Pelosi Democraps Block Oil Drlling : Oil Hits $ 140.00
gun liberal k00k@dnc.org 2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet their Panties
Oil jumps above $140
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
Republican Liar
"2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet their Panties" <anti gun
liberal k0...@dnc.org> wrote in message
news:4LCdncX_Ne7za_7V...@comcast.com
> Thansk you fucking democraps!
>
>
> Oil jumps above $140
> http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
Why have republicans always voted to block drilling? Why does the right want
Americans to pay more at the pumps?
pkgrunke
Currently speculation is why we have high prices, a raise the price if i
think it will rain over the fields today.
pkgrunke
technology is a better route...
retro...@comcast.net wrote:
> Those oil guys, Bush and Cheney are high fiving each other:
> http://www.villagevoice.com/blogs/bushbeat/bush-cheney-tele-3-07-copy-thumb.jpg
>
> Mission accomplished!!
Raymond
<anti gun liberal k...@dnc.org> wrote:
> Thansk you fucking democraps!
>
> Oil jumps above $140http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
Re: CHINESE OIL DRILLING OFF FLORIDA
by jammer
06/10/2008, 11:12 AM #
Reply
Thank then Gov. Jeb Bush and the Republicon lead Florida legislature,
pal. They are the ones that blocked drilling off the coast of Florida,
Didn't want to spoil their picturesque views. Florida, with more
shoreline than any state but Alaska.
Your boss, Gov. Jeb Bush, has kept us from an adequate energy supply
in this country. I find it unacceptable that we have been negotiating
with one state,"
Florida insists on keeping rigs at least 100 miles off its coast.
Preferably 125..China Is going to Drill Off of Calif and Florida for
OIL . since Jeb Bush and George Bush blocked drilling off the Florida
coast.
----Rep. John Peterson, R-Pa.,
He sponsored a bill to allow natural gas drilling as close as 20 miles
from shore. Block everything within 100 miles of Florida's west coast,
he told Castille, and you block much of the eastern gulf and its
enormous potential for natural gas.
,
Bugman
"2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet their Panties" <anti gun liberal
news:4LCdncX_Ne7za_7V...@comcast.com...
> Thansk you fucking democraps!
>
>
> Oil jumps above $140
> http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
The oil companies hold leases on over 68 million acres. Why aren't they
producing on them?
pkgrunke
hogs and into more energy eff cars and trucks.
pkgrunke
pushing OPEC to raise cost...
jose
<anti gun liberal k...@dnc.org> wrote:
> Thansk you fucking democraps!
>
> Oil jumps above $140http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
Pelosi is as dumb as a styrofoam block. The scariest thing
to remember is that she is only two heart beats away from
the Oval Office. God help us.
Deaf Power
But there is a better plan to help lower gas prices which you have
been viliantly advocating on this newsgroup, but, ironically, your
fascist idol Republicraps are blocking it:
Democrats have a commonsense plan to help bring down skyrocketing gas
prices by cracking down on price gouging, rolling back the billions of
dollars in taxpayer subsidies, tax breaks and royalty relief given to
big oil and gas companies, and increasing production of alternative
fuels.²
Democrats have a plan to lower gas prices.join Democrats who are
working to lower gas prices now."
Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Press Release, April 19, 2006
When will you complain to your Republicraps?
jose
> On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23 -0400, "2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet
>
> Mission accomplished!!
Mission accomplished, indeed. The Democrats
believe it will be to their advantage to keep gas
prices high through November. The next time you
fill up your tank thank and bless Pelosi and her
herd of Democrat morons.
jose
> "2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet their Panties" <anti gunliberal k...@dnc.org> wrote in message
>
> news:4LCdncX_Ne7za_7V...@comcast.com
>
> > Thansk you fucking democraps!
>
> > Oil jumps above $140
> >http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
>
> Why have republicans always voted to block drilling? Why does the right want
> Americans to pay more at the pumps?
Clinton is a Democrat and opposed off shore drilling.
You are obviously a Democrat liar.
jose
> "2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet their Panties" <anti gun liberalk...@dnc.org> wrote in message
>
> news:4LCdncX_Ne7za_7V...@comcast.com...
>
> > Thansk you fucking democraps!
>
> > Oil jumps above $140
> >http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
>
> The oil companies hold leases on over 68 million acres. Why aren't they
> producing on them?
There has to be oil under that leased ground to justify
drilling. Drilling is extremely expensive that's why oil
men want to drill where the oil is.
Since when are professional politician lifers more
savvy about drilling for oil than professional oil men.
jose
> No 1 reason not to drill is there are no gas shortages...Only Bush
> pushing OPEC to raise cost...
>
>
>
> Bugman wrote:
> > "2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet their Panties" <anti gun liberal
> >news:4LCdncX_Ne7za_7V...@comcast.com...
