http://Amazon.com/forum/jfk%20assassination/ref=cm_cd_et_md_pl?_encoding=UTF8&cdForum=Fx1VLRED2TYB89B&cdMsgNo=14&cdPage=1&cdSort=oldest&cdThread=Tx2UDM1Q2Q956B4&cdMsgID=Mx1X80T54KBW9AW#Mx1X80T54KBW9AW
RALPH CINQUE SAID:
All in all, I am even more convinced that Lovelady was NOT Doorman
[the man seen in the TSBD doorway in James Altgens' photo] and Oswald
was.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Ralph,
Doesn't it matter at all to you that Lovelady HIMSELF said that he was
the man in the doorway? Lovelady even drew an arrow to himself on WC
exhibit #369, with that arrow pointing to the man you say is Lee
Oswald.
Is Lovelady himself a liar?
And is Wesley Frazier a liar too when he said that Doorway Man was
Lovelady and not Oswald? (See the video below to hear Frazier say it
himself [at 8:25].)
http://DVP-Potpourri.blogspot.com/2010/07/buell-wesley-frazier.html
RALPH CINQUE SAID:
No, it doesn't matter to me at all what Lovelady said. We know for
certain that Lovelady either replaced his shirt OR he altered it, so
that makes him a conspirator.
And regarding Frazier, you notice in that video that when asked if
Lovelady and Oswald looked alike, he [Buell Wesley Frazier] indicated
no, that Lovelady was a much more stocky fellow, and of course he was
at the time.
But as for his mistaking Lovelady for Doorman, I attribute it to their
having moved Lovelady's face over. Frazier was looking at the face and
not at the body and the clothes. And when he saw Lovelady's facial
features, it never occurred to him that anyone could be so evil as to
move the face over in order to cover up the conspiracy and deceive the
entire world.
The bottom line is that Doorman has Oswald's build, and he is wearing
Oswald's clothes. And THAT MAKES HIM OSWALD REGARDLESS OF WHAT ANYBODY
SAID.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Oh, brother.
ROBERT MORROW SAID:
Ralph, I am going to give you a tip. You are conversing with multiple
personalties [sic] of David von Pein [sic] -- S.V. Anderson being the
primary one. Shaboo is another. Dale Hayes is definitely another.
I will not respond to any thread that David von Pein [sic] or any of
his numerous sock puppets start. He (and his multiple fake profiles)
are not looking for truth.
Occassionally [sic], I do make exceptions to my rule, but it is just
not productive to engage a disinformation artist. I personally don't
agree with your "Owald [sic] in the TSBD door theory" but at least you
believe what you say.
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Oh goodie! I've now got at least three other "personalities" on the
Internet (per an insane person named Morrow).
Lovely. I wish my Langley bosses would pay me four times the Disinfo
salary then. Looks like I've earned it.
BTW, care to lose another $100, Morrow? I guess losing that first
hundred didn't faze the kook in the least. Even after I proved that
I'm not S.V. Anderson (to the point where Morrow actually had to cough
up a hundred bucks, which he did), Morrow is still sticking to his lie
about me having "multiple personalities" online.
But that's typical CT-Kook behavior, of course -- i.e., they'll stick
to the worn-out and proven-false theories until the day they join
their hero Oswald in the world beyond.
A great example of that strange mindset is being exhibited by Ralph
Cinque right now (regarding the Doorway Man issue). Regardless of how
many different ways he is shown to be 100% wrong--he'll still insist
on dragging out the old "Oswald Was In The Doorway" myth. And that's a
myth that essentially died in the 1960s even. But it's still not a
dead enough equine for Mr. Cinque. Go figure.
http://JFK-Archives.blogspot.com/2012/01/doorway-man.html
S.V. ANDERSON SAID:
David, Does it get any better than this? I'm you and you're Shaboo2
and you are also Dale Hayes and I am Vincent Bugliosi and I am John
McAdams and you are me.
Maybe Jim Garrison was right when he said getting involved in this
world means black is white and up is down. Maybe we really are through
the looking glass. Between Robert Morrow and Ralph Cinque I have been
accused of being five different personalities. See what you [are]
missing [by] not hanging around this nut house?
DAVID VON PEIN SAID:
Indeed, Steve. It looks like the acj nuthouse isn't the only place to
go to find the outer-fringe CT crazies, huh?
According to Dave Healy (another CT loon of the first order), I am
also supposed to be Dave Reitzes, Vince Bugliosi, and someone named
Steve Keating (plus many other people who serve as my "aliases").
Truth is, I've never used an alias at all on the Internet....except
for the username "LAX" at an aviation forum that I used to post at
several years ago. And even on that forum, my full name was visible in
my profile for all to see.
http://Airliners.net/profile/lax
I have always used my real name on Internet forums, or in the case of
IMDB, my initials ("DVP-1"). I have no reason to hide behind any
aliases or "multiple personalities" (to use Morrow's description).
That's silly, IMO, mainly because I want my own credit for my own
common-sense posts on the subjects I write about. Why should I want my
remarks attributed to some "alias" who doesn't even exist? And I truly
think that "common sense" resides in my posts, and on the LN side of
the JFK debate. I've always felt that way.
But if Mr. Morrow wants to get rid of another hundred bucks or so,
I'll gladly give him the chance. Because that's a bet I can't possibly
lose.
Addendum:
BTW, Steve (S.V.) -- I was re-introduced to this Amazon JFK forum by
way of a post you made recently that was attached to your review of
John McAdams' book here at Amazon.
http://Amazon.com/review/R6F3CW1OW0QFB
http://Amazon.com/review/R6F3CW1OW0QFB/ref=cm_cr_rev_detmd_pl?ie=UTF8&cdForum=Fx17T9BHSIFUU0X&cdMsgNo=65&cdPage=7&asin=1597974897&store=books&cdSort=oldest&cdThread=Tx2TBR87F38BEQI&cdMsgID=Mx2DJA1XHSEJUG1#Mx2DJA1XHSEJUG1
After seeing your post, I was reminded of the many discussions at this
forum, and I then decided it would be a good idea to add a link to it
on two of my websites:
http://DVP-Potpourri.blogspot.com/2010/01/jfk-forums.html
http://DavidVonPein.blogspot.com/#JFK-Assassination-Forums