Re: [symfony-cmf-devs] Digest for symfony-cmf-devs@googlegroups.com - 6 Messages in 2 Topics

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Juan Madrigal

unread,
Aug 24, 2010, 11:08:14 PM8/24/10
to symfony-...@googlegroups.com
I accidentally closed an issue, how do I reopen it? In-context/inline editing capability (custom defined areas)

The buttons are way too close horrible UI design on GitHub's part.

Thanks,
z3r0

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 8:48 AM, <symfony-cmf-...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-cmf-devs/topics

    Lukas Kahwe Smith <sm...@pooteeweet.org> Aug 23 11:03PM +0200 ^
     
    Hi,
     
    So I was told that many people didn't really closely follow the previous thread and therefore have asked me to make things more clear by starting a new thread. Here it is. Again the goal of this voting period is to identify the key features we want to support in order to figure out the architecture. There will still be plenty of time to submit feature requests and other ideas afterwards:
    - Voting will be done on the tickets on http://github.com/symfony-cmf/symfony-cmf/issues
    - Click on the little triangles which will then no longer appear "filled"
    - Voting will last for one week, aka August 30th
    - Please do not edit the ticket topics/body or create new tickets during the voting period
    - Please review all tickets but obviously only vote on the tickets you support
    - Feel free to comment, but do not vote on the comments
     
    After the voting period we will review the results, if during the period certain tickets create a lot of controversy or someone is concerned that an important issue was overlooked, we might need to do a second voting period. But if there are no big concerns we will hopefully use the voting results to then focus on defining our architecture, which will then let us split up the work and get to coding. yeah!
     
    Sorry for the confusion and the delay, but I guess we better do it right or risk an unhealthy start.
     
    regards,
    Lukas Kahwe Smith
    sm...@pooteeweet.org

     

    Lukas Kahwe Smith <sm...@pooteeweet.org> Aug 23 09:57PM +0200 ^
     
    On 20.08.2010, at 23:16, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
     
     
    > Just a reminder, voting is in progress:
    > http://github.com/symfony-cmf/symfony-cmf/issues#sort=votes
     
    > The top items have 16 votes, but that seems a bit low to me given the large number of people who have expressed an interested in the Symfony CMF.
     
     
    ok we got a few more votes in. i guess i never really clarified the voting period. in most emails i talked about a 1 week period which would mean that voting will last until the 25th. at the same time it seems that the order hasnt really changed much from what i can see. a few new tickets were created during the voting period. some seem redundant, some are good additions. however i don't think they would have any affect in the more general architecture discussion and this to me is the key thing to address next.
     
    personally i am a bit surprised how few votes some things and how many others got, but all the more reason for us to have done this voting process to sort out our priorities. so what i would like to ask from all of you is keep an eye on the voting results, but ideally mentally prepare your thoughts on what these results mean to you all in terms of architecture. obviously the idea of using the JCR spec is on the table, but as we always said depending on the out come of the voting we might discover that we need to decide which way to go. i would like to get the discussion started on Wednesday (*).
     
    also i should note if anyone thinks there was something very controversial which they need to clear up before we have the architecture discussion. or something important was missing (for example some of you might feel those new tickets do in fact bring up areas that would be important to decide on before discussion the architecture) make sure to raise your voice so that we dont jump into the architecture discussion before having a good basis.
     
    regards,
    Lukas Kahwe Smith
    sm...@pooteeweet.org
     
    (*) do note that I will be going into surgery (ACL reconstruction) on thursday .. i should have internet in the hospital but not sure yet how actively I will be participating in the discussion, but there are plenty of smart people on this list so talk away without me.

     

    Lukas Kahwe Smith <sm...@pooteeweet.org> Aug 23 10:03PM +0200 ^
     
    On 23.08.2010, at 22:01, Kris Wallsmith wrote:
     
    > So, when does the voting period end? I just got back from holiday…
     
    on the evening of the 24th. dont care about timezones although we do have the full range on this list .. from .NZ to California, to Europe :)
     
    regards,
    Lukas Kahwe Smith
    sm...@pooteeweet.org

     

    Jonathan Wage <jon...@gmail.com> Aug 23 03:20PM -0500 ^
     
    I think we should make a new e-mail announcing that voting has started and
    explain the details of the voting process there.
     
    - Jon
     
     
    --
    Jonathan H. Wage
    http://www.twitter.com/jwage

     

    Pablo Godel <pgo...@gmail.com> Aug 23 04:54PM -0400 ^
     
    yes, it took me a while to figure out how to vote, even though is
    super easy, I was looking for something more "difficult" :)
     
    Pablo
     
     
    --
    Pablo Godel
    ServerGrove Networks
    http://servergrove.com/

     


Lukas Kahwe Smith

unread,
Aug 25, 2010, 1:41:53 AM8/25/10
to symfony-...@googlegroups.com

On 25.08.2010, at 05:08, Juan Madrigal wrote:

> I accidentally closed an issue, how do I reopen it? In-context/inline editing capability (custom defined areas)
>
> The buttons are way too close horrible UI design on GitHub's part.

you can reopen tickets via the actions dropdown.
i already reopened the ticket.

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages