Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

DAVID MOORE - SUPERMORON

2 views
Skip to first unread message

krp

unread,
May 15, 2008, 2:44:10 PM5/15/08
to
OPEN LETTER TO A MORON NAMED DAVID DANIEL MOORE OF 850 BUFFALO AVENUE,
CALUMET CITY, INDIANA

Moore I have been telling you for a DECADE that you are a mongoloid. Do
you REALLY think that mailing a letter from across the line into Indiana
showing a GARY, INDIANA postmark is going to FOOL PEOPLE? WOW what a GIANT
INTELLECT!

Yes Davey it was hand delivered to me by somebody and turned over to the
proper AUTHORITIES yesterday. By the way I - IDIOT - thanks much for the
DNA sample. MISTER ANONYMOUS.... Forget the FINGERPRINTS... Hey DIPSHIT
remember when you were in the Marines?????? Remember when they took DNA from
you? GOD you are a MORON! No wonder they kicked your STUPID ass out.


THANKS AGAIN - RUN DAVEY RUN...

gposter

unread,
May 15, 2008, 2:56:02 PM5/15/08
to

TNKev

unread,
May 15, 2008, 3:51:16 PM5/15/08
to
krp wrote:

> By the way I - IDIOT -

we already know.


>thanks much for the
> DNA sample.


you're disgusting.

Kent Wills

unread,
May 15, 2008, 5:53:09 PM5/15/08
to
On Thu, 15 May 2008 18:44:10 GMT, " krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote:

>OPEN LETTER TO A MORON NAMED DAVID DANIEL MOORE OF 850 BUFFALO AVENUE,
>CALUMET CITY, INDIANA

So you're NOT writing to the David Moore who posts to Usenet.
After all, you have PROOF that his middle name is Dennis.

>
> Moore I have been telling you for a DECADE that you are a mongoloid.

That you HATE Asians is well known and documents. Your racism
isn't even being debated.

>Do
>you REALLY think that mailing a letter from across the line into Indiana
>showing a GARY, INDIANA postmark is going to FOOL PEOPLE? WOW what a GIANT
>INTELLECT!

Pretending such a letter was sent, prove it was David who sent
it.

>
> Yes Davey it was hand delivered to me by somebody and turned over to the
>proper AUTHORITIES yesterday. By the way I - IDIOT - thanks much for the
>DNA sample. MISTER ANONYMOUS.... Forget the FINGERPRINTS... Hey DIPSHIT
>remember when you were in the Marines?????? Remember when they took DNA from
>you?

Does anyone actually lick envelopes anymore? As far as I know,
people use sponges.

>GOD you are a MORON!

Yet he consistently PROVES he's your intellectual superior.

>No wonder they kicked your STUPID ass out.
>

Prove it.

>
> THANKS AGAIN - RUN DAVEY RUN...
>
>

Offer proof of your latest lie, Kenny-Bob. Unless this is another
of your pathological lies.

"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
fan and GAY lover."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-Team, LYING
and claiming David Moore is his gay lover. Message-ID:
<_MlOj.598$pH4.7@trnddc06>

Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 15, 2008, 8:08:00 PM5/15/08
to
On May 15, 2:44 pm, " krp" <krp24...@verizon.net> wrote:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

krp

unread,
May 15, 2008, 9:38:37 PM5/15/08
to

"TNKev" <TN...@TNKev.aintnone> wrote in message
news:g0i4bj$eao$1...@news.datemas.de...
> krp wrote:
>
>> By the way I TKNEV am an IDIOT -
>
> we already know.

Everyone knows you are Kevin. We also know you are queer and in love
with Kunt Wills your husband.


krp

unread,
May 15, 2008, 9:39:19 PM5/15/08
to

"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9ubp24d8kkehlc8o8...@4ax.com...

>>OPEN LETTER TO A MORON NAMED DAVID DANIEL MOORE OF 850 BUFFALO AVENUE,
>>CALUMET CITY, INDIANA

> So you're NOT writing to the David Moore who posts to Usenet.
> After all, you have PROOF that his middle name is Dennis.

You epitomize EVEY Polish joke ever told Kunt.


Kent Wills

unread,
May 15, 2008, 9:50:46 PM5/15/08
to

Your bigotry is well known and documented. You don't need to
keep offering undeniable proof of it.

krp

unread,
May 15, 2008, 10:06:46 PM5/15/08
to
"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:k1qp24dou16mrsqm9...@4ax.com...

>>>>OPEN LETTER TO A MORON NAMED DAVID DANIEL MOORE OF 850 BUFFALO AVENUE,
>>>>CALUMET CITY, INDIANA
>>
>>> So you're NOT writing to the David Moore who posts to Usenet.
>>> After all, you have PROOF that his middle name is Dennis.
>>
>> You epitomize EVEY Polish joke ever told Kunt.
>>
>
> Your bigotry is well known and documented. You don't need to
> keep offering undeniable proof of it.

Nice post edit Kunt. But you ARE a walking POLISH JOKE.


Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 15, 2008, 10:14:13 PM5/15/08
to
On May 15, 9:38 pm, " krp" <krp24...@verizon.net> wrote:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

freedom

unread,
May 16, 2008, 10:06:35 AM5/16/08
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Thu, 15 May 2008, " krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote:
>OPEN LETTER TO A MORON NAMED DAVID DANIEL MOORE OF 850 BUFFALO AVENUE,
>CALUMET CITY, INDIANA

I doubt if he'll ever receive this "LETTER," as there is no such place.

>
> Moore I have been telling you for a DECADE that you are a mongoloid.

Yes, projection is one of your traits.

> Do
>you REALLY think that mailing a letter from across the line into Indiana
>showing a GARY, INDIANA postmark is going to FOOL PEOPLE? WOW what a GIANT
>INTELLECT!
>

What are you babbling about now?

> Yes Davey it was hand delivered to me by somebody and turned over to the
>proper AUTHORITIES yesterday. By the way I - IDIOT - thanks much for the
>DNA sample.

No problem. At first I didn't understand why Barbara refused to swallow
(she almost always does) or why she had that glass test tube on the
nightstand.

> MISTER ANONYMOUS.... Forget the FINGERPRINTS... Hey DIPSHIT
>remember when you were in the Marines?????? Remember when they took DNA from
>you? GOD you are a MORON! No wonder they kicked your STUPID ass out.
>
>
> THANKS AGAIN - RUN DAVEY RUN...

(yawn) Got any new material, Ken? The "law enforcement is going to get
you" gag is really worn out.

http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals

"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
- --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **,
in a verbal threat to his girlfriend

"...my aunt wouldnt come over to our house anymore because of how he would
talk to her and come on to her....and he had over 180 pictures of her on
his computer"
- --Ken Pangborn's former stepdaughter Megan, on growing up in the Pangborn
household


** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQA/AwUBSC12nqbdsu4taRc6EQLRiACeNsuzyLWKQfyXsWSYcdtxOoPXlJ4AoMYg
LMW++jlW9w1QvQR+yfvaJQGc
=UAqZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 16, 2008, 10:09:21 AM5/16/08
to
On May 16, 10:06 am, freedom
<aboutKRP...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

krp

unread,
May 16, 2008, 12:39:26 PM5/16/08
to

"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
news:5722f55bf292fbab...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...

krp

unread,
May 16, 2008, 12:41:10 PM5/16/08
to

"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
news:5722f55bf292fbab...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>>OPEN LETTER TO A MORON NAMED DAVID DANIEL MOORE OF 850 BUFFALO AVENUE,
>>CALUMET CITY, ILLINOIS

>
> I doubt if he'll ever receive this "LETTER," as there is no such place.

Sure there is Davey.

>> Do you REALLY think that mailing a letter from across the line into
>> Indiana
>>showing a GARY, INDIANA postmark is going to FOOL PEOPLE? WOW what a
>>GIANT
>>INTELLECT!

> What are you babbling about now?

Your STUPID letter to the "LEGAL RESIDENT" Davey. Thanks for the DNA
sample BTW.

>> Yes Davey it was hand delivered to me by somebody and turned over to
>> the
>>proper AUTHORITIES yesterday. By the way I - IDIOT - thanks much for the
>>DNA sample.
>
> No problem. At first I didn't understand why Barbara refused to swallow
> (she almost always does) or why she had that glass test tube on the
> nightstand.
>
>> MISTER ANONYMOUS.... Forget the FINGERPRINTS... Hey DIPSHIT
>>remember when you were in the Marines?????? Remember when they took DNA
>>from
>>you? GOD you are a MORON! No wonder they kicked your STUPID ass out.
>>
>>
>> THANKS AGAIN - RUN DAVEY RUN...
>
> (yawn) Got any new material, Ken? The "law enforcement is going to get
> you" gag is really worn out.

Davey your DNA was all over the envelope! You're a MORON!


Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 16, 2008, 12:42:36 PM5/16/08
to

" krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:2NiXj.775$_g.137@trnddc07...
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 16, 2008, 12:49:12 PM5/16/08
to

" krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:GOiXj.832$_g.742@trnddc07...
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


dragonsgirl

unread,
May 16, 2008, 5:14:33 PM5/16/08
to
According to mapquest there is no city called 'calumet city' in Indiana.
http://www.mapquest.com/maps/850+buffalo+avenue+calumet+city+in/
According to mapquest there is a city called 'calumet city' in Illinois.

"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
news:5722f55bf292fbab...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...

Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 16, 2008, 5:24:03 PM5/16/08
to
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Kent Wills

unread,
May 16, 2008, 10:05:11 PM5/16/08
to

Where is the post edit?

http://groups.google.com/group/soc.men/msg/2ff92349d9b3f134

Once again you are proved to be the pathological liar you are.
And there is still no need for you to keep offering undeniable
proof that you're a bigot.

Kent Wills

unread,
May 16, 2008, 10:07:55 PM5/16/08
to
On Fri, 16 May 2008 16:06:35 +0200, freedom
<about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>On Thu, 15 May 2008, " krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote:
>>OPEN LETTER TO A MORON NAMED DAVID DANIEL MOORE OF 850 BUFFALO AVENUE,
>>CALUMET CITY, INDIANA
>
>I doubt if he'll ever receive this "LETTER," as there is no such place.
>

The ONLY reference to Calumet City, Indiana I can find is from
Kenny-Bob. I think it's more proof, if any were needed, that he has a
mental illness that forces him to lie. And about the dumbest things.

>>
>> Moore I have been telling you for a DECADE that you are a mongoloid.
>
>Yes, projection is one of your traits.

I don't think Kenny-Bob is Asian. The pictures I've seen of him
are not of an Asian male.
Kenny-Bob has opted to express his hate for Asians. Not that he
hasn't done so MANY times in the past.

>
>> Do
>>you REALLY think that mailing a letter from across the line into Indiana
>>showing a GARY, INDIANA postmark is going to FOOL PEOPLE? WOW what a GIANT
>>INTELLECT!
>>
>
>What are you babbling about now?
>

Given Kenny-Bob's lack of education, I seriously doubt he knows.

>> Yes Davey it was hand delivered to me by somebody and turned over to the
>>proper AUTHORITIES yesterday. By the way I - IDIOT - thanks much for the
>>DNA sample.
>
>No problem. At first I didn't understand why Barbara refused to swallow
>(she almost always does) or why she had that glass test tube on the
>nightstand.

While there is NO question that Kenny-Bob deserves everything he
gets in life, attacking his wife, who has NO part in this, is over the
line, David.
You are better than this, David.

>
>> MISTER ANONYMOUS.... Forget the FINGERPRINTS... Hey DIPSHIT
>>remember when you were in the Marines?????? Remember when they took DNA from
>>you? GOD you are a MORON! No wonder they kicked your STUPID ass out.
>>
>>
>> THANKS AGAIN - RUN DAVEY RUN...
>
>(yawn) Got any new material, Ken? The "law enforcement is going to get
>you" gag is really worn out.
>

I'm still waiting for me to get into trouble over Kenny-Bob's
bigotry.
The dullard is BIG on threats, but very low on actually doing
anything.

>http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
>criminals
>

"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest

Kent Wills

unread,
May 16, 2008, 10:12:17 PM5/16/08
to
On Fri, 16 May 2008 16:41:10 GMT, " krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote:

>
>"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
>news:5722f55bf292fbab...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>
>>>OPEN LETTER TO A MORON NAMED DAVID DANIEL MOORE OF 850 BUFFALO AVENUE,

>>>CALUMET CITY, INDIANA


>>
>> I doubt if he'll ever receive this "LETTER," as there is no such place.
>
>Sure there is Davey.

You can post edit all you want. I doubt anyone but you is fooled
by it.

>
>>> Do you REALLY think that mailing a letter from across the line into
>>> Indiana
>>>showing a GARY, INDIANA postmark is going to FOOL PEOPLE? WOW what a
>>>GIANT
>>>INTELLECT!
>
>> What are you babbling about now?
>
> Your STUPID letter to the "LEGAL RESIDENT" Davey. Thanks for the DNA
>sample BTW.
>
>>> Yes Davey it was hand delivered to me by somebody and turned over to
>>> the
>>>proper AUTHORITIES yesterday. By the way I - IDIOT - thanks much for the
>>>DNA sample.
>>
>> No problem. At first I didn't understand why Barbara refused to swallow
>> (she almost always does) or why she had that glass test tube on the
>> nightstand.
>>
>>> MISTER ANONYMOUS.... Forget the FINGERPRINTS... Hey DIPSHIT
>>>remember when you were in the Marines?????? Remember when they took DNA
>>>from
>>>you? GOD you are a MORON! No wonder they kicked your STUPID ass out.
>>>
>>>
>>> THANKS AGAIN - RUN DAVEY RUN...
>>
>> (yawn) Got any new material, Ken? The "law enforcement is going to get
>> you" gag is really worn out.
>
> Davey your DNA was all over the envelope! You're a MORON!
>

His finger prints may well have been all over the envelope (this
pretends you aren't lying about his sending a letter), but from a
practical POV, the only DNA would be where he licked the envelope.
And David would be smart enough to either use a sponge or a "Peal and
Seal" type envelope.

Kent Wills

unread,
May 16, 2008, 10:13:52 PM5/16/08
to
On Fri, 16 May 2008 16:14:33 -0500, "dragonsgirl"
<drago...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>According to mapquest there is no city called 'calumet city' in Indiana.
>http://www.mapquest.com/maps/850+buffalo+avenue+calumet+city+in/
>According to mapquest there is a city called 'calumet city' in Illinois.
>

The sole reference to Calumet City, Indiana I can find comes from
Ken.
My first presumption upon reading it was that Ken wrote Indiana in
error. Since he didn't claim it was in error (he did a post edit to
try and hide what he wrote) it's clear it was an intentional act.
Kenny-Bob lied.
More proof, if any were needed, that Kenny-Bob has a deep rooted
psychological NEED to lie.


>"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
>news:5722f55bf292fbab...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>
>> On Thu, 15 May 2008, " krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote:
>>>OPEN LETTER TO A MORON NAMED DAVID DANIEL MOORE OF 850 BUFFALO AVENUE,
>>>CALUMET CITY, INDIANA
>>
>> I doubt if he'll ever receive this "LETTER," as there is no such place.

"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest

krp

unread,
May 17, 2008, 5:11:26 AM5/17/08
to

"dragonsgirl" <drago...@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:XOmXj.285$Q57...@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com...

> According to mapquest there is no city called 'calumet city' in Indiana.
> http://www.mapquest.com/maps/850+buffalo+avenue+calumet+city+in/
> According to mapquest there is a city called 'calumet city' in Illinois.

BINGO... CALUMENT CITY, ILLINOIS. 850 Buffalo Avenue the FUEHRER
BUNKER HQS!!

krp

unread,
May 17, 2008, 5:12:59 AM5/17/08
to
"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:rles24t5f3cph9mds...@4ax.com...

>> Davey your DNA was all over the envelope! You're a MORON!

> His finger prints may well have been all over the envelope (this
> pretends you aren't lying about his sending a letter), but from a
> practical POV, the only DNA would be where he licked the envelope.
> And David would be smart enough to either use a sponge or a "Peal and
> Seal" type envelope.

No - he's a Polack just like You Kunt. Licked the tab like a MORON!
Nice DNA sample.


Greegor

unread,
May 17, 2008, 6:16:54 AM5/17/08
to
BW > According to mapquest there is no city called 'calumet city' in
Indiana.

Who started this brain fart about calumet city being in indiana?

http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2007/06/10/news/porter_county/docc35ea9cd21c834f1862572f4007bfc11.txt

Sunday, June 10, 2007
ARRESTS
Monday through Friday [ June 4 to June 8 ]
Battery David Moore, 36, Calumet City

David Daniel Moore court records: David D. Moore
DOB 9/26/70 850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, IL
case 64D 060706FD 4989 Monday June 4th 2007
Class D Felony, Assault on somebody under 14 years old
pretrial was February 8th 8:30 for Mar 12 hearing

hearing rescheduled for July 22 at 8:30AM

The North Porter County complex is in Portage, Indiana
219 759 8219 no e-records, won't fax or e-mail records
paid $2000 bond, Attorney Robert Harper Portage, Indiana
does not have a probation officer pre-trial

BOLINGBROOK, IL
TWENTYNINE PALMS, CA (Marine Base)
LOS ANGELES, CA
CALUMET CITY, IL (850 Buffalo Ave, Janet M. Moore)
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL

http://www.cookcountyassessor.com/filings/searchflat//searchdetails001.asp?issearch=true&pin=30182330330000

Cook County Assessor's Office: Property Search Details
Property Index Number: 30-18-233-033-0000
View Property Picture
View Property Map
Address : 850 Buffalo Ave
City : Calumet City
Township : Thornton
Neighborhood : 61
Taxcode : 37030
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessed Valuation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2007
Assessor Certified Assessment 2006
Board of Review Certified
Land Assessed Value 2,521
2,521
Building Assessed Value 14,957
14,957
Total Assessed Value 17,478
17,478
Estimated Market Value 109,238
109,238

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Property Characteristics
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Class: 2-11

Description : Two to Six Apartments, Over 62 Years

Residence Type Two Story
Use Multi Family
Apartments Two
Exterior Construction Masonry
Full Baths 2
Half Baths 0
Basement1 Partial and Rec Room
Attic None
Central Air No
Number of Fireplaces 1
Garage Size/Type2 2.5 car detached
Building Square Footage: 1,752
Land Square Footage 6,304
Assessment Pass Assessor Certified
Age: 24
Land Square Footage: 6,304
1 Excluded from Building Square footage, except apartment
2 Excluded from Building Square footage
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2007 Assessment Appeal Information
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No appeal filed for this year.
Other Information:
Return to Search Results New Search
Cook County Assessor's Office (Main) County Building, Third Floor
118 North Clark Street, Chicago, IL 60602 (312) 443-7550

Kent Wills

unread,
May 17, 2008, 6:32:45 AM5/17/08
to

Prove it.
First prove the letter was sent. A scan of the letter showing it
was mailed from Gary, Indiana (canceled stamp) serve as proof for me.
Next, prove that it was David who sent it. Proving his DNA is on
the envelope will serve as proof for me.
If I were a betting man, I'd put all I have that you'll never do
either. And I would win.

Kent Wills

unread,
May 17, 2008, 6:36:06 AM5/17/08
to

In Message-ID: <_v%Wj.17873$%X1.15679@trnddc08>, you wrote,


"OPEN LETTER TO A MORON NAMED DAVID DANIEL MOORE OF 850 BUFFALO

AVENUE, CALUMET CITY, INDIANA..."
Since you've not stated you wrote Indiana in error, it's clear
you meant to write it.
What aspect of your mental illness forced you to claim Calumet
City is in Indiana when you knew it was not? This is a serious
question.

Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 17, 2008, 7:39:30 AM5/17/08
to
On May 17, 6:36 am, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 17, 2008, 7:45:05 AM5/17/08
to

dragonsgirl

unread,
May 17, 2008, 9:01:13 AM5/17/08
to

"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:233654f2-8d93-41f2...@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...

> BW > According to mapquest there is no city called 'calumet city' in
> Indiana.
>
> Who started this brain fart about calumet city being in indiana?

Ken

Kent Wills

unread,
May 17, 2008, 10:01:35 AM5/17/08
to
On Sat, 17 May 2008 03:16:54 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<Gree...@gmail.com> wrote:

>BW > According to mapquest there is no city called 'calumet city' in
>Indiana.
>
>Who started this brain fart about calumet city being in indiana?

Your hero, Kenneth Robert Pangborn. He doesn't seem to know in
which state the town is located.

" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson

krp

unread,
May 17, 2008, 10:09:10 PM5/17/08
to
"KUnt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:lsct24d6lioerb0ap...@4ax.com...

>>
>>>> Davey your DNA was all over the envelope! You're a MORON!
>>
>>> His finger prints may well have been all over the envelope (this
>>> pretends you aren't lying about his sending a letter), but from a
>>> practical POV, the only DNA would be where he licked the envelope.
>>> And David would be smart enough to either use a sponge or a "Peal and
>>> Seal" type envelope.
>>
>> No - he's a Polack just like You Kunt. Licked the tab like a MORON!
>>Nice DNA sample.

Childish STUPID Polack tantrum to follow:

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it


> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

> Prove it

Kent Wills

unread,
May 18, 2008, 7:21:12 AM5/18/08
to
On Sun, 18 May 2008 02:09:10 GMT, " krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote:

>"KUnt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:lsct24d6lioerb0ap...@4ax.com...
>
>>>
>>>>> Davey your DNA was all over the envelope! You're a MORON!
>>>
>>>> His finger prints may well have been all over the envelope (this
>>>> pretends you aren't lying about his sending a letter), but from a
>>>> practical POV, the only DNA would be where he licked the envelope.
>>>> And David would be smart enough to either use a sponge or a "Peal and
>>>> Seal" type envelope.
>>>
>>> No - he's a Polack just like You Kunt. Licked the tab like a MORON!
>>>Nice DNA sample.
>
>Childish STUPID Polack tantrum to follow:
>

What tantrum?
Do you mean the post edit you did?
Should anyone actually believe what you posted, they can check
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.men/msg/cd2f93f59d2caf1f and see
that you did do a post edit. But then, you did state you love to post
edit, so it shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone that you did it.
Your mental illness once again forced you to lie.
You NEED professional mental health care. I'm being very
serious.

>> Prove it.
>> First prove the letter was sent. A scan of the letter showing it
>>was mailed from Gary, Indiana (canceled stamp) serve as proof for me.
>> Next, prove that it was David who sent it. Proving his DNA is on
>>the envelope will serve as proof for me.
>> If I were a betting man, I'd put all I have that you'll never do
>>either. And I would win.


I note you are unable to prove anything. Little wonder since you
were lying. Again. Or is that still?

krp

unread,
May 18, 2008, 8:07:19 AM5/18/08
to

"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2kfv24dt4t51hfh9e...@4ax.com...

>>>>
>>>>>> Davey your DNA was all over the envelope! You're a MORON!
>>>>
>>>>> His finger prints may well have been all over the envelope (this
>>>>> pretends you aren't lying about his sending a letter), but from a
>>>>> practical POV, the only DNA would be where he licked the envelope.
>>>>> And David would be smart enough to either use a sponge or a "Peal and
>>>>> Seal" type envelope.
>>>>
>>>> No - he's a Polack just like You Kunt. Licked the tab like a MORON!
>>>>Nice DNA sample.
>>
>>Childish STUPID Polack tantrum to follow:

> What tantrum?

Kunt - DNA is NOT a "point of view." It either exists or it doesn't. In
this case your MORON buddy licked the envelope. Nice DNA sample.


Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 18, 2008, 8:59:37 AM5/18/08
to
On May 18, 8:07 am, " krp" <krp24...@verizon.net> wrote:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Kent Wills

unread,
May 18, 2008, 9:52:53 AM5/18/08
to
On Sun, 18 May 2008 12:07:19 GMT, " krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote:

>
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:2kfv24dt4t51hfh9e...@4ax.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Davey your DNA was all over the envelope! You're a MORON!
>>>>>
>>>>>> His finger prints may well have been all over the envelope (this
>>>>>> pretends you aren't lying about his sending a letter), but from a
>>>>>> practical POV, the only DNA would be where he licked the envelope.
>>>>>> And David would be smart enough to either use a sponge or a "Peal and
>>>>>> Seal" type envelope.
>>>>>
>>>>> No - he's a Polack just like You Kunt. Licked the tab like a MORON!
>>>>>Nice DNA sample.
>>>
>>>Childish STUPID Polack tantrum to follow:
>
>> What tantrum?

>> Do you mean the post edit you did?
>> Should anyone actually believe what you posted, they can check
>>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.men/msg/cd2f93f59d2caf1f and see
>>that you did do a post edit. But then, you did state you love to post
>>edit, so it shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone that you did it.
>> Your mental illness once again forced you to lie.
>> You NEED professional mental health care. I'm being very
>>serious.
>>
>>>> Prove it.
>>>> First prove the letter was sent. A scan of the letter showing it
>>>>was mailed from Gary, Indiana (canceled stamp) serve as proof for me.
>>>> Next, prove that it was David who sent it. Proving his DNA is on
>>>>the envelope will serve as proof for me.
>>>> If I were a betting man, I'd put all I have that you'll never do
>>>>either. And I would win.
>>
>>
>> I note you are unable to prove anything. Little wonder since you
>>were lying. Again. Or is that still?
>>
>>
>>
>

> Kunt - DNA is NOT a "point of view."

Your reply does not address the points I raised. Little
wonder since you can't address them without lying.
You're dishonest avoidance aside, you claimed the DNA "...was all
over the envelope!" It's unlikely any actual DNA is available
anywhere other than the glue area on the back. If any DNA did
transfer from the fingers to the envelope, it's unlikely to be of any
use. Others will have handled the envelope, contaminating any DNA
transferred.
Even someone with your limited education should be able to
understand such a concept.

>It either exists or it doesn't. In
>this case your MORON buddy licked the envelope. Nice DNA sample.
>

In order for your claim of his DNA being all over the envelope,
as you present it, to be true, he would have needed to lick the whole
of the envelope. You can't be so mentally ill that you actually think
this would have happened, can you? Really?

Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 18, 2008, 9:53:47 AM5/18/08
to
On May 18, 9:52 am, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

krp

unread,
May 18, 2008, 11:58:39 AM5/18/08
to
NUTBAG
"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:vlc034hcbclu3o49m...@4ax.com...

>> Kunt - DNA is NOT a "point of view."
>
> Your reply does not address the points I raised. Little
> wonder since you can't address them without lying.
> You're dishonest avoidance aside, you claimed the DNA "...was all
> over the envelope!" It's unlikely any actual DNA is available
> anywhere other than the glue area on the back.

Not just SUPREME COURT JUSTICE Wills and ATTORNEY WILLS but now FORENSIC
SCIENTIST Wills to boot. You're just a jack of all trades ain't ya, Kunt? No
DNA in the oil on our bodies? So now you are also HEAD of CSI! You're an
AMAZING dude there Kunt. I have yet to see ANY subject on which you don't
hold yourself out as a CERTIFIED AAAAAAA++++++ EXPERT! And we've hit a bunch
of topics from Cuba to broadcast electronics to law, to biology and now
FORENSIC SCIENCES..... How many PhD's do you have Kunt? 20? 50? 200? 2,000?
How many fields do you claim expertise in there Kunt?
You're really ONE OF A KIND Kunt.

Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 18, 2008, 12:32:53 PM5/18/08
to
On May 18, 11:58 am, " krp" <krp24...@verizon.net> wrote:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Kent Wills

unread,
May 18, 2008, 12:48:16 PM5/18/08
to
On Sun, 18 May 2008 15:58:39 GMT, " krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote:

>NUTBAG
>"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:vlc034hcbclu3o49m...@4ax.com...
>
>>> Kunt - DNA is NOT a "point of view."
>>
>> Your reply does not address the points I raised. Little
>> wonder since you can't address them without lying.
>> You're dishonest avoidance aside, you claimed the DNA "...was all
>> over the envelope!" It's unlikely any actual DNA is available

>> anywhere other than the glue area on the back. If any DNA did
>>transfer from the fingers to the envelope, it's unlikely to be of any
>>use. Others will have handled the envelope, contaminating any DNA
>>transferred.
>> Even someone with your limited education should be able to
>>understand such a concept.
>

>Not just SUPREME COURT JUSTICE Wills and ATTORNEY WILLS but now FORENSIC
>SCIENTIST Wills to boot.

Outside of your mental illness, I'm not a judge, an attorney nor
a forensic scientist.
You really need to seek professional help for your mental
illness. I'm being VERY serious.

>You're just a jack of all trades ain't ya, Kunt? No
>DNA in the oil on our bodies?

Trouble reading? Note where I wrote, as can be seen above, "If


any DNA did transfer from the fingers to the envelope, it's unlikely
to be of any use. Others will have handled the envelope,
contaminating any DNA transferred."

I realize you don't have any formal education (you bought your
degrees from a diploma mill), but even you should be able to
understand the concept presented.
Perhaps I over-estimated your intellectual abilities once again.

>So now you are also HEAD of CSI! You're an
>AMAZING dude there Kunt. I have yet to see ANY subject on which you don't
>hold yourself out as a CERTIFIED AAAAAAA++++++ EXPERT!

Outside of your mental illness, there is no such certification.

>And we've hit a bunch
>of topics from Cuba to broadcast electronics to law, to biology and now
>FORENSIC SCIENCES..... How many PhD's do you have Kunt? 20? 50? 200? 2,000?

>How many fields do you claim expertise in there Kent?

You're the one with the mental illness that forces you to think
I'm an expert in so many fields.
What is the root cause of your mental illness? This is a serious
question. I'd like to know just what caused you to lose all contact
with reality.

>You're really ONE OF A KIND Kunt.
>

I understand you know very little of female anatomy, but there is
no way for me, a male, to have a vagina without undergoing a sex
change operation. The pictures of me you claim to have (another of
your MANY lies) show me to be male.
Next Kenneth Robert Pangborn pathological lie, please.

krp

unread,
May 18, 2008, 12:54:13 PM5/18/08
to
"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:8um034931a6u1rm4c...@4ax.com...

>>Not just SUPREME COURT JUSTICE Wills and ATTORNEY WILLS but now FORENSIC
>>SCIENTIST Wills to boot.

> Outside of your mental illness, I'm not a judge, an attorney nor
> a forensic scientist.

At this point KUNT - everyone on the planet KNOWS THAT!

>
>>So now you are also HEAD of CSI! You're an
>>AMAZING dude there Kunt. I have yet to see ANY subject on which you don't
>>hold yourself out as a CERTIFIED AAAAAAA++++++ EXPERT!
>
> Outside of your mental illness, there is no such certification.

YOU are the ONLY one who believes you have it, however!


Kent Wills

unread,
May 18, 2008, 9:43:32 PM5/18/08
to
On Sun, 18 May 2008 16:54:13 GMT, " krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote:

>"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:8um034931a6u1rm4c...@4ax.com...
>
>>>Not just SUPREME COURT JUSTICE Wills and ATTORNEY WILLS but now FORENSIC
>>>SCIENTIST Wills to boot.
>
>> Outside of your mental illness, I'm not a judge, an attorney nor
>> a forensic scientist.
>
> At this point KUNT - everyone on the planet KNOWS THAT!

I consistently mention it, so most should know.
It's truly sad that your mental illness forces you to believe I
am that which I consistently state I am not. And it's clear that you
believe I am all of the above, since with the exception of forensic
scientist, you claim I am the rest nearly every day.
I do expect your mental illness to have you claim I'm any number
of scientists in short order.
BTW, why not address the actual topic? The non-existent (you've
offered nothing but your word) envelope and how you claim usable DNA
is all over it.
I know, you want to get away from that claim, since you can see
it's about to blow up in your face, metaphorically speaking, but I'm
going to keep bringing you back.
You may admit you've been lying, if you wish.

>
>>
>>>So now you are also HEAD of CSI! You're an
>>>AMAZING dude there Kunt. I have yet to see ANY subject on which you don't
>>>hold yourself out as a CERTIFIED AAAAAAA++++++ EXPERT!
>>
>> Outside of your mental illness, there is no such certification.
>
> YOU are the ONLY one who believes you have it, however!
>

I keep pointing out the certification doesn't exist. It's a
certification your mental illness has invented.
What is the root cause of your mental illness creating a
delusional world in which such a certification exists? I'm very
curious and it's a very serious question.

freedom

unread,
May 19, 2008, 2:31:22 AM5/19/08
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Also, it would be impossible for Ken to know whether such DNA exists. This
would require a lab with extensive testing equipment and methodology.
Which would also take time and money, neither of which any such lab is
going to expend for something like what Ken is claiming. (On his listserv,
he's claiming that I sent a letter to the new residents of his
house....which, if true, wouldn't involve him at all.)

And, even if we lived in some fantasy world where a law enforcement agency
actually cared about getting some such envelope analyzed, (a) the results
would not have been returned so quickly and (b) Ken would not have access
to the results.

Oh, and then there's his lie about the matching of my DNA with my military
records. Small problem....such DNA is used for identification purposes,
and can't be used for something like what Ken is claiming.


>
>
>"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
>fan and GAY lover."
> Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-Team, LYING
>and claiming David Moore is his gay lover. Message-ID:
><_MlOj.598$pH4.7@trnddc06>

http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com


The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals

"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
- --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **,
in a verbal threat to his girlfriend

"...my aunt wouldnt come over to our house anymore because of how he would
talk to her and come on to her....and he had over 180 pictures of her on
his computer"
- --Ken Pangborn's former stepdaughter Megan, on growing up in the Pangborn
household


** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQA/AwUBSDBRv6bdsu4taRc6EQKNTACgwEhrfrYbvHaKCNVpAap+H1KYrq8AnRDf
h7FEFtHrdvAP/EZUupba4C4g
=EFVv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 19, 2008, 7:46:12 AM5/19/08
to
On May 18, 12:54 pm, " krp" <krp24...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Kunt Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message

The consensus is you're lying, piggy.

Greegor

unread,
May 19, 2008, 6:36:39 PM5/19/08
to
G > Who started this brain fart about calumet city being in indiana?

BW > Ken

Got a LINK?

Greegor

unread,
May 19, 2008, 6:45:34 PM5/19/08
to
DDM > Oh, and then there's his lie about the
DDM > matching of my DNA with my military
DDM > records.  Small problem....such DNA
DDM > is used for identification purposes,
DDM > and can't be used for something
DDM > like what Ken is claiming.

Got a cite to some law that says that
fingerprints and DNA from the military
cannot be used in a criminal investigation
and prosecution?

Kent Wills

unread,
May 19, 2008, 6:47:44 PM5/19/08
to

Has anyone noticed how as soon as I proved, again, that Kenneth
Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-Team, LIED, he ran away?

Ken has the time, but not the money. If he had the money, he
would pay his creditors what he morally, if no longer legally, owes
them.

>neither of which any such lab is
>going to expend for something like what Ken is claiming. (On his listserv,
>he's claiming that I sent a letter to the new residents of his
>house....which, if true, wouldn't involve him at all.)

The really funny thing, IMO, is that he's not yet sold the home.
As of 5:45AM, give or take a minute, today, it was still listed on the
web site as for sale.

>
>And, even if we lived in some fantasy world where a law enforcement agency
>actually cared about getting some such envelope analyzed, (a) the results
>would not have been returned so quickly and (b) Ken would not have access
>to the results.
>
>Oh, and then there's his lie about the matching of my DNA with my military
>records. Small problem....such DNA is used for identification purposes,
>and can't be used for something like what Ken is claiming.

Kenny-Bob is not one to let reality get in the way.

>>
>>
>>"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
>>fan and GAY lover."
>> Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-Team, LYING
>>and claiming David Moore is his gay lover. Message-ID:
>><_MlOj.598$pH4.7@trnddc06>
>
>
>
>
>
>http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
>criminals
>


--
"Maybe he's like me to attach some kiddie porn to aid his fantasies?"
Ken Pangborn expressing his fondness for child porn in Message-ID:
<RECUi.494$Q%3.238@trnddc04>

Kent Wills

unread,
May 19, 2008, 6:51:41 PM5/19/08
to


Message-ID: <_v%Wj.17873$%X1.15679@trnddc08>

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/0525d0cc9aafcf5f

But you already knew that. It's the first post in this thread.


"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
Message-ID: <35120b16.04011...@posting.google.com>

Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 19, 2008, 7:01:58 PM5/19/08
to

GFYS, greg.

Kent Wills

unread,
May 19, 2008, 7:13:59 PM5/19/08
to

Where has anyone claimed they can't?
Further, what criminal offence do you claim David committed in
sending the letter (pretending for a moment he did)?
Why are you stalking and harassing past and current members of
alt.friends?


--

"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll
cripple you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out,

I'll be able to walk,but you will still be a cripple."
--Greg Hanson, in a verbal threat to his girlfriend

Greegor

unread,
May 19, 2008, 7:41:20 PM5/19/08
to
DDM > Oh, and then there's his lie about the
DDM > matching of my DNA with my military
DDM > records. Small problem....such DNA
DDM > is used for identification purposes,
DDM > and can't be used for something
DDM > like what Ken is claiming.

G > Got a cite to some law that says that
G > fingerprints and DNA from the military
G > cannot be used in a criminal investigation
G > and prosecution?

KW > Where has anyone claimed they can't?

--------------------------------------
DDM > DNA is used for identification
DDM > purposes, and can't be used for
DDM > something like what Ken is claiming.
-------------------------------------

KW > Further, what criminal offence do you
KW > claim David committed in sending the
KW > letter (pretending for a moment he did)?

Got a link to where somebody said that?

KW > Why are you stalking and harassing
KW > past and current members of alt.friends?

DS > GFYS, greg.

I'm always glad to cheer you up, Dan!

Kent Wills

unread,
May 19, 2008, 9:44:15 PM5/19/08
to
On Mon, 19 May 2008 16:41:20 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<Gree...@gmail.com> wrote:

>DDM > Oh, and then there's his lie about the
>DDM > matching of my DNA with my military
>DDM > records. Small problem....such DNA
>DDM > is used for identification purposes,
>DDM > and can't be used for something
>DDM > like what Ken is claiming.
>
>G > Got a cite to some law that says that
>G > fingerprints and DNA from the military
>G > cannot be used in a criminal investigation
>G > and prosecution?
>
>KW > Where has anyone claimed they can't?
>
>--------------------------------------
>DDM > DNA is used for identification
>DDM > purposes, and can't be used for
>DDM > something like what Ken is claiming.
>-------------------------------------
>

Again I ask, where has anyone claimed they can't?
Kenny-Bob isn't claiming the DNA is being used for any criminal
investigation. This claim is your lie alone.

>KW > Further, what criminal offence do you
>KW > claim David committed in sending the
>KW > letter (pretending for a moment he did)?
>
>Got a link to where somebody said that?

If you're going to lie, don't include the proof of you lie in
your post.
As can be read above, you wrote, "Got a cite to some law that says
that fingerprints and DNA from the military cannot be used in a
criminal investigation and prosecution?"
Your question implies that Ken's use of the DNA on the fictional
envelope (Kenny-Bob has been unable to offer anything to support the
claim the letter was sent) is for a criminal case. Not even Kenny-Bob
has suggested this is the case. Of course, you do have the unique
ability to make Ken look honest.
Can you offer a cite to support your innuendo?
Didn't think so.

>
>KW > Why are you stalking and harassing
>KW > past and current members of alt.friends?
>

Care to answer the question? In the past you've only played the
avoidance game.

>DS > GFYS, greg.
>
>I'm always glad to cheer you up, Dan!

It would cheer me up greatly to know the root cause of your
psychological NEED to stalk and harass past and current members of
alt.friends.
And why, exactly, are you combining my post and Dan's? What is
the root cause of this specific mental defect you display? Serious
question.


--
"I am erudite [sic] but not Buckelyesque"
GregWhore Hanson, Jan 22, 2008

krp

unread,
May 20, 2008, 4:44:36 AM5/20/08
to

"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:a23017ca-cfd5-42aa...@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

ATTORNEY DAVID DIPSHIT MOORE OFFERS HIS LEGAL OPINION

Again we have Moore and Wills engaging in the MALpractice of law on
Usenet!


krp

unread,
May 20, 2008, 8:35:01 AM5/20/08
to
STUPID AS USUAL
"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:la2434pu4rnqvt593...@4ax.com...

> On Mon, 19 May 2008 15:45:34 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>DDM > Oh, and then there's his lie about the
>>DDM > matching of my DNA with my military
>>DDM > records. Small problem....such DNA
>>DDM > is used for identification purposes,
>>DDM > and can't be used for something
>>DDM > like what Ken is claiming.
>>
>>Got a cite to some law that says that
>>fingerprints and DNA from the military
>>cannot be used in a criminal investigation
>>and prosecution?
>
> Where has anyone claimed they can't?

Go slowly Kunt. Go to the top and your HERO DAVID DANIEL MOORE. See the
"can't be used" bullshit from him?


krp

unread,
May 20, 2008, 8:37:45 AM5/20/08
to
"Kunt (dumb Polack) Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:hla43490j71c3sk6c...@4ax.com...

HEY DUMBASS.. Read what your MASTER - DAVID DANIEL MOORE said.. REPLAY for
the THINKING IMPAIRED

GET IT now DUMBASS?


dragonsgirl

unread,
May 20, 2008, 9:28:29 AM5/20/08
to

"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4d1ac19e-c0d9-4f98...@m45g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...

>G > Who started this brain fart about calumet city being in indiana?
>
> BW > Ken
>
> Got a LINK?

What, you don't read the threads?
I agree with Dan, GFYS.


Greegor

unread,
May 20, 2008, 2:39:48 PM5/20/08
to
DDM > Oh, and then there's his lie about the
DDM > matching of my DNA with my military
DDM > records. Small problem....such DNA
DDM > is used for identification purposes,
DDM > and can't be used for something
DDM > like what Ken is claiming.

G > Got a cite to some law that says that
G > fingerprints and DNA from the military
G > cannot be used in a criminal investigation
G > and prosecution?

KW > Where has anyone claimed they can't?

KRP > Go slowly Kunt. Go to the top and your
KRP > HERO DAVID DANIEL MOORE. See
KRP > the "can't be used" bullshit from him?

Got a link or a legal code citation that
prohibits military DNA or fingerprints
from being used for prosecution?

Kent Wills

unread,
May 20, 2008, 6:39:01 PM5/20/08
to

Of course he did. GregWhore is, once again, lying via innuendo.
It's what he does.

>I agree with Dan, GFYS.
>

GregWhore is only interested, sexually, in underage girls. As an
adult male, GregWhore has no interest in himself.


--
"Excuse me. Have you seen a blowfish driving a sports car?"
"Bloody Torchwood!"

Kent Wills

unread,
May 20, 2008, 6:39:36 PM5/20/08
to

What criminal act and investigation are you alleging?

Kent Wills

unread,
May 20, 2008, 6:40:06 PM5/20/08
to
On Tue, 20 May 2008 12:35:01 GMT, " krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote:

>STUPID AS USUAL

Yet still your intellectual superior.

No comment regarding criminal investigations can be found in the
quote.
He states it can't be used in the manner you claim. You've not
claimed any law was broken in sending the letter (pretending it was
sent), so no criminal investigation can be in progress.
Next Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-Team,
pathological lie, please.

Kent Wills

unread,
May 20, 2008, 6:40:52 PM5/20/08
to
On Tue, 20 May 2008 12:37:45 GMT, " krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote:

>"Kunt

You're gay. We got it. We don't care.


>(dumb Polack)

You're a bigot. We got it. Move on.

>> As can be read above, you wrote, "Got a cite to some law that says
>>that fingerprints and DNA from the military cannot be used in a
>>criminal investigation and prosecution?"
>> Your question implies that Ken's use of the DNA on the fictional
>>envelope (Kenny-Bob has been unable to offer anything to support the
>>claim the letter was sent) is for a criminal case. Not even Kenny-Bob
>>has suggested this is the case. Of course, you do have the unique
>>ability to make Ken look honest.
>> Can you offer a cite to support your innuendo?
>> Didn't think so.
>

>HEY DUMBASS

What a nasty thing to call GregWhore. Just because he got
confused by your lying is no reason to call him a dumb ass. He
probably has some mental retardation that makes seeing your lies for
what they are difficult.

Nice meltdown, K00K.


>GET IT now DUMBASS?
>

You once accused GregWhore of committing multiple felonies with
NOTHING to support the accusations, now you call him a dumb ass for
believing your LIES.
It's no wonder you have no friends.

Greegor

unread,
May 20, 2008, 9:43:15 PM5/20/08
to
DDM > Oh, and then there's his lie about the
DDM > matching of my DNA with my military
DDM > records. Small problem....such DNA
DDM > is used for identification purposes,
DDM > and can't be used for something
DDM > like what Ken is claiming.

G > Got a cite to some law that says that
G > fingerprints and DNA from the military
G > cannot be used in a criminal investigation
G > and prosecution?

KRP > Again we have Moore and Wills engaging
KRP > in the MALpractice of law on Usenet!

KW > What criminal act and investigation are you alleging?

Dave said "can't be used" not isn't being used.

krp

unread,
May 20, 2008, 9:46:22 PM5/20/08
to

"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:40e4db14-c156-474b...@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com...

Kent is DEMANDING to know the "criminal act." "STALKING" Kunt!


Kent Wills

unread,
May 20, 2008, 10:52:54 PM5/20/08
to

Can't be used for something like what Ken is claiming. Isn't in
interesting how the full context alters what you want to present?
Ken isn't claiming any criminal act was committed or being
investigated.
Next lie via innuendo, please.


--

"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll
cripple you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out,

I'll be able to walk,but you will still be a cripple."
--Greg Hanson, in a verbal threat to his girlfriend

Kent Wills

unread,
May 20, 2008, 10:54:01 PM5/20/08
to

You've not claimed any criminal act was committed. Sending a
letter is not criminal, in and of itself.
Of course, at this point, it's obvious no letter was sent.

freedom

unread,
May 21, 2008, 9:48:56 AM5/21/08
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Tue, 20 May 2008, Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 21 May 2008 01:46:22 GMT, " krp" <web2...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:40e4db14-c156-474b...@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>>> DDM > Oh, and then there's his lie about the
>>> DDM > matching of my DNA with my military
>>> DDM > records. Small problem....such DNA
>>> DDM > is used for identification purposes,
>>> DDM > and can't be used for something
>>> DDM > like what Ken is claiming.
>>>
>>> G > Got a cite to some law that says that
>>> G > fingerprints and DNA from the military
>>> G > cannot be used in a criminal investigation
>>> G > and prosecution?
>>>
>>> KRP > Again we have Moore and Wills engaging
>>> KRP > in the MALpractice of law on Usenet!
>>>
>>> KW > What criminal act and investigation are you alleging?
>>>
>>> Dave said "can't be used" not isn't being used.
>>
>>Kent is DEMANDING to know the "criminal act." "STALKING" Kunt!
>>
>
> You've not claimed any criminal act was committed. Sending a
>letter is not criminal, in and of itself.

Nor is sending a letter containing what Ken is claiming here and on his
listserv. His claim is that a letter was sent to another party (the
fictional new resident of his house) about him. At worst, the letter could
contain defamation, which would be civil, not criminal.

Unless the letter was soliciting the recipient's help in killing Ken or
some other criminal act, but Ken hasn't claimed that. Look for him to
update his lie to include that soon :)

> Of course, at this point, it's obvious no letter was sent.

If there was, he should be able to produce a scan of it. As it doesn't
exist, he'd have to find an existing letter and alter it....and he's still
humiliated from the fiasco with his faked boarding pass.

http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals

"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple


you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."

- --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **,

in a verbal threat to his girlfriend

"...my aunt wouldnt come over to our house anymore because of how he would


talk to her and come on to her....and he had over 180 pictures of her on
his computer"
- --Ken Pangborn's former stepdaughter Megan, on growing up in the Pangborn
household


** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQA/AwUBSDP++Kbdsu4taRc6EQLGKQCgyzSvOibFE3b3v0DK2Dy0wL6FTI4AoMaN
8oXe0MUDDZKl2S+ieuC9qFNH
=tmCT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Greegor

unread,
May 21, 2008, 12:00:39 PM5/21/08
to
DDM > Oh, and then there's his lie about the
DDM > matching of my DNA with my military
DDM > records. Small problem....such DNA
DDM > is used for identification purposes,
DDM > and can't be used for something
DDM > like what Ken is claiming.

G > Got a cite to some law that says that
G > fingerprints and DNA from the military
G > cannot be used in a criminal investigation
G > and prosecution?

KRP > Again we have Moore and Wills engaging
KRP > in the MALpractice of law on Usenet!

KW > What criminal act and investigation are you alleging?

G > Dave said "can't be used" not isn't being used.

8:46
KRP > Kent is DEMANDING to know the "criminal act." "STALKING"
Kunt!

9:52
KW > Can't be used for something like what
KW > Ken is claiming. Isn't in interesting how
KW > the full context alters what you want
KW > to present? Ken isn't claiming any
KW > criminal act was committed or being
KW > investigated. Next lie via innuendo, please.

You're still posting, Kent.

krp

unread,
May 21, 2008, 2:48:51 PM5/21/08
to
ATTORNEY DAVID MOORE - CALUMET CITY'S LEADING LEGAL AUTHORITY
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
news:a9ca4033c6701491...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

>>>> DDM > Oh, and then there's his lie about the
>>>> DDM > matching of my DNA with my military
>>>> DDM > records. Small problem....such DNA
>>>> DDM > is used for identification purposes,
>>>> DDM > and can't be used for something
>>>> DDM > like what Ken is claiming.
>>>>
>>>> G > Got a cite to some law that says that
>>>> G > fingerprints and DNA from the military
>>>> G > cannot be used in a criminal investigation
>>>> G > and prosecution?
>>>>
>>>> KRP > Again we have Moore and Wills engaging
>>>> KRP > in the MALpractice of law on Usenet!
>>>>
>>>> KW > What criminal act and investigation are you alleging?
>>>>
>>>> Dave said "can't be used" not isn't being used.
>>>
>>>Kent is DEMANDING to know the "criminal act." "STALKING" Kunt!
>>>
>>
>> You've not claimed any criminal act was committed. Sending a
>>letter is not criminal, in and of itself.

> Nor is sending a letter containing what Ken is claiming here and on his
> listserv. His claim is that a letter was sent to another party (the
> fictional new resident of his house) about him. At worst, the letter
> could
> contain defamation, which would be civil, not criminal.

Moore - are you denying you sent the letter?

Kent Wills

unread,
May 21, 2008, 8:24:12 PM5/21/08
to
On Wed, 21 May 2008 18:48:51 GMT, " krp" <web2...@verizon.net> wrote:

>ATTORNEY DAVID MOORE - CALUMET CITY'S LEADING LEGAL AUTHORITY


Outside of your mental illness, David is not a lawyer.

He's already done so.
Since you can't produce a scan of the letter/envelope, which
would serve as proof for me (others may require a higher standard of
proof) that it was sent, it's clear none was sent.
Even if it was sent, altering the new owner(s) of damage you've
admitted existed at one time (you've claimed the sink holes have been
fixed) wouldn't be illegal. Certainly you couldn't claim to be the
victim of any crime as the result of the letter being sent.

Kent Wills

unread,
May 21, 2008, 8:26:34 PM5/21/08
to

Did I claim, directly or through implication, that I wouldn't be
posting?
Why are you quoting out of order? You removed the part to which
I was actually replying. I was replying to you, not Ken.
What is the specific reason for deceptively implying I was
replying to Ken?

Kent Wills

unread,
May 21, 2008, 8:27:56 PM5/21/08
to
On Wed, 21 May 2008 12:27:29 -0500, TNKev <TNK...@gmail.com> wrote:

>greegwhore, usenet would be a better place if you were *not* posting.

At the very least, he could quote and post honestly. Sadly, this
is impossible for GregWhore. He really does have the unique ability
to make Pangborn look honest.


"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."

-- GregWhore Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child
abuser.
Message-ID: <35120b16.04011...@posting.google.com>

freedom

unread,
May 22, 2008, 3:11:24 AM5/22/08
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Wed, 21 May 2008, " krp" <web2...@verizon.net> wrote:
>ATTORNEY DAVID MOORE - CALUMET CITY'S LEADING LEGAL AUTHORITY

Nobody from Calumet City authored the post you're replying to.

Yes. Prove otherwise. Crickets on standby, and all that....

http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals

"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
- --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **,
in a verbal threat to his girlfriend

"...my aunt wouldnt come over to our house anymore because of how he would
talk to her and come on to her....and he had over 180 pictures of her on
his computer"
- --Ken Pangborn's former stepdaughter Megan, on growing up in the Pangborn
household


** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQA/AwUBSDSeWabdsu4taRc6EQJJdQCeJvWLFeAxHP7UV5O62cGgypau3QIAoNVc
L5WDk489rOG8kRzB/0JFEosR
=FoVB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


krp

unread,
May 22, 2008, 7:27:54 AM5/22/08
to

"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
news:845d5389006ff6cb...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Moore, you are ALWAYS and I do mean ALWAYS a "COWARD" who hides behind
being ANONYMOUS. You have NO other choice. You learned a long time ago that
your bullshit couldn't stand the light of day. You RUN from the light Davey.

Copy of a E-MAIL you have been sending out to Real Estate folks Davey boy.
In your FANATIC stalking.........

=====================================

-------- Original Message -------- From: - Thu May 22 06:25:21 2008
X-UIDL: 346683
X-Mozilla-Status: 0003
X-Mozilla-Status2: 10000000
Return-Path: <aboutken...@gmail.com>
Received: from [209.85.198.234] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) by
mailsys01.intnet.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.4) with ESMTP id 185351363
for pang...@a-team.org; Wed, 21 May 2008 23:20:07 -0400
Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id k40so2302981rvb.15
for <pang...@a-team.org>; Wed, 21 May 2008 20:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com;
s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
bh=jhlm5a70mbzbCzaiMEQfBHVs27PY+Rvf/SPJnnZc+2Q=;
b=GR7Fh6suJ1TeLzmxE5PlQihAwt8FIgzsqnSTVuTFHj2/neJLXjxUomhbuHYJpKp9Nb5bMcCFzPw2WmUHeNszP3OfJK4Xfl8YIIDxMzL3nIV3Kw8OPlWkk+C2ngsjRzUir7tlabYLjlRM2JSt3sGI13oICa9OYR03LjxDWGmXiZU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type;
b=Do8QelJPU2wrUPn0r805vMGMW3D6rSNmONdluIVpMoq5U1jHCFSXB2y7ZZeIzIk3RO+HEFYDV+TgxoCEVrtE8iDRQr0NboU5onU7U14DQq7A3wqV4dISGoJV8qoj2xZTMwE0Rcjo7sOAllYrx8bbsVW/CIucBaTnJMAWeL0Phuw=
Received: by 10.141.154.5 with SMTP id
g5mr5525393rvo.290.1211426220019; Wed, 21 May 2008 20:17:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.141.163.10 with HTTP; Wed, 21 May 2008 20:16:59 -0700
(PDT)
Message-ID:
<1c37fbcb0805212016k61e...@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 22:16:59 -0500
From: "about ken" <aboutken...@gmail.com>
To: dad...@adelphia.net, fr...@realagent.biz, joshand...@kw.com,
tcal...@tampabay.rr.com, ecas...@gmail.com, Bro...@BuyerAgencyOnly.com,
J...@JimCoffaro.com
Subject: 3980 Orchard Hill Circle, Palm Harbor
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
boundary="----=_Part_7247_17543472.1211426220010"


There is a possible issue with the property at 3980 Orchard Hill Circle in
Palm Harbor, which you might want to be aware of. Please print this and
post in your office, in case another agent may be working on a transaction
with this property.

The property was appraised a few years ago and was found to have sinkholes
and termite problems.
================
Now Davey DENY DENY DENY DENY DENY DENY DENY.

OR - -

Tell uis how GOD called down to you in a BURNING BUSH and told you that this
was your mission in life.


Greegor

unread,
May 22, 2008, 1:14:25 PM5/22/08
to
DDM > There is a possible issue with the property
DDM > at 3980 Orchard Hill Circle in Palm Harbor, which
DDM > you might want to be aware of. Please print this
DDM > and post in your office, in case another agent may
DDM > be working on a transaction with this property.
DDM >
DDM > The property was appraised a few years ago and
DDM > was found to have sinkholes and termite problems.

Golly, Dave, NOBODY would ever figure out that it was you!

krp

unread,
May 22, 2008, 5:02:09 PM5/22/08
to

"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:23051f02-3c0f-4fcc...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

He's SOOOOOOOOO clever! A mental giant among Polacks!


Kent Wills

unread,
May 22, 2008, 8:07:50 PM5/22/08
to

Since it's not from David's E-mail account, the chances of it
being David are so small as to be laughable.
Did you note from where the E-mail actually originated?

Greegor

unread,
May 22, 2008, 9:59:14 PM5/22/08
to
DDM > There is a possible issue with the property
DDM > at 3980 Orchard Hill Circle in Palm Harbor, which
DDM > you might want to be aware of. Please print this
DDM > and post in your office, in case another agent may
DDM > be working on a transaction with this property.
DDM >
DDM > The property was appraised a few years ago and
DDM > was found to have sinkholes and termite problems.

G > Golly, Dave, NOBODY would ever figure out that it was you!

KRP > He's SOOOOOOOOO clever! A mental giant among Polacks!

Dan comes to Dave's rescue with zzzz's!

krp

unread,
May 23, 2008, 6:55:05 AM5/23/08
to

"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:em2c349mbd0inqe75...@4ax.com...

> On Thu, 22 May 2008 10:14:25 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>DDM > There is a possible issue with the property
>>DDM > at 3980 Orchard Hill Circle in Palm Harbor, which
>>DDM > you might want to be aware of. Please print this
>>DDM > and post in your office, in case another agent may
>>DDM > be working on a transaction with this property.
>>DDM >
>>DDM > The property was appraised a few years ago and
>>DDM > was found to have sinkholes and termite problems.
>>
>>Golly, Dave, NOBODY would ever figure out that it was you!
>
> Since it's not from David's E-mail account, the chances of it
> being David are so small as to be laughable.


WHAT fukkkking e-mail account? He NEVER posts from an E-Mail account you
INCREDIBLY STUPID POLACK! Your HERO only posts via ANONYMOUS REMAILERS!!!!
Here's one for you, asswipe, PROVE that it's HIM!!!!

GOT A LINK?


Greegor

unread,
May 23, 2008, 3:20:20 PM5/23/08
to

G > Dan comes to Dave's rescue with zzzz's!

See Dan.
See Dan post impotent z's over and over!
Run Dan, run!

Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 23, 2008, 3:24:40 PM5/23/08
to
On May 23, 3:20 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

My impotent "z"s?

I have children, greg.

While you have convictions for abusing your wife.

And a listing of your name on the Iowa Child Abuse Registry.

krp

unread,
May 23, 2008, 5:41:45 PM5/23/08
to

"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:3d06007c-c2c7-4ee1...@z66g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...

> On May 23, 3:20 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>
> My impotent "z"s?
>
> I have children, greg.

But child molesting is a crime Danny.


Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 23, 2008, 7:48:38 PM5/23/08
to
On May 23, 5:41 pm, " krp" <krp24...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message

So that's why your daughter does porn videos, piggy!

How'd you keep from getting caught?

Greegor

unread,
May 23, 2008, 10:02:05 PM5/23/08
to
DS > My impotent "z"s? I have children, greg.

I was blatantly not talking about fertility, but
if you want to play that card I'll ask when
the last time was your fertility was tested.
Made any babies with sane people lately, Dan?

How does making babies with a freakin' mental
case 20 years ago relate to your fertility now?

Does the zzzz stuff boost your flaccid ego?

Or do you think it proves you are a strategic genius, Dan?

Military prints and DNA can't be used in a criminal investigation??
Where's the LEGAL CODE?

Come on Daniel! Show off your intellectual potency!

Kent Wills

unread,
May 23, 2008, 10:34:51 PM5/23/08
to
On Fri, 23 May 2008 10:55:05 GMT, " krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote:

>
>"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:em2c349mbd0inqe75...@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 22 May 2008 10:14:25 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
>> <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>DDM > There is a possible issue with the property
>>>DDM > at 3980 Orchard Hill Circle in Palm Harbor, which
>>>DDM > you might want to be aware of. Please print this
>>>DDM > and post in your office, in case another agent may
>>>DDM > be working on a transaction with this property.
>>>DDM >
>>>DDM > The property was appraised a few years ago and
>>>DDM > was found to have sinkholes and termite problems.
>>>
>>>Golly, Dave, NOBODY would ever figure out that it was you!
>>
>> Since it's not from David's E-mail account, the chances of it
>> being David are so small as to be laughable.
>
>
>WHAT fukkkking e-mail account?

about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com
I'm sure you can figure out what bits to remove if you wish to
E-mail him.
The address appears in every one of his posts.

>He NEVER posts from an E-Mail account you
>INCREDIBLY STUPID POLACK!

Everyone reading s well aware that you HATE everyone in/from
Poland. Your bigotry is well known and documented.

>Your HERO only posts via ANONYMOUS REMAILERS!!!!

I wasn't aware Prof. Hawking posts to Usenet. I've never been
able to find anything he's posted.
Wait. You're lying again.

>Here's one for you, asswipe, PROVE that it's HIM!!!!
>

You're the one claiming he wrote it.

>GOT A LINK?
>
>

Sure do, archive monkey. Feel free to check the full headers of
any post you find here:

http://groups.google.com/groups/profile?enc_user=KoDkUygAAAByUcKeScuueS6GWz3OPZ98PS-SvNHw-by2duWQJ7UMsmFJeHfHSulgpZG13MNG5Ng

Again, David doesn't use the E-mail address listed in the E-mail.
Further, the point of origin isn't where he lives, or even where you
claim he lives.
Did you notice from where the E-mail was sent?

Kent Wills

unread,
May 23, 2008, 10:45:11 PM5/23/08
to
On Fri, 23 May 2008 19:02:05 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
<Gree...@gmail.com> wrote:

>DS > My impotent "z"s? I have children, greg.
>
>I was blatantly not talking about fertility, but
>if you want to play that card I'll ask when
>the last time was your fertility was tested.
>Made any babies with sane people lately, Dan?

Fortunately, your genetic code ends with you, GregWhore.

>
>How does making babies with a freakin' mental
>case 20 years ago relate to your fertility now?
>
>Does the zzzz stuff boost your flaccid ego?

More to the point, GregWhore, do you think your complete
inability to be honest about anything, at any time, does anything for
you other than prove you can't be honest?

>
>Or do you think it proves you are a strategic genius, Dan?
>
>Military prints and DNA can't be used in a criminal investigation??
>Where's the LEGAL CODE?

Since you alone are the one making this claim, you should be the
one to cite where in any applicable jurisdiction such a legal code
exists.
I don't expect you'll ever do so.

>
>Come on Daniel! Show off your intellectual potency!

I've not seen Dan make the claim. Only you are presenting the
claim that they can't be used in a criminal investigation. Ken hasn't
even claimed any criminal investigation is being conducted over the
matter.


" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson

krp

unread,
May 24, 2008, 5:27:41 AM5/24/08
to
"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:0jve34lnj1rhrtucr...@4ax.com...

>>> Since it's not from David's E-mail account, the chances of it
>>> being David are so small as to be laughable.
>>
>>
>>WHAT fukkkking e-mail account?
>
> about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com
> I'm sure you can figure out what bits to remove if you wish to
> E-mail him.
> The address appears in every one of his posts.

Are you TOTALLY INSANE?


Kent Wills

unread,
May 24, 2008, 9:19:16 AM5/24/08
to
On Sat, 24 May 2008 09:27:41 GMT, " krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote:

>"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:0jve34lnj1rhrtucr...@4ax.com...
>>>> Since it's not from David's E-mail account, the chances of it
>>>> being David are so small as to be laughable.
>>>
>>>
>>>WHAT fukkkking e-mail account?
>>
>> about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com
>> I'm sure you can figure out what bits to remove if you wish to
>> E-mail him.
>

>Are you TOTALLY INSANE?
>

I thought you'd be able to figure out what to remove should you
wish to E-mail him. Your question serves to prove I over estimated
your abilities once again.
Since you can't figure out what to remove, I'll make it a bit
easier. Remove the capital letters.

Greegor

unread,
May 24, 2008, 4:14:33 PM5/24/08
to
DS > My impotent "z"s? I have children, greg.

Do their names have any vowels?
Or are they z1 and z2, etc?

G > I was blatantly not talking about fertility,

DS > Then what's "impotent" about the letter "z?"

You're a giant of an intellect, Dan!

G > but if you want to play that card I'll ask when
G > the last time was your fertility was tested.

DS > Is Lisa Watkins looking to get pregnant by
DS > someone other than a convicted wife/child abuser?

G > Made any babies with sane people lately, Dan?

DS > Lisa may be sane, but she's definitely
DS > not stable... or even a fit parent.

G > How does making babies with a freakin' mental
G > case 20 years ago relate to your fertility now?

DS > You tell me.

You made babies with a freakin mental case
and since then your winky shriveled up like
a peanut. So?

You're such a potent intellect that you think
impotent only applies to your privates?
Need the dictionary definition again, Dan?

Strategic genius, What a crock.
You think like a bureaucrat with the kind of brains
that bureaucrats are famous for, the ones you sit on.

Greegor

unread,
May 24, 2008, 10:25:00 PM5/24/08
to
DS > My impotent "z"s? I have children, greg.

G > Do their names have any vowels?
G > Or are they z1 and z2, etc?

DS > A number of vowels.

G > I was blatantly not talking about fertility,

DS > Then what's "impotent" about the letter "z?"

G > You're a giant of an intellect, Dan!

DS > Thanks.

G > but if you want to play that card I'll ask when
G > the last time was your fertility was tested.

DS > Is Lisa Watkins looking to get pregnant by
DS > someone other than a convicted wife/child abuser?

G > Made any babies with sane people lately, Dan?

DS > Lisa may be sane, but she's definitely
DS > not stable... or even a fit parent.

G > How does making babies with a freakin' mental
G > case 20 years ago relate to your fertility now?

DS > You tell me.

G > You made babies with a freakin mental case
G > and since then your winky shriveled up like
G > a peanut. So?

DS > So why are you speculating about my genitals?

I made a reference to your intellectual prowess
with the letter z. You diverted to procreative ability.

Then rather than answer a question
you said "You tell me".

What kind of complaint can you have after that?

Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 24, 2008, 11:32:54 PM5/24/08
to

You didn't make a reference to my intellectual prowess..

You posted "See Dan post impotent z's over and over!

You referred to the "z's" as impotent.

> You diverted to procreative ability.
>
> Then rather than answer a question
> you said "You tell me".

You questioned my current state of fertility.

> What kind of complaint can you have after that?

You tell me.

Greegor

unread,
May 25, 2008, 6:35:54 PM5/25/08
to

Then don't bitch and whine if you don't like what I say!
That's what you did last time you tried this
masterful strategy.

Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 25, 2008, 6:57:29 PM5/25/08
to

My masterful strategy?

You made a post imitating a first grade reading book.

"See Dan.

See Dan post impotent z's over and over!

Run Dan, run!"

And I responded with

"My impotent "z"s?

I have children, greg.

While you have convictions for abusing your wife.

And a listing of your name on the Iowa Child Abuse Registry."

So I didn't bitch and whine as you claim.

All I did was post information that proves you're a long term loser.

It's better to keep your mouth shut and have people think you're a
twice convicted wife abuser and child abuser, than it is to open your
mouth and remove all doubt.

Care to comment now, greg?


Greegor

unread,
May 26, 2008, 2:37:43 PM5/26/08
to

First you accuse me of being gutless, then you
try to explain your own lack of intestinal fortitude.

Post those 13 year old misdemeanors, Dan!

Prove you're not gutless, Dan.
Post your criminal history!

Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 26, 2008, 2:45:59 PM5/26/08
to

Which you are.

> then you
> try to explain your own lack of intestinal fortitude.

I never claimed I had a lack of fortitude.

> Post those 13 year old misdemeanors, Dan!

AGAIN???

Are you trying to prove you're not gutless by proving you're a glutton
for punishment!

Evidently you don't believe it's better to keep your mouth shut and


have people think you're a twice convicted wife abuser and child
abuser, than it is to open your mouth and remove all doubt.

> Prove you're not gutless, Dan.

OK I will.

> Post your criminal history!

I have no criminal history, greg.

Proof enough?


Greegor

unread,
May 26, 2008, 3:29:01 PM5/26/08
to
DS > My impotent "z"s? I have children, greg.

G > Do their names have any vowels?
G > Or are they z1 and z2, etc?

DS > A number of vowels.

G > I was blatantly not talking about fertility,

DS > Then what's "impotent" about the letter "z?"

G > You're a giant of an intellect, Dan!

DS > Thanks.

G > but if you want to play that card I'll ask when
G > the last time was your fertility was tested.

DS > Is Lisa Watkins looking to get pregnant by
DS > someone other than a convicted wife/child abuser?

G > Made any babies with sane people lately, Dan?

DS > Lisa may be sane, but she's definitely
DS > not stable... or even a fit parent.

G > How does making babies with a freakin' mental
G > case 20 years ago relate to your fertility now?

DS > You tell me.

G > You made babies with a freakin mental case
G > and since then your winky shriveled up like
G > a peanut. So?

DS > So why are you speculating about my genitals?

G > I made a reference to your intellectual prowess
G > with the letter z.

DS > You didn't make a reference to my intellectual prowess..

DS > You posted "See Dan post impotent z's over and over!

You don't see that as a refernce to your intellectual prowess?

DS > You referred to the "z's" as impotent.

G > You diverted to procreative ability.
G > Then rather than answer a question
G > you said "You tell me".

DS > You questioned my current state of fertility.

You diverted to it, and got all inflated
about your 20 year old procreative ability.

G > What kind of complaint can you have after that?

DS > You tell me.

G > Then don't bitch and whine if you don't like what I say!
G > That's what you did last time you tried this
G > masterful strategy.

DS > My masterful strategy?

G > You made a post imitating a first grade reading book.

Dick and Jane. Guess which one you are.

See Dan.
See Dan post impotent z's over and over!
Run Dan, run!"

DS > And I responded with

DS > "My impotent "z"s?

DS > I have children, greg.

DS > While you have convictions for abusing your wife.

Misdemeanors from THIRTEEN years ago.

DS > And a listing of your name on the Iowa Child Abuse Registry.

You were listed on the same kind of registry FIVE TIMES!

DS > So I didn't bitch and whine as you claim.

DS > All I did was post information that proves you're a long term
loser.

Yeah, yeah, you're a real badass! LOL

DS > It's better to keep your mouth shut and
DS > have people think you're a twice convicted
DS > wife abuser and child abuser, than it is to
DS > open your mouth and remove all doubt.

DS > Care to comment now, greg?

G > First you accuse me of being gutless,

DS > Which you are.

G > then you try to explain your own
G > lack of intestinal fortitude.

DS > I never claimed I had a lack of fortitude.

To be technical, and I know you like this,
I never said that you claimed it.
I said that you posted your explanations
(excuses) for it.

G > Post those 13 year old misdemeanors, Dan!

DS > AGAIN???

DS > Are you trying to prove you're not gutless
DS > by proving you're a glutton for punishment!

DS > Evidently you don't believe it's better to
DS > keep your mouth shut and have people
DS > think you're a twice convicted wife abuser
DS > and child abuser, than it is to open your
DS > mouth and remove all doubt.

You plagiarize a famous quote and misapply it
and think you're SMART??

G > Prove you're not gutless, Dan.

DS > OK I will.

G > Post your criminal history!

DS > I have no criminal history, greg.
DS > Proof enough?

Show me the record of your arrest.
Please include any information helpful for verification.

Just because you're such a brave badass.

Dan Sullivan

unread,
May 26, 2008, 4:29:15 PM5/26/08
to

Obviously not.

> DS > You referred to the "z's" as impotent.
>
> G > You diverted to procreative ability.
> G > Then rather than answer a question
> G > you said "You tell me".
>
> DS > You questioned my current state of fertility.
>
> You diverted to it,

Impotent was your word, greg.

> and got all inflated
> about your 20 year old procreative ability.

Inflated?

I think not.

> G > What kind of complaint can you have after that?
>
> DS > You tell me.
>
> G > Then don't bitch and whine if you don't like what I say!
> G > That's what you did last time you tried this
> G > masterful strategy.
>
> DS > My masterful strategy?
>
> G > You made a post imitating a first grade reading book.
>
> Dick and Jane. Guess which one you are.
>
> See Dan.
> See Dan post impotent z's over and over!
> Run Dan, run!"

And that's supposed to be impressive, greg?

> DS > And I responded with
>
> DS > "My impotent "z"s?
> DS > I have children, greg.
>
> DS > While you have convictions for abusing your wife.
>
> Misdemeanors from THIRTEEN years ago.

My statement is accurate and true.

You can try and make less of the truth, but the truth still stands.

> DS > And a listing of your name on the Iowa Child Abuse Registry.
>
> You were listed on the same kind of registry FIVE TIMES!

Not that I'm aware of.

> DS > So I didn't bitch and whine as you claim.
>
> DS > All I did was post information that proves you're a long term
> loser.
>
> Yeah, yeah, you're a real badass! LOL

No, no, YOU'RE a LOSER!!!

> DS > It's better to keep your mouth shut and
> DS > have people think you're a twice convicted
> DS > wife abuser and child abuser, than it is to
> DS > open your mouth and remove all doubt.
>
> DS > Care to comment now, greg?
>
> G > First you accuse me of being gutless,
>
> DS > Which you are.
>
> G > then you try to explain your own
> G > lack of intestinal fortitude.
>
> DS > I never claimed I had a lack of fortitude.
>
> To be technical, and I know you like this,
> I never said that you claimed it.
> I said that you posted your explanations
> (excuses) for it.

And what were my "excuses?"

> G > Post those 13 year old misdemeanors, Dan!
>
> DS > AGAIN???
>
> DS > Are you trying to prove you're not gutless
> DS > by proving you're a glutton for punishment!
>
> DS > Evidently you don't believe it's better to
> DS > keep your mouth shut and have people
> DS > think you're a twice convicted wife abuser
> DS > and child abuser, than it is to open your
> DS > mouth and remove all doubt.
>
> You plagiarize a famous quote and misapply it
> and think you're SMART??

I used a famous quote and I used it properly.

> G > Prove you're not gutless, Dan.
>
> DS > OK I will.
>
> G > Post your criminal history!
>
> DS > I have no criminal history, greg.
> DS > Proof enough?
>
> Show me the record of your arrest.

I just said I don't have a criminal history.

That means there is no record.

> Please include any information helpful for verification.

Here.

It's in between the parenthesis ( ! ), got it now, greg?

> Just because you're such a brave badass.

That's not a badass.

It's just the best I could do.

Greegor

unread,
May 26, 2008, 4:50:54 PM5/26/08
to
DS > It's just the best I could do.

That much is somewhat obvious.

freedom

unread,
Jul 23, 2008, 10:17:48 AM7/23/08
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

On Sat, 17 May 2008, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>BW > According to mapquest there is no city called 'calumet city' in
>Indiana.
>
>Who started this brain fart about calumet city being in indiana?
>
>http://www.thetimesonline.com/articles/2007/06/10/news/porter_county/docc3
>5ea9cd21c834f1862572f4007bfc11.txt
>
>Sunday, June 10, 2007
>ARRESTS
>Monday through Friday [ June 4 to June 8 ]
>Battery David Moore, 36, Calumet City
>
>David Daniel Moore court records: David D. Moore
>DOB 9/26/70 850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, IL
>case 64D 060706FD 4989 Monday June 4th 2007
>Class D Felony, Assault on somebody under 14 years old
>pretrial was February 8th 8:30 for Mar 12 hearing
>
>hearing rescheduled for July 22 at 8:30AM

Just checking....whatever happened with this? Supposedly I was charged
with this crime, and according to Ken, the prosecutor had an "iron clad"
case against me?

Yet another of Ken's "deadlines," where he promises arrest, conviction or
some other sort of dire legal action against me....then the date comes and
goes and I'm still right here. Starting to question your emperor just a
little?

http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals

"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
- --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **,
in a verbal threat to his girlfriend

"...my aunt wouldnt come over to our house anymore because of how he would
talk to her and come on to her....and he had over 180 pictures of her on
his computer"
- --Ken Pangborn's former stepdaughter Megan, on growing up in the Pangborn
household


** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A

iQA/AwUBSIc7Aabdsu4taRc6EQKhRwCgt4GRJVN79swzmIWUVmuYdSOA2mgAn2ud
yyYPXFb/OiC3+rUhORJrSmb8
=YuUu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Greegor

unread,
Jul 23, 2008, 12:44:05 PM7/23/08
to
Sentencing is usually not done immediately upon conviction.

Dan Sullivan

unread,
Jul 23, 2008, 12:50:20 PM7/23/08
to
On Jul 23, 12:44 pm, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sentencing is usually not done immediately upon conviction.

Says the man who knows better than most.

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages