeknownst to the Board of Trustees, uh, which was
a, uh, a broken trust." (Skelskey, p. 4.)
a. Skelskey knows he personally voted to move membership trust fund certificates on deposit
to the Oregon Bank, that the interest might be used for my operation. More authorization was
voted than actually used, in point of fact.
b. Skelskey also knows the audience he is speaking to does not know he voted for transferring
the funds. He simply flim-flams them, knowing that in the rigidly controlled organization he
is setting up, no one will ever be the wiser (so he thinks!) Spirit knows all and what It
knows must become known. That is truth. It is a reality overlooked by the dictators, con
men and takeover plotters of all time, why they always come to grief. The average person has no
way to uncover or combat organized, massive lying, but Spirit does. When the cup of their iniquity
is full, the ancient wisdom explains, the law of compensation will have the final word.
c. This bold lie shows Skelskey as architect of the takeover plot. An innocent man was ruined
to cover-up for the takeover conspiracy. It appears likely as a consequence that it may also
have been Skelskey who influenced Klemp's decision to "jump the gun", to seize by stealth and
deception what he could have earned, had he only been willing to persevere and accept the
discipline of training.
In retrospect, anyone capable of doing what Klemp did is not ready for the position. Klemp,
knowing his own secret thought processes, apparently became convinced he would not make the
grade. He elected to betray his mentor, stabbing me in the back.
---
7. "He and he alone decides what he wants to do in the physical organization".
(Skelskey, p. 4.)
Comments by Darwin Gross:
a. The first corporation sole filing is over two years away but Skelskey's statement is
prophetic. The independent Board of Paul's day and mine is doomed. The majority trustees
forfeited their independence. When the Trustees installed Skelskey-Klemp they signed a
declaration of dependence. The new policy is one-man rule.
b. The enunciated takeover policy was subsequently written into law. Two years after the
subject meeting of higher initiates, Minnesota corporation papers were signed by Klemp and
notarized October 9, 1985, (shortly after the Settlement Agreement with Sri Darwin Gross).
The papers were actually filed January 30, 1987. (Minnesota was the third corporation to
be denied trustee voting control. It was formed as a corporation sole, unlike Nevada and
California, both of which were governed by majority vote of trustees, prior to being
amended by Klemp.)
---
8. "He's (Darwin) out there telling all kinds of things, including he has told people
that he has no money for food and they are sending him money for food. Now when you're
making $80,000 a year you can eat pretty well."
"So we are um talking because the other side is being told and is and we were accused
even of a cover-up. There is no cover-up. We are trying to avoid an open confrontation,
but its being triggered off anyway." (Simpson, p. 4.)
Comments by Darwin Gross:
a. Simpson knows I was confronted with large legal fees in defending against corporation
lawsuits, the first of which was filed two days after the takeover.(21) As an insider she
must have known or could have known the corporation had a gun at my head, demanding I be
quiet and disappear if I wanted a pension and medical benefits.(22)
Discovering my convictions were not for sale, they broke the promise given by themselves
and by former trustees, a promise I relied upon to my great detriment. Faced with complete
loss of my income, medical benefits and facing expensive litigation in addition, I
conserved meager funds for legal expense as much as possible, living pretty much on
distilled water and brown rice for months at a time.
Even then I couldn't afford to appeal a bad decision, an appeal that several experts said
I was certain to win. Winning would have only meant more appeals by the corporation, an
effort I would have had to match. If I won in the highest court, it would only have resulted
in the case being sent back for trial, where it should have been in the first place. By then
the costs would have added up to far more than I had available going in, all before the cost
of trial itself!
Like so many other Americans, I simply found the price of justice too high. I had to walk away,
all the while knowing I had every right to the retirement contract I earned from the corporation.
I should never have been placed in the position of having to sue for it in the first place. That
is on Harold, Pete and the Board of Trustees.
b. The conspirators' idea of avoiding a confrontation is for me to roll over and play dead while
they invent and lap up vile gossip about my character. The confrontation was triggered by extreme
suspiciousness, disloyalty and ambition. My fault was to trust them far more than they deserved.
Yet I have to trust those who ask me for help, to a considerable extent, or I can't assist
in bringing out the best potential an individual has. Judgmental doesn't get it. Trust leaves
one in a vulnerable position. Fortunately not every one betrays the one they turn to for help.
That conduct is reserved for channels of the negative power, and by those who have been deeply
confused by such channels.
c. Simpson's statement that my side is being told is contradicted by the fact they would NOT
let me tell my side to the membership. The membership has NEVER been allowed to learn of my
side. The fact is, Simpson and associates are doing the talking. They are talking about letting
me talk but they never do so. It is vintage double talk, a real shuffle on the audience.
--- ---
[A section of comment & questions is cut from the document]
12. "I'd like to introduce Darwin's board" (Klemp, p. 7).
"Each member of the board was hand-picked by Darwin Gross. This has been
Darwin's Board ... Harold any time for any reason, you can remove any of us
... We're going to see ... that no president, no general manager, can
impugn the living Master again. The living Master will pick the board.
Not as it was done in the past." (Skelskey, p. 7).
Comments by Darwin Gross:
Can any listener unscramble this concoction? It is in code, intended to confuse.
First, its said to be a board handpicked by me. Second it is said that Klemp will do the
picking from now on. Third it is said that the second is not the way it was done in the
first instance! The sophists are hard at work confusing the audience. Did people fall for
this contradiction in terms? You bet they did. Look at the results.
Ninety-five percent of those present were initiated under me, yet ninety-five percent of
that number swallowed it like so many guppies. Like I say, Kal has a temporary advantage
down here.
Just for the record, I did not introduce all nominations to the board. Peter Skelskey is
a case in point [I the summer of 1981]. I'm glad I don't have that one on my conscience!
Klemp is quite enough, thank you.
I didn't put much time or attention on the physical organization, nor did Paul. That is why
so many tricks were slipped over on us, a circumstance not appreciated by the great majority
who have never worked that close to what really happens with those carrying the true
spiritual mantle. Most people think if it came from the office with corporation name on it,
we must have approved it in advance.
I got to see most things the same way everyone else did, after the fact. Paul and I had more
important things to do with our time, to get the message out and help the students. That is
what I was trying to do for Harold, hanging in there, bad health and all; trying to keep the
business off his back. He turned on me, beating me over the head with my concern for his
success.
I eventually got around to telling Harold how his returning of evil for good was so extreme
a case he had given ingratitude itself a black eye, no easy task since it already has one
of the worst names in the language.
--- ---
Closing summary comments by Darwin Gross about the Oct 22, 1983 HI meeting.
Monumental ingratitude and a jugular instinct are the only two things I can think of in
which he showed real proficiency. Both are negative talents and have no part in the tradition
I received from Paul. He was an extremely appreciative human being and compassionate beyond
measure.
Harold's claim to succeed me, and Peter's claim to succeed Paul Twitchell,(36), is lewdness
in the Cathedral for sure, right off the astral plane, per The Tiger's Fang by Sri Twitchell.
I don't have time to cover the entire proceedings of 10-22-83. Suffice it to say it is more
of the same pious fraud. How could this have happened? Paul warned in a special brochure he
and I had widely distributed, of Dangers of the Psychic World for Truth Seekers.(37) Harold
has described his psychic experiences in Child in the Wilderness.
Had I known, I would not have nominated him for the stress of seeking the mastership. It is
not a role for those subject to mental breakdown. I would have worked with him first in an
effort to help him get a stronger foundation.
A lot of things have happened since 10-22-1983, but I will leave that to another time. The
contradictions continue, I can say that much anyway. For example, Harold wrote in the Spring
of 1984 "Why do so many paths to God compete with each other to lure innocent people away
from their beliefs?"
Yet in the Stranger by the River, (Klemp revision recently published), a spiritual master is
portrayed with a field of crosses. It is a blatant attempt to influence Christians, pulling
them off their path.
Paul and I have always emphasized that if people are satisfied in the church, temple of
synagogue, they should stay where they are. Christian symbolism is misplaced in Paul's
universal works. He respected the truth where ever he found it, not in one particular
religion but in all.
It is not a proper presentation of Sri Paul's writings, I can assure you of that, just in
passing of course!