Re: THE TINY CABIN
krp
"Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixm...@remailer.privacy.at> wrote in
message news:2604d10034bb87a2...@remailer.privacy.at...
> I do LOVE so much you commenting on Betty and I. Like YOU have the
> INSIDE on it. Kunt, SOME day you'll figure out WHY I call you a "STUPID
> POLACK!" But I am betting against it, somebody will have to tell you,
> somebody with incredible patience to explain it to you ion a way your TINY
> Polack mind can grasp.
> "Betty and I"?? Ken, you illiterate dweeb. Who are YOU to say ANYONE
> else is stupid? You wrote "Betty and I" instead of "Betty and me".
There you go Moore, PRETENDING to know English again. Keep on in your
delusion that you have an understanding of the relationship between Betty
and I.
Dragon's Girl
> LITTLE DAVID MOORE CALUMET CITY'S GAY PRIDE PARADE FAIRY PRINCESS
> messagenews:2604d10034bb87a2...@remailer.privacy.at...
>
> > I do LOVE so much you commenting on Betty and I. Like YOU have the
> > INSIDE on it. Kunt, SOME day you'll figure out WHY I call you a "STUPID
> > POLACK!" But I am betting against it, somebody will have to tell you,
> > somebody with incredible patience to explain it to you ion a way your TINY
> > Polack mind can grasp.
> > "Betty and I"?? Ken, you illiterate dweeb. Who are YOU to say ANYONE
> > else is stupid? You wrote "Betty and I" instead of "Betty and me".
>
> There you go Moore, PRETENDING to know English again. Keep on in your
> delusion that you have an understanding of the relationship between Betty
> and I.
Ken and I have a fair understanding of one another.
I see him like anyone else here...looks to me like we're all in the
same boat (almost all) because we've all been victimized to some
degree by others.
Whether it be internet nut cakes that swear we're someone we aren't,
or social services...doesn't really matter...we've expressed our
opinions in these news groups and have had someone try to use
harassment, stalking, or other types of abuse to stifle our God given
right to express ourselves and our beliefs when they did not agree.
It's pretty simple.
I don't want to argue...I think I have better things to do with my
life.
krp
"Dragon's Girl" <betty...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:876d7ed7-4c2b-4fd9...@o21g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>
> > I do LOVE so much you commenting on Betty and I. Like YOU have the
> > INSIDE on it. Kunt, SOME day you'll figure out WHY I call you a "STUPID
> > POLACK!" But I am betting against it, somebody will have to tell you,
> > somebody with incredible patience to explain it to you ion a way your
> > TINY
> > Polack mind can grasp.
> > "Betty and I"?? Ken, you illiterate dweeb. Who are YOU to say ANYONE
> > else is stupid? You wrote "Betty and I" instead of "Betty and me".
>
> There you go Moore, PRETENDING to know English again. Keep on in your
> delusion that you have an understanding of the relationship between Betty
> and I.
Ken and I have a fair understanding of one another.
Oh Betty, now you have spoiled it. Moore was on a tear with the idea
that you and I are enemies because we had some strong disagreements in the
past. He doesn't understand that time marches on for most of us and
disagreements end and people become friends. That is something totally
beyond his understanding. Something that is impossible for HIM.
Dragon's Girl
> "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
I understand but I don't want to be part of antagonizing anyone.
womanGoddess
Betty, Kennie's using you as a patsy to antagonize others.
Wake up, girl.
Moe
Eternal FOREVER KNIGHT fan
" A vampire cop? REALLY?"
"http://home.earthlink.net/~19ranger57/blies.htm
Know your scum--- http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
krp
BW> I understand but I don't want to be part of antagonizing anyone.
Understood.
freedom
>On Oct 21, 12:18=A0pm, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>> LITTLE DAVID MOORE =A0CALUMET CITY'S GAY PRIDE PARADE FAIRY PRINCESS
>> "Anonymous Remailer (austria)" <mixmas...@remailer.privacy.at> wrote in
>> messagenews:2604d10034bb87a2...@remailer.privacy.at...
>>
the
>> > INSIDE on it. Kunt, SOME day you'll figure out WHY I call you a "STUPI=
D
>> > POLACK!" But I am betting against it, somebody will have to tell you,
TINY
>> > Polack mind can grasp.
E
>> > else is stupid? You wrote "Betty and I" instead of "Betty and me".
>>
in your
>> delusion that you have an understanding of the relationship between Bett=
y
>> and I.
>
>Ken and I have a fair understanding of one another.
>I see him like anyone else here...looks to me like we're all in the
>same boat (almost all) because we've all been victimized to some
>degree by others.
I'd have to strongly disagree on this one. Ken is hardly a "victim" here.
He's a two-bit con artist who hopes to find men in trouble and separate
them from their money. He's harassed people online ever since there's been=
an "online," and then he cries and plays the victim act when he gets a dose=
of his own medicine.
>Whether it be internet nut cakes that swear we're someone we aren't,
That would describe Ken to a T. For years, he's insisted that I'm some guy=
in Illinois. Oh, and also, I didn't write the post he was replying to.
Yet another example of his dishonesty. =20
>or social services...doesn't really matter...we've expressed our
>opinions in these news groups and have had someone try to use
>harassment, stalking, or other types of abuse to stifle our God given
>right to express ourselves and our beliefs when they did not agree.
>It's pretty simple.
This is because people like Ken need to control and bully. When he doesn't=
like what you have to say, he'll complain to your ISP, or invent lies about=
you, or resort to other harassment.
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals
"[I have] [n]ever had [any] standing in the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer's=
Association or AN Y connection to them."
--Ken Pangborn in a usenet post on January 1, 2009, denying affiliation
with the TCDLA, to whom he provided bogus educational credentials. His lie=
is disproved here:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060822021821/www.tcdla.com/secure/experts/inde=
x.shtml
"Some photo of some girl without even any documentation on THAT only proves=
that YOU are a PSYCHO! A really STUPID one at that!"
--Ken Pangborn, admitting to being a "stupid" "psycho" in message-ID
<jOp3l.292$Es4...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>
"The FACT is that [my mail-order wife Barbara Sanciprian] and I were
introduced in the FORMAL Spanish tradition by mutual friends, and were
married first in Cuba after 2 year courtship."
--Ken Pangborn, admitting that he began cheating on his wife Peggy on
September 28, 2001, nearly two years before she separated from him
"I'm David Moore and I am insane!"
--Ken Pangborn posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, attempting to claim
that his name is David Moore
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
--Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **,
in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
Keywords: false allegations,sexual abuse,marital rape, date rape, sexual
harassment,child abuse,domestic violence,rape allegations,false allegations=
of child abuse,false rape allegations,false abuse accusations,false
accusations,recovered memories,child sexual abuse,abuse child,sexual
assault,child molestation,reactive attachment disorder,penile
plethysmograph,polygraph,attorneys,divorce,visitation,pedophiles
More-keywords: KRP CONSULTING. False allegations of child abuse, false
abuse accusations, false domestic violence allegations help, false rape
allegations, abuse child, sexual abuse, child sexual abuse, false
allegations, false accusations, recovered memories, sexual assault, child
molestation, child sexual abuse, reactive attachment disorder, penile
plethysmograph, polygraph, trial consulting, jury consulting, jury
selection, jury voire dire, wrongful allegations, false child sexual abuse
allegations. Wrongful child sexual abuse allegations. Domestic Violence.
Rape. Marital rape. Date Rape. Confidence Rape.
Yet-more-keywords: ken pangborn,kenneth pangborn,barbara pangborn,barbara
sanciprian,palm harbor,tampa,attorneys,florida lawyers,florida
attorneys,tampa lawyers,tampa attorneys,trial consultant,trial
consulting,dui,domestic violence,vawa,abuse,3648 cockatoo,new port
richey,ernesto sanciprian,ernesto miguel blanco sanciprian,blanco
sanciprian,bryce carter,holguin,julio aguilar,yudith bacallao,raimundo
cabrera,ana hernandez chi,lixandro cordero,leandis diaz,al faisbuker,wendy
gil,armando capo ramos,george riveron,reinaldo rodriguez,lexis ross,liana
yisell alvarez silveira,madelyn tamayo,manuel toledo,thais valdes
Extra-keywords: Julito Sainz,craig clawson,lia yisell
krp
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
news:c9a7a6610ebc11b7...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>>Ken and I have a fair understanding of one another.
>>I see him like anyone else here...looks to me like we're all in the
>>same boat (almost all) because we've all been victimized to some
>>degree by others.
>
> I'd have to strongly disagree on this one. Ken is hardly a "victim" here.
> He's a two-bit con artist who hopes to find men in trouble and separate
> them from their money. He's harassed people online ever since there's
> been
> an "online," and then he cries and plays the victim act when he gets a
> dose
> of his own medicine.
And YET, Moore - YOU are the only one with a STALKING and HARASSING
website. YOU are the PSYCHO with his KEYWORD LIST. Including more than a
dozen completely innocent people because YOU claim it is your "RIGHT!" You
claim you do it so I will OBEY you and therefore your stalking and
harassment of the people IN YOUR MIND is MY fault. That, Moore, is the
standard argument of a SOCIOPATH, blaming others for his destructive
behavior.
Greegor
DDM > YOU to say ANYONE else is stupid? You wrote
DDM > "Betty and I" instead of "Betty and me".
KRP > There you go Moore, PRETENDING to know English again.
LOL
Greegor
that "Betty and I" should be "Betty and me" ?
I see Dave's socks arguing about it, but where
is the precious original? Dave! LOL
freedom
>Where is the original post where Dave said
>that "Betty and I" should be "Betty and me" ?
As I never made such a statement, you'll probably have trouble finding the
"original post" in question.
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals
"[I have] [n]ever had [any] standing in the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer's
Association or AN Y connection to them."
--Ken Pangborn in a usenet post on January 1, 2009, denying affiliation
with the TCDLA, to whom he provided bogus educational credentials. His lie
is disproved here:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060822021821/www.tcdla.com/secure/experts/inde
x.shtml
"Some photo of some girl without even any documentation on THAT only proves
that YOU are a PSYCHO! A really STUPID one at that!"
--Ken Pangborn, admitting to being a "stupid" "psycho" in message-ID
<jOp3l.292$Es4...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>
"The FACT is that [my mail-order wife Barbara Sanciprian] and I were
introduced in the FORMAL Spanish tradition by mutual friends, and were
married first in Cuba after 2 year courtship."
--Ken Pangborn, admitting that he began cheating on his wife Peggy on
September 28, 2001, nearly two years before she separated from him
"I'm David Moore and I am insane!"
--Ken Pangborn posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, attempting to claim
that his name is David Moore
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
--Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **,
in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
Keywords: false allegations,sexual abuse,marital rape, date rape, sexual
harassment,child abuse,domestic violence,rape allegations,false allegations
krp
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
>>Where is the original post where Dave said
>>that "Betty and I" should be "Betty and me" ?
> As I never made such a statement, you'll probably have trouble finding the
> "original post" in question.
Hiya Queenie! Where is your PROOF I was "kicked out" of ASTC? Oh that's
right today the story is you NEVER SAID IT! It weas that "OTHER" David
Moore, the one who lives in his mommy's basment leading his COALITION
FORCES. <snicker> Moore you always get smart assed with your belief that
you are the SMARTEST dude on the planet. Yet for two years in a row you fell
for the old ROPE A DOPE. Guess what, Nimrod. You are so STUPID that you WILL
fall for it again NEXT YEAR.
Say Davey, how come your WHINING about the old photo of your house in
Bolingbrook with that ratty old MINI-Van to Photobucket? Right up top,
Davey. Aren't they responding to you crying like a BABY any more? Remember
the tickets to Cuba you said were PHOTOSHOPPED, yes they're there too. See
if you can still find anyone STUPID enough to agree with you that they are
all fake.
http://s283.photobucket.com/albums/kk302/kenPphotos/
Davey it's been a BAD week for you. A REALLY bad week when some more of
your "COALITION TROOPS" seem to have defected. Life's a BITCH, ain't it,
Davey? People you were so SURE were on your side. It seems to happen quote a
bit to you, doesn't it? Davey - is your asshole puckering right now? It
SHOULD BE! In due time you'll find out why. I know you THINK you are SMARTER
than everyone. Especially cops and the like. Davey - when the wall finally
falls on your FAIRY ASS, it's gonna HURT! I have seen LE type keep a case
open for 20 years before they move. Just keep thinking that you are
superman, Davey. Keep sniffing the air, Davey. Something wonderful is
coming. I'll love it, but you will NOT!
Greegor
G > that "Betty and I" should be "Betty and me" ?
DDM > As I never made such a statement,
DDM > you'll probably have trouble finding the
DDM > "original post" in question.
Sure, Dave, The stupid comment you made
never took place and the quotations in
responses to it are figments of my imagination, too.
So WHY are your sock puppets arguing in
defense of the comment you say you never made?
David Daniel Moore DOB 9/26/70
If the STREET VIEW button doesn't show up, click
on the address in bold blue on the left, then
click on STREET VIEW to see Davey's bunker!
Parcel details
http://198.173.15.21/ccao/ParcelDetails.asp?PIN=30182330330000
Map
http://198.173.15.21/ccao/MapIndex.asp?action=parcel&PIN=30182330330000
Photo
http://198.173.15.21/AssessorPics/GeoSpan/30182330330000.jpg
http://www.cookcountyassessor.com/data/searchflat/ParcelImage.asp?pin=30182330330000
http://www.whitepages.com/search/ReverseAddress?street=850+buffalo+ave&where=Calumet+City%2C+IL
http://198.173.15.21/ccao/ParcelDetails.asp?PIN=30182330330000
Cook County Assessor's Office: Property Search Details
Property Index Number: 30-18-233-033-0000
View Property Picture
View Property Map
Address : 850 Buffalo Ave
City : Calumet City
Township : Thornton
Neighborhood : 61
Taxcode : 37030
Assessed Valuation
2008
First Pass Assessment 2007
Board of Review Certified
Land Assessed Value 3,025
2,521
Building Assessed Value 16,434
14,957
Total Assessed Value 19,459
17,478
Estimated Market Value 121,619
109,238
Property Characteristics
Class: 2-11
Description : Two to Six Apartments, Over 62 Years
Residence Type Two Story
Use Multi Family
Apartments Two
Exterior Construction Masonry
Full Baths 2
Half Baths 0
Basement1 Partial and Rec Room
Attic None
Central Air No
Number of Fireplaces 1
Garage Size/Type2 2.5 car detached
Building Square Footage: 1,752
Land Square Footage 6,304
Assessment Pass First Pass
Age: 27
Land Square Footage: 6,304
1 Excluded from Building Square footage, except apartment
2 Excluded from Building Square footage
Sunday, June 10, 2007
ARRESTS
Monday through Friday [ June 4 to June 8 ]
Battery David Moore, 36, Calumet City
David Daniel Moore court records: David D. Moore
DOB 9/26/70 850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, IL
case 64D 060706FD 4989 Monday June 4th 2007
Class D Felony, Assault on somebody under 14 years old
pretrial February 8th 8:30 hearing on March 12th 1PM
The North Porter County complex is in Portage, Indiana
219 759 8219 no e-records, won't fax or e-mail records
paid $2000 bond, Attorney Robert Harper Portage, Indiana
does not have a probation officer pre-trial
--------------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/51dcda5be649629b
On Jan 30, 4:08 am, freedom <aboutKRP...> wrote:
G > Dave tried to say this was me.
DDM > No, I didn't. <snip>
--------------------------------------
http://www.courts.state.pa.us/OpPosting/Superior/out/a24025_04.pdf
http://ujsportal.pacourts.us/WebDocketSheets/OtherCriteria.aspx?mode=cp
http://ujsportal.pacourts.us
Public Calendar schedule
E-Services (button)
Public Web Docket Sheets (dropdown menu)
Court of Common Pleas (dropdown button CLICK)
Common Pleas Docket sheet page
Search type: CP/MP Docket Number
Docket number (fill in these blanks) CP-48-CR-0002394-2002
CLICK the search button.
further down the page this appears:
CP-48-CR-0002394-2002 Comm. v. Hanson, Gregory 8/1/2002 12:00:00 AM
Northampton Hanson, Gregory Christian Closed H5648506 10/17/1975
If you look closely at the left end of that there is a graphic box.
Put your mouse over it and a drop down menu appears offering
Docket Sheet or
Court Summary
Select Docket Sheet
http://ujsportal.pacourts.us/docketsheets/CPReport.aspx?matterID=61271779
COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF NORTHAMPTON COUNTY
DOCKET
Docket Number: CP-48-CR-0002394-2002
Court Case
CRIMINAL DOCKET
Page 1 of 17
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
v.
Gregory Christian Hanson
CASE INFORMATION
Judge Assigned: Moran, William F. Date Filed: 08/01/2002 Initiation
Date: 08/01/2002
OTN: H5648506 Lower Court Docket No: CR-0000212-02
Initial Issuing Authority: Ralph W Litzenberger Final Issuing
Authority: Ralph W Litzenberger
Arresting Agency: Forks Twp Police Dept Arresting Officer: Affiant
Case Local Number Type(s) Case Local Number(s)
Legacy Docket Number C-48-CR-2002-2394
[ Snipped for brevity. ]
http://ujsportal.pacourts.us/docketsheets/CourtSummaryReport.aspx?matterID=61271779
Northampton County Court of Common Pleas
Court Summary
Hanson, Gregory Christian
Frackville, PA 179312699
Aliases:
Hanson, Gregory
Hanson, Gregory C.
DOB:10/17/1975
Race:Caucasian
Hair:
Eyes:
Sex:Male
Closed
Northampton
CP-48-CR-0001279-1999
Arrest Dt: 05/03/1999
[ Snipped for brevity. ]
Keywords:
850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, Illinois 60409,
INTERNET STALKER CON ARTIST David Daniel Moore,
pathological liar David Daniel Moore,
internet psychopath David Daniel Moore,
hate site, sociopath stalker,pervert,creep
pathological liar David Daniel Moore
abusive real estate agents,deception,hacker,
sexual blackmail David Daniel Moore coward,
tara moreland, Linda Boss, janet m moore,
dawn moore, tara moreland, alias dustin calloway,
alias david miller, alias david boss,
alias jeff johnson, criminal, computer hacker,
criminal hacker, internet stalkers, stalker,
internet harassment, usenet threats
usenet forgery David Daniel Moore, forger,
new zealand hate site, internet libel
website of lies, chicagoland pansies
malicious use of employers computers,
formerly of Sara Lee Corporation, child abuser,
sara lee corporation, never employ this temp,
internet psychopaths, internet addiction,
internet stalking, woman hater, blackmailer,
sexual harassment, stalker, sexual blackmail,
David Daniel Moore bbs blackmail,usmc 29 palms,
discharge for the good of the service,
linda boss, formerly of Sara Lee Corporation,
short term contract programmer lotus,
David Moore lives in his mommy's basement,
850 Buffalo Avenue, Calumet City, Illinois 60409,
temp worker, lotus consultant, temp worker,
short term contracts,IP address trickery,
casino software consultant moral terpitude,
computer identity forgery, mommys basement,
anonymous remailer stalkers, office disruption,
anonymous remailer abusers, coalition forces,
David Daniel Moore basement dweller,
off shore website avid Daniel Moore,
new zealand, malaysia website,
David Daniel Moore employer computer abuse,
obsessive compulsive disorder
Greegor
> DAVID D. MOORE - Calumet City's QUEEN FOR A DECADE"freedom" <aboutKRP...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
OUR Davey? Naa. He's ""Anonymous"" !
krp
"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:jhd5e5ds5nkspecf0...@4ax.com...
> Outside of your intense paranoia, there is no COALITION FORCE,
> Pangborn.
> I'm sure it seems very real to you, but the COALITION FORCE
> exists solely within the confines of your mind.
For the millionth time, Kunt, ****I****** know there is NO coalition
forces. But your buddy MOORE really believes he is the "ALLIED SUPREME
COMMANDER" of a HUGE coalition forces. It is part of what started to go
wrong with his mind in Desert Storm. He started to think he outranged
Schwarzkopf! It is MOORE'S delusions of grandeur, I don't believe it for a
minute. Right now he has YOU and leads you around by your POLACK dick. And,
Kunt, people are LAUGHING at you. Especially your former pals in AUK.. OH
HOW THE MIGHTY HAVE FALLEN! Wills you are a JOKE the more you YAP the more
YOU prove it!
krp
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:86dce841-b2ad-43c6...@33g2000vbe.googlegroups.com...
Davey is SO anonymous with his own ENCRYPTION program that he wrote
NOBODY can crack his anonymity! Not the KGB, not the NSA, not the DIA, not
the FBI, not the CIA, not even the Israelis or Chinese. Just ask him. He'll
tell you how SMART he is!
Greg - tell me, if DAVID MOORE is so SMART as he claims - how in the
world did he EVER fall for the ROPE-A-DOPE 2 years in a row? HOOK LINE AND
SINKER! Notice how QUIET Davey is being as he in in his mommy's basement
licking his wounds.
Dragon's Girl
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:23:12 -0400, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
> >> Outside of your intense paranoia, there is no COALITION FORCE,
> >> Pangborn.
> >> I'm sure it seems very real to you, but the COALITION FORCE
> >> exists solely within the confines of your mind.
>
> > For the millionth time, Kunt, ****I****** know there is NO coalition
> >forces.
>
>
> "you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited."
> Kenneth Robert Pangborn claiming in misc.legal that David Moore can
> and does edit Google's Usenet archive.
> Message-ID: <n9Sfm.1372$nh2...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
>
> Yes, I pulled a Pangborn in my reply.
It's really remarkable.
Greg posted a 'story'.
I responded by saying it was a good one.
Look where it led.
I'm reconsidering reading the group on a regular basis now that winter
is going to be settling in.
So much drama as ever.
I've seen less with high school girls.
krp
>>> Outside of your intense paranoia, there is no COALITION FORCE,
>>> Pangborn.
>>> I'm sure it seems very real to you, but the COALITION FORCE
>>> exists solely within the confines of your mind.
>>
>> For the millionth time, Kunt, ****I****** know there is NO coalition
>>forces.
> Then why doesn't your paranoia compel you to claim there is?
I don't Kunt, I just MAKE FUN of your psycho idiot pal. HE believes he
is the "ALLIED SUPREME COMMANDER" of this massive coalition forces. That's
HIS belief, not mine. I just RIDICULE it!
lostintranslation
> On Oct 24, 12:26 pm, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 05:23:12 -0400, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
> > wrote:
>
> > >> Outside of your intense paranoia, there is no COALITION FORCE,
> > >> Pangborn.
> > >> I'm sure it seems very real to you, but the COALITION FORCE
> > >> exists solely within the confines of your mind.
>
> > > For the millionth time, Kunt, ****I****** know there is NO coalition
> > >forces.
>
> > Then why doesn't your paranoia compel you to claim there is?
>
> > "you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited."
> > Kenneth Robert Pangborn claiming in misc.legal that David Moore can
> > and does edit Google's Usenet archive.
>
> > Yes, I pulled a Pangborn in my reply.
>
> It's really remarkable.
> Greg posted a 'story'.
> I responded by saying it was a good one.
> Look where it led.
> I'm reconsidering reading the group on a regular basis now that winter
> is going to be settling in.
> So much drama as ever.
> I've seen less with high school girls.
Hey Lady! Long time no talk!
Greegor
> G > Where is the original post where Dave said
> G > that "Betty and I" should be "Betty and me" ?
>
> DDM > As I never made such a statement,
> DDM > you'll probably have trouble finding the
> DDM > "original post" in question.
>
> Sure, Dave, The stupid comment you made
> never took place and the quotations in
> responses to it are figments of my imagination, too.
>
> So WHY are your sock puppets arguing in
> defense of the comment you say you never made?
That was the ""OTHER"" Dave Moore, right?
Dragon's Girl
krp
GH> That was the ""OTHER"" Dave Moore, right?
Are you "OUR" Greg Hanson or are you the "OTHER" Greg Hanson?
krp
> On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:51:32 -0400, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:d6e6e5h58lfj1etkd...@4ax.com...
>>
>>>>> Outside of your intense paranoia, there is no COALITION FORCE,
>>>>> Pangborn.
>>>>> I'm sure it seems very real to you, but the COALITION FORCE
>>>>> exists solely within the confines of your mind.
>>>>
>>>> For the millionth time, Kunt, ****I****** know there is NO coalition
>>>>forces.
>>
>>> Then why doesn't your paranoia compel you to claim there is?
>>
>>
>> I don't Kunt, I just MAKE FUN of your psycho idiot pal.
>
No but the "OTHER" David Moore is.
krp
"Dragon's Girl" <betty...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e2e94416-a32e-4487...@l33g2000vbi.googlegroups.com...
BW> How are you Kim?
Now Betty. You KNOW she's not "OUR" Kim she's a HE. Just ask the "OTHER"
Kent Wills. HE KNOWS.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:osu6e5d00ein7f6mn...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:51:32 -0400, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>news:d6e6e5h58lfj1etkd...@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>>>> Outside of your intense paranoia, there is no COALITION FORCE,
>>>>>> Pangborn.
>>>>>> I'm sure it seems very real to you, but the COALITION FORCE
>>>>>> exists solely within the confines of your mind.
>>>>>
>>>>> For the millionth time, Kunt, ****I****** know there is NO coalition
>>>>>forces.
>>>
>>>> Then why doesn't your paranoia compel you to claim there is?
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't Kunt, I just MAKE FUN of your psycho idiot pal.
>>
>> You're not my pal.
>
> No but the "OTHER" David Moore is.
I know only one person named David Moore. I realize there are
other people with that name, but I don't know them.
Deal with it.
"YOU ARE INSANE.
"That claim is BULLSHIT!!!!"
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, self admitted alcoholic, insane
owner/operator of KRP Consulting and the A-Team, admitting his claims
that I've been found legally insane are lies.
MID aRcrm.2326$tl3....@nwrddc01.gnilink.net
Kent Wills
wrote:
How many do you think post to the groups listed?
I understand double vision is common when one gets as drunk as
you seem to get before you post, but just because you see two posts
for every one doesn't mean there is more than one Greg Hanson posting.
"you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn claiming in misc.legal that David Moore can
and does edit Google's Usenet archive.
Message-ID: <n9Sfm.1372$nh2...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
lostintranslation
Doing well; very well. How are you?
lostintranslation
> "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Yes, I am the other LIT/Kim. The one with reason, intelligence and
passion. I am also the married one, MOTHER of 5 children, living in
CT. Apparently, the other/other LIT is male, not named Kim and living
in his mother's basement.
krp
:
>>> G > Where is the original post where Dave said
>>> G > that "Betty and I" should be "Betty and me" ?
>>>
>>> DDM > As I never made such a statement,
>>> DDM > you'll probably have trouble finding the
>>> DDM > "original post" in question.
>>>
>>> Sure, Dave, The stupid comment you made
>>> never took place and the quotations in
>>> responses to it are figments of my imagination, too.
>>>
>>> So WHY are your sock puppets arguing in
>>> defense of the comment you say you never made?
>>
>>GH> That was the ""OTHER"" Dave Moore, right?
>>
>> Are you "OUR" Greg Hanson or are you the "OTHER" Greg Hanson?
>
> How many do you think post to the groups listed?
Which are you? "OUR" Kent Wills or the "OTHER" Kent Wills?
krp
>>>>
>>>> I don't Kunt, I just MAKE FUN of your psycho idiot pal.
>>>
>>> You're not my pal.
>>
>> No but the "OTHER" David Moore is.
>
> I know only one person named David Moore.
Then that one is your HOMO-PAL! The "OTHER" David Moore.
krp
"lostintranslation" <lostintran...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ff3d10dd-72e2-4582...@r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > >> Outside of your intense paranoia, there is no COALITION FORCE,
> > > > >> Pangborn.
> > > > >> I'm sure it seems very real to you, but the COALITION FORCE
> > > > >> exists solely within the confines of your mind.
>
> > > > > For the millionth time, Kunt, ****I****** know there is NO
> > > > > coalition
> > > > >forces.
>
> > > > Then why doesn't your paranoia compel you to claim there is?
> > Hey Lady! Long time no talk!
> BW> How are you Kim?
>
> Now Betty. You KNOW she's not "OUR" Kim she's a HE. Just ask the "OTHER"
> Kent Wills. HE KNOWS.
LIT> Yes, I am the other LIT/Kim.
"OUR" LIT then. Not the "OTHER" LIT.
LIT> Apparently, the other/other LIT is male, not named Kim and living
LIT> in his mother's basement.
Presumably in Calumet City, Illinois and NOT in the Ne England area.
signed
The "OTHER' Ken Pangborn
krp
puked:
> Maybe I'd be okay once you got to know me, but maybe you don't want to
> take that chance.
lostintranslation
> "lostintranslation" <lostintranslation...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Wherever the other LIT lives it certainly isn't here! I did hear the
other LIT is on trip though. Sure hope he didn't get caught up in
some nasty storm last night!
Sincerely,
the original FEMALE 'your' LIT
lostintranslation
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 02:16:53 -0400, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
I won't be around much today. I am busy playing Mafia Wars via
Facebook with my son and listening to Disturbed. Have fun boys!
krp
> > > > > >> Outside of your intense paranoia, there is no COALITION FORCE,
> > > > > >> Pangborn.
> > > > > >> I'm sure it seems very real to you, but the COALITION FORCE
> > > > > >> exists solely within the confines of your mind.
>
> > > > > > For the millionth time, Kunt, ****I****** know there is NO
> > > > > > coalition
> > > > > >forces.
>
> > > > > Then why doesn't your paranoia compel you to claim there is?
> > > Hey Lady! Long time no talk!
> > BW> How are you Kim?
>
> > Now Betty. You KNOW she's not "OUR" Kim she's a HE. Just ask the "OTHER"
> > Kent Wills. HE KNOWS.
>
> LIT> Yes, I am the other LIT/Kim.
>
> "OUR" LIT then. Not the "OTHER" LIT.
>
> LIT> Apparently, the other/other LIT is male, not named Kim and living
> LIT> in his mother's basement.
>
> Presumably in Calumet City, Illinois and NOT in the Ne England area.
>
> signed
>
> The "OTHER' Ken Pangborn
LIT> Wherever the other LIT lives it certainly isn't here! I did hear the
LIT> other LIT is on trip though. Sure hope he didn't get caught up in
LIT> some nasty storm last night!
The "OTHER" LIT seems to live in the dark empty recesses of "OUR" Kent
Wills head. He may have had his RACING PT Cruiser doing wheelies... What a
LUXURY CAR!
