Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Guidance from URCM moderators please

7 views
Skip to first unread message

M Wicks

unread,
Mar 22, 2013, 12:54:10 PM3/22/13
to
Please could the URCM moderators tell me if these posts, which I made
to URCM and had approved before the "probation" rule came into effect,
would have been approved had I made them now instead?

------
POST 1
------

Message ID: <e36f0e82-c30c-42d9-
b473-209...@c19g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/group/uk.rec.cycling.moderated/msg/a5771bfcc398abac

Start of the 146-post thread "Bicycle helmet charity bids for share
of Wish £15,000"

------
POST 2
------

Message ID: <dc32ba61-0e4d-44f8-955e-
f120a1...@a6g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/group/uk.rec.cycling.moderated/msg/50b6ee88f0614ea2

Start of the 67-post thread "Would you warn other cyclists of
enforcement ahead of them?"

------
POST 3
------

Message ID:
<58d62e4f-38b6-41f9...@l7g2000vbj.googlegroups.com>
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/group/uk.rec.cycling.moderated/msg/11582765d65c370a

Start of the 74-post thread "Cyclist warns of "constant stupidity""

------
POST 4
------

Message ID: <efba298a-129d-4c12-
bfb8-0d8...@w18g2000vbe.googlegroups.com>
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com/group/uk.rec.cycling.moderated/msg/b373056dc2f9e316

Start of the 114-post thread "Traffic lights shouldn't apply to
cyclists"

I'm just trying to understand exactly which sorts of posts fall under
"reject probation", and so I ask for your assistance in this regard.
Would you not prefer that I do that, instead of trying to find the
"probation" boundaries through "trial and error", probably resulting
in rejections (which are a waste of your time)?

So I hope that a moderator will at least reply to this perfectly
reasonable and polite query. The answer will help the many posters
(not just "trolls" by any means) who have said that they are unsure
exactly what sorts of posts come under "probation". We know *who* is
likely to be on probation (by what views they have), we just don't
know exactly which of their posts are likely to be "reject
probation"ed.
0 new messages