Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Kinpa: 'Option A or Option B?'
31 views
Skip to first unread message
Henosis Sage
Jul 18, 2016, 10:00:12 PM7/18/16
to
Reposted message:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.religion.eckankar/BWAE_ITH9BY/nfuLRo9EBwAJ
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 08:40:26 UTC+10, Kinpa wrote:
"See this person's version of "a uanced fact based rational response" where he outlines what his Munchausen's Syndrome means....however, do note that he purposely left out the great many paragraphs that were inconvenient for his BS "definition" which was patently a lie. Of course I was forced to come along and add a few actual facts so as to make the actual definition, and full range of applicable definitions more clear and obvious. It begs the question, "Why did sean leave so much of the actual definition for the term out?"
Why? Fear of course....he has never been able to operate in even the most slightly rational manner unless he is "framing" things the way he wants them to be misunderstood. He has done the exact same thing on the whole "ProtoIndoEuropean" idea. Note that Indo is included in the word.
Also note that finding one or even several linguists who disagree with the other theories and ideas in the world means literally nothing, because of the simple fact that all of the world's linguists have NEVER agreed on ANY theory, and they still do not.
Of course none of that changes the fact that sean is anything BUT an expert on any linguistics in the world. But his claiming to be one is just another symptom of Munchausen's Syndrome, that anyone can read up on at any number of sites.
End of story...
=== === ===
About the whole "ProtoIndoEuropean" idea
RE Matt is saying this above:
"...because of the simple fact that all of the world's linguists have
NEVER agreed on ANY theory, and they still do not."
VERSUS Matt also saying of the 'theory' of Proto-Indo-European (PIE):
"The patterns are consistent in the comparisons of the languages. This
is not theory, it is factual."
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.religion.eckankar/Su-nhMYdu5M/C7A8YPKwBgAJ
Option A) Linguists have never agreed on any PIE theory
Option B) PIE is not a theory it is factual, a True Fact
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.religion.eckankar/BWAE_ITH9BY/nfuLRo9EBwAJ
On Tuesday, 19 July 2016 08:40:26 UTC+10, Kinpa wrote:
"See this person's version of "a uanced fact based rational response" where he outlines what his Munchausen's Syndrome means....however, do note that he purposely left out the great many paragraphs that were inconvenient for his BS "definition" which was patently a lie. Of course I was forced to come along and add a few actual facts so as to make the actual definition, and full range of applicable definitions more clear and obvious. It begs the question, "Why did sean leave so much of the actual definition for the term out?"
Why? Fear of course....he has never been able to operate in even the most slightly rational manner unless he is "framing" things the way he wants them to be misunderstood. He has done the exact same thing on the whole "ProtoIndoEuropean" idea. Note that Indo is included in the word.
Also note that finding one or even several linguists who disagree with the other theories and ideas in the world means literally nothing, because of the simple fact that all of the world's linguists have NEVER agreed on ANY theory, and they still do not.
Of course none of that changes the fact that sean is anything BUT an expert on any linguistics in the world. But his claiming to be one is just another symptom of Munchausen's Syndrome, that anyone can read up on at any number of sites.
End of story...
=== === ===
About the whole "ProtoIndoEuropean" idea
RE Matt is saying this above:
"...because of the simple fact that all of the world's linguists have
NEVER agreed on ANY theory, and they still do not."
VERSUS Matt also saying of the 'theory' of Proto-Indo-European (PIE):
"The patterns are consistent in the comparisons of the languages. This
is not theory, it is factual."
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.religion.eckankar/Su-nhMYdu5M/C7A8YPKwBgAJ
Option A) Linguists have never agreed on any PIE theory
Option B) PIE is not a theory it is factual, a True Fact
Etznab
Jul 19, 2016, 9:23:44 AM7/19/16
to
Someone needs to learn how to write in a more honest and respectful manner.
Kinpa
Jul 19, 2016, 5:39:46 PM7/19/16
to
Why this is marked as abuse? It has been marked as abuse.
Report not abuse
Henosis Sage
Jul 19, 2016, 7:22:48 PM7/19/16
to
On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 07:39:46 UTC+10, Kinpa wrote:
>
> Aww poor babies! Keep crying! You fool no one with your tripe...and respect is earned, and neither of you have earned even the slightest amount of it...try again
>
> Aww poor babies! Keep crying! You fool no one with your tripe...and respect is earned, and neither of you have earned even the slightest amount of it...try again
Kinpa says:
Option A) Linguists have never agreed on any PIE theory
Option B) PIE is not a theory it is factual, a True Fact
?
Option A) Linguists have never agreed on any PIE theory
Option B) PIE is not a theory it is factual, a True Fact
Etznab
Jul 19, 2016, 9:23:21 PM7/19/16
to
Etznab
Jul 19, 2016, 9:27:30 PM7/19/16
to
Henosis Sage
Jul 19, 2016, 10:59:24 PM7/19/16
to
Not only that, a Sant Shabda ...
https://plus.google.com/u/0/106704473738376182941/about
In Hinduism and other Indian religions, sant is a human being revered for
his or her knowledge of "self, truth, reality" and as a "truth-exemplar".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sant
Truth exemplar? Don't think so, know so he isn't.
And not only that, several months back on the LFN website he was promoted to
Shaykh Sant Shabda-Preceptor for a while. Like wow!
Sheikh —also transliterated Sheik, Shaik, Shayk, Shaykh, Shaikh, Cheikh, and Shekh— is an honorific title in the Arabic language. It commonly designates the ruler of a tribe, who inherited the title from his father. "Sheikh" is given to a royal male at birth, whereas the related title "Sheikha" is given to a royal female at birth.
"Sheikh" also often serves as a title for prominent Islamic leaders or clerics.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sheikh
Is it Sant, as in sant mat aka sufism?
As "point of view of the Sants", the term Sant is pivotal. Derived from the Sanskrit sat (सत) and has overlapping usages (true, real, honest, right). Its root meaning is "one who knows(is) the truth" or "one who has experienced (merged into) Ultimate Reality." The term 'sant' has taken on the general meaning of "a good person" but is properly assigned to the poet-sants of medieval India.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sant_Mat#Similar_movements
A preceptor is a teacher responsible to uphold a certain law or tradition, a precept.
A preceptor was historically in charge of a preceptory, the headquarters of certain orders of monastic knights, such as the Knights Hospitaller and Knights Templar, within a given geographical area.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preceptor
Just as I suspected, Kinpa's an Illuminatti agent!
[ that's a joke btw lol ]
Still one does need to be vigilant of things going off the rails completely
and innocent people being harmed or worse.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_Jones
and Shabda?
aka Shabda
Śábda is the Sanskrit word for "speech sound". In Sanskrit grammar, the term
refers to an utterance in the sense of linguistic performance.
Well there has certainly been 'a performance' here on a.r.e. for some time.
And a very 'popular' compiler of articles on the lfn.
Esoterically, Shabd is the “Sound Current vibrating in all creation. It can be heard by the inner ears.” [1] Variously referred to as the Audible Life Stream, Inner Sound, Sound Current or Word in English, the Shabd is the esoteric essence of God which is available to all human beings, according to the Shabd path teachings of Eckankar, the Quan Yin Method, Sant Mat, Surat Shabd Yoga, and M.S.I.A. (Movement of Spiritual Inner Awareness).
Adherents believe that a Satguru, or Eck Master, who is a human being, has merged with the Shabd in such a manner that he or she is a living manifestation of it at its highest level (the “Word made flesh”). However, not only can the Satguru attain this, but all human beings are inherently privileged in this way. Indeed, in Sant Mat the raison d’être for the human form is to meditate on the Sound Current, and in so doing merge with it until one’s own divinity is ultimately realized.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shabda#In_religion
These were the basic meanings for 'Shaykh Sant Shabda-Preceptor'
The prominent Leader-ruler spokesperson for LFN Initiates,
Truth-exemplar for the Sound Current,
Upholder of Spiritual law and precepts,
Is one Shaykh Sant Shabda-Preceptor,
aka Matt.
Henosis Sage
Jul 20, 2016, 3:33:55 AM7/20/16
to
On Wednesday, 20 July 2016 11:27:30 UTC+10, Etznab wrote:
> >
> >
> > Kinpa the big bad wolf.
>
> Pretending to be a Shabda master.
Mattji :)
>
> Pretending to be a Shabda master.
Henosis Sage
Jul 20, 2016, 3:52:18 AM7/20/16
to
A bit of shit stirring iow. It didn't seem stay up very long, one day it was
there and months later was back to the old name again. :-)
Meanwhile I see RSSB is still drawing crowds for satsang above 500,000 at a time.
New RSSB Dera documentary movie "The Enigma of Love" http://www.rssb.org/eolneol.php
Check out the thousands heading into the Dera at Beas. It's incredible.
No mobile phones allowed. The colours and singing.
A large-size photographic album, Equilibrium of Love tells the story of the Dera through pictures and text.
http://www.rssb.org/files/books/en/EOL/Equilibrium%20of%20Love-Dera%20Baba%20Jaimal%20Singh.html
a RS worship service?
http://www.rssb.org/files/books/en/EOL/Equilibrium%20of%20Love-Dera%20Baba%20Jaimal%20Singh.html#p=4
0 new messages