On Saturday, November 10, 2018 at 2:10:07 PM UTC-5, Michael Pendragon wrote:
> On Saturday, November 10, 2018 at 1:37:35 PM UTC-5, George J. Dance wrote:
> > On Saturday, November 10, 2018 at 12:20:00 PM UTC-5, Michael Pendragon wrote:
> > > On Saturday, November 10, 2018 at 10:39:43 AM UTC-5, George J. Dance wrote:
> > > > On Saturday, November 10, 2018 at 3:10:44 AM UTC-5, Will Dockery wrote:
> > > > > Gibberish... you prove my point for me, Pendragon... you simply do not understand modern poetry.
> > > >
> > > > Certainly his idea that "gibbberish" means "not written in complete sentences" is a non-starter when it comes to poetry, period. The grammatical units of poetry are lines and stanzas, not (as in prose) sentences and paragraphs.
> > >
> > > Do you even believe the b.s. you spew out, Dunce?
> >
> > Ho, hum; let's see if the Pedo can back up his insult.
>
> There was no insult, NAMBLA Dunce.
One expects you to fail to understand what others write, Pedodragon; but are you really incapble of understanding what you write?
> I'd merely asked you a question (which, btw, you haven't answered).
> > > Grammatical units are parts of ... (wait for it) ... sentences.
> >
> > So you're saying that paragraphs and sentences (which are not "parts of ... (wait for it) ... sentences") are not grammatical units.
> >
>
> No, NAMBLA Dunce.
But you just claimed that "grammatical units" were all "parts of ... (wait for it) ... sentences" - so that's what your sentence means, Pedodragon.
> But we are discussing incomplete sentences.
Well, right now, we're discussing my claim that the grammatical units are lines and stanzas; which you tried to disprove by claiming (somewhat stupidly) that grammatical units are all parts of sentences. I refuted your claim by giving you two counter-examples.
> Do try to focus.
Indeed.
> > > This is as true for poetry as it is for prose.
> > >
> >
> > > Homer, Dante, Shakespeare, Pope, Blake, Byron, Shelley, Keats, Poe, Tennyson, Eliot, WCW, Ginsberg (albeit run-on) and even Bukowski wrote complete sentences, Dunce.
> >
> > Do you have a point, Pedodragon?
>
> Yes, and I'm sure that even a dunce like yourself can figure it out.
Well, Pedo, since you can't explain what it is, I'll have to try. You've noticed that a lot of poets have written poems using complete sentences; which is where you got the idea that poetry has to be written in complete sentences.
> > > cummings occasionally gibbered
> >
> > Whatever that's supposed to mean. If you're back to your "gibberish means 'not written in a complete sentence' chant, well, that's just something you've made up.
>
> I've already supplied you with the Merriam-Webster definition of "gibberish,"
Not to me you haven't; but since Merriam-Webster has supplied it online, let me "supply" it here:
"Definition of gibberish
: unintelligible or meaningless language:
a : a technical or esoteric (see ESOTERIC sense 1) language
(The doctors spoke to one another in their medical gibberish that I was unable to follow.)
b : pretentious or needlessly obscure language
Nothing to do with the use of complete or incomplete sentences there.
Notice, BTW, that Merriam Webster's definitions are not complete sentences; which does not make them either unintelligible or meaningless.
> NAMBLA Dunce. "Gibbered" (obviously) would be its past-tense verb form.
Yes, Pedodragon. I think everyone understood you were claiming that Cummings occasionally wrote gibberish (whatever that's supposed to mean).
> > ... but Will isn't conducting word experiments.
> >
> > What do "word experiments" have to do the the use of "complete sentences"? One can write a complete sentence full of word experiments;
>
> Certainly, one *can* ... be, again, we are discussing incomplete sentences.
> cummings' word experiments included his abandoning the sentence form.
If that's what you meant, then that's what you should have said.
Did you really think you'd win your point simply be calling Cummings's poems that don't use complete sentences "gibberish"?
> > as an example, here's a famous example of a complete sentence that's full of them:
> >
> > ’Twas brillig, and the slithy toves
> > Did gyre and gimble in the wabe:
> > All mimsy were the borogoves,
> > And the mome raths outgrabe.
> > - from "Jabberwocky," Lewis Carroll
>
> It's also a complete sentence
As I just told you: it's a complete sentence full of gibberish; enough to show that "gibberish" has nothing to do with writing in complete sentences.
> , NAMBLA Dunce, and therefore unrelated to the discussion at hand.
It shows that "gibberish" and "not written in complete sentences" do not have the same, or even a similar, meaning.