On Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 10:21:46 PM UTC-4,
borisba...@gmail.com wrote:
> An 8-year old begins crying:
>
> >
> > Now you`re just saying stuff.
>
> I like this. Evidence is "stuff". That's good.
You said...
"No, I quoted a ballistics and weapons expert who knows precisely how bullets behave upon impact with different surfaces, not excluding bones and flesh."
This is not evidence, this is you just saying stuff. You aren`t showing that the things you say are true. You are shooting blanks.
> >
> > Look, if you think it will help you, I can link to photos of firearms and photos of bullet wounds and I expect even a retard such as yourself might be able to make a distinction between the two completely different things.
>
> You can try.
Ok, lets give it a shot...
These are firearms ...
http://ransom-lawfirm.com/practice-areas/firearms/
These are gunshot wounds...
https://www.pinterest.com/micktan_us/gunshot-wounds-graphic/
To help you further, Robert Frazier was an FBI`s firearms expert. Alfred Olivier was the Army`s wound ballistics expert. They are two different fields. If someone is a cab driver that doesn`t make them an expert in the wounds people sustain from being hit by cabs.
> But then you'd have to explain it. Which you can't do.
I can explain it fine, you are an intellectual coward trying to obscure the issue because you can`t support your ideas.
> >
> > Actually, it didn`t say that but we can`t expect accuracy from you, can we?
>
> It did, and we can.
Now you are lying, and cutting away the content that shows you are lying. I`ll put it back in, you said...
"YOU cited Ayoob's bio, which in that very citation identifies him as an expert witness in the capacity of firearms and ballistics in court."
The Wikipedia source had this...
"Ayoob has appeared as an expert witness in several trials."
Doesn`t say what in what capacity he testified as a expert, you assumed.
> >
> > I would be smart enough not to cite a plumber when the subject is electricity.
>
> So if a plumber told you not to stick a fork in an outlet, you'd ask him what his expertise on the matter is, and then do it anyway. You've probably done it before...and that's why you're you. :-)
You`d have an electrician put a toilet in for you because you are unable to make the distinction between the two different fields.
> >
> > And why are you being a retard and trying to misdirect back to me? *You* cited this guy.
>
> "This guy." It's so obvious you don't even really know who he is.
Yet I linked to his "bio". You really are desperate when you have to misdirect to the words I choose to use to avoid addressing the points I`m making. Just admit you were an idiot who didn`t know enough to tell whether this guy was an expert in a field relevant to the discussion.
>
> > Focus, stupid, we need to establish his credentials before we can give weight to his opinions. Now, with that in mind, answer the following question...
> >
> > "What is the compelling reason to give any weight to what this individual says on that subject?"
Still running from this, eh, "Boris"?
> > > Ayoob believes the same bullet hit both JFK and Connally.
> > >
> > > Ayoob points out that Oswald was left-handed, which would have enabled him to actually shoot faster and better.
> > >
> > > Ayoob does not discount the LN narrative....
> >
> > What does any of this have to do with what was being discussed?
>
> You asked, why should we give any weight to what he has to say on the subject?
Now I have to school you on what was being discussed? It was the damage to Kennedy`s skull, stupid.
>Well, you've been giving weight to all of the above probably your whole homunculus life. Why pay any credence to you?
>
> > > Bullets like those fired in Oswald's rifle just don't do what we've been told they do.
> >
> > Support that.
> >
> > >They just don't send pieces of skull flying across the sky when fired from a distance.
> >
> > Support that.
>
> I'll be happy to support both, BUT you've been way under-contributing with the quid pro quo.
There is no quid pro quo, stupid. You made these claims, it is up to you to support them. You think you can fire off an unending series of blanks and never have to support any of them.
> So since we're on the topic of bullets and targets,
We aren`t. You just want to flit away to other ideas you won`t support. Chew what is in your mouth first.
> I want you to support the SBT.
I want a pony.
> Support it. *Show* it.
It has been discussed here. Look for it.
You don`t get to demand that I respond to anything that pops into your head. When I start a post about the SBT or express ideas in a post about the SBT then you can demand that I support whatever position I take or idea I express. You don`t seem to understand anything.
> You take a turn for once. If you can do that, I will post the citations I've found to support Ayoob.
You can support you words or run, it doesn`t matter to me. It is clear that you will never support that this guy has the expertise to comment on the damage to Kennedy`s head. You won`t put up and you won`t shut up.
> If you can't, we can assume you're a know-nothing coward who cannot defend his position.
You and Ben were making claims about the damage seen in that x-ray, stupid. How it works is if you post ideas you have to support them. You just want to shoot off blanks as if what you say is meaningful. It isn`t.
> Let's see what you do.
>
> >
> > > > Perhaps if there was a photo showing where the bullet entered Kennedy`s back this could help you. Naw...
> > >
> > > Those are a dime a dozen.
> >
> > There is that "willful ignorance" you were talking about. As soon as the evidence conflicts with your silly ideas, rather than discard your silly ideas you discard the evidence.
>
> Dummy, I mean those photos are everywhere on the Internet.
Yet you seem unable to apply what is seen in that photo to determine where Kennedy was shot. Why is that?
> Google "jfk back wound." You can even do it like that, with "jfk" all lowercase, since the right way is too much work for an asshole like yourself.
I linked to it a week or so back, stupid.
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/alt.conspiracy.jfk/8AL8mAXLS_0/OPKMtw4QAgAJ
> Don't forget to support your local SBT!!!
Did that. You need to find it.