This is final:T. Rex had mammalian RBC's.
Wretch Fossil
wide
renown for publishing on the Science Magazine an article about the
soft
tissue of a T. Rex dinosaur. She released the following two photos
that show--in her words-- "round structure" in the
"blood vessel". I found they were actually mammalian red blood cells
as labelled in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. Don't forget to compare them with
the birds' red blood cells in Fig. 3.
Fig.1: Newly labled huge,red,round,concave, thus mammalian, red blood
cells within the blood vessel.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881284001&p=20
Fig. 2: Newly labled, surely concave RBC.
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881274248&p=21
Fig. 3: Birds' RBC's
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881203610&p=22
Tim McGaughy
> Dr. Mary H. Schweitzer, an American paleontologist, received world-
> wide
> renown for publishing on the Science Magazine an article about the
> soft
> tissue of a T. Rex dinosaur. She released the following two photos
> that show--in her words-- "round structure" in the
> "blood vessel". I found they were actually mammalian red blood cells
YOU found? What are your qualifications, exactly?
John Baker
<wretch...@gmail.com> wrote:
Fuck off, loon.
<re-PLONK!>
John Baker
wrote:
Why, he's the only other person in the world who's as smart as Ed
Conrad, of course. <G>
Wretch Fossil
My qualification came from observing more fossilized RBC's than Dr.
Schweitzer did.
I have spent hundreds of hours examining thousands upon thousands of
fossilized RBC's under microscopes. Some RBC'S changed their shapes
during the process of their lithification into fossils. In that
process, other liquids in the blood, such as serum, may adhere to
RBC's exterior and solidify together with RBC'S. At the same time, the
solidified RBC's may need a "chair" in order to sit firmly in the
dried-up environment.
Above process may result in fossilized RBC's looking like a bowl or
"moon-like'' shape as one expert called it. The best identifiers of
RBC'S are pathologists followed by anatomists. However, some
biologists may not be able to recognize some fossilized RBC'S owing to
their having changed their shapes.
In fact, I may be one of the few people in the world who have observed
thousands of fossilized RBC's IN DETAILS. That's because I have the
material and I know the material still retains RBC'S.
Tim McGaughy
> On 7月22日, 下午2時07分, Tim McGaughy <tee...@toast.net> wrote:
>> Wretch Fossil wrote:
>>> Dr. Mary H. Schweitzer, an American paleontologist, received world-
>>> wide
>>> renown for publishing on the Science Magazine an article about the
>>> soft
>>> tissue of a T. Rex dinosaur. She released the following two photos
>>> that show--in her words-- "round structure" in the
>>> "blood vessel". I found they were actually mammalian red blood cells
>> YOU found? What are your qualifications, exactly?
>
> My qualification came from observing more fossilized RBC's than Dr.
> Schweitzer did.
Uh huh.
What are your educational qualifications?
Wretch Fossil
I am qualified to teach fossil identification.
mclark
>
> - Show quoted text -
Sure ya are, Bucky, and I'm the Queen of Sheba.
Tim McGaughy
Exactly how are you qualified?
Wretch Fossil
>
> - 顯示被引用文字 -
Don't you know that I found a fossilized limb's cross section on Mars?
That find qualified me to teach fossil identification. For NASA has
all kinds of professors. But they did not find it or any fossil on
Mars. In fact, I know of no professor who could identify fossilized
cells/tissue/organ on earth or on Mars. Do you have any such teaching
job?
pete
I'm seeing the exact opposite of you see.
In this image:
http://www.healthsystem.virginia.edu/internet/hematology/images/Erythrocyte-100x-website-arrow.jpg
You can plainly see the single most distinguishing feature
of the mammalian erythrocyte, which is that is has no nucleus,
resulting in an image which shows the center of the cell
as light and the edge as dark.
Your T rex blood cell images have a dark centers and light edges:
http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881284001&p=20
--
pete
El tigre exterminador
>
> Don't you know that I found a fossilized limb's cross section on Mars?
I find it highly unlikely that you found a fossilised limb's cross
section on Mars.
Tim McGaughy
I find it highly unlikely that he can find his own ass with both hands.
RichTravsky
How are you qualified? What is your educational background?
John Baker
<traR...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote:
>Wretch Fossil wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 24, 10:25� pm, Tim McGaughy <tee...@toast.net> wrote:
>> > Wretch Fossil wrote:
>> > > On 7月22日, 下�?�2時07分, Tim McGaughy <tee...@toast.net> wrote:
>> > >> Wretch Fossil wrote:
>> > >>> Dr. Mary H. Schweitzer, an American paleontologist, received world-
>> > >>> wide
>> > >>> renown for publishing on the Science Magazine an article about the
>> > >>> soft
>> > >>> tissue of a T. Rex dinosaur. She released the following two photos
>> > >>> that show--in her words-- "round structure" in the
>> > >>> "blood vessel". I found they were actually mammalian red blood cells
>> > >> YOU found? What are your qualifications, exactly?
>> >
>> > > My qualification came from observing more fossilized RBC's than Dr.
>> > > Schweitzer did.
>> >
>> > Uh huh.
>> >
>> > What are your educational qualifications?
>>
>> I am qualified to teach fossil identification.
>
>How are you qualified? What is your educational background?
He reads Ed Conrad's posts.
Wretch Fossil
> Wretch Fossil wrote:
>
> > Dr. Mary H. Schweitzer, an American paleontologist, received world-
> > wide
> > renown for publishing on the Science Magazine an article about the
> > soft
> > tissue of a T. Rex dinosaur. She released the following two photos
> > that show--in her words-- "round structure" in the
> > "blood vessel". I found they were actually mammalian red blood cells
> > as labelled in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2. Don't forget to compare them with
> > the birds' red blood cells in Fig. 3.
>
> > Fig.1: Newly labled huge,red,round,concave, thus mammalian, red blood
> > cells within the blood vessel.
>
> >http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881284001&p=20
>
> > Fig. 2: Newly labled, surely concave RBC.
> > http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881274248&p=21
>
> > Fig. 3: Birds' RBC's
>
> >http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881203610&p=22
>
> I'm seeing the exact opposite of you see.
>
> In this image:
>
>
> You can plainly see the single most distinguishing feature
> of the mammalian erythrocyte, which is that is has no nucleus,
> resulting in an image which shows the center of the cell
> as light and the edge as dark.
>
> Your T rex blood cell images have a dark centers and light edges:http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=12&f=1881284001&p=20
You are fooled by colors which resulted from chemical staining done by
Dr. Schweitzer, a standard process in the preparation of thin sections
for histology examination. (Geologists don't use chemical staining in
thin sections. Only histologists/medical students do it for easier
identification of living cell parts.) Different staining methods
result in different-color photos. In this case, the centers of the
concave RBC's get more stains, so they look darker. Please note that
the criteria for identifying RBC's does not lie in colors, but in
shapes (morphology). Dr. Schweizter already proved, by various
difficult tests, the material was actually "blood vessels" and
"organic cells" in the blood cells. In short she proved they were
blood cells in blood vessels. So, if such blood cells in blood vessels
are both round and concave, they must be mammalian red blood cells.
>
> --
> pete- 隱藏被引用文字 -
>
> - 顯示被引用文字 -