Hi,
W dniu 12.03.2024 o 15:15, Jon Evans pisze:
> For what it's worth, I'm guessing that if you are trying phone numbers
> from around the world, you are getting these phone numbers from VOIP
> services and they aren't actually linked to a physical phone that you
> control, which is kind of exactly what GitLab is trying to block...
The numbers from that site look like being able to receive activation
codes for verity of services (including google). The receive box is
publicly visible, so I could browse the history and see many such codes
there. So, even if they are VoIP, they get the SMS from senders.
But there is a limited count of those numbers, so they are easy to
enumerate on blacklists, and that's what gitlab probably did.
>
> I don't claim that GitLab's system is perfect or ideal, but the point is
> that they are giving anyone who signs up free resources, and they have a
> lot of trouble with abuse of their resources. In order to get access to
> those resources, you need to be willing to disclose enough information
> to them for them to feel like you are a low risk (because, if you
> started abusing their system, you'd be "burning" the good will of your
> identity).
I have a different opinion:
1. I haven't started accessing their resources (unless you count putting
a phrase into an input-text field as such "access")
2. They've started abusing my patience.
BTW: the only problem they could have with abusing their resources is
through their free CI/CD - and this can be prevented easily by allowing
only "thoroughly verified" users to commit code to the builds. Or they
could disabled CI/CD for the "free" projects and be 100% on the safe
side. The didn't. They have overdone their "security".
So I'm very sorry, but that's a nogo for me.
-R
PS: this is out off the topic here, but since I'm probably be signing
off the list in near future, I'd like to ask a question regarding KiCAD
design. After years of doing the ordinary sequence of: draw-sch,
numerate, footprint assign, export to pcb ... I've looked up the files
and to my surprise found out, that the footprints are actually stored in
the PCB, not in the SCH. So my question is: is the footprint assignment
BEFORE netlist export to PCB a "design feature", or is it implemented
this way because of some legacy code from the past? (the question
originates from pondering of multiboard/multi-pcb-variant design options)
> >>>
https://quackr.io/ <
https://quackr.io/>
> >>>>>
www.kipro-pcb.com <
http://www.kipro-pcb.com>
> <
https://www.kipro-pcb.com/ <
https://www.kipro-pcb.com/>>
>
in...@kipro-pcb.com <mailto:
in...@kipro-pcb.com>
> >>>>> <mailto:
in...@kipro-pcb.com <mailto:
in...@kipro-pcb.com>>
> <mailto:
devlist%2Bunsu...@kicad.org>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
>
https://groups.google.com/a/kicad.org/d/msgid/devlist/3aa37107-fe4b-473e-9e69-a58b1b7e143e%40electric-sheep.eu <
https://groups.google.com/a/kicad.org/d/msgid/devlist/3aa37107-fe4b-473e-9e69-a58b1b7e143e%40electric-sheep.eu>.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "KiCad Developers" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to
devlist+u...@kicad.org
> <mailto:
devlist+u...@kicad.org>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
>
https://groups.google.com/a/kicad.org/d/msgid/devlist/CA%2BqGbCA-%3DAsZk2x0qyZnPT%3DajyREsW%2B98fGqH5rQC%3D00C71Qkw%40mail.gmail.com <
https://groups.google.com/a/kicad.org/d/msgid/devlist/CA%2BqGbCA-%3DAsZk2x0qyZnPT%3DajyREsW%2B98fGqH5rQC%3D00C71Qkw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.