Kent Wills
<lostintran...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
>> =A0 =A0 Now Betty. You KNOW she's not "OUR" Kim she's a HE. Just ask the =
>"OTHER"
>> Kent Wills. HE KNOWS.
>
>Yes, I am the other LIT/Kim. The one with reason, intelligence and
>passion. I am also the married one, MOTHER of 5 children, living in
>CT. Apparently, the other/other LIT is male, not named Kim and living
>in his mother's basement.
There is no one else posting with the nym LIT as far as I've
seen.
If you have anything that supports your claim, please present it.
If this was another example of your dishonesty, well, you won't be
able to offer anything.
--
"Kent"
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>> Presumably in Calumet City, Illinois and NOT in the Ne England area.
>>
>> signed
>>
>> The "OTHER' Ken Pangborn
>
>LIT> Wherever the other LIT lives it certainly isn't here! I did hear the
>LIT> other LIT is on trip though. Sure hope he didn't get caught up in
>LIT> some nasty storm last night!
>
> The "OTHER" LIT seems to live in the dark empty recesses of "OUR" Kent
>Wills head.
You already admitted, by default, that your alcoholism forced you
to lie about that.
>He may have had his RACING PT Cruiser doing wheelies... What a
>LUXURY CAR!
You really do need professional mental health care. Unless you've
offered MORE proof that you're a pathological liar, you hold the
delusion that the PT Cruiser is a luxury car.
"Maybe he's like me to attach some kiddie porn to aid his fantasies"
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-Team, expressing
his fondness for child porn in
Message-ID:
<RECUi.494$Q%3.238@trnddc04>
Kent Wills
wrote:
I know only the one David Moore. He's heterosexual.
Your lustful desires for him, and assorted other heterosexual
males, will never be returned. Move on. Find a man who is actually
gay. You MIGHT stand a chance.
krp
>>> Presumably in Calumet City, Illinois and NOT in the New England area.
>>>
>>> signed
>>>
>>> The "OTHER' Ken Pangborn
>>
>>LIT> Wherever the other LIT lives it certainly isn't here! I did hear the
>>LIT> other LIT is on trip though. Sure hope he didn't get caught up in
>>LIT> some nasty storm last night!
>> The "OTHER" LIT seems to live in the dark empty recesses of "OUR"
>> Kent
>>Wills head.
>>He may have had his RACING PT Cruiser doing wheelies... What a
>>LUXURY CAR!
>
> You really do need professional mental health care. Unless you've
> offered MORE proof that you're a pathological liar, you hold the
> delusion that the PT Cruiser is a luxury car.
The PT Cruiser is a "PIECE OF SHIT!"
Greegor
Are you the OTHER Ken?
SOYLENT GREEN IS........ PEOPLE!
lostintranslation
Which people, Greg? The 'our' people or the other people?
~Signed the Real, often misrepresented/not living in my mommy's
basement/LIT
Greegor
the
LIT> other LIT is on trip though. Sure hope he didn't get caught up
in
LIT> some nasty storm last night!
KRP > The "OTHER" LIT seems to live in the dark
KRP > empty recesses of "OUR" Kent Wills head.
KRP > He may have had his RACING PT Cruiser
KRP > doing wheelies... What a LUXURY CAR!
Careful, There were two different engines in PT Cruisers.
Kent would CERTAINLY have the one with the
larger, less economical engine to trailer HIS BOAT!
Or was that the ""OTHER"" Kent Wills?
Wait, Which one is such an idiot his parents
set up his inheritance in a PROTECTIVE family trust?
Was that OUR Kent Wills or the ""OTHER"" one?
Greegor
KBW > I know only one person named David Moore.
KBW > I realize there are other people with that
KBW > name, but I don't know them. Deal with it.
Kent, You sound like you're getting TESTY!
The ""OTHER"" Kent never got testy.
Dragon's Girl
> "Dragon's Girl" <bettywir...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
I assume it's Kim. I have no reason not to.
Dragon's Girl
Doing alright. I just found out that I have some medical problems
that will likely end in disability, but other than that, things are
going great.
Thanks for asking.
Greegor
LIT > playing Mafia Wars via Facebook with
LIT > my son and listening to Disturbed.
LIT > Have fun boys!
Do you prefer "Indestructible" or "down with the sickness"?
I like the female soldier in the Iraq sequences of the Indestructible
video.
That wierd monkey screech in down with the sickness is catchy.
The "Land of Confusion" video is kind of nice.
But these are all kind of male oriented.
Aren't you afraid the ""OTHER"" Kent will talk?
lostintranslation
Down with the sickness is one of my favorite songs. Of course Meaning
of Life is up there too. Saw Disturbed live 8 times. Not enough in
my book.
lostintranslation
Though the song "Deify" is about George Bush, it does remind me of a a
few certain people here.
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>>>He may have had his RACING PT Cruiser doing wheelies... What a
>>>LUXURY CAR!
>>
>> You really do need professional mental health care. Unless you've
>> offered MORE proof that you're a pathological liar, you hold the
>> delusion that the PT Cruiser is a luxury car.
>
>The PT Cruiser is a "PIECE OF SHIT!"
So you've offered more proof that you're a pathological liar. OK.
"CPS cases are legal matters. Offering advice IS practicing law
without a license."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn admitting he practices law without a
license in misc.legal
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>LIT> Wherever the other LIT lives it certainly isn't here! �I did hear
>the
>LIT> other LIT is on trip though. �Sure hope he didn't get caught up
>in
>LIT> some nasty storm last night!
>
>KRP > The "OTHER" LIT seems to live in the dark
>KRP > empty recesses of �"OUR" Kent Wills head.
>KRP > He may have had his RACING PT Cruiser
>KRP > doing wheelies... What a LUXURY CAR!
>
>Careful, There were two different engines in PT Cruisers.
There are? I wasn't aware of this.
There's no reason there couldn't be, I just never thought to check
such a thing.
>
>Kent would CERTAINLY have the one with the
>larger, less economical engine to trailer HIS BOAT!
Actually, we use a truck for that, as I've mentioned before. You
claim to have read everything I've posted, so you would already know
about the Dodge Ram used for towing.
You're admitted use and abuse of illegal drugs really has you
messed up, huh?
>
>Or was that the ""OTHER"" Kent Wills?
Outside of your latest proof that your admitted use and abuse of
illegal drugs has seriously messed you up mentally, I'm the only
person who posts with the nym Kent Wills.
>
>Wait, Which one is such an idiot his parents
>set up his inheritance in a PROTECTIVE family trust?
As far as I know, none.
You already admitted you were lying about the trust fund.
>
>Was that OUR Kent Wills or the ""OTHER"" one?
Neither. When you couldn't prove your FACT CLAIM there was/is a
trust fund, you admitted you were lying about its existence the whole
time.
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so
stupid he thinks I'm Asian.
MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
Message-ID: <35120b16.04011...@posting.google.com>
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story
Kent Wills
<betty...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
>> > Hey Lady! Long time no talk!
>>
>> BW> How are you Kim?
>>
>> =A0 =A0 Now Betty. You KNOW she's not "OUR" Kim she's a HE. Just ask the =
>"OTHER"
>> Kent Wills. HE KNOWS.
>
>I assume it's Kim. I have no reason not to.
Ken is convinced there is more than one person posting as LIT.
He's offered nothing to support the possition he presents.
"It's attached to a thing called a "WIFE" Betty."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn showing how he views his wife
as an object and NOT a human being.
Message-ID: <KLf2j.31312$9h.4837@trnddc07>
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Oct 25, 3:21�am, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>KBW > I know only one person named David Moore.
>KBW >�I realize there are other people with that
>KBW > name, but I don't know them. �Deal with it.
>
>Kent, You sound like you're getting TESTY!
Why are you so UNABLE to be honest?
>
>The ""OTHER"" Kent never got testy.
What other Kent Wills? I've only seen another use the nym once.
Kevin did so to help prove that one's nym isn't always going to be the
poster's real name.
Whereas I replied to his post, and you claimed you've read
everything I've posted, you would already know all about it.
Once again you offer PROOF that your admitted use and abuse of
illegal drugs makes honesty impossible for you, unless you make a
mistake or are in some way forced.
Kent Wills
Again you offer proof of your obsession with me. In a
conversation where I wasn't a topic, you HAD to mention me.
Get the help you NEED, Greg. I'm being very serious.
Greegor
LIT > playing Mafia Wars via Facebook with
LIT > my son and listening to Disturbed.
LIT > Have fun boys!
G > Do you prefer "Indestructible" or "down with the sickness"?
G > I like the female soldier in the Iraq sequences
G > of the Indestructible video.
G > That wierd monkey screech in down with the sickness is catchy.
G > The "Land of Confusion" video is kind of nice.
G > But these are all kind of male oriented.
G > Aren't you afraid the ""OTHER"" Kent will talk?
KBW > Again you offer proof of your obsession
KBW > with me. In a conversation where I wasn't
KBW > a topic, you HAD to mention me.
When it came to music that tends to be
popular with males, how could I MISS that
you recently asserted that Kim is male?
Oh wait! Was that the ""OTHER"" Kent
who said that?
KBW > Get the help you NEED, Greg.
KBW > I'm being very serious.
While you post your FICTION about
me Operating While Intoxicated?
The funny one with NO COURT CASE NUMBER?
Did it come from the same place as the
information that Kim is a male?
> Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
> (DOB 05/22/1959)
> CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
> Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
> OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
> Comments: CT 2 SPEED
> Disposition Status
> GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
Pathology again.
Zipperhead has many definitions.
Kent picked one definition which is slur on Asians.
Do you speak mandarin or canton, Kent?
I never heard of Polish immigrants considered
to be Asians before.
But then, who appointed YOU to pick which
definition of zipperhead I was intending?
And funniest of all, Dan Sullivan used the
slur on somebody else who is in no way Asian.
It seems that Dan and I intended the same
meaning, meaning somebody is an imbecile.
Is Dan a racist?
> "That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
> Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so
> stupid he thinks I'm Asian.
> MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
> Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
> drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
> alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Pathological connection on top of "stacked deck" or "loaded question"
Kent's Title claims child abuse, yet quote
points out the CPS allegation is for Neglect.
> Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
>
> "My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
> in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
> the Child Abuse registry, for example."
> -- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
> Message-ID: <35120b16.04011...@posting.google.com>
This is not me.
Kent knows this.
If you can't tell, this OTHER Greg Hanson
would likely NEVER deny making the statement.
I deny making the statement because
it was NOT me.
This all came out of the deliberate campaign
to confuse who is who, to obscure correct
ID's of Davey and you, Kent.
> " ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
> minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
> minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
> the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
> address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
> April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
This one is was used as part of a POSTED FRAME JOB.
It was actually a very bad forgery, done with an
anonymous remailer.
The FULL header shows an anonymous remailer, dizum I thought.
Kent KNOWS this was a fake, yet he pretends he doesn't.
> Path:
> news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
> From: Greegor <greego...@gmail.com>
> Newsgroups:
> misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
lostintranslation
>
> > Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
> > drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
> > alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
>
> Pathological connection on top of "stacked deck" or "loaded question"
>
> Kent's Title claims child abuse, yet quote
> points out the CPS allegation is for Neglect.
>
> > Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
>
> > "My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
> > in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
> > the Child Abuse registry, for example."
> > -- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
First line of Meaning of Life...'Run you little Bitch!' I wonder if
Kent is actually a woman pretending to be a man. And Kent, you can't
accuse me of lying as someone told me that you may be a female.
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>G > Aren't you afraid the ""OTHER"" Kent will talk?
>
>KBW > Again you offer proof of your obsession
>KBW > with me. =A0In a conversation where I wasn't
>KBW > a topic, you HAD to mention me.
>
>When it came to music that tends to be
>popular with males, how could I MISS that
>you recently asserted that Kim is male?
Which has what to do with your obsession about me?
Why, exactly, am I the single most important person in your
on-line life? Am I as important to you in real life?
>
>Oh wait! Was that the ""OTHER"" Kent
>who said that?
What other Kent Wills? Be specific.
As far as I am aware, no one else posts with the same nym. I
know of only one other time anyone else has used the nym.
Maybe your admitted use and abuse of illegal drugs is giving you
hallucinations?
>
>KBW > Get the help you NEED, Greg.
>KBW >=A0I'm being very serious.
>
>While you post your FICTION about
>me Operating While Intoxicated?
I've done no such thing.
>
>The funny one with NO COURT CASE NUMBER?
Speak to the State of Iowa. It's from public records.
I've told you to offer evidence that another person with your
first and last name who has the same date of birth you claim for
yourself is the actual person. If you would do so, and the
information you offer is confirmed, I'll state so and remove the
information from my sig.
As of my writing this, there is nothing to indicate you've made
any effort.
You won't because it's either about you, and you can't, or it's
not and proving it would end one item about which you can claim victim
status.
>
>Did it come from the same place as the
>information that Kim is a male?
I told you from where I got the information about your OWI. Are
you so messed up that you think Iowa would have records about the
gender of a person who, as far as I know, has never lived in Iowa?
>
>> Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 (DOB 05/22/1959)
>> CRIMINAL COMPLAINT =A0 04/10/1996
>> =A0 =A0 =A0Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
>> OTHER CITATION =A0 04/10/1996
>> =A0 =A0 =A0Comments: CT 2 SPEED
>> Disposition Status
>> =A0 =A0 =A0GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
>
>
>Pathology again.
What, exactly, does the branch of medical science that studies
the causes and nature and effects of diseases have to do with
anything?
The definition I use above comes from Dictionary.com. Unless
you're going to argue the people in charge of the site are wrong,
you've once again exposed your INABILITY to be honest, except by
accident or force.
>Zipperhead has many definitions.
>Kent picked one definition which is slur on Asians.
Whereas that's how you meant it, it was correct.
You waited MONTHS to whine about my quoting your racist rant. Had
I been in error, you would have made a comment about it very early on.
>Do you speak mandarin or canton, Kent?
I speak enough Mandarin to get some ideas across. I'd say I
speak well enough to communicate as well in Mandarin as a native
two-year-old.
I had thought I was better, until we took the trip to China. I
learned that I didn't (and don't) have as firm a grasp as I thought.
Mostly it was pronunciation. One word, pronounced differently,
can have different meanings.
Maw (that's my attempt at transliteration) can mean horse, cow or
female, depending on where and how the emphasis is placed.
Such is the way of "musical" languages.
>I never heard of Polish immigrants considered
>to be Asians before.
Are you letting me, and everyone else reading, know that I so
completely destroyed your lies that your ONLY option was to attack a
dead woman?
Either you believe I'm Asian (you've stated I'm not so this is no
longer a plausible option), that you HATE Asians, or you felt the only
option you had available was to attack a woman who has been dead for
over 20 years.
I would hope it's not option three. Not even Jonezie has been
willing to cross that line.
>
>But then, who appointed YOU to pick which
>definition of zipperhead I was intending?
>
You picked it. I simply pointed it out.
>And funniest of all, Dan Sullivan used the
>slur on somebody else who is in no way Asian.
I've seen no such post from Dan.
>
>It seems that Dan and I intended the same
>meaning, meaning somebody is an imbecile.
I've seen no such post from Dan.
>
>Is Dan a racist?
>
I've seen nothing that would support such a claim.
Is there a specific reason you're trying to distract from the
proof of your racial HATE by bringing Dan into the conversation? Have
I proved your racism so completely that you're left with no other
possible options?
>
>> "That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
>> =A0 Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so
>> stupid he thinks I'm Asian.
>> MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
>http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a
>http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=3Dzipperhead
>
>> Me: =A0"I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
>> drugs, Greg. =A0Is the reason for your stalking the members of
>> alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Why did you snip the part of the quote where you wrote, "Of
course."?
Is it because you slipped and were being honest?
>
>Pathological connection on top of "stacked deck" or "loaded question"
>
>Kent's Title claims child abuse, yet quote
>points out the CPS allegation is for Neglect.
>
Neglect is a form of abuse under Iowa law, as you already know.
Do you NEED me to cite the specific statute again?
>> Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: =A0"Of course."
You have two convictions for beating your wife. You don't even
try to deny this. You do try to minimize it and claim, as all
predators do, that it was all her fault.
You claim, but have never offered any proof, that you are on
Iowa's Child Abuse Registry.
I'm of the opinion that you were lying. That you claimed it as
a means to get people who are dealing with CPS to trust you. Once
they trusted you, they would be more willing to follow your advice.
Advice that would ensure they would and will lose against the CPS
organization you LOVE.
If my opinion is faulty, then it's faulty. You've offered
NOTHING to indicate it's not 100% correct. Quite the opposite, in
fact.
>>
>> "My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
>> in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
>> the Child Abuse registry, for example."
>> =A0 =A0-- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
>> Message-ID: <35120b16.04011...@posting.google.com>
>
>This is not me.
>Kent knows this.
There is evidence, that has yet to be countered, that you are the
author.
>If you can't tell, this OTHER Greg Hanson
>would likely NEVER deny making the statement.
>I deny making the statement because
>it was NOT me.
Again, there is evidence. It's not strong enough to state with
certainty that you wrote it, but it's certainly plausible.
>
>This all came out of the deliberate campaign
>to confuse who is who, to obscure correct
>ID's of Davey and you, Kent.
Why do you lie?
There is evidence that it's you. Even without it, YOUR standards
(everyone with the same first and last name are all the same person)
means you wrote it.
If you think your standards are wrong, cease using them in
regards to others.
>
>> " ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
>> minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
>> minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
>> the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
>> address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0April 2000, Gr=
>egory Hanson
>http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
>
>
>This one is was used as part of a POSTED FRAME JOB.
>It was actually a very bad forgery, done with an
>anonymous remailer.
It's a direct C&P from YOUR post. The post is available on
Google, should anyone wish to check.
But why spend the time. Here are the full headers from
datemas.de (I still encourage those with an interest to verify via
Google, a disinterested third party):
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!o41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services,alt.usenet.kooks
Subject: Bad impersonation
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 161
Message-ID:
<25d2473b-965b-41a0...@o41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com>
References: <postings-6D13AC...@news.bigpond.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.191.213.214
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1255336810 19637 127.0.0.1 (12 Oct 2009
08:40:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 08:40:10 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
Injection-Info: o41g2000yqb.googlegroups.com;
posting-host=207.191.213.214;
posting-account=5SXNEQkAAAC6SFadCHPE9O-jLMHq7h-Y
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 5.1;
Trident/4.0; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.04506.30; .NET
CLR 1.1.4322;
.NET CLR 3.0.04506.648; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR
3.5.30729),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Xref: news.datemas.de misc.kids:30443506
alt.support.foster-parents:55429 uk.people.parents:3754
alt.support.child-protective-services:299531 alt.usenet.kooks:690261
You replied to a post from bigpond.com. That's not a re-mailer,
Greg. It's a well known broadband provider located in Australia.
Why are you so UNABLE to be honest about anything at any time,
unless you make a mistake? That's a serious question. One I hope you
can bring yourself to be honest enough to answer, though I don't hold
out much hope, really.
>
>The FULL header shows an anonymous remailer, dizum I thought.
As can be seen above, and verified via Google, no re-mailer is
listed.
If you're going to lie, and you are, you should lie about that
which can't be proved. You have a real problem with this.
It's almost as if you think to yourself, "This will be easy to
expose as a lie. I'm definitely going to post it!"
I doubt you actually have such thoughts, but given how easy you
make it to prove you're lying, it's not impossible.
>
>Kent KNOWS this was a fake, yet he pretends he doesn't.
You forged yourself? Why?
If your claim is true, then you must have done so.
How were you able to post through bigpond?
Oh wait, you're lying again. Or is that still?
>
>> Path:
>> news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.g=
>oo=ADgle.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
>> From: Greegor <greego...@gmail.com>
>> Newsgroups:
>> misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-=
>pr=ADotective-services
>>
>> With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
>> into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
>> videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) =A0After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
>> was at my wits end. =A0I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
>> water. =A0Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
>> a full minute, with her flailing her arms. =A0I brought her up and she
>> gasped for air. =A0When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, =A0"When yo=
>u
>> were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? =A0Pokemon? =A0Rhianna?"
>> She shook her head. =A0"What were you thinking about?" I
>> prodded. =A0She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
>>
>> "Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
>> triumphantly.
>>
>> --a true story
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so
stupid he thinks I'm Asian.
MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
Message-ID: <35120b16.04011...@posting.google.com>
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
Kent Wills
<lostintran...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
>First line of Meaning of Life...'Run you little Bitch!' I wonder if
>Kent is actually a woman pretending to be a man. And Kent, you can't
>accuse me of lying as someone told me that you may be a female.
Maybe I am.
I've offered ample evidence over the years that would enable any
rational person to conclude I'm male. Still, it's possible I'm
female.
People who have met me in real life, and continue to refer to me
as male could be a part of the hoax.
On Usenet, one can be pretty much anything they want. One can
claim they've given birth to five children, if so desired. This
doesn't, of course, instantly mean the poster has ever done such.
You do realize that if I am female, then Greg has been lying
about me for the past few years, since the person he writes about is
male.
If you wish to claim I'm female, that's fine. It does me no
harm. Of course, you'll be stating Greg has been lying. Yes, he has
been no matter my gender, but wow! That he's been lying to the degree
you suggest is, well, wow!
--
"Kent"
krp
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:10b3d7fc-c2bd-498e...@e34g2000vbm.googlegroups.com...
LIT> Wherever the other LIT lives it certainly isn't here! I did hear
the
LIT> other LIT is on trip though. Sure hope he didn't get caught up
in
LIT> some nasty storm last night!
KRP > The "OTHER" LIT seems to live in the dark
KRP > empty recesses of "OUR" Kent Wills head.
KRP > He may have had his RACING PT Cruiser
KRP > doing wheelies... What a LUXURY CAR!
GH> Careful, There were two different engines in PT Cruisers.
Neither could make it go. The PTC is in the same class as the Chevy
Vega, Ford Pinto and a few other crap boxes from Detroit. Maybe Davey needs
some class and he can get his hands on that REAL status car a "LADA!"
krp
"Dragon's Girl" <betty...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:9c6f8d49-770a-44a9...@r36g2000vbn.googlegroups.com...
BW> I assume it's Kim. I have no reason not to.
Betty - wake up. "THE OTHER!" Remember.
krp
> On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:54:59 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>LIT> Wherever the other LIT lives it certainly isn't here! I did hear
>>the
>>LIT> other LIT is on trip though. Sure hope he didn't get caught up
>>in
>>LIT> some nasty storm last night!
>>
>>KRP > The "OTHER" LIT seems to live in the dark
>>KRP > empty recesses of "OUR" Kent Wills head.
>>KRP > He may have had his RACING PT Cruiser
>>KRP > doing wheelies... What a LUXURY CAR!
>>
>>Careful, There were two different engines in PT Cruisers.
>
> There are? I wasn't aware of this.
Sure there is the regular shit grinder motor, and then the TURBO shit
grinder you measure 0 to 60 times with a CALENDAR!
Kent Wills
wrote:
It's sad that your so jealous. I realize that due to your
inability to handle your finances you can't afford anything better
than what you have. Still, do you NEED to expose your jealousy?
"Quotes below have been highly altered."
-- Kenneth Robert Pangborn accidentally admitting in misc.legal
that he alters posts when he replies.
Kent Wills
wrote:
You're jealous that you can't afford anything more than the
little POS you currently own. It's Ok. Someday you MIGHT be able to
afford something better.
Someday.
"(CONTEXT REMOVED AS TO THE BELOW CLAIM)"
Kenneth Robert Pangborn admitting he alters the context of posts
when he replies.
MID FyUom.1363$Jd7....@nwrddc02.gnilink.net
freedom
On Sun, 25 Oct 2009, Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 25 Oct 2009 12:16:52 -0400, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
>wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>> Presumably in Calumet City, Illinois and NOT in the Ne England area.
>>>
>>> signed
>>>
>>> The "OTHER' Ken Pangborn
>>
>>LIT> Wherever the other LIT lives it certainly isn't here! I did hear the
>>LIT> other LIT is on trip though. Sure hope he didn't get caught up in
>>LIT> some nasty storm last night!
>>
>> The "OTHER" LIT seems to live in the dark empty recesses of "OUR" Kent
>>Wills head.
>
> You already admitted, by default, that your alcoholism forced you
>to lie about that.
>
>>He may have had his RACING PT Cruiser doing wheelies... What a
>>LUXURY CAR!
>
> You really do need professional mental health care. Unless you've
>offered MORE proof that you're a pathological liar, you hold the
>delusion that the PT Cruiser is a luxury car.
Actually, I just found out that it classifies as a "light truck."
Ours, unfortunately, is going to end up being a total loss. Still, with
the new baby, and with the older kids starting to get into lots more
activities, it might be time for something larger.
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals
"[I have] [n]ever had [any] standing in the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer's
Association or AN Y connection to them."
- --Ken Pangborn in a usenet post on January 1, 2009, denying affiliation
with the TCDLA, to whom he provided bogus educational credentials. His lie
is disproved here:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060822021821/www.tcdla.com/secure/experts/inde
x.shtml
"Some photo of some girl without even any documentation on THAT only proves
that YOU are a PSYCHO! A really STUPID one at that!"
- --Ken Pangborn, admitting to being a "stupid" "psycho" in message-ID
<jOp3l.292$Es4...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>
"The FACT is that [my mail-order wife Barbara Sanciprian] and I were
introduced in the FORMAL Spanish tradition by mutual friends, and were
married first in Cuba after 2 year courtship."
- --Ken Pangborn, admitting that he began cheating on his wife Peggy on
September 28, 2001, nearly two years before she separated from him
"I'm David Moore and I am insane!"
- --Ken Pangborn posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, attempting to
claim that his name is David Moore
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
- --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services
**, in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
Keywords: false allegations,sexual abuse,marital rape, date rape, sexual
harassment,child abuse,domestic violence,rape allegations,false allegations
of child abuse,false rape allegations,false abuse accusations,false
accusations,recovered memories,child sexual abuse,abuse child,sexual
assault,child molestation,reactive attachment disorder,penile
plethysmograph,polygraph,attorneys,divorce,visitation,pedophiles
More-keywords: KRP CONSULTING. False allegations of child abuse, false
abuse accusations, false domestic violence allegations help, false rape
allegations, abuse child, sexual abuse, child sexual abuse, false
allegations, false accusations, recovered memories, sexual assault, child
molestation, child sexual abuse, reactive attachment disorder, penile
plethysmograph, polygraph, trial consulting, jury consulting, jury
selection, jury voire dire, wrongful allegations, false child sexual abuse
allegations. Wrongful child sexual abuse allegations. Domestic Violence.
Rape. Marital rape. Date Rape. Confidence Rape.
Yet-more-keywords: ken pangborn,kenneth pangborn,barbara pangborn,barbara
sanciprian,palm harbor,tampa,attorneys,florida lawyers,florida
attorneys,tampa lawyers,tampa attorneys,trial consultant,trial
consulting,dui,domestic violence,vawa,abuse,3648 cockatoo,new port
richey,ernesto sanciprian,ernesto miguel blanco sanciprian,blanco
sanciprian,bryce carter,holguin,julio aguilar,yudith bacallao,raimundo
cabrera,ana hernandez chi,lixandro cordero,leandis diaz,al faisbuker,wendy
gil,armando capo ramos,george riveron,reinaldo rodriguez,lexis ross,liana
yisell alvarez silveira,madelyn tamayo,manuel toledo,thais valdes
Extra-keywords: Julito Sainz,craig clawson,lia yisell
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQCVAwUBSuWu6cWdjev37kExAQEAHQQAg3Ss1d0p7RmcCDyfpjWmTDhi0mGNEFV+
uFz9lsdWI1DkymN3FTWX2oiQ9QD8Y6tGMQB3Tuyh8aXWPSXTV9mc9mmYS4FnExgB
QrvHuKXFRfd6dwITqe8bm5ePRNOxLuU+/4NStYr666akh9y/dQY39XtuIrByj888
0KYh1qc1BVA=
=vj/F
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
krp
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
news:a7615bdfa2fed8d8...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Presumably in Calumet City, Illinois and NOT in the Ne England area.
>>>>
>>>> signed
>>>>
>>>> The "OTHER' Ken Pangborn
>>>
>>>LIT> Wherever the other LIT lives it certainly isn't here! I did hear
>>>the
>>>LIT> other LIT is on trip though. Sure hope he didn't get caught up in
>>>LIT> some nasty storm last night!
>>>
>>> The "OTHER" LIT seems to live in the dark empty recesses of "OUR"
>>> Kent
>>>Wills head.
>>
>> You already admitted, by default, that your alcoholism forced you
>>to lie about that.
>>
>>>He may have had his RACING PT Cruiser doing wheelies... What a
>>>LUXURY CAR!
> Actually, I just found out that it classifies as a "light truck."
SURE, Davey!
> Ours, unfortunately, is going to end up being a total loss. Still, with
> the new baby, and with the older kids starting to get into lots more
> activities, it might be time for something larger.
Oh Davey we ALL believe every word you say! You ALWAYS tell the truth.
<barf>
freedom
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, krp <kr...@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:
>POOR LITTLE INNOCENT VICTIM DAVID MOORE - READ HIM WHINE
>"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
>news:a7615bdfa2fed8d8...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>>>>> Presumably in Calumet City, Illinois and NOT in the Ne England area.
>>>>>
>>>>> signed
>>>>>
>>>>> The "OTHER' Ken Pangborn
>>>>
>>>>LIT> Wherever the other LIT lives it certainly isn't here! I did hear
>>>>the
>>>>LIT> other LIT is on trip though. Sure hope he didn't get caught up in
>>>>LIT> some nasty storm last night!
>>>>
>>>> The "OTHER" LIT seems to live in the dark empty recesses of "OUR"
>>>> Kent
>>>>Wills head.
>>>
>>> You already admitted, by default, that your alcoholism forced you
>>>to lie about that.
>>>
>>>>He may have had his RACING PT Cruiser doing wheelies... What a
>>>>LUXURY CAR!
>
>> Actually, I just found out that it classifies as a "light truck."
>
> SURE, Davey!
http://www.internetautoguide.com/new-cars/03-int/chrysler/pt-cruiser/index.html
"The Chrysler PT Cruiser is designed by Chrysler, offers a spacious
interior large enough for five passengers, and it is a front wheel drive
automobile that is classified as a light truck/compact vehicle."
There are numerous other references on the web which also corroborate that
it classifies as a "light truck."
>
>> Ours, unfortunately, is going to end up being a total loss. Still, with
>> the new baby, and with the older kids starting to get into lots more
>> activities, it might be time for something larger.
>
> Oh Davey we ALL believe every word you say! You ALWAYS tell the truth.
><barf>
Why would I, or anyone, lie about my vehicle being wrecked? Seriously,
what useful purpose would it serve?
You honestly need to go back to school, perhaps get a GED. Perhaps then
you wouldn't embarrass yourself so much.
iQCVAwUBSuc22sWdjev37kExAQEECQQAk+YKzLOvmY4yMVwoN4UZNVwEH+XMw0xv
0EswHXoLs7KbnMMHBV1N52tvOz305RiHtik69dgu0/tsT6IMVTkA8LxTG7R0Cr0t
SIU3JvjCmB4AnxymAE2KNSmXsjR6DkGkwk/oSJNJqCK5x5Io4eCGsrJo0Mc34SaO
seN1lAHZYdI=
=l0hv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Kent Wills
BURN!
>
>>
>>> Ours, unfortunately, is going to end up being a total loss. Still, with
>>> the new baby, and with the older kids starting to get into lots more
>>> activities, it might be time for something larger.
>>
>> Oh Davey we ALL believe every word you say! You ALWAYS tell the truth.
>><barf>
>
>Why would I, or anyone, lie about my vehicle being wrecked? Seriously,
>what useful purpose would it serve?
>
Ken so hates honesty that he MUST believe everyone else hates it
to the same degree.
>You honestly need to go back to school, perhaps get a GED. Perhaps then
>you wouldn't embarrass yourself so much.
>
I'm of the opinion he graduated high school. I have nothing to
present to support my opinion, but something makes me think he did.
It's clear that he BARELY got through, but I still think he did.
Based on Greg's posts (the ones he authors), I doubt he graduated
high school.
>
>
>http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
>criminals
>
"Quotes below have been highly altered."
krp
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>>He may have had his RACING PT Cruiser doing wheelies... What a
>>>>>LUXURY CAR!
>>
>>> Actually, I just found out that it classifies as a "light truck."
>>
>> SURE, Davey!
>
> http://www.internetautoguide.com/new-cars/03-int/chrysler/pt-cruiser/index.html
>
> "The Chrysler PT Cruiser is designed by Chrysler, offers a spacious
> interior large enough for five passengers, and it is a front wheel drive
> automobile that is classified as a light truck/compact vehicle."
And YET was ranked in the 10 WORST cars.
http://www.edmunds.com/chrysler/ptcruiser/2005/review.html
CONTRARY VIEWS
Acceleration can be sluggish with base engine, awkward seating position for
shorter drivers, unimpressive fuel economy.
Consumer Ratings & Reviews
Very bad car
This car has the worst turn radius! It also has lots of problems with the
engine. My blew at 70,000 miles and Chrysler won't fix it. I advise you not
to buy this car. I use to be so happy with it until a well taken care of
blew for no reason.
even when they like it owners say this:
This car is very comfortable. I wish it wouldn't die at 70,000 miles.These
cars don't last long.
I feel like a sucker for buying this junker.Back in 05 I thought buying new
would give me worry free driving for atleast 4 to 5 years.Man I could have
not been more wrong. I bought in May and by October it was at the dealer for
7 weeks because the whole instrument cluster was shot to hell.The problems
have not stopped since.I have replaced the drive shafts 5 times already.The
box is not big enough to list all the problems that I have had.If I did not
have friends who are mechanics and had to bring this car to the dealer, I
would be near $20,000 in repairs.With one year left in payments near $4,000
I am so tempted to drive this piece of junk thruogh the front window of
Chryslers head office.
For a four cylinder the gas mileage stinks. Component quality and paint is
identical with the base model. Ride quality and noise level are strickly
econobox.
DAVEY - IF the car is so GREAT - why is 2010 the LAST YEAR it will be
made???????????
Dragon's Girl
> DIPPY DAVEY MOORE"freedom" <aboutKRP...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
>
> news:7486370b64f487bc...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> >>>>>He may have had his RACING PT Cruiser doing wheelies... What a
> >>>>>LUXURY CAR!
>
> >>> Actually, I just found out that it classifies as a "light truck."
>
> >> SURE, Davey!
>
The new ones are actually a lot different than the PTs of yesteryear.
My mother made parts for the PT prototype.
That being so, my aunt bought one as soon as they rolled off the
line ...my mother's company provided parts for the car so it was
'family loyalty' that made her do it.
Hers turned out to be a gas hogging POS.
However, this past summer I rented a '10 PT and it made for an awesome
traveling vehicle. Took the roads well (I was in hill
country...Kentucky and Tennessee) and got great gas mileage. I drove
just over 2000 miles in it and loved the car. Ran great, pulled
great, had lots of room, lots of baggage room, and it didn't kill my
wallet ...my total cost on gas was just under $250. I think that's
pretty good for all the driving I did.
Yes, the older PTs are crap cars, but I think they're making
improvements.
krp
They are now made in Mexico and 2010 is their last year. They are breaking
Chrysler with warranty claims.
Greegor
Is a PT Cruiser a good fit for that?
Or is a PT Cruiser a convenient dream for a misfit making false
claims?
freedom
I never said the car was "GREAT." I said it classified as a light truck.
You're arguing about points not in contention.
Trouble with reading comprehension again?
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals
"[I have] [n]ever had [any] standing in the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer's
Association or AN Y connection to them."
--Ken Pangborn in a usenet post on January 1, 2009, denying affiliation
with the TCDLA, to whom he provided bogus educational credentials. His lie
is disproved here:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060822021821/www.tcdla.com/secure/experts/inde
x.shtml
"Some photo of some girl without even any documentation on THAT only proves
that YOU are a PSYCHO! A really STUPID one at that!"
--Ken Pangborn, admitting to being a "stupid" "psycho" in message-ID
<jOp3l.292$Es4...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>
"The FACT is that [my mail-order wife Barbara Sanciprian] and I were
introduced in the FORMAL Spanish tradition by mutual friends, and were
married first in Cuba after 2 year courtship."
--Ken Pangborn, admitting that he began cheating on his wife Peggy on
September 28, 2001, nearly two years before she separated from him
"I'm David Moore and I am insane!"
--Ken Pangborn posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, attempting to claim
that his name is David Moore
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
krp
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
>>http://www.edmunds.com/chrysler/ptcruiser/2005/review.html
And IF it is so good, WHY is this the last year it will be made??????
krp
> On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:47:57 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
> <gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>David is posing as a family man.
>>Is a PT Cruiser a good fit for that?
>
>
>>
>>Or is a PT Cruiser a convenient dream for a misfit making false
>>claims?
>>
>
> Greg?
It is a little shitbox on 4 wheels and that's no lie. Semi cute when it
first came out. It's SO good that this is the last year it will be made.
Kent Wills
<about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote:
>>DAVEY - IF the car is so GREAT - why is 2010 the LAST YEAR it will be
>>made???????????
>
>I never said the car was "GREAT." I said it classified as a light truck.
>You're arguing about points not in contention.
>
>Trouble with reading comprehension again?
Ken is having trouble with honesty. Still.
>
>http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
>criminals
"Maybe he's like me to attach some kiddie porn to aid his fantasies"
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-Team, expressing
his fondness for child porn in
Message-ID:
<RECUi.494$Q%3.238@trnddc04>
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>>>DAVEY - IF the car is so GREAT - why is 2010 the LAST YEAR it will be
>>>made???????????
>>
>> I never said the car was "GREAT." I said it classified as a light truck.
>
> And IF it is so good, WHY is this the last year it will be made??????
Get off the booze Pangborn. At least until AFTER you've posted
to Usenet.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>>>Or is a PT Cruiser a convenient dream for a misfit making false
>>>claims?
>>>
>>
>> What false claims are you making in regards to the PT Cruiser,
>> Greg?
>
> It is a little shitbox on 4 wheels and that's no lie. Semi cute when it
>first came out. It's SO good that this is the last year it will be made.
First, you aren't Greg.
Second, it's OK as far as vehicles go. There are better, and there
are worse.
That you are unable to afford one doesn't make it as bad as you
claim.
Dragon's Girl
> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:38:21 -0400, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
> >>>Or is a PT Cruiser a convenient dream for a misfit making false
> >>>claims?
>
> >> What false claims are you making in regards to the PT Cruiser,
> >> Greg?
>
> > It is a little shitbox on 4 wheels and that's no lie. Semi cute when it
> >first came out. It's SO good that this is the last year it will be made.
>
> First, you aren't Greg.
> Second, it's OK as far as vehicles go. There are better, and there
> are worse.
> That you are unable to afford one doesn't make it as bad as you
> claim.
I paid much more for my Kia Rio than the PTs are going for around
here.
Not terribly expensive cars.
>
> "(CONTEXT REMOVED AS TO THE BELOW CLAIM)"
> Kenneth Robert Pangborn admitting he alters the context of posts
> when he replies.
> MID FyUom.1363$Jd7.1...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net
Greegor
G > Is a PT Cruiser a good fit for that?
KBW > Yes.
G > Or is a PT Cruiser a convenient dream
G > for a misfit making false claims?
KBW > What false claims are you making
KBW > in regards to the PT Cruiser, Greg?
You tell me, Kent!
Kent Bradley Wills AKA Compuelf DOB Jan 8 1969 Felony Garage Burglar
used teen as accomplice
Kent's Appeal
IN PRINTED LAW BOOKS
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d
Cite as 696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005)
Kent's Appeal
http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/states/Iowa/04-0202.asp.html
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&size=Large
Notice that KENT made claims re sale of 202 NW College apartment
building
That's geoparcel gp=802415452029
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
( Step by step instructions elsewhere with name Kent B Wills )
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
http://www.rogersgis.com/zoom/Residential_Development/indexfull.htm
http://www.arcountydata.com/county.asp?county=Benton
TWO of Kent Wills' usenet newsgroup identities:
Do It Yourself Instructions to look up Kent's record
Iowa Department of Corrections records for Kent
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=1155768
Name Kent Bradley Wills [ As Collected Sept 13, 2009 ]
Offender Number 1155768
Sex M
Birth Date 01/08/1969
Age 40
Location
Offense
County Of Commitment
Commitment Date
Duration
TDD/SDD *
* TDD = Tentative Discharge Date
* SDD = Supervision Discharge Date
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 12/16/2008
Probation C Felony Polk 12/16/2008
Supervision Status Offense Class County of Commitment End Date
Probation Aggravated Misdemeanor Polk 11/25/2003
IN PRINTED LAW BOOKS
West's North Western Reporter
Second Series
A Unit of the National Reporter System
Volume 696 N.W.2d
Cite as 696 N.W.2d 20 (Iowa 2005)
Kent's Appeal
http://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/states/Iowa/04-0202.asp.html
http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=sc%5C20050506%5C04-0202&invol=1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA
No. 31 / 04-0202
Filed May 6, 2005
STATE OF IOWA,
Appellee,
vs.
KENT BRADLEY WILLS,
Appellant.
Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Polk
County, Michael D. Huppert, Judge.
Defendant appeals claiming ineffective
assistance of counsel. AFFIRMED.
Linda Del Gallo, State Appellate Defender,
and Tricia Johnston, Assistant State
Appellate Defender, for appellant.
Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General, Kevin
Cmelik, Assistant Attorney General, John P.
Sarcone, County Attorney, and John Judisch,
Assistant County Attorney, for appellee.
WIGGINS, Justice.
Kent Wills appeals his conviction for
second-degree burglary contending that
an attached garage is a separate occupied
structure from that of the living quarters
of the residence. In this appeal, we must
determine whether trial counsel was
ineffective for (1) failing to move for
judgment of acquittal on the basis there
was insufficient evidence to convict Wills
of second-degree burglary when he entered
an attached garage of a residence when no
persons were present in the garage, but
when persons were present in the living
quarters; and (2) failing to object to a
jury instruction based on this same
argument. Because we find there was no
legal basis for the motion for judgment
of acquittal or the objection to the jury
instruction, Wills' trial counsel was not
ineffective. Accordingly, we affirm the
judgment of the district court.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
Around 1 a.m., an Ankeny resident called
the local police to report that a car
alarm sounded in the resident's
neighborhood. The city dispatched a police
officer to the location. Observing nothing
unusual, the officer left the area, only
to be stopped a couple of blocks later
by a person who informed the officer he
had witnessed someone running from the
area of the car alarm. As the officer
started driving back to the area of the
car alarm, he noticed a person walking
on the sidewalk. The officer asked the
person, a minor, if he had noticed anybody
running from the area. The minor answered
that he had not. While the officer and
another officer were speaking to the minor,
another resident of the neighborhood
arrived in her car and informed the
officers that she had observed two people,
one of whom was heavy set with a blinking
light on his back pocket, walking in the
area of her neighbor's residence. She
observed the heavier-set individual, later
identified as Wills, enter her neighbor's
attached garage through an unlocked service
door. She further observed a smaller
individual standing by a van parked in
the neighbor's driveway.
The officers eventually let the minor leave
even though they found a large amount of
coins, a flashlight, and an electronic
pocket organizer in his pockets. After
releasing the minor, the police officers
drove to the residence where the neighbor
observed the two suspicious people and
woke the owner. The owner, his wife,
and two daughters were in the residence
sleeping at the time. After a search
of his vehicles, the owner discovered
change and an electronic pocket organizer
were missing from the vehicles. The
owner's daughter reported a diamond ring
and some change were missing from her
vehicle. The officers then contacted
the minor's parents, who informed the
officers the minor was with Wills. After
the officers questioned the minor again,
he admitted his involvement in the theft
and implicated Wills in the burglary.
Although Wills denied involvement in the
burglary, the officers arrested him.
The State filed a trial information
charging Wills with second-degree
burglary. The State later amended the
information to include two additional
charges of burglary in the third degree
and using a juvenile to commit an
indictable offense.
The jury returned a verdict finding Wills
guilty of the crimes of burglary in the
second degree, burglary in the third
degree, and using a juvenile to commit
an indictable offense. Wills appeals his
conviction for second-degree burglary
claiming ineffective assistance of
counsel.
II. Scope of Review.
Claims of ineffective assistance of counsel
are derived from the Sixth Amendment of the
United States Constitution. Strickland v.
Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 684-86, 104 S.
Ct. 2052, 2063-64, 80 L. Ed. 2d 674, 691-93
(1984). Our review for a claim involving
violations of the Constitution is de novo.
State v. Fintel, 689 N.W.2d 95, 100
(Iowa 2004). We normally preserve
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
for postconviction relief actions. State
v. Carter, 602 N.W. 2d 818, 820 (Iowa 1999).
However, we will address such claims on
direct appeal when the record is sufficient
to permit a ruling. State v. Artzer,
609 N.W.2d 526, 531 (Iowa 2000). The
appellate record in the present case is
sufficient to allow us to address Wills'
ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims
on direct appeal.
In order for a defendant to succeed on a
claim of ineffective assistance of counsel,
the defendant must prove: (1) counsel
failed to perform an essential duty and
(2) prejudice resulted. Id. Prejudice
results when "there is a reasonable
probability that, but for the counsel's
unprofessional errors, the result of the
proceeding would have been different."
State v. Hopkins, 576 N.W.2d 374, 378
(Iowa 1998) (quoting Strickland, 466
U.S. at 694, 104 S. Ct. at 2068,
80 L. Ed. 2d at 698). Wills' arguments
also raise issues of statutory
interpretation, which we review for
correction of errors at law. State v.
Wolford Corp., 689 N.W.2d 471, 473 (Iowa 2004).
III. Analysis.
To find Wills guilty of burglary in the
second degree, the State had to prove
Wills perpetrated a burglary "in or
upon an occupied structure in which one
or more persons are present . . . ." Iowa
Code § 713.5(2) (2003) (emphasis added).
In this appeal, Wills first contends his
trial counsel was ineffective for failing
to move for a judgment of acquittal on
the basis there was insufficient evidence
to support a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage, there were persons
present in or upon the occupied structure.
Wills concedes the garage was an occupied
structure, but argues the living quarters
and the attached garage are separate and
independent occupied structures; therefore,
the jury could not have found there were
people present in the attached garage
at the time of the burglary.
The Code defines an "occupied structure" as:
[A]ny building, structure, appurtenances
to buildings and structures, land, water
or air vehicle, or similar place adapted
for overnight accommodation of persons,
or occupied by persons for the purpose of
carrying on business or other activity
therein, or for the storage or safekeeping
of anything of value. Such a structure
is an "occupied structure" whether or not
a person is actually present.
Id. § 702.12.
Wills relies on State v. Smothers, 590
N.W.2d 721 (Iowa 1999), to argue the
garage and the living quarters are separate
and independent occupied structures. In
Smothers, two separate and distinct
businesses connected by interior fire doors
were operated in the same structure.
590 N.W.2d at 723. We held the defendant
committed two burglaries by entering each
business because "[t]he facility's
construction history and physical make-up
demonstrate that the portions are
independent working units which constitute
'[a] combination of materials to form a
construction for occupancy [or] use.'" Id.
Smothers is not at odds with the present
case because the living quarters and the
garage are not separate or independent
units of the residence.
Our review of the record reveals the garage
in question was a three-car attached garage
separated from the living quarters by a
door. The same roof covered the garage as
the rest of the residence. The living
quarters surrounded the garage on two sides.
It was structurally no different from any
other room in the residence.
The garage was a functional part of the
residence. On the night of the incident,
the door was unlocked. The owner of the
residence used two stalls in the garage to
park the family vehicles. The owner used
the third stall for his motorcycle. As
such, the garage and the living quarters
are a single "structure" or "building"
functioning as an integral part of the
family residence. Thus, the residence
including the garage is a single
"occupied structure" under section 702.12.
See, e.g., People v. Ingram, 48 Cal. Rptr.
2d 256 (Ct. App.1995) (holding defendant's
entry into an attached garage constituted
first-degree burglary because the garage
was attached to the house; therefore,
burglary of the garage was burglary of
an inhabited dwelling house); People v.
Cunningham, 637 N.E.2d 1247, 1252 (Ill.
App. Ct. 1994) (holding "ordinarily an
attached garage is a 'dwelling' because
it is part of the structure in which
the owner or occupant lives");
State v. Lara, 587 P.2d 52, 53
(N.M. Ct. App. 1978) (holding "burglary
of the [attached] garage was burglary of
the dwelling house because the garage was
a part of the structure used as living
quarters"); People v. Green, 141 A.D.2d
760, 761 (N.Y. App. Div. 1988) (holding
"[s]ince the garage in the present case
was structurally part of a building
which was used for overnight lodging of
various persons, it must be considered
as part of a dwelling"); White v. State,
630 S.W. 2d 340, 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1982)
(holding an attached garage under the
same roof as the home would be considered
a habitation within the purview of the
penal code because the garage is a
structure appurtenant to and connected
to the house); State v. Murbach, 843 P.
2d 551, 553 (Wash. Ct. App 1993)
(holding the definition of a dwelling
under Washington's burglary statute
included an attached garage).
Had Wills' trial counsel moved for a
judgment of acquittal on the basis there
was insufficient evidence to support
a finding that at the time Wills
entered the garage there were no persons
present in or upon the occupied
structure, it would have been overruled
by the court because the owner and his
family were present in the residence at
the time of the burglary.
Wills also claims his counsel was
ineffective for failing to object to
the jury instruction used by the district
court on the same ground; that the
living quarters were a separate and
independent occupied structure from the
attached garage. The instruction as
given stated:
The State must prove all of the following
elements of Burglary in the Second
Degree as to Count I:
1. On or about the 12th day of August,
2003, the defendant or someone he aided
and abetted broke into or entered the
residence at . . . .
2. The residence at . . . was an occupied
structure as defined in Instruction No. 29.
3. The defendant or the person he aided
and abetted did not have permission or
authority to break into the residence at ...
4. The defendant or the person he aided
and abetted did so with the specific
intent to commit a theft therein.
5. During the incident persons were present
in or upon the occupied structure.
If the State has proved all of the elements,
the defendant is guilty of Burglary in the
Second Degree. If the State has failed to prove
any of the elements, the defendant is not
guilty of Burglary in the Second Degree and
you will then consider the charge of
Attempted Burglary in the Second Degree
explained in Instruction No. 21.
(Emphasis added.)
Wills' claim is without merit. As we have
discussed, the residence is the one and
only "occupied structure" under the facts
of this case. Had Wills' trial counsel
made this objection to the instruction,
it would have been overruled.
Therefore, Wills' trial counsel is not
ineffective for failing to move
for a judgment of acquittal or objecting
to the instruction because there was no
legal basis for the motion or objection.
See State v. Hochmuth, 585 N.W.2d 234,
238 (Iowa 1998) (holding trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise an
issue that has no merit).
IV. Disposition.
We affirm the judgment of the district
court because Wills' trial counsel was
not ineffective for failing to raise
meritless issues.
AFFIRMED.
---------------------------------
Pay close attention to past owners of 202 NW College Ave.
Kent made affirmative claims about the property online.
Kent's folks sold it in 1994 while Kent lived there!
On 03/30/1999 Sweeney's filed on Kent for UNPAID RENT!
GeoParcel 8024-15-452-029 District/Parcel 181/00392-048-000
[ As Collected Sept 13, 2009 ]
Seller: WILLS, FRED A. & JANET R.
Buyer: THE SWEENEY REVOCABLE GRANTOR TRUST
04/26/1994 135,000 D/Deed 7010/188
-
Seller: SHELDAHL, ERIC A.
Buyer: WILLS, FRED
01/02/1990 130,500 D/Deed 6189/972
A Larger photo:
http://www.assess.co.polk.ia.us/cgi-bin/seephoto/photosize.cgi?gp=802415452029&size=Large
Notice that name SWEENEY above?
Check this out!
Iowa Courts Docket and Disposition web site
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
Iowa Courts
Online Search
< Start A Case Search Here! > click
Iowa Courts Online Search
Search Selection
Under Trial Court < click on Case Search >
Wills Kent B
02401 ESPR015146 INA J WILLS ESTATE
05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT ******
05771 SCSC335210 CITI FINANCIAL VS KENT
05771 SCSC374163 SFI F SCHERLE PRES VS KENT
05771 SCSC374164 SFI F SCHERLE III PRES VS KENT
05771 STAN201670 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 STAN210929 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
A list of case numbers will be presented.
Click on the SWEENEY case, 4th one down.
Under the "Filings" tab:
JUDGEMENT DEFAULT BRANDT GREGORY D 08/25/1999 09/01/1999 09/01/1999
Comments: $156.25 7.244% FROM 03/30/99
COMPUTER GENERATED NOTICE 05/11/1999 05/11/1999 05/11/1999
Comments: Notice of Proof of Claim
RETURN OF ORIGINAL NOTICE 04/21/1999 04/23/1999 04/23/1999
Comments: 4/10/99 KENT PERS
37.60
VERIFICATION OF ACCT HAS BEEN FILED 03/30/1999 03/30/1999
03/30/1999
SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE SWEENEY RENTALS 03/30/1999 03/30/1999
03/30/1999
Comments: UNPAID RENT
Under the "Financial" Tab:
Summary Orig Paid Due
COSTS 98.60 31.00 67.60
FINE 0.00 0.00 0.00
SURCHARGE 0.00 0.00 0.00
RESTITUTION 0.00 0.00 0.00
OTHER 238.46 0.00 238.46
-----------
$337.06 $31.00 $306.06
SUPPORT/ALIMONY N/A 0.00 N/A
----------------------------------------
Kent's 2000 Felony, first of TWO in Iowa
WILLS, KENT BRADLEY 05771 FECR145250 (POLK)
01/24/2000 Offense Date THEFT 2ND DEGREE - 1978 (FELD) WITHDRAWN
01/24/2000 Offense Date THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
03/07/2000 DEFERRED JUDGMENT (At that time) Sentence: 365 Day(s)
03/07/2000 PROBATION INFORMAL; 8/07/01-TRNFRD TO FORMAL 365 Day(s)
03/07/2000 COMMUNITY SERVICE 50 Hour(s)
03/07/2000 REFERRED TO OTHER AGENCY 1ST TIME OFFENDER CLASS
08/07/2001 JAIL PROB HRG 11 Day(s)
08/07/2001 JAIL PROB HRG 11 Day(s) TIME SERVED
08/07/2001 PROBATION EXTENDED PROB HRG
04/16/2002 PROBATION EXTENDED TO 08/06/03
04/16/2002 IMPOSED 7 Day(s)
04/16/2002 OTHER/MISCELLANEOUS PROB HRG 6 Day(s)
04/16/2002 DETENTION PROB HRG 6 Day(s)
08/07/2003 PRIOR ORDERS CONTINUED PROB EXTENDED UNTIL 8-06-04
11/26/2003 REVOKED PROB HRG; PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL
11/26/2003 PLACEMENT HRG PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL120 Day(s)
11/26/2003 SUSPEND PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; TIME SERVED 106 Day(s)
11/26/2003 COMMUNITY CORR PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL 14 Day(s)
( When Kent's second Felony revoked the rest of his Probation.)
http://www.iowacourts.state.ia.us/
Iowa Courts
Online Search
< Start A Case Search Here! > click
Iowa Courts Online Search
Search Selection
Under Trial Court < click on Case Search >
Wills Kent B
02401 ESPR015146 INA J WILLS ESTATE
05771 FECR145250 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 FECR176876 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
05771 SCSC310505 SWEENEY RENTALS VS KENT ******
05771 SCSC335210 CITI FINANCIAL VS KENT
05771 SCSC374163 SFI F SCHERLE PRES VS KENT
05771 SCSC374164 SFI F SCHERLE III PRES VS KENT
05771 STAN201670 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 STAN210929 IOWA vs [ KENT ] 01/08/1969
05771 SWCR177169 STATE VS KENT 01/08/1969
A list of case numbers will be presented.
Click on case FECR145250, 2nd one down.
Under the "[Criminal Charges/Disposition]" tab:
Charges, Dispositions, Sentences
Title: STATE VS KENT B WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR145250 (POLK)
Citation Number:
Defendant: WILLS, KENT BRADLEY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Count 01 Charge
Charge:
714.2(2) Description: THEFT 2ND DEGREE - 1978 (FELD)
Offense Date: 01/24/2000 Arrest Date: Against Type:
DPS Number:
0386367-01
Adjudication
Charge:
714.2(2) Description: THEFT 2ND DEGREE - 1978 (FELD)
Adj.:
DNU-WITHDRAWN Adj.Date: 03/07/2000
Adj.Judge:
WILSON, ROBERT D
Comments: AMENDED TI FILED
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(2) Description: THEFT 2ND DEGREE - 1978 (FELD)
Sentence Date:
03/07/2000 Sentence: WITHDRAWN
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: WILSON, ROBERT D
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Count 02 Charge
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Offense Date: 01/24/2000 Arrest Date: Against Type:
DPS Number:
0386367-02
Adjudication
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Adj.:
DEFERRED Adj.Date: 03/07/2000
Adj.Judge:
WILSON, ROBERT D
Comments:
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
03/07/2000 Sentence: DEFERRED JUDGMENT
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: WILSON, ROBERT D
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 365 Day(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
03/07/2000 Sentence: PROBATION
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: WILSON, ROBERT D
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 365 Day(s)
Comment:
INFORMAL;8/07/01-TRNFRD TO FORMAL
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
03/07/2000 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: WILSON, ROBERT D
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 50 Hour(s)
Comment:
TO BE DETERMINED BY PROBATION
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
03/07/2000 Sentence: REFERRED TO OTHER AGENCY
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: WILSON, ROBERT D
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
1ST TIME OFFENDER CLASS
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
08/07/2001 Sentence: JAIL
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: JACOBS, LOUISE M
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 11 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
08/07/2001 Sentence: TIME SERVED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: JACOBS, LOUISE M
Facility Type:
J Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 11 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
08/07/2001 Sentence: PROBATION EXTENDED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: JACOBS, LOUISE M
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROB HRG-4/16/02-PROBATION EXTENDED TO 08/06/03
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
04/16/2002 Sentence: IMPOSED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: COPPOLA, CAROL L
Facility Type:
J Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 7 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
04/16/2002 Sentence: OTHER/MISCELLANEOUS
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: COPPOLA, CAROL L
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 6 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
04/16/2002 Sentence: DETENTION
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: COPPOLA, CAROL L
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 6 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
08/07/2003 Sentence: PRIOR ORDERS CONTINUED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: MCGHEE, ODELL
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROB EXTENDED UNTIL 8-06-04
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
11/26/2003 Sentence: REVOKED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: SMITH, JOE E
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROB HRG; PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
11/26/2003 Sentence: PLACEMENT
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: SMITH, JOE E
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 120 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG; PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
11/26/2003 Sentence: SUSPEND
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: SMITH, JOE E
Facility Type:
J Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 106 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG; PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; TIME SERVED
Sentence
Charge:
714.2(3) Description: THEFT 3RD DEGREE - 1978 (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
11/26/2003 Sentence: COMMUNITY CORRECTIONS
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: SMITH, JOE E
Facility Type:
J Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 14 Day(s)
Comment:
PROB HRG; PROBATION/DJ REVOKED; JAIL
---------------------------------------
Charges, Dispositions, Sentences
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
Citation Number:
Count 01
08/12/2003 Offense Date BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
12/17/2003 Adj.Date: GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence 10 Year(s) SUSPENDED PRISON
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
Count 02
08/12/2003 Offense BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR VEHICLE
(AGMS)
12/17/2003 GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON Duration: 2 Year(s) SUSPENDED PRISON
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION Duration: 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE Duration: 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/06/09
Count 03
08/12/2003 USING JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE OFFENSE(FELC)709A.6
(2)
12/17/2003 GUILTY
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON Duration: 10 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: SUSPENDED PRISON 10 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION 2 Year(s)
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY FT DSM FACILITY-MAX
BENEFITS
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE 150 Hour(s)
12/17/2003 Sentence: JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
Charges, Dispositions, Sentences
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
Citation Number:
Count 01 Charge
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Offense Date: 08/12/2003 Arrest Date: Against Type:
DPS Number:
0668408-01
Adjudication
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Adj.:
DNU-GUILTY Adj.Date: 12/17/2003
Adj.Judge:
HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Comments: GUILTY
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 10 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: SUSPENDED PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 10 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 2 Year(s)
Comment:
FORMAL
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Facility Type:
R Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Facility Type:
R Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 150 Hour(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
12/17/2003 Sentence: PROBATION EXTENDED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
Sentence
Charge:
713.5 Description: BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE - 1983 (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Count 02 Charge
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Offense Date: 08/12/2003 Arrest Date: Against Type:
DPS Number:
0668408-02
Adjudication
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Adj.:
DNU-GUILTY Adj.Date: 12/17/2003
Adj.Judge:
HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Comments: GUILTY
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 2 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: SUSPENDED PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 2 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 2 Year(s)
Comment:
FORMAL
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
R Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 150 Hour(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
12/17/2003 Sentence: PROBATION EXTENDED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
Sentence
Charge:
713.6A(2)-A Description: BURGLARY 3RD DEGREE - UNOCCUPIED MOTOR
VEHICLE (AGMS)
Sentence Date:
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/06/09
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Count 03 Charge
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Offense Date: 08/12/2003 Arrest Date: Against Type:
DPS Number:
0668408-03
Adjudication
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Adj.:
DNU-GUILTY Adj.Date: 12/17/2003
Adj.Judge:
HUPPERT, MICHAEL D
Comments: GUILTY
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 10 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: SUSPENDED PRISON
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 10 Year(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: PROBATION
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 2 Year(s)
Comment:
FORMAL
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: RESIDENTIAL FACILITY
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
R Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/16/2004 Sentence: COMMUNITY SERVICE
Appeal:
AFFR Sen.Judge: OVROM, ELIZA
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
Y Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer: N
Fine Amount:
Duration: 150 Hour(s)
Comment:
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
12/17/2003 Sentence: PROBATION EXTENDED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: Y
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
JO-PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09
Sentence
Charge:
709A.6(2) Description: USING A JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE
OFFENSE (FELC)
Sentence Date:
01/25/2006 Sentence: IMPOSED
Appeal:
Sen.Judge: HUTCHISON, ROBERT A
Facility Type:
Attorney: N
Restitution:
N Drug: N Extradition: N
Lic.Revoked:
N DDS: N Batterer:
Fine Amount:
Duration:
Comment:
PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 01/16/09
-------------------------------------
Filings
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
ORDER OF DISCHARGE OVROM ELIZA 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008
Comments: FROM PROBATION
OTHER EVENT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS 12/16/2008 12/16/2008
12/16/2008
Comments: FIELD DISCHARGE REPORT
OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 12/16/2008 12/16/2008 12/16/2008
Comments: REVOCATION HEARING SET FOR 1/07/2009 IS CANCELLED
DEFENDANT HAS NOT PAID IN FULL FINANCIAL
OBLIGATIONS
ORDER FOR PROBATION REVOCATION HEARING MOISAN CYNTHIA M 12/05/2008
12/05/2008 12/05/2008
Comments: ON 1/7/09 AT 9:30AM RM204
PROBATION REVOCATION 12/05/2008 12/05/2008 12/05/2008
Comments: REPORT OF VIOLATIONS FILED BY JAN HORNOCKER
FORMAL PROBATION HUTCHISON ROBERT A 01/25/2006 01/26/2006
01/26/2006
Comments: EXTENDED TO 01/16/09 OR UNTIL CONDITIONS ARE MET
COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/13/2006 01/13/2006 01/13/2006
OTHER ORDER HUTCHISON ROBERT A 01/11/2006 01/13/2006 01/13/2006
Comments: DEFT'S PROBATION EXTENDED UNTIL 1/16/09; DEFT TO
COMPLETE
CONDITIONS LISTED
OTHER EVENT 09/15/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005
Comments: THE SUPREME COURT RETURNED FILE, PSI, 4 TRANSCRIPTS,
AND 1 ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS
OTHER EVENT APPELLATE DEFENDER'S OFFICE 06/09/2005 06/13/2005
06/13/2005
Comments: STATEMENT OF HOURS
15.9 HOURS = $795.00
ATTORNEY - GRETA TRUMAN
OTHER EVENT CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 06/02/2005 09/15/2005
09/15/2005
Comments: BILL OF COSTS
$27.50 TAXED AGAINST THE APPELLANT AND PAYABLE
TO
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
#04-0202
OTHER ORDER SUPREME COURT OF IOWA 06/02/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005
Comments: RE DEFT'S APPEAL CLAIMING INEFFECTIVE COUNSEL:
JUDGEMENT AFFIRMED
#04-0202
PROCEDENDO CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 06/02/2005 09/15/2005 09/15/2005
Comments: AFFIRMED
PROCEED W/DILIGENCE AS IF THERE HAD BEEN NO
APPEAL
#04-0202
COMMUNITY SERVICE 05/25/2004 05/27/2004 05/27/2004
Comments: 135 HRS COMPLETED 5/24/04
INDIGENT DEFENSE CLAIM FORM TAYLOR KAREN 05/11/2004 05/13/2004
05/13/2004
Comments: $1150
ELECTRONIC FILING
OTHER EVENT 04/26/2004 04/28/2004 04/28/2004
Comments: SUPREME COURT REC'D 1 FILE, 1 PSI ENVELOPE,
1 EXHIBIT(1 ENVELOPE DATED 1/21/04)
REC'D 4/20/04
OTHER ORDER NICKERSON DON 04/23/2004 04/27/2004 04/27/2004
Comments: THE BALANCE OF ATTNY FEE AND CC SHALL BE
CONVERTED TO 135 HRS COMM SERVICE
TO BE COMPLETED FROM FT DSM FACILITY
OR TRANSFER TO INTERSTATE COMPACT
COMMUNITY SERVICE 04/22/2004 04/23/2004 04/23/2004
Comments: 150 HRS COMPLETED
APRIL 8, 2004
OTHER EVENT 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 04/20/2004
Comments: RECD CHANGE OF ADDRESS FOR DEFT
OTHER EVENT 04/20/2004 04/20/2004 04/20/2004
Comments: FILE AND PSI SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT
ONE ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS FILED 1/21/04
SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT
OTHER EVENT 04/19/2004 04/19/2004 04/19/2004
Comments: SUP CRT RECEIVED 2 TRANSCRIPTS OF PROCEEDINGS
FILED 4/1/04 (VOL I & II)
SUP CRT 04-202
OTHER EVENT 04/06/2004 05/18/2004 05/18/2004
Comments: 2 TRANSCRIPTS FILED 4/1/04 SENT TO THE
SUPREME COURT
DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT MAXEY REBECCA 04/01/2004 04/05/2004
04/05/2004
Comments: OF PROCEEDINGS ON 12/16/03
VOLUME II
DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT MAXEY REBECCA 04/01/2004 04/05/2004
04/05/2004
Comments: OF PROCEEDINGS ON 12/15/03
VOLUME I
OTHER EVENT 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004
Comments: EXHIBITS RETURNED
OTHER EVENT 03/31/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004
Comments: ENVELOPE OF EXHIBITS CHECKED OUT TO COURT
REPORTER R.M.
OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 03/29/2004 03/31/2004 03/31/2004
Comments: MOTION IS GRANTED REGARDING REVIEW OF
PAYMENT OF COURT APPOINTED ATTY FEES AND
THE STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER IS ORDERED TO MAKE
PAYMENT AS REQUESTED.
OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 03/29/2004 03/30/2004 03/31/2004
ENTERED IN ERROR
Comments: STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER SHALL MAKE PAYMENT AS
REQUESTED.
MOTION 03/18/2004 03/19/2004 03/19/2004
Comments: TO ENLARGE TIME FOR DOCKETING FILED BY
ASSISTANT APPELLATE DEFENDER
ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 03/15/2004 03/16/2004 03/16/2004
Comments: ON MOTION TO REVIEW ACTION RE:PAYMENT OF
COURT APPOINTED ATTY.
3/29/04 8:15AM RM209A
MOTION 03/15/2004 03/16/2004 03/16/2004
Comments: FOR REVIEW OF ACTION REGARDING PAYMENT
OF COURT APPOINTED ATTORNEY FEES
FILED BY ATDF
OTHER EVENT 03/11/2004 03/11/2004 03/11/2004
Comments: SUPREME COURT RECVD 2 TRANSCRIPTS OF SENTENCING
ON 1/16/04 AND STATUS CONF ON 12/12/03 FILED
3/1/04
04-202
OTHER EVENT 03/09/2004 03/09/2004 03/09/2004
Comments: 2 TRANSCRIPTS FILED 3/1/04 SENT TO THE
SUPREME COURT
INDIGENT DEFENSE CLAIM FORM TAYLOR KAREN 03/09/2004 03/18/2004
03/18/2004
Comments: $1350.00 ELECTRONIC FILING
DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 03/01/2004
03/03/2004 03/03/2004
Comments: OF STATUS CONFERENCE ON 12/12/2003
DNU - COURT REPORTER TRANSCRIPT HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 03/01/2004
03/03/2004 03/03/2004
Comments: OF SENTENCING ON 01/16/2004
OTHER EVENT APPELLATE DEFENDER'S OFFICE 02/26/2004 02/27/2004
02/27/2004
Comments: COMBINED CERTIFICATE
OTHER EVENT 02/24/2004 02/24/2004 02/24/2004
Comments: DOCKET ENTRIES RECEIVED BY SUPREME COURT
2-10-04; SUPREME COURT NUMBER 04-202
ORDER APPOINTING OVROM ELIZA 02/18/2004 02/19/2004 02/19/2004
Comments: ORDER GRANTING K TAYLOR TO W/D
APPELLATE COUNSEL IS APPT
OTHER APPLICATION 02/18/2004 02/19/2004 02/19/2004
Comments: TO WITHDRAW
OTHER EVENT 02/10/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004
Comments: DOCKET ENTRIES AND CERTIFIED COPY OF NOTICE
OF APPEAL SENT TO THE SUPREME COURT
OTHER EVENT TAYLOR KAREN A 02/09/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004
Comments: COURT APPOINTED BILLING
47 HOURS = $2500
OTHER EVENT TAYLOR KAREN 02/09/2004 02/10/2004 02/10/2004
ENTERED IN ERROR
Comments: COURT
NOTICE OF APPEAL TAYLOR KAREN A 02/06/2004 02/09/2004 02/09/2004
Comments: FILED BY ATDF
OTHER EVENT 01/23/2004 01/27/2004 01/27/2004
Comments: ADDENDUM TO PSI REPORT
EXHIBIT MAXEY REBECCA 01/21/2004 01/21/2004 01/21/2004
Comments: STATE'S EXHIBITS
1-$13.21; 2-$24.25 (IN VAULT); 3-LIGHT;
4&5-WRITTEN STATEMENT; 6,7,8-DIAGRAM
1 ENVELOPE & VAULT
OTHER EVENT 01/20/2004 01/26/2004 01/26/2004
Comments: VORP
VICTIM DOES NOT WANT TO VORP
NO RESTITUTION ISSUES AT THIS TIME
VICTIM DENNIS AND JAMIE WIEBEN
COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/20/2004 01/20/2004 01/20/2004
COURT ORDERED PAYMENT PLAN 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004
COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 01/16/2004
01/20/2004 01/20/2004
Comments: $15.00
PRE SENTENCE INVESTIGATION REPORT PSI 01/16/2004 01/16/2004
01/16/2004
ORDER OF DISPOSITION OVROM ELIZA 01/16/2004 01/16/2004 01/16/2004
Comments: FOUND GUILTY BY JURY/PRISON-SUSPENDED; FORMAL
PROBATION; FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS;
COMMUNITY SERVED; RESTITUTION-SUPP ORDER TO
FOLLOW; VORP; APPEAL BOND $13000 C/S
ORDER OF DISPOSITION OVROM ELIZA 01/16/2004 01/16/2004
01/16/2004
ENTERED IN ERROR
Comments: PLED GUILTY/PRISON-SUSPENDED; FORMAL
PROBATION; FT DSM FACILITY-MAX BENEFITS;
COMMUNITY SERVED; RESTITUTION-SUPP ORDER TO
FOLLOW; VORP; APPEAL BOND $13000 C/S
MITTIMUS TO STATE INSTITUTION WILLS KENT BRADLEY 01/16/2004
01/16/2004 01/16/2004
Comments: **FORT DES MOINES**
RETURN OF SERVICE - OTHER POLK COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE 12/23/2003
12/26/2003 12/26/2003
Comments: TRANSPORT COSTS $96.24
OTHER EVENT 12/22/2003 12/23/2003 12/23/2003
Comments: DEFT'S COPY OF ORDER TO EXCEED STATE FEE
LIMITATION RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE
COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE MAXEY REBECCA 12/17/2003 12/18/2003
12/18/2003
CRIMINAL VERDICT HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003
Comments: OF GUILTY TO BURGLARY 2ND, 3RD, AND USING A
JUVENILE TO COMMIT AN INDICTABLE OFFENSE; DCS
WILL SUBMIT A PSI BY 1 WK PRIOR TO SENTENCING
DATE; PRESENTENCE CONF & SENTENCING 1-16-04
@ 8:30 AM IN RM 209A; BOND CONT
AMENDED TRIAL INFORMATION HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003
12/18/2003
Comments: FILED BY JOHN JUDISCH
JURY SELECTION HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003
INSTRUCTIONS 12/17/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003
Comments: TO THE JURY AND STATEMENT OF THE CASE
OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/16/2003 12/17/2003 12/17/2003
Comments: JUV SEAN BILYEU SHALL BE TRANSFERRED TO THE
CUSTODY OF POLK CO SHERIFF FOR THE DURATION
OF HIS REQUIRED TESTIMONY/PRESENCE IN THIS
MATTER. SEAN BILYEU SHALL REMAIN IN THE
CUSTODY OF POLK CO SHERIFF OR ANY OTHER
LOCATION (MEYER HALL) DEEMED APPROPRIATE BY
THE SHERIFF UNTIL THE POLK CO SHERIFF CAN
EXECUTE THE TIMELY TRANSPORT OF SEAN BILYEU
FROM THE CUSTODY OF THE SHERIFF TO THE ELDORA
TRAINING CENTER.
OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/16/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003
Comments: DEFT TO BE RETURNED FROM ELDORA-COTTAGE 5
BY JIM TROTTER, INVESTIGATOR/CTY ATTY'S
OFFICE; DEFT CAN BE PRESENT AT HIS TESTIMONY
ON 12-16-03
OTHER ORDER HUPPERT MICHAEL D 12/15/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003
Comments: ATDF IS PERMITTED TO EXCEED GUIDELINE FOR
CT APPT ATTY IN THIS MATTER AND THAT THIS
ORDER SHALL INCLUED ALL FEES INCURRED AS OF
THE DATE OF THIS ORDER.
APPLICATION TO EXCEED FEES 12/15/2003 12/16/2003 12/16/2003
COURT REPORTER CERTIFICATE HILGENBERG VIVIAN ROSE 12/12/2003
12/17/2003 12/17/2003
MOTION IN LIMINE TAYLOR KAREN 12/12/2003 12/15/2003 12/15/2003
ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 12/05/2003 12/08/2003 12/08/2003
Comments: STATUS CONF: 12/12/03 @ 10:00 AM RM 204
RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/20/2003 12/09/2003 12/09/2003
Comments: 4=$0
RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/18/2003 11/25/2003 11/25/2003
Comments: 3=$0
ORDER SETTING HEARING OVROM ELIZA 11/14/2003 11/14/2003 11/14/2003
Comments: STATUS CONFERENCE
11/13/03 9AM RM 204
ALL PARTIES MUST BE PRESENT
ORDER SETTING TRIAL OVROM ELIZA 11/13/2003 11/14/2003 11/14/2003
Comments: 12/15/03 @ 9:00 AM RM 204
WAIVER OF SPEEDY TRIAL TAYLOR KAREN 11/13/2003 11/14/2003
11/14/2003
Comments: LIMITED
RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 11/10/2003 11/12/2003 11/12/2003
Comments: 1 = $0
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF DAVID DUVALL
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF BETH ANN SKOGEN
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF NEIL LEMKE
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF DENNIS WIEBEN
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF NATALIE BALUKOFF
OTHER EVENT 11/10/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
Comments: DEPOSITION OF SEAN BILYEU
RETURN OF SERVICE ON SUBPEONA 10/31/2003 11/04/2003 11/04/2003
Comments: 6=$0
AMENDED TRIAL INFORMATION OVROM ELIZA 10/31/2003 11/03/2003
11/03/2003
Comments: FILED BY JOHN JUDISCH
NOTICE WARD JAMES P 10/31/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003
Comments: OF ADDITIONAL WITNESSES
DNU - SUBPOENA PER DUCES TECUM 10/31/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003
Comments: 1 - $13.70
OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: FOR DEPOSITIONS AND SERVICE
AT STATE EXPENSE
OTHER APPLICATION 10/21/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: FOR DEPOSITIONS AND SERVICE
AT STATE EXPENSE
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITION
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS
NOTICE TAYLOR KAREN 10/20/2003 10/21/2003 10/21/2003
Comments: OF DEPOSITIONS
OTHER ORDER OVROM ELIZA 10/07/2003 10/08/2003 10/08/2003
Comments: ORDER ENTERED 9/18/03 SETTING TRIAL FOR
11/19/03 WAS IS ERROR. TRIAL IS RESET FOR
11/12/03 @9:00 AM RM 204
OTHER EVENT 09/24/2003 09/26/2003 09/26/2003
Comments: DEFT'S COPY OF APP TO W/D
RETURNED UNDELIVERABLE
PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE OVROM ELIZA 09/18/2003 09/19/2003 09/19/2003
Comments: WAS HELD; TRIAL ON 11-19-03
ATDF TAYLOR
OTHER EVENT AMUNDSON LAURA K 08/26/2003 09/02/2003 09/02/2003
Comments: STATEMENT OF HOURS
.4-$18.00
APPEARANCE TAYLOR KAREN 08/25/2003 08/26/2003 08/26/2003
Comments: FILED BY KAREN TAYLOR
WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL OVROM ELIZA 08/21/2003 08/22/2003 08/22/2003
Comments: OF ADULT PUBLIC DEF IS GRANTED
KAREN TAYLOR IS APPOINTED
ORDER OF ARRAIGNMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/21/2003 08/21/2003 08/21/2003
Comments: Pretrial Conference 09/18/2003 01:30 PM DCC1
Trial 10/22/2003 09:00 AM DCC9
Bond is continued
TRIAL INFORMATION OVROM ELIZA 08/20/2003 08/20/2003 08/20/2003
Comments: FILED BY JAMES WARD
ORDER FOR ARRAIGNMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/14/2003 08/14/2003
08/14/2003
Comments: IN CUSTODY ON 8/21/03 AT 10:30AM JAILCOURT
OUT OF CUSTODY AT 8AM ROOM 204
PRELIM HAS NOT BEEN WAIVED SET FOR 8/22/03
DNU - HEARING FOR BOND REDUCTION MCGHEE ODELL 08/14/2003 08/14/2003
08/14/2003
Comments: BOND $13000 C/S
APP FOR COUNSEL/FINANCIAL STATMENT MCGHEE ODELL 08/13/2003
08/13/2003 08/13/2003
Comments: APPROVED
PD IS APPOINTED
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 08/13/2003 08/13/2003 08/13/2003
Comments: BURGLARY 2ND
ANPD 03-75354
HEARING FOR INITIAL APPEARANCE MCGHEE ODELL 08/13/2003 08/13/2003
08/13/2003
Comments: Preliminary Hearing 08/22/2003 08:00 AM DA03
Bond Review 08/14/2003 08:30 AM DA04
Bond set for 713.5 $13000 C/S
Total Bond $13000 C/S
Indexed PUBLIC DEFENDER-POLK COUNTYPIN-
PK1000375
Title: STATE VS KENT BRADLEY WILLS
Case: 05771 FECR176876 (POLK)
Citation Number:
Orig Paid Due Summary
3501.70 3501.70 0.00 COSTS
0.00 0.00 0.00 FINE
125.00 125.00 0.00 SURCHARGE
0.00 0.00 0.00 RESTITUTION
27.50 27.50 0.00 OTHER
-------------------------------------
$3654.20 $3654.20 $0.00
WILLS, KENT B [ Collected Sept 13, 2009]
Age: 40
Rogers, AR
Ankeny, IA
Marshalltown, IA
Bartlett, IL
Villa Park, IL
And from another source: Hanover Park, IL
WILLS, FREDERICK ALFRED (Kent's Dad 65 )
WILLS, MICHAEL A (Kent's son ??)
WILLS, JANET RAE (Kent's Mom 62 )
HARTWIG,TIFFANY JEANNE (Wills) (Kent's sister )
From another source: Kelly M Wills Kent's wife ?? )
( Samantha T Wills, Kathleen M Wills, James Wills ? )
-----------------------------------
Consider the following:
If "our" Kent is NOT Kent Bradley Wills then
his ""Fake ID"" has worked well, so what's
the problem?
Consider Kent's OWN comments about:
A. regarding his sister (by name)
B. property in CORPORATION name (Wills Family Trust)
C. footage of "Wills" plaque avoiding first name
D. apt building at 202 NW College Ave Ankeny IA
E. past residence in various cities in IA
F. connection to Arkansas
G. that he set up/was assigned this ""Fake ID""
Does an actual Garage Burglary Felon have a
RIGHT to con people into thinking he ISN'T one?
Does a TWO time thieving Felon actually have
a right to conceal his record and a right
against having his record exposed?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/b9653f6758b592b8
Newsgroups: alt.fan.bob-larson, alt.law-enforcement, alt.usenet.kooks
From: Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com>
Local: Wed, Oct 15 2008 5:59 pm
> and running to Arkansas ain't gonna help you this time, Kent --
KBW > I've never run to Arkansas.
KBW > We have a house near Fort Smith, AR.
KBW > I'm confident your stalking has found
KBW > just where it is. You were able to
KBW > find my phone number from when I
KBW > lived in Chicago (you posted part
KBW > of it) back in 1988, so finding a
KBW > current address should have been
KBW > real easy for you.
2006 Assets Learning Conference Session III.8
Understanding the New Bankruptcy and Credit Laws:
Implications for the Field
Facilitated for the Assets Alliance by:
Janet Wills
Wills Resources
8250 Wills Court
Rogers, AR 72756
Phone & Fax Number: (479) 925-4001
E-mail: janetw...@yahoo.com
Ramona McKinney
Asset Builders Program Director
Southern Good Faith Fund
2304 West 29th Avenue
Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71603
Phone Number: (870) 535-6233, ext. 15
E-mail: rmck...@southerngff.org
History of Bankruptcy
Roots of word traced to medieval Italy – “banco rotto” which means
broken bench
Early U. S. bankruptcy law was modification of British law
1800’s – First federal bankruptcy law signed by President John Adams
in 1800 2 more laws passed and repealed until the Bankruptcy Act of
1898
1900’s and Beyond
A bankruptcy environment that had as its focus helping debtors seek a
new start remained in place for most of 20th century.
By beginning of 21st century creditors successfully argued that this
current law and environment were too easy on debtors
BAPCPA
The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005
was passed and went into effect October 19, 2005
Interruption in our presentation
There is a blank page in the back of your packet. As we are talking
today about bankruptcy and credit, please use it to jot down some of
your thoughts on how this new bankruptcy environment is going to
impact you and the people you serve.
Specifically write yourself a note or two about at least one
bankruptcy proceeding you know about personally. Then in 20 words or
less state what you think the contributing cause was for that person’s
financial problems.
We will want to hear your thoughts later.
Types of Bankruptcy
Chapter 7
Chapter 11
Chapter 12
Chapter 13
Chapter 7
For personal bankruptcy
Often referred to is liquidation bankruptcy
Debtors turn over nonessential assets to bankruptcy trustee, who then
sells it off and distributes proceeds to creditors eliminating debt
completely
This type of bankruptcy was most affected by the BAOCPA
Chapter 11
For corporations that want to reorganize their finances and remain in
business
Features a debt repayment plan
Chapter 12
For family farmers and fishermen
Features payment plan and debt restructuring
Chapter 13
For individuals
Features debt repayment plan
More individuals who previously would have filed under Chapter 7 will
be forced into Chapter 13
Changes with the BAPCPA
Means test
Required Credit Counseling
Required Debtor Education
Means Test
To qualify for Chapter 7 “liquidation bankruptcy” individual must pass
means test
Income must be below state’s median income
Or if it is above, debtor is subject to means test
Monthly income less allowed expenses
If after all these subtractions the total monthly disposable income is
less than $100 the debtor has passed the Means Test
Means Test cont.
If disposable income is more than $166.67 Means test is flunked and
debtor is not eligible for Chapter 7, must go to Chapter 13
If disposable income is between $100 and $166.67 then calculations are
figured to see if what is left over is enough to pay off more than 25%
of unsecured debt over 5 years.
In other words – the means test is not easy.
Required Credit Counseling
Debtors filing for Chapter 7 must complete required credit counseling
& debtors must pay for it.* Credit Counseling must be provided by a
qualifying 501(c)3 organization that has been approved by Bankruptcy
Trustees.
*fee can be waived
Debtor Education
2 hours required
Required topics
Budget Development
Setting short-term & long-term financial goals as well as developing
skills to assist in achieving these goals
Calculating gross monthly income & net monthly income
Identifying & classifying monthly expenses as fixed, variable, or
periodic
Debtor Education
Required topics cont
Money Management
Keeping adequate financial records
Developing decision-making skills required to distinguish between
wants and needs and to comparison shop for goods & services
Maintaining appropriate levels of insurance coverage, taking into
account the types and costs of insurance
Saving for emergences, for periodic payments, and for financial goals
Debtor education
required topics cont.
Wise Use of Credit
Types sources, and costs of credit & loans
Identifying debt warning signs
Appropriate use of credit & alternatives to credit use
Checking a credit rating
Debtor Education
required topics cont.
Consumer information
Public and non-profit resources for consumer assistance
Applicable consumer protection laws and regulations, such as those
governing correction of a credit record and protection against
consumer fraud
Approved credit counseling and debtor education can be provided
In person
Internet
Telephone
(can be approved for a combination of internet/telephone. That is the
approval we have)
www.usdoj.gov/ust/
The U. S. Trustees home page
A Huge wealth of information
www.usdoj.gov/ust/eo/bapcpa/ccde/cc_approved.htm#AL
Web site (part of the trustee web site) for list of approved credit
counselors and debtor education providers
Click on state
Click on your judicial district
Bankruptcy and the Future
At first it’s a relief – you file for bankruptcy, the creditors stop
calling and harassing you, and the juggling act ends.
Many people who file bankruptcy ask, “Now what can I expect?”
Let’s begin looking at “what’s next” by completing the quiz.
Bankruptcy will expire from your credit report after 10 years.
Some credit reporting agencies may remove Chapter 13 after 7 years.
Bankruptcy is for life – if you apply for insurance, credit, or a job
you can be asked if you have ever filed for bankruptcy. There is no
time limit even if it is very old.
Bankruptcy will stay with me forever: True.
2. The accounts included in my bankruptcy will be removed from my
credit report upon discharge: False.
Accounts included in bankruptcy expire independently from bankruptcy.
These accounts will be marked “Included in BK” on the credit report.
They will remain up to 7 years after filing.
After discharge the balance must be reported as “0.”
I will never get credit again: False.
You can expect receive many offers of credit.
Many of these may be from unscrupulous creditors with activation fees
and/or membership fees.
There are “debtor-friendly” agencies that specialize in credit repair
loans.
Do not be too eager to get credit again – know the terms and
conditions of the credit.
I will not be able to by a home for 10 years: False.
There are some lenders who prefer to deal with consumers with good
credit and will not do business for the 10 years it remains.
It is not a quick fix, it may take those in Chapter 13 three to five
years to complete their payment plan.
With strides to rebuild credit and no new negative “marks,” you may be
able to receive a conventional mortgage within one to two years.
Even after bankruptcy I may still have some of my existing debt:
True.
Even with Chapter 7 not all debt will be discharged, it depends on the
type of debts that are owed.
Certain debts that cannot be discharged include: most taxes, child
support, most student loans, court fines and criminal restitution, and
personal injury.
Debts incurred after filing for bankruptcy will not be included.
I will lose all my property if I file for bankruptcy: False.
With Chapter 13, which is like a payment plan, you may be allowed to
keep property.
Chapter 7 involves the sale of all assets that are not exempt.
Exemptions differ from state to state but typically allow: equity in
home, insurance, retirement plans, personal property, car, public
benefits, and/or tools used on job.
Filing for bankruptcy will lower my credit score: True.
The drop in the credit score will depend on the type of debt and
payment history prior to filing.
Credit score is calculated using a complicated algorithm that takes
into account hundreds of factors and values.
It is very difficult to predict how the credit score will be affected
but bankruptcy is one of the most negative factors included in the
report.
I cannot file for bankruptcy for 8 years after discharge: True.
This is only true for Chapter 7.
Chapter 13 waiting period is shorter and can be as little as two
years.
After bankruptcy all my debts will be free and clear and I will have
peace of mind: False.
As stated in #5 all debts will not be discharged.
Bankruptcy is listed in the top five life-altering negative events
that one can go through.
Bankruptcy is life-altering and leaves deep wounds both to the psyche
and the credit report.
After bankruptcy I will need to take steps to protect myself from
another bankruptcy: True.
Even if the bankruptcy was through no fault of your own it will be a
good time to examine what led to bankruptcy to begin to prepare for
unforeseen events.
Take a critical look at spending and saving habits.
Implement strategies to control spending, develop a budget, and start
a savings plan.
Let’s Talk About It
Implications to the IDA field
The “typical” person seeking bankruptcy
Contributing causes
freedom
>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:29:11 -0400, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
>wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>>DAVEY - IF the car is so GREAT - why is 2010 the LAST YEAR it will be
>>>>made???????????
>>>
>>> I never said the car was "GREAT." I said it classified as a light truck.
>>
>> And IF it is so good, WHY is this the last year it will be made??????
>
> Get off the booze Pangborn. At least until AFTER you've posted
>to Usenet.
His tirade about the PT Cruiser is quite funny. I have to wonder how much
time he spent digging up the "facts" he posted, to argue points which
weren't even remotely in contention.
My only statements were that my wife totalled our Cruiser, and that I found
out from our insurance agent that the vehicle actually classifies as a
light truck. I never made any argument about how "good" the vehicle was,
or that it was an ideal family vehicle, etc..... in fact, to the contary, I
believe I mentioned that we'd probably look in another direction for a
replacement vehicle, considering a new baby and older kids who have
increasing activities.
I guess it's a good thing, though....every minute Ken spends researching
irrelevant informatioin, is one minute he's not out there scamming fathers.
Perhaps we should get him started again on trying to prove that the
internet can't be accessed in Cuba, or one of his other rants....
Greegor
G > me Operating While Intoxicated?
KBW > I've done no such thing.
G > The funny one with NO COURT CASE NUMBER?
KBW > Speak to