On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 10:44:48 -0700 (PDT), Bud <
sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
>On Monday, March 23, 2020 at 1:15:35 PM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 08:40:36 -0700 (PDT), Bud <
sirs...@fast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>On Monday, March 23, 2020 at 11:22:23 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>>>>>>>"No credible evidence suggests that the shots were fired from the
>>>>>>> railroad bridge over the Triple Underpass, the nearby railroad yards
>>>>>>> or any place other than the Texas School Book Depository Building."
>>>>>>> (WCR 61)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Only by ignoring the overwhelming mass of eyewitnesses can the WC make
>>>>>> a statement such as this. And since the legal system in America *does*
>>>>>> accept eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence", the WC was simply
>>>>>> lying. ...
>>>>>
>>>>> Stop right there. There is no such thing as the U.S. Judicial system
>>>>> accepting all eyewitness testimony as "credible evidence" as you
>>>>> claim."
>>>>
>>>> Amusingly, Huckster simply ran away when his lie was pointed out.
>>>>
>>>> Prediction: Chickenshit will try to defend Huckster - but won't quote
>>>> where I made the claim that Huckster said I'd claimed...
>>>
>>> Hank is making a distinction you cannot.
>>
>> You're lying again, Chickenshit.
>>
>> The "distinction" isn't the issue at all,
>
> Of course it is.
Then simply quote me saying it.
But you've already proven yourself incapable of doing so - just has
Huckster was unable to.
You're simply lying...
> Hank said "credible evidence". "credible" means "able to be believed;
> convincing". You created your own meaning, which seems to have
> something to do with being allowed into evidence in a court of law.
Prove that eyewitness testimony cannot be "credible."
If you cannot, then the Warren Commission, Huckster, and you are
liars.
>> and Huckster was forced to
>> lie about what was stated in order to bring it up.
>
> The only think I would fault Hank on is not declaring your
> response a non sequitur, as it didn`t speak to what he wrote at all.
Pointing out when someone is lying cannot be a "non sequitur."
It's ALWAYS relevant.
>> Remember folks, I predicted it!
>>
>> Huckster FLAT LIED about what I'd stated,
>
> What you stated was a non sequitur. Or, at least, a strawman.
Neither you nor Huckster has been able to refute what I stated.
>> and Chickenshit can neither
>> admit it, nor quote where I'd stated what Huckster lied about.
>
> What did Hank say that was different from what you claimed?
You're lying again, Chickenshit.
>> Being a believer means you have to defend the lies of others so that
>> they'll defend YOUR lies.
>
> I doubt anyone on our side gives any credence to your claims of "lies".
The feelings of proven liars doesn't mean much to ordinary folk.
>>> Just allowing something into evidence does not speak to the
>>> credibility (that is, the amount of weight given to that evidence)
>>> of that evidence. When Hank is saying "credible evidence" he means
>>> evidence that has value in determining what occurred, and your
>>> strawman assumes that just allowing it into evidence conveys upon it
>>> value. Things allowed into evidence can point away from the truth.
>>
>>
>> Huckster, and you... are simply lying, as did the Warren Commission.
>
> Now you are going to attempt to talk over what I wrote instead of
> addressing the points made. You were acting like just because a court
> allows information into evidence, that somehow conveys upon that
> information credibility.
There you go again, molesting the neighborhood children.
What a COWARDLY molester you are!
>> They were labeling as "not credible" witnesses that they could **NOT**
>> discredit.
>
> It isn`t a matter of "discrediting". It is a matter of weighing
> the available information correctly. The real criminal investigators
> on the scene seem to have discounted the knoll as a source of shots
> early on.
The Warren Commission, Huckster, and you are lying.
>> You can't either...
>>
>> As you've just proven.
>>
>>
>>>> When lies are all you have to defend the WCR - it's time to change
>>>> your beliefs...
>>
>>
>> Of course, if you've spent your life lying, you may not understand
>> this simple concept.
>
> Since hot air is all you have to offer, you blow hot air.
Since all you have are lies, you tell 'em.