On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 09:25:31PM -0700, Mrunal Patel wrote:
> We could discuss any open issues for runtime/image specs.
We had been planning on landing runtime-spec#513 and runtime-spec#518
by the end of the month. Last week, Mrunal called for a second LGTM
on #518 [1] and more review for #513 [2]. I'm happy to field
questions on either tomorrow if that would help with the review (but
I'm happy to field questions anytime if folks would rather post them
to the issues ;).
Other recently-active image-spec discussions include:
* Adding ‘Labels’ to image-spec's config format [3].
* Tooling and semantics around imageLayoutVersion [4,5].
* Supporting self-describing media types [6].
I looked through the open runtime-spec PRs, and nothing stood out at
me other than the console/command-line ones (#513 and #518). There
are a lot of open PRs and issues though, it would be good to get some
of those addressed (and at least either rejected or assigned a
milestone) before we get too deep into the 1.0 RCs. I'm not sure if
there's anything we can do about that during the weekly call, but
thought I'd bring it up in case anyone else has ideas :p.
Cheers,
Trevor
[1]:
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opencontainers/2016/opencontainers.2016-10-26-21.01.log.html#l-70
[2]:
http://ircbot.wl.linuxfoundation.org/meetings/opencontainers/2016/opencontainers.2016-10-26-21.01.log.html#l-74
[3]:
https://github.com/opencontainers/image-spec/pull/371
[4]:
https://github.com/opencontainers/image-spec/pull/414
[5]:
https://github.com/opencontainers/image-spec/pull/434
[6]:
https://github.com/opencontainers/image-spec/pull/411
--
This email may be signed or encrypted with GnuPG (
http://www.gnupg.org).
For more information, see
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pretty_Good_Privacy