Here is the note.
Today’s note:
———Note Start—— ------
Rick has concern about the publicness.
Version 1-> public review
Next step:
Reduce Complexity
Yunsup:
don’ want reducing trace and serial port to stop the progress
All agree.
Grammar Editing pass
Not clear about what to implement.
Need a help from every one?
Larry:
We should decide whether we use SHALL or, SHOULD, or OPTIONAL wording, etc.
Vy:
Generalize run-control option.
Debug mode.
General debug state diagram. Overall approach to debug mode.
run-control options are hardwired to specific state, but we should generalise these to more state.
More bit for flexibility.
Megan:
Ok, please upload it. Moreover, please make sure the compatibility.
We need to decide a deadline.
Yunsup:
Use this email to communicate
Debug workspace
Larry:
Debug working group will vote in a future meeting.
[Enumeration & Probing]
Still in implementation.
[Authentication]
Yunsup will talk to Don.
[MIPI]
No update.
[What else?]
Voting-> within the task group. Use Kavi. Choose the active.
Voting is a process to make sure the spec is good enough to send out to the committee.
Vy:
Vote should be about which feature is good or not.
Yun:
It’s a formal voting about the final spec. If people have concern about the feature, it should be raised now.
Megan:
Maybe send quick survey to WG member for each features.
Clear, Unclear, not good.
[Next week]
Working on tightening spec and getting it ready for public.
HW/SW implementations