> >> Thansk you fucking democraps!
>
> >> Oil jumps above $140
> >>http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
>
> > The oil companies hold leases on over 68 million acres. Why aren't they
>
> - Show quoted text -
Why are you lefties such morons?
George Grapman
Tell us what happened to prices during the 6 years when Republicans
ran everything.
George Grapman
Was Jeb Bush a Democrat?
Arizona Bushwhacker
"jose" <josef...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:5cc4ef06-fcce-400c...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
Good Lord!
Some ultra leftist who want to ban guns even
more than his hero Gun Grabber McCain is
calling other people 'lefties'.
What a fucking joke!
TypicalWh...@mailcity.com
> Drilling for oil with increase cost, it cost to drill. Alternate
> technology is a better route...
So tell us what alternate energy is available, or will be available in
the near future that cost less and takes less energy to produce and
can give the same results as oil or fossil fuels?
TypicalWh...@mailcity.com
>
> news:4LCdncX_Ne7za_7V...@comcast.com
>
> > Thansk you fucking democraps!
>
> > Oil jumps above $140
> >http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
>
> Why have republicans always voted to block drilling? Why does the right want
> Americans to pay more at the pumps?
Eight six percent of the simple-minded dummycrats in congress voted
against drilling. Try to get it moron.
johnny@.
What would help the most is for all automobiles to be battery powered,
and charged from a solar cell array mounted in people's backyards.
General Motors had this technology in the mid nineties and destroyed it.
Tesla Motors has brought it back with the Tesla Roadster, that gets 240
miles per charge, and goes from 0 to 60 in 3.9 seconds. The first cars
are expensive, $120,000, but next year they will come out with a family
car that is affordable.
Patrick Henry
their Panties wrote:
> Thansk you fucking democraps!
This has nothing to do with the price of oil. But of course you're not
bright enough to understand this.
Black Elk
> Thansk you fucking democraps!
We have ex-oil execs infesting the WH and oil corporations making record
profits. Do the math.
>
>
> Oil jumps above $140
> http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
--
WAR IS A RACKET
WAR is a racket. It always has been.
It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most
vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one
in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.
-=-
Republican Liar
"jose" <josef...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:c3f9beeb-fb19-4b2a...@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com
You are a total moron. Republicans have blocked their own bills while they
had control of both houses. Why did republicans vote to block drilling and
why aren't we drilling now? Will you always be a lying moron?
Republican Liar
<TypicalWh...@mailcity.com> wrote in message
news:2afc3ac0-65d5-49e9...@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com
You really are a stupid shit aren't you? You start by telling me why
republicans voted to block drilling. You can't? I guess that means you don't
get it moron. Why didn't they open ANWR when they had complete control of
the government? Try to get it moron. Wahahahahaha...........
Republican Liar
"jose" <josef...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:25a9ea7b-5b4d-44f7...@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com
Who have no reason to lie, right?
Republican Liar
"jose" <josef...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:5157bf8b-08d5-424d...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com
Good answer. Now explain why republicans have voted to block drilling.
Deaf Power
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 15:33:39 -0700 (PDT), jose <josef...@yahoo.com>
wrote:
We already have Adolf W. Bush who is dumber than a styrofoam block,
and it's been truly scary. No worry about Pelosi, we have already
witnessed the destruction Bush has caused on America.
Babs Has Shit for Brains
> Thansk you fucking democraps!
>
>
> Oil jumps above $140
> http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D91HU5I81&show_article=1
>
Bush and Co. set it all in motion years ago. Still drunk, Babs?
Deaf Power
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:04:23 -0400, "2nd Ammedment Lives: Liberals wet
their Panties" <anti gun liberal k0...@dnc.org> wrote:
>Thansk you fucking democraps!
Fuck you you fucking republicraps!
http://money.cnn.com/2008/05/01/news/companies/exxon_earnings/
Exxon profit soars, but misses forecasts
No. 1 U.S. oil company's profit and revenue miss estimates, even as it
posts second-largest earnings total on record.
By Steve Hargreaves, CNNMoney.com staff writer
Last Updated: May 1, 2008
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Record oil prices netted Exxon Mobil a
$10.89 billion profit in the first three months of the year, sharply
higher than a year earlier but short of Wall Street estimates and
below what was needed to set a new all-time profit record.
The profit was still enough to be the second-highest U.S. corporate
profit on record, falling just short of the record $11.66 billion
Exxon Mobil (XOM, Fortune 500) earned in the prior quarter. The profit
in that quarter came to $1,385 a second, enough to buy nearly 382
gallons of gas at current prices.
The sheer size of the Exxon profit reported Thursday will still likely
attract attention from consumer groups and lawmakers, who have been
arguing for higher taxes on oil companies amid soaring gas and oil
prices.
http://money.cnn.com/2008/02/01/news/companies/exxon_earnings/
Exxon shatters profit records
Oil giant makes corporate history by booking $11.7 billion in
quarterly profit; earns $1,300 a second in 2007.
By David Ellis, CNNMoney.com staff writer
February 1 2008
NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Exxon Mobil made history on Friday by
reporting the highest quarterly and annual profits ever for a U.S.
company, boosted in large part by soaring crude prices.
capri
Pie in the sky!
It's not cheap, It's not available and what are you gonna do with the
existing cars, "force" people to give them up?
Lamont Cranston
So, how would voting for drilling bring down the price of gasoline by
November?
Lamont Cranston
Why are you unable to answer a single question?
The Trucker
That's why algae based biofuels are the right answer.
--
"I know no safe depository of the ultimate powers
of society but the people themselves; and
if we think them not enlightened enough to
exercise their control with a wholesome
discretion, the remedy is not to take it from
them, but to inform their discretion by
education." - Thomas Jefferson
http://GreaterVoice.org/extend
cmdr buzz corey
wrote:
I'll type this slowly so maybe you and repug liar can understand. If
President Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded dummycrat, had not
vetoed the ANWR proposal in 1995, we would have that oil today.
So no, drilling now won't bring the price down by November or anytime
soon, and it may not bring it down in the future as oil will be more
and more in demand, but if we had started drilling 10 years ago, that
oil would be on-line today and prices might not be as high as they
are. So let's start now for the future.
If that is still too hard for your simple-minded dummycrat brain to
grasp, get the six year old next door to read it to you and explain.
cmdr buzz corey
> <TypicalWhitePer...@mailcity.com> wrote in message
It was your hero Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded dummycrat President
that vetoed a bill in 1995 to allow drilling in ANWR.
It is currently the simple-minded dummycrats that are voting against
drilling. Hard for you to grasp I know, but do try to keep up.
Clave
news:11e18f86-25c1-45e3...@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
And your boys couldn't come up with an override?
You whine a lot.
Jim
Clave
news:00mb64lg2ogtsd8c8...@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:58:21 -0700, "Clave"
> <ClaviusNo...@cablespeed.com> wrote:
>
>>> It was your hero Billyboy Clinton, a simple-minded dummycrat President
>>> that vetoed a bill in 1995 to allow drilling in ANWR.
>>
>>And your boys couldn't come up with an override?
>
"Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among those Republicans who voted No
to drilling in ANWR."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10560979
Yeah, you and I know why. But corey doesn't and that's sweet.
Jim
Republican Liar
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-bu...@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:e1738307-c68a-46a8...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
If Bush had not waged a war over lies and destroyed the economy in the
process there wouldn't be an oil crisis. You repugs sure are a stupid bunch
if you think this is all about oil suddenly disappearing and you are more
ignorant than anyone ever imagined.
Why have republicans blocked oil drilling much more recently then Clinton?
Why didn't the right open ANWR when they had complete control of both houses
and the WhiteHouse for so long?
You sure are stupid retard aren't you?
Republican Liar
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-bu...@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:11e18f86-25c1-45e3...@j22g2000hsf.googlegroups.com
You are so far behind you will never catch on retard. Why have the
republicans voted to block drilling? Why didn't the right open ANWR while
they had control of both houses and the presidency. If Bush had done that
when he first took office and not waged war with a country that was no
threat to anyone there wouldn't be an oil crises and the economy wouldn't be
in the tank. Will you personally be such a complete idiot forever?
Republican Liar
"Clave" <ClaviusNo...@cablespeed.com> wrote in
message
news:y5SdnZxJi6liQfjV...@cablespeedwa.com
There have been other republicans that voted to block drilling but not one
retarded rightWingNut can even try to explain why they did. Not one
RightTard can explain why they are still obstructionists.
nobody
Apparently you've forgotten the Dems used the filibuster to block
Anwar.
Republican Liar
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:hlmc641th235c6d91...@4ax.com
But WHY did republicans vote to block ANWR? It was they who were
responsible for the defeat of the bill. NOT the democrats. Why do you liars
continue lying and blaming the left for your failures to get things done?
From your own cite:
Supporters of the plan fell four votes short of the number needed to prevent
opponents using a filibuster - or delaying tactic - to derail the vote.
The Republicans fell short of the 60 votes needed to avoid the Democrat-led
filibuster, with the tally standing at 56-44.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among those to vote
'No'................
.....Republicans joined the filibuster................
The Republicans had hoped to win Senate support by tacking the Alaska
measure on to a major defense spending bill.
What you either fail to admit or totally fail to understand, I think it is
the latter because you RightTards are just that STUPID is that the results
is known in advance and sometimes even before a bill is drafted. The bill
was known to fail when it was "attached" to other bills. The right has not
the balls given them to do it right from the start and send forth a bill
that would pass. It's called politics.
Why are you retards so stupid? Why? so you can blame your failures on the
left thinking you will fool most of America. This is why you lame ducks will
be outside looking in for so long you won't recognize you perverted faces
from you arses in a few short years.
Republican think they can win votes at election time by obstruction and
fabrication making it seem like they did the right things while all along
failing to do anything. Nice position if it works. This time you fools fall
flat on your lying faces.
Now........If you have any balls at all please explain why republicans
voted to block drilling.
Waahahahahahahaa...................
cmdr buzz corey
> Now........If you have any balls at all please explain why republicans
> voted to block drilling.
>
> Waahahahahahahaa...................
Now if you have any brains, (obviously you don't ) please explain why
the simple minded dummycrats are voting to block drilling.
Osama Obama is just an empty suit with big ears. No harm intended to
suit hangers and donkeys.
Republican Liar
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-bu...@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:bb796a2f-2caf-4e24...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com
SIOW you have no idea why republicans have blocked drilling for oil. None
of you tards do. You tards sure are a stupid bunch. You can accuse the left
for continued blocking but you have no idea why the right has voted to block
oil drilling for decades.
Bugman
> On Jun 28, 1:17 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
>
>> Now........If you have any balls at all please explain why republicans
>> voted to block drilling.
>>
>> Waahahahahahahaa...................
>
> Now if you have any brains, (obviously you don't ) please explain why
> the simple minded dummycrats are voting to block drilling.
Big oil has leases on 68 million acres. Democrats are against giving them
any MORE. Why aren't they developing what they already have?
Republican Liar
"Bugman" <jmpo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:dIidnQqjeIaFdvvV...@giganews.com
> "cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-bu...@mailcity.com> wrote in
> message
> news:bb796a2f-2caf-4e24...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jun 28, 1:17 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc>
>> wrote:
>>> Now........If you have any balls at all please explain
>>> why republicans voted to block drilling.
>>>
>>> Waahahahahahahaa...................
>>
>> Now if you have any brains, (obviously you don't )
>> please explain why the simple minded dummycrats are
>> voting to block drilling.
>
> Big oil has leases on 68 million acres. Democrats are
> against giving them any MORE. Why aren't they developing
> what they already have?
Not one RightTard has been able to explain why they vote to block drilling
for oil. They all complain that the left votes that way but they are totally
ignorant of why they vote the way they do. The right are the stupidest
people anywhere.
cmdr buzz corey
> "Bugman" <jmpos...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:dIidnQqjeIaFdvvV...@giganews.com
>
> > "cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-buzz-co...@mailcity.com> wrote in
> > message
> >news:bb796a2f-2caf-4e24...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> >> On Jun 28, 1:17 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc>
> >> wrote:
> >>> Now........If you have any balls at all please explain
> >>> why republicans voted to block drilling.
>
> >>> Waahahahahahahaa...................
>
> >> Now if you have any brains, (obviously you don't )
> >> please explain why the simple minded dummycrats are
> >> voting to block drilling.
>
> > Big oil has leases on 68 million acres. Democrats are
> > against giving them any MORE. Why aren't they developing
> > what they already have?
>
> Not one RightTard has been able to explain why they vote to block drilling
> for oil. They all complain that the left votes that way but they are totally
> ignorant of why they vote the way they do. The right are the stupidest
> people anywhere.
Simple-minded dummycrats constantly vote to block drilling for oil.
Simple-minded dummycrats want high oil prices, want you to pay a high
price for gasoline, and will raise your taxes so you can afford even
less. You think things may be hard now, if Osama Obama gets into the
WHITE house you won't be able to afford toothpaste to brush your
teeth. We will be at the mercy of foreign oil, because the simple-
minded dummycrats will continue to vote to block drilling for our own
oil.
Osama Obama is just and empty suit with big ears. No disrespect meant
to suit hanger or donkeys.
Republican Liar
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-bu...@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:88c5c334-f11d-463f...@m73g2000hsh.googlegroups.com
You, numbnuts, are just another tard that has no idea why the right has
voted to block oil. Obama will be in the WhiteHouse, you can count on that.
The main reason for this is directly due to you and the right. If you
weren't such screw ups in the first place there wouldn't even be an election
of any significance in the fall. If Bush wasn't mentally ill he would really
be a hero to America and the world. All he had to do was chase Bin Laden
like he said and never stop. But he blew it, lied about Iraq and the
terrorists, WMD, and ruined the economy and will be known by all as the
worst president America has ever had. He makes Carter look like saint in
comparison.
So, tard, why HAS the right voted to block drilling for new oil for so
long?
nobody
<Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
More attempted dishonesty by a lib loon. If the Dems had not led the
filibuster, the measure would have passed. The Dems blocked the
drilling by voting as a block, not the Republicans as you've tried to
portray.
nobody
wrote:
>
>"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-bu...@mailcity.com> wrote in message
>news:bb796a2f-2caf-4e24...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>> On Jun 28, 1:17 pm, "Republican Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
>>
>>> Now........If you have any balls at all please explain why republicans
>>> voted to block drilling.
>>>
>>> Waahahahahahahaa...................
>>
>> Now if you have any brains, (obviously you don't ) please explain why
>> the simple minded dummycrats are voting to block drilling.
>
>Big oil has leases on 68 million acres. Democrats are against giving them
>any MORE. Why aren't they developing what they already have?
Perhaps because there's not oil on those acres or it is cost
prohibitive to get it?
http://money.cnn.com/2008/06/23/news/economy/oil_drilling/index.htm?eref=ib_topstories
Republican Liar
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:ehsf6454i7dt7jetg...@4ax.com
"Perhaps." Nice fact filled comeback.
Republican Liar
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9...@4ax.com
Nothing dishonest about it moron. If you actaully read the link you would
see that what I posted came directly from it.
It seems that you are the one that is the loon here. LOL
nobody
Perhaps you can show us using the provided cite or any other
legitimate cite that there is tons of oil on the land of those leases
and the oil companies could economically drill for it but aren't. You
seem long on whines, short on cites.
>
nobody
<Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
Right, the cite says the Dems for the most part voted as a block
resulting in stopping the bill. A few Republicans joining the
filibuster does not change that fact.
>
>
>
>
Republican Liar
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:a7hh6419jdp8emp3v...@4ax.com
So so tell why the republicans voted to block the bill. If they didn't it
would have passed.
"Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among those to vote 'No'."
All you RightTards do is bitch about the democrats that vote against
drilling but can't even explain why it is your own party that is succeeding
in the actual block. When morons like you can find a bill where every
republican votes for it then you might have something to cry about. Until
you can get your own party of obstruction under control then you are nothing
more than a fool if you complain. They promised to bring it up again but
never did. The promised to bring it up again but never did. The right is
just as guilty of blocking drilling bills as the left.
cmdr buzz corey
> "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>
> news:a7hh6419jdp8emp3v...@4ax.com
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400, "Republican Liar"
> > <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
>
> >>"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >>news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9...@4ax.com
> >>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400, "Republican Liar"
> >>> <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
>
> >>>>"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:hlmc641th235c6d91...@4ax.com
> >>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400, "Republican Liar"
> >>>>> <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
>
Explain why the majority of the simple minded dummycrats are voting to
block drillling. If they were voting for drilling it would pass
regardless of how the repubs are voting.
You really have a problem with comprehension don't you.
nobody
Perhaps you can show us using the provided cite or any other
nobody
<Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
Right, the cite says the Dems for the most part voted as a block
nobody
<Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
Gotta love libs. One side votes almost in lock-step against a bill,
the other side a few vote against it. To the lib, it is the minority
that was responsible, not the other side that voted as a block against
it. Oh BTW, *both* sides share the responsibility. This seems to be
the fact you are unable to deal with.
nobody
>On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 07:34:32 -0400, nobody
><nob...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>Perhaps you can show us using the provided cite or any other
>>legitimate cite that there is tons of oil on the land of those leases
>>and the oil companies could economically drill for it but aren't.
>
>Show us that there is not, you dumb asshole.
I've already provided the cite that supports my position. I believe I
was responding to the claim of the libs that the oil companies are
sitting on land that contains oil and should be drilled for before any
additional leases are granted. Can you support the claim or not?
Republican Liar
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:puoi64doo47rddjpd...@4ax.com
It doesn't take much to prove how stupid a tard like you is. You are
incapable of thinking on your own and need someone to tell you how to think.
You need Bush the oil man to tell you his side of reality.
Republican Liar
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:6sqi64p6k76csa7gq...@4ax.com
There is plenty of oil in many places in the world. There is no shortage of
it. You are incapable of thinking for yourself and believe that in the short
time Bush has held office all of a sudden there is none left. Do you need a
cite to show you what a fool you are? That is already obvious.
Republican Liar
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-bu...@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:25592a3c-483e-4286...@s50g2000hsb.googlegroups.com
You are just to stupid to be able to provide and answer as to why
republicans have voted to block oil drilling so you place all the blame on
the left. Drilling will do nothing to lower prices and no matter what you
will never be able to show why the right has been doing the blocking. You
are just totally clueless.
Republican Liar
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:2hqi641nfkkdq27af...@4ax.com
You are one of the dumbest tards on usenet. You will always be unable to
show why the right has successfully blocked drilling.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among those to vote 'No' " on the bill
to allow drilling. The right could have passed it if they didn't vote
against it.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/4549884.stm
You dance right around the question. Why is that tard? Why has the right
successfully blocked drilling?
Republican Liar
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1voi64hs93pqb8ep1...@4ax.com
You will always remain a stupid tard. It says:
"Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist was among those to vote 'No' ".
Now explain why Frist was one of the first to vote his own bill down. He
was not the only RightTard to vote against it and he won't be the last. You
just can't live without thinking that Fox has been lying can you tard?
Man you are one stupid tard.
cmdr buzz corey
> You dance right around the question. Why is that tard? Why has the right
> successfully blocked drilling?
And you are too stupid to provide an answer as to why the simple-
minded dummycrats are now voting to block drilling. The two most
abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity. You seem
to have cornered the market on stupidity so you are unable to show why
the simple-minded dummycrats are voting to block drilling.
Dance little boy, dance. LOL!!!!
George Grapman
Care to tell us the following:
How did Bill Frist vote on ANWR?
What was the stance of Jeb Bush on drilling?
How long a supply does ANWR have according to the USGS?
George Grapman
One more question:
What guarantee do we have that this oil would not be sold to other
countries?
David Johnston
The petroleum market is global.
Republican Liar
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-bu...@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:5091bfa7-d66f-450b...@8g2000hse.googlegroups.com
You are the little boy that is dancing not me. You will forever remain
stupid as the right continues to vote to block drilling. This was the
question not the other way around. Everyone knows why the left votes that
way but you are unable to fathom why you are just to ignorant. I have you
dancing on a rope that is hanging you because you are such a fool. Gawd you
tards are stupid.
Republican Liar
"George Grapman" <sfge...@paccbell.net> wrote in message
news:sIhak.20456$co7....@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com
You won't get this or any RightTard fool to come up with an answer. To
stupid to even know why.
nobody
<Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
Right after you explain how a party voting as a block is not
responsible for stopping a bill, yet a few individuals from another
party who vote against a bill are ones who are responsible for
stopping that bill.
>
> Man you are one stupid tard.
>
Man, you are a complete waste of time...
nobody
It's all he has. He is a loon after all.
nobody
Can you answer the question or not? Dodging is so typical of the
leftie loon.
nobody
<Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
Of course you are fool enough to think that I agree with Bush too.
Can you provide a cite that the land has oil on it and it can be
drilled for economically or not?
>
nobody
<Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
Certainly doing absolutely nothing but finger point (as the Dems are
doing) will not lower prices. The cost of oil is not currently based
on supply and demand -- it based on perception. If this country even
threatens to drill, it will help lower the cost of oil.
Bugman
I've read many times that because of ANWR is located that the oil would
almost certainly be sold to the Asian market for refinement.
Bugman
"Bugman" <jmpo...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Ks-dnZiP9djSs_fV...@giganews.com...
I hadn't had my coffee yet.
Republican Liar
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:l41k6455qve819tr1...@4ax.com
You are the one that has been dodging my question moron, not the other way
around. When you answer mine I will answer yours to stupid tard.
Republican Liar
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:071k6492v1mm1malq...@4ax.com
It is common knowledge that OPEC could provide more oil. Bush was turned
down by his friends in SA. Then they agreed to provide a little more. Much
more oil can be output by OPEC if they wanted to. Have you ever done any
researching for yourself or have you only relied on others to tell you what
to think? I would say that you are very ignorant and haven't one clues about
the oil available in Russia and other parts of the world. I can provide you
with links but I want you to show me that you know more than what Fox or
Rush is telling you. Maybe you are just an ignorant troll and wouldn't
believe anything I showed you anyway.
How stupid are you really? Where do you get your information from?
TeeVeee..............?
Republican Liar
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:jb1k64dfbhjfq7ajs...@4ax.com
You are an idiot. It is you RightTards that are blaming the left for voting
down drilling. I am countering with proof that both are doing the same thing
but so far not one tard like you is able to prove me wrong.
The cost of
> oil is not currently based on supply and demand
There is no supply and demand aspect to it at all. Big Oil is keeping the
supply to the open market low by purchasing "Paper Barrels" and
"speculating" by doing so it will drive the prices up. So far they have been
successful. There is plenty of oil available if you are a Big Oil but not if
you want it to fuel your car.
Technically there is oil "on the market" but not all can be accessed by the
end user. Do you REALLY believe the in a few short years that Bush has been
in office that the demand has risen by 500% to reflect the recent increase
in price? It seem like you are swallowing it hook line and sinker. You just
willingly accept what you hear and do no actual thinking. How pathetic.
Republican Liar
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:1s0k64hfeuloubhjg...@4ax.com
No fool. You are running from the original question. You are unable to
answer so you continue to remain ignorant.
nobody
<Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
Read further back in the thread and comprehend that A: I asked the
first question that you dodged and B: I've already cited my position.
>
>
nobody
<Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
Absolutely none of your rant has anything to do with the claim that
land that is already leased has oil waiting for the drilling and this
is why more land should not be leased for drilling. Care to try
again?
nobody
<Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
The Republicans are blaming the oil companies for "excessive profits"
like the Dems are? What is the Dem plan to lower energy costs? Be
specific, precise and cite (give it a try, you'll like it).
ejo...@nhdallas.com
> "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1s0k64hfeuloubhjg...@4ax.com
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:24:35 -0400, "Republican Liar"
> > <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
>
> >>"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >>news:1voi64hs93pqb8ep1...@4ax.com
> >>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400, "Republican Liar"
> >>> <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
>
> >>>>"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9...@4ax.com
> >>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400, "Republican Liar"
> >>>>> <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>news:hlmc641th235c6d91...@4ax.com
> >>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400, "Republican
> >>>>>>> Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
this thread is a great example of why I am now an extreme independent.
first off, most of the posts seem to have been written by people to
young to remember the last oil crisis. the same solutions were
proposed by both parties before the 1980 election. after the election
nothing got done, no new nuke plant, no new oil wells, no green
energy. second gas prices in CA have little to do w/ the left wing and
alot to do with the cost of *trying* to clean up air quality on the
unique land mass upon which most people in CA live on ... they have a
natural *smog* problem. third the only options presented are right
wing drill and left wing are rhetoric, drill or don't drill
for decades huge pools of only have sat untapped in known and
drillable areas but not been developed ... why? because it cost lots
of money to put a sizeable field into production and big oil would
raise their asset value (stock price) by proving new fields and
without laying out the massive investment needed to turn reserves into
production ...
do the research increases in production come from increasing
production on long producing wells and small producers who can't play
the games big oil can, big oil rarely puts new fields into production
and files laws suits against small operators seeking to drill
production wells in their neighborhood
just this week a small oil company worked out an offshore deal with so
called environmentalists in SoCal ... the only law suites threatened
were from big oil who claim the small oil company is directional
drilling into fields that are too expensive for them (big oil) to
produce on
keep this in mind - there are enough fossil fuel reserves in the US in
the current mineral rights of fortune 100 companies to more than
supply all US energy needs and export some too. the big boys can drill
if they want to
legislation can make big oil put fields into production, produce on
the leases or surrender them, is your party demanding such laws? why
not?
if we simply offer new oil leases to big oil some politicians will
claim issue solved ... in reality big oil will win the high bids then
drill proving wells ... run up their stock and keep putting just
enough production flowing to keep prices up ... think about it
the only way oil prices came down in the 1980s was when Reagan talked
the Saudis into increasing production in exchange for what may be the
world's 2nd best military force
if we don't drill (meaning don't sale new oil leases) ... we're stuck
even if we increase production of non-fossil energy by a factor of 10
note the rnc says do all the above, beginning with new oil leases
note the dnc says do all the above, except new oil leases
who is served by this gridlock ... big oil, who loses ... our
disposalable income
if we don't figure a way to increase "energy" production, fossil and
non-fossil, by empowering small & mid size firms to produce such,
we're sunk ... the difficulty of this obvious solution is no future
1000 companies are currently investing in the politics of "drill" or
"no-drill". note the politics of the dnc & the rnc are not the
solution - they are the problem
this same problem exists at many levels, the dnc tax the rich, the rnc
don't tax the rich ...
the rnc has preached for years cutting taxes for thr rich will create
more investment and more jobs ... calling on Adam Smith's "wealth of
nation's" as an intellectual foundation for classical economics ...
excuse me but there was no such thing as big business in Adam's day,
for example - please domonstrate how buying Exon or Walmart or Ford
stock will create more jobs. The problem with such a policy is that it
drives money into big cap stocks not into fast growing small or mid
size companies (note the DOW goes up fatser than small stocks under
the rnc rule)
the dnc by contrasts are avdocating Keynes economics (if they admit it
or not) which suggests during hard times r amp up govenrment
spending ... under normal circumstances this can work, it did in the
1930s, the diferrence - we weren't $10 trillion in debt when FDR came
to office
solution get some 30 year 5% seed money in the hands of up and coming
movers and shakers ... the big bucks behind the dnc & rnc are
terrified of such because that would put a big dent in their
respective power bases
again big biz lobbies for rich tax cuts ... unions for no rich tax
cuts ... no other political solution offered by either wing because
there are no big dawg political machines fighting for a real solution
in short neither party is offering real solutions - just BS rhetoric
now we face the the worst long term financial challenges in US history
= most of us can't afford a new house to too much regulation AND the
debt generated by the S&L scandal and the sub prime scandal (both
scandals caused by the refusal of Bush I and Dubya tp enforce the law)
and worse, due to ridulous foriegn poicly by all 3 presidents since
Reagan we can't cut our military budget, and military spending is the
only sizeable big ticket which is even negotiable ... debt service,
SS, and MC are all long term deals which the US government agreed too
long ago - it may come down to ... depression
******
sadly what's most likely is a swing to the radical left because the
swing to the right which began back in 1980 has ended with the likes
of this Bush administration, the most far right bunch since Hoover
that swing to the left will likey bring on faggot weddings and over
regulation ... oh well ... is that any worse than war profiteering neo
nazis?
we are close to telling seniors we have no healh care for ya and we
can't send ya SS check and your savings are tied up in a house and
stocks which are worth less than you paid for them ... or telling T-
bond holders we'll pay you some of what we promised sooner or
later ...
military vulnerablity and or bankruptcy seem likely if we leave things
to the lame ass right wing or the lame ass left wing
maybe one day we will start a viable 3rd party of non-brain washed
folks who love their country more than their parties ...
unforetunately most people have lost their ability to think for
themselves and are willing to accept brand R or brand D
cmdr buzz corey
> "nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1s0k64hfeuloubhjg...@4ax.com
>
>
>
> > On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 20:24:35 -0400, "Republican Liar"
> > <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
>
> >>"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >>news:1voi64hs93pqb8ep1...@4ax.com
> >>> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:10:49 -0400, "Republican Liar"
> >>> <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
>
> >>>>"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >>>>news:cdsf649q4v5qu16j9...@4ax.com
> >>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 15:17:19 -0400, "Republican Liar"
> >>>>> <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>>news:hlmc641th235c6d91...@4ax.com
> >>>>>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 05:20:51 -0400, "Republican
> >>>>>>> Liar" <Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
>
Why won't you answer the question of why the simple-minded dummycrats
in congress are currently voting against drilling?
Republican Liar
"cmdr buzz corey" <cmdr-bu...@mailcity.com> wrote in
message
news:b16e8da1-e631-4422...@y38g2000hsy.googlegroups.com
No moron. I have been asking why have the republicans voted to block oil
drilling for so long. I have been asking this for some time and haven't
found one tard that can answer. You are just one more clueless simpleton so
you run like the pussy you are.
Republican Liar
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:a9dl645f4i1euij4a...@4ax.com
Well to begin with moron. I never claimed that land already leased has any
oil on it. Do you care to pay attention?
Republican Liar
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:mddl64tel7cov5kiv...@4ax.com
Is that what you read in the above post by me? Let me say it again. Both
the left and the right are voting to block drilling while the right blames
it all on the left. I never claimed that the left had a plan to lower costs.
The costs will never go down more than a small amount over time. There is no
need to drill for more oil because that will not lower prices. There is
plenty of world oil that can be supplied to the end user. The speculators
need to pay higher taxes on their profits from investments. More deals need
to be made with OPEC to supply more oil. The Bush war for oil has caused the
rise in prices by cutting the flow from Iraq but this was the plan all
along. The right screws America yet again. Nothing new here.
Republican Liar
<ejo...@nhdallas.com> wrote in message
news:4030b7a3-181a-4ae7...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com
So, all in all you are scared of "faggot weddings". Nothing new here Tard.
Have a nice day.
nobody
<Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
I never said you did make the claim. Apparently you have difficulty
following a thread since the subject of the oil leases is what I've
been talking about. Perhaps if you tried responding to the actual
topic...
nobody
<Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
This is the kind of logic one would expect from a loon who says that a
party who votes as a block against Anwar is not responsible for
blocking the drilling, but the party who had a few individuals vote
against drilling is the party responsible for blocking the bill.
As I said before: you are rapidly becoming a complete waste of
time...
>
Republican Liar
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:2qhm64thl8n9532m4...@4ax.com
You are retarded. If you had been following the thread you would see what a
total fool you are. The thread is not about oil leases moron, it is about
blocking drilling. You get more stupid with every post. Try again fool. You
can't weasel out now. Lying only makes you look even more of an ignoramace.
Republican Liar
"nobody" <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:d4im64dg4ggceeunl...@4ax.com
Your cowardice noted. You are unable to even comment on the right blocking
drilling ANWR and other places so you again try to weasel. Nothing new for
you Tards. The right has successfully blocked oil drilling for decades. Deal
with it fool.
nobody
<Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
It must be very interesting in your world....
nobody
<Re...@uLiars.moc> wrote:
Really? Perhaps you should have explained that when the subject of
leases was introduced into the thread in message 17 of the thread.
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.misc/msg/a3652e91ff772420?dmode=source
"Big oil has leases on 68 million acres. Democrats are against giving
them
any MORE. Why aren't they developing what they already have?"
I was conversing with him when you insinuated yourself into the
discussion. If you don't believe the subject of leases for oil is
relevant to the discussion, then why on earth have you responded to me
when it's clear that's the discussion I was engaged in?
> You get more stupid with every post. Try again fool. You
>can't weasel out now. Lying only makes you look even more of an ignoramace.
Your inability to comprehend a point or follow a thread detour does
not constitute a lie.