Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
John Humble, the disappeared
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Old Jinglebollocks
Apr 20, 2013, 9:57:41 AM4/20/13
to
=================================
The Yorkshire Ripper Cover-up revisited
=================================
The Gregg v. O’Gara juryless libel ‘judgment’ has stifled rational
discussion of the Yorkshire Ripper cover-up.
If a man has a house and a car and a job and a wife and a child, then
he will greatly fear a libel case against him.
Constable Gregg’s action against Mr O’Gara was supposedly funded by
the association of police officers, or whatever it’s called. But it
was probably funded from an informal ruling group ‘slush fund.’
The purpose of the Gregg v. O’Gara juryless ‘judgment’ was not to get
money from Mr O’Gara and not to comfort constable Gregg’s ego.
[As far as I know, they have not pursued Mr Noel O’Gara for the
£50,000, although they probably can do so now under EU law. They know
that Mr O’Gara would kick up a hell of a stink in the Irish media and
on the internet if they pursued the matter. That’s the last thing
they
want.
They want to silence discussion on the Yorkshire Ripper cover-up.
So, as far as I know, they are not pursuing Mr O’Gara for that
£50,000, as money was never what it was about.]
The purpose of the Gregg v. O’Gara juryless ‘judgment’ was only to
supply a big stick to wave in the faces of website managers and
individuals who dare to speak anything truthful about the Yorkshire
Ripper cover-up.
It’s working well.
It will be only decades from now, when crime writers are sure Jim
Hobson… and all the other participants in the
Yorkshire Ripper cover-up are well dead, and no longer able to mount
a
libel suit……… only then will the truth be written widely about the
Yorkshire Ripper cover-up.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In Argentina and Chile there was and still is great agitation to
obtain justice for “the disappeared.”
John Humble is one of “the disappeared” in England. But there is
something sheepish about the white English race, and there is no
agitation to demand Habeus Corpus with regard to John Humble. It
takes
the Irish or the Scottish to say what needs to be said in England.
The disappearance of John Humble is a matter that should worry all of
us.
If John Humble can disappear, so can you too, under “British
Justice.”
----------------------------------------------------
Mr Noel O’Gara of Ireland is entitled to great respect and admiration
for his work over several decades, at great financial cost to
himself,
to keep the Yorkshire Ripper anomaly in the public eye.
I’ve never met Billy Tracey. I never said directly that he is the man
who killed the women Peter Sutcliffe did not kill during those years.
I said Billy Tracey should be hunted down and questioned and
investigated in connection with the numerous killings Peter Sutcliffe
did not commit but confessed to.
My opinion is that Billy Tracey was quietly bumped off some time in
the 1980s. A man like that needed killing, some would say, and I
guess
somebody back then decided that enough was enough, and got rid of
him.
A man like Billy Tracey could not stay ‘off the radar’ for all these
years. He must be long dead.
----------------------------------------------------
More recently, a man who uses the name ‘Rupert Bear’ has offered a
new
perspective on the Yorkshire Ripper cover-up.
I’ve read his posts, and some salient points stick in the mind.
Were the Yorkshire Ripper killings a case of “folie-a-deux,” meaning
a
husband and wife team doing the numerous Yorkshire Ripper killings
that Peter Sutcliffe confessed to but did not commit?
‘Rupert Bear’ makes the interesting point that in some of the
Yorkshire Ripper cases, “a couple was seen walking near the scene and
police are anxious to trace them.”
What better cover for a sneaky serial killer!
A lone man seen walking near the scene of a Yorkshire Ripper murder
would be a murder suspect. But a male-female couple would not be
suspected, in the context of the time.
A “folie-a-deux?”
If the REAL Yorkshire Ripper had a female accomplice, another Rose
West / Myra Hyndley / Bonnie Parker……… a “folie-a-deux” …… that
would
explain his ability to escape detection, since everyone was convinced
at the time that the Yorkshire Ripper was a loner.
One could argue that it was Billy Tracey and his slave-girl wife.
Or was it another couple?
----------------------------------------------------
The essential, discernible truths about the Yorkshire Ripper cover-up
have been told by only a few brave souls who don’t fear libel
actions.
The truth about the Yorkshire Ripper cover-up will become widely
known
only after Jim Hobson, Margaret Thatcher, and all the other
participants in the cover-up are well dead and not able to mount a
libel suit.
Until then, the Gregg v. O’Gara juryless ‘judgment’ will be a big
stick to be waved in the face of any website manager or individual
who
dares to speak the truth about any aspect of the Yorkshire Ripper
cover-up.
------------------------------------------------------
Meanwhile there is still no news on John Humble, the ‘fall guy’ for
clearing up the ‘loose end’ of the ‘Wearside Jack’ letters and tape.
Why are the English people - including the ‘trendy lefties’ - so
selective with regard to what they can get ‘riled up’ about?
The disappearance of John Humble clearly has been the subject of a “D
Notice,” as it used to be called, but in fact it’s a bit more
‘informal’ than a D Notice.
Hans Ruesch was the victim of a media blackout in the 1980s in
England
and USA.
Not an official “D Notice,” but just the way the system works……
Similarly, no journalist in England is free to voice concern over the
disappearance of John Humble.
If you contact a junior ‘cup reporter’ and give him or her the
details
of the John Humble disappearance, they will be receptive and filled
with youthful zeal at first. Then they will speak enthusiastically to
their “superiors” about this unprecedented scandal, a front-page
sensation, the disappearance of John Humble…… but then the editor
will
educate them in the facts of life…….. and then they go silent and
will
always be “out of the office” if you call again.
That has happened many, many times in many, many contexts.
That’s the state of “freedom of expression” in England in the twenty-
first century.
If John Humble can disappear, and if the media can be forbidden to
comment upon his disappearance, and if this happens under “British
Justice,” then maybe you too will disappear at some stage, under
“British Justice.”
“They came for the Jews, they came for the Catholics, they came for
the homosexuals, they came for the mentally retarded…….. the West
Yorkshire Police came for John Humble…… and I remained silent……… then
they came for me, and there was nobody left to protest for me…….. “
====================================
THE FAKE PRESS CONFERENCE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&feature=related&hl=uk&v=8zcxudS-hrc
I'M JACK:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22DUclUZiX4
And:
https://groups.google.com/group/uk.legal/msg/0af836e687799b85?hl=en
The Yorkshire Ripper Cover-up revisited
=================================
The Gregg v. O’Gara juryless libel ‘judgment’ has stifled rational
discussion of the Yorkshire Ripper cover-up.
If a man has a house and a car and a job and a wife and a child, then
he will greatly fear a libel case against him.
Constable Gregg’s action against Mr O’Gara was supposedly funded by
the association of police officers, or whatever it’s called. But it
was probably funded from an informal ruling group ‘slush fund.’
The purpose of the Gregg v. O’Gara juryless ‘judgment’ was not to get
money from Mr O’Gara and not to comfort constable Gregg’s ego.
[As far as I know, they have not pursued Mr Noel O’Gara for the
£50,000, although they probably can do so now under EU law. They know
that Mr O’Gara would kick up a hell of a stink in the Irish media and
on the internet if they pursued the matter. That’s the last thing
they
want.
They want to silence discussion on the Yorkshire Ripper cover-up.
So, as far as I know, they are not pursuing Mr O’Gara for that
£50,000, as money was never what it was about.]
The purpose of the Gregg v. O’Gara juryless ‘judgment’ was only to
supply a big stick to wave in the faces of website managers and
individuals who dare to speak anything truthful about the Yorkshire
Ripper cover-up.
It’s working well.
It will be only decades from now, when crime writers are sure Jim
Hobson… and all the other participants in the
Yorkshire Ripper cover-up are well dead, and no longer able to mount
a
libel suit……… only then will the truth be written widely about the
Yorkshire Ripper cover-up.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In Argentina and Chile there was and still is great agitation to
obtain justice for “the disappeared.”
John Humble is one of “the disappeared” in England. But there is
something sheepish about the white English race, and there is no
agitation to demand Habeus Corpus with regard to John Humble. It
takes
the Irish or the Scottish to say what needs to be said in England.
The disappearance of John Humble is a matter that should worry all of
us.
If John Humble can disappear, so can you too, under “British
Justice.”
----------------------------------------------------
Mr Noel O’Gara of Ireland is entitled to great respect and admiration
for his work over several decades, at great financial cost to
himself,
to keep the Yorkshire Ripper anomaly in the public eye.
I’ve never met Billy Tracey. I never said directly that he is the man
who killed the women Peter Sutcliffe did not kill during those years.
I said Billy Tracey should be hunted down and questioned and
investigated in connection with the numerous killings Peter Sutcliffe
did not commit but confessed to.
My opinion is that Billy Tracey was quietly bumped off some time in
the 1980s. A man like that needed killing, some would say, and I
guess
somebody back then decided that enough was enough, and got rid of
him.
A man like Billy Tracey could not stay ‘off the radar’ for all these
years. He must be long dead.
----------------------------------------------------
More recently, a man who uses the name ‘Rupert Bear’ has offered a
new
perspective on the Yorkshire Ripper cover-up.
I’ve read his posts, and some salient points stick in the mind.
Were the Yorkshire Ripper killings a case of “folie-a-deux,” meaning
a
husband and wife team doing the numerous Yorkshire Ripper killings
that Peter Sutcliffe confessed to but did not commit?
‘Rupert Bear’ makes the interesting point that in some of the
Yorkshire Ripper cases, “a couple was seen walking near the scene and
police are anxious to trace them.”
What better cover for a sneaky serial killer!
A lone man seen walking near the scene of a Yorkshire Ripper murder
would be a murder suspect. But a male-female couple would not be
suspected, in the context of the time.
A “folie-a-deux?”
If the REAL Yorkshire Ripper had a female accomplice, another Rose
West / Myra Hyndley / Bonnie Parker……… a “folie-a-deux” …… that
would
explain his ability to escape detection, since everyone was convinced
at the time that the Yorkshire Ripper was a loner.
One could argue that it was Billy Tracey and his slave-girl wife.
Or was it another couple?
----------------------------------------------------
The essential, discernible truths about the Yorkshire Ripper cover-up
have been told by only a few brave souls who don’t fear libel
actions.
The truth about the Yorkshire Ripper cover-up will become widely
known
only after Jim Hobson, Margaret Thatcher, and all the other
participants in the cover-up are well dead and not able to mount a
libel suit.
Until then, the Gregg v. O’Gara juryless ‘judgment’ will be a big
stick to be waved in the face of any website manager or individual
who
dares to speak the truth about any aspect of the Yorkshire Ripper
cover-up.
------------------------------------------------------
Meanwhile there is still no news on John Humble, the ‘fall guy’ for
clearing up the ‘loose end’ of the ‘Wearside Jack’ letters and tape.
Why are the English people - including the ‘trendy lefties’ - so
selective with regard to what they can get ‘riled up’ about?
The disappearance of John Humble clearly has been the subject of a “D
Notice,” as it used to be called, but in fact it’s a bit more
‘informal’ than a D Notice.
Hans Ruesch was the victim of a media blackout in the 1980s in
England
and USA.
Not an official “D Notice,” but just the way the system works……
Similarly, no journalist in England is free to voice concern over the
disappearance of John Humble.
If you contact a junior ‘cup reporter’ and give him or her the
details
of the John Humble disappearance, they will be receptive and filled
with youthful zeal at first. Then they will speak enthusiastically to
their “superiors” about this unprecedented scandal, a front-page
sensation, the disappearance of John Humble…… but then the editor
will
educate them in the facts of life…….. and then they go silent and
will
always be “out of the office” if you call again.
That has happened many, many times in many, many contexts.
That’s the state of “freedom of expression” in England in the twenty-
first century.
If John Humble can disappear, and if the media can be forbidden to
comment upon his disappearance, and if this happens under “British
Justice,” then maybe you too will disappear at some stage, under
“British Justice.”
“They came for the Jews, they came for the Catholics, they came for
the homosexuals, they came for the mentally retarded…….. the West
Yorkshire Police came for John Humble…… and I remained silent……… then
they came for me, and there was nobody left to protest for me…….. “
====================================
THE FAKE PRESS CONFERENCE:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?gl=US&feature=related&hl=uk&v=8zcxudS-hrc
I'M JACK:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22DUclUZiX4
And:
https://groups.google.com/group/uk.legal/msg/0af836e687799b85?hl=en
0 new messages