From: Sebastian Willert <reply+i-3545608-87047bc9f6ffa10...@reply.github.com>Subject: [ack] Files without an extension (#213)Date: March 7, 2012 10:26:21 AM CSTTo: Andy Lester <an...@petdance.com>Allow files without an extension to be recognized as a distinct type. Keep old behavior unless --type-allow-empty is explicitly specified to ensure backwards-compatibility. Added tests and help text for this change.
You can merge this Pull Request by running:
git pull https://github.com/willert/ack master
Or you can view, comment on it, or merge it online at:
https://github.com/petdance/ack/pull/213
-- Commit Summary --
* Allow files without an extension to be recognized as a distinct type. Keep old behavior unless --type-allow-empty is explicitly specified. Added tests and help text for this change.
-- File Changes --
M Ack.pm (15)
M ack (15)
M t/ack-text.t (1)
M t/ack-type.t (20)
A t/swamp/no-extension (1)
-- Patch Links --
https://github.com/petdance/ack/pull/213.patch
https://github.com/petdance/ack/pull/213.diff
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/petdance/ack/pull/213
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ack dev/users" group.
To post to this group, send email to ack-...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to ack-users+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/ack-users?hl=en.
Thoughts? Would this be useful to you?
I really don't want to modify ack's behavior on file searching any more in ack 1.x, but this patch looks like it might be able to handle files without an extension without causing any weird behavior elsewhere.Thoughts? Would this be useful to you?xoa
Begin forwarded message:
I really don't want to modify ack's behavior on file searching any more in ack 1.x, but this patch looks like it might be able to handle files without an extension without causing any weird behavior elsewhere.Thoughts? Would this be useful to you?xoa
Begin forwarded message: