Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Message from discussion Better reporting of call stack overflows
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Yang Guo  
View profile  
 More options Nov 5 2012, 6:37 am
From: Yang Guo <yang...@chromium.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 12:37:40 +0100
Local: Mon, Nov 5 2012 6:37 am
Subject: Re: [v8-dev] Better reporting of call stack overflows

(previously sent without actually finishing the mail...)

Hi Dave,

I wasn't aware of this problem before. We currently already have redundant
ways to capture stack trace (at throw site and at creation site of the
Error object). I've been wanting to consolidate this, which would also
enable me to solve this issue.

Your current approach has some subtle problems. If you have some patience,
as I will be working on this issue, it will be solved eventually. I'll file
a bug for this.

Yang

On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Yang Guo <yang...@chromium.org> wrote:
> Hi Dave,

> I wasn't aware of this problem before. We currently already have redundant
> ways to capture stack trace (at throw site and at creation site of the
> Error object). I wanted to consolidate those

> On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Dave Smith <diz...@singly.com> wrote:

>> Hi,

>> I've been using node.js (and hence, v8) for a little bit and one thing
>> that has driven me nuts is the lack of reporting when the call stack
>> overflows. So, in keeping with open source tradition, I've knocked together
>> a (simplistic) patch to fix this specific problem. My patch is here:

>> https://github.com/dizzyd/node/commit/40434019540ffc17e984ff0653500a3...

>> (note that it's against the fork of the node codebase, which embeds v8
>> directly).

>> My lack of familiarity with v8 is probably grossly evident, but perhaps
>> someone could provide some direction on improvements if this is an itch
>> bothering other people. :)

>> Thanks!

>> D.

>>  --
>> v8-dev mailing list
>> v8-dev@googlegroups.com
>> http://groups.google.com/group/v8-dev


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.