On 8/27/12 at 12:08 PM, law...@theculvers.us (Lawson Culver) wrote:
>This makes me wonder if it's all of our systems that aren't working,OK, I had not compared side-by-side like that. Now that I have,
>or perhaps you're not comparing to a retina-enabled application.
>Here's a screenshot of 18pt Monaco. The top line is Text Wrangler,
>and the bottom line is Text Edit.
I do see the same difference OMM. From all the complaints on the
list, I had expected the difference to be dramatic and render
TextWrangler virtually unusable. Now that I see what all the
fuss is about, I personally find the difference to be quite
minor and not at all distressing. For normal use, TextWrangler
is still quite readable to me. It would be nice to see
TextWrangler made to be retina-enabled, but for my own use I'm
not terribly concerned about it.
>On Aug 27, 2012, at 1:58 PM, Christopher Bort wrote:--
>>On 8/27/12 at 6:36 AM, law...@theculvers.us (Lawson Culver) wrote:
>>> I left my MacBook Pro at work, so I wasn't able to (constructively)
>>I'm aware of Monaco's design and purpose. It's why I prefer it for
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.