Final:T. Rex had mammalian RBC's.
Wretch Fossil
renown for publishing on the Science Journal an article about the
soft
tissue of a T. Rex dinosaurs. She released the following two photos,
among others, that show--in her words-- "round structure" in the
"blood vessel". I found they were actually mammalian red blood cells
as labelled in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. Don't forget to compare them with
the birds' red blood cells in Fig. 3.
Fig.1: Newly labled huge,red,round,concave, thus mammalian, red blood
cells within the blood vessel.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881284001&p=20
Fig. 2: Newly labled, nearly same as above.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881274248&p=21
Fig. 3: Birds' RBC's
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881203610&p=22
Glenn
> Dr. Mary H. Schweitzer, an American paleontologist, received world
Lin, you have multi-posted this same message, and that is a no-no.
Changing your name to avoid killfiles and blacklists is also a no-no.
From: Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo,alt.atheism
Subject: This is final:T. Rex had mammalian RBC's.
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:21:14 -0700 (PDT)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/msg/cd4036c601462b75?dmode=source
Wretch Fossil
> On Jul 21, 10:10 pm, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:> Dr. Mary H. Schweitzer, an American paleontologist, received world
>
> snip
>
> Lin, you have multi-posted this same message, and that is a no-no.
newsgroups with a comma. Doesn't it mean I can post to multi-groups?
> Changing your name to avoid killfiles and blacklists is also a no-no.
Don't you know that google's Juda just banned my e-mails and killed my
groups?
>
> From: Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com>
> Newsgroups: sci.anthropology.paleo,alt.atheism
> Subject: This is final:T. Rex had mammalian RBC's.
> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 22:21:14 -0700 (PDT)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.anthropology.paleo/msg/cd4036c6014...
Desertphile
<wretch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dr. Mary H. Schweitzer, an American paleontologist, received world
> renown for publishing on the Science Journal an article about the
> soft tissue of a T. Rex dinosaurs. She released the following two photos,
> among others, that show--in her words-- "round structure" in the
> "blood vessel". I found they were actually mammalian red blood cells
> as labelled in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. Don't forget to compare them with
> the birds' red blood cells in Fig. 3.
How the bloody hell did you get out of my killfile?
--
http://desertphile.org
Desertphile's Desert Soliloquy. WARNING: view with plenty of water
"Why aren't resurrections from the dead noteworthy?" -- Jim Rutz
Kent Paul Dolan
> http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881284001&p=20
> http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881203610&p=22
Trying to sneak back into talk.origins under a new
account ID, after being banned under several others,
Ed Conrad?
Don't you know that your mendicating obsessed
insanity identifies you more clearly than a
fingerprint would?
xanthian.
Kermit
No, this is Ed's sole minion, Mr. Lin Liangtai. He seems to be a
solitary net loon on his own, who has latched onto Ed as the great
scientist who produces evidence which supports his own peculiar ideas.
Ask him sometime about the ancient civilizations...
Kermit
Wretch Fossil
>
> - 顯示被引用文字 -
My posts were good for all Americans. If you don't like sunshine,
that's your loss.
Kent Paul Dolan
> No, this is Ed's sole minion, Mr. Lin Liangtai. He
> seems to be a solitary net loon on his own, who
> has latched onto Ed as the great scientist who
> produces evidence which supports his own peculiar
> ideas. Ask him sometime about the ancient
> civilizations...
If you think Ed and "Lin" are two different people,
I have a deal on a bridge I think you should
consider.
xanthian.
Ed for example has gone so far as to forget which
account he was using, and make nonsense statements
only appropriate to the opposite sock-puppet. Ed
isn't one of the brighter lights on the string, or
he wouldn't espouse the beliefs he does, and he
often shows his inadequacy to plan and carry out
large conspiracies solo.
Kent Paul Dolan
> My posts were good for all Americans.
As for example here, where "Lin" writes a jingoist
statement only appropriate to someone living not
where Ed pretends "Lin" lives. Like I said, Ed is
not the brightest light on the string.
xanthian.
Boikat
> On 7月22日, 下午2時42分, Glenn <GlennShel...@msn.com> wrote:> On Jul 21, 10:10 pm, Wretch Fossil <wretchfos...@gmail.com> wrote:> Dr. Mary H. Schweitzer, an American paleontologist, received world
>
> > snip
>
> > Lin, you have multi-posted this same message, and that is a no-no.
>
> Each time I post, I see words telling me to separate different
> newsgroups with a comma. Doesn't it mean I can post to multi-groups?
>
> > Changing your name to avoid killfiles and blacklists is also a no-no.
>
> Don't you know that google's Juda just banned my e-mails and killed my
> groups?
>
That should tell you something.
Boikat
Ron O
There could be two of them. Stranger things have likely happened on
the internet.
Ron Okimoto
Kermit
> Kermit wrote:
>
> > No, this is Ed's sole minion, Mr. Lin Liangtai. He
> > seems to be a solitary net loon on his own, who
> > has latched onto Ed as the great scientist who
> > produces evidence which supports his own peculiar
> > ideas. Ask him sometime about the ancient
> > civilizations...
>
> If you think Ed and "Lin" are two different people,
> I have a deal on a bridge I think you should
> consider.
Hang on to that bridge; you'll need it for your retirement:
Lin Liangtai has never subjected us to bad poetry. Nor has he ever
leaned on the cap locks key.
And while he has mentioned global conspiracies and the stupidity of
academia, he has never gone on vicious rants about them at great
length, as though he had a personal grudge against them.
>
> xanthian.
>
> Ed for example has gone so far as to forget which
> account he was using, and make nonsense statements
> only appropriate to the opposite sock-puppet. Ed
> isn't one of the brighter lights on the string, or
> he wouldn't espouse the beliefs he does, and he
> often shows his inadequacy to plan and carry out
> large conspiracies solo.
Sorry; I don't remember him ever doing this with the alleged sock
puppet Lin. I have not read all of Ed's posts, of course.
Kermit
Wretch Fossil
> On Jul 24, 2:46 am, Kent Paul Dolan <xanth...@well.com> wrote:
>
> > Kermit wrote:
>
> > > seems to be a solitary net loon on his own, who
> > > produces evidence which supports his own peculiar
> > > ideas. Ask him sometime about the ancient
> > > civilizations...
>
> > I have a deal on a bridge I think you should
> > consider.
>
> Hang on to that bridge; you'll need it for your retirement:
> Lin Liangtai has never subjected us to bad poetry. Nor has he ever
> leaned on the cap locks key.
>
> And while he has mentioned global conspiracies and the stupidity of
> academia, he has never gone on vicious rants about them at great
> length, as though he had a personal grudge against them.
>
>
>
> > xanthian.
>
> > account he was using, and make nonsense statements
> > only appropriate to the opposite sock-puppet.Ed
> > isn't one of the brighter lights on the string, or
> > he wouldn't espouse the beliefs he does, and he
> > often shows his inadequacy to plan and carry out
> > large conspiracies solo.
>
> Sorry; I don't remember him ever doing this with the alleged sock
> puppet Lin. I have not read all ofEd'sposts, of course.
>
> Kermit
Click on "my profile" in this message. I just left God's words/method
there . It deserves all humans' attention.