On 25/06/2021 09:27, Yoav Weiss wrote:
> We previously discussed
> for skipping TAG review and browser signals, but I don't think we ever
> formalized them.
> I think this falls into that bucket. The only exception from what we
> previously discussed is we are the first to ship, but with other
> browsers committed to fast-follow, which sounds like something we can
> add to the exception list.
Just some clarification. This was shipped long time ago in Chromium, and
then it was unshipped as Mozilla didn't find style containment useful by
that time .
Now (as style containment is being tweaked and with the needs regarding
container queries) the CSSWG has discussed and agreed to re-add it, and
Mozilla and other vendors are on board with that decision. But that
doesn't mean that they will fast-follow AFAIK.
BTW WebKit has a patch for this that is under review
to implement style
containment. And as WebKit hasn't shipped any containment support yet, I
guess they would include style containment in strict and content values.
> I also think it'd be good to add those conditions to our general
> guidance on TAG reviews, so that the guidelines would be clearer.
> On Wednesday, June 23, 2021 at 10:15:27 AM UTC+2 Manuel Rego wrote:
> On 22/06/2021 18:16, Chris Harrelson wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 21, 2021 at 7:50 PM Chris Harrelson
> > <https://www.chromestatus.com/
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "blink-dev" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> > an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org
> > <mailto:blink-dev+...@chromium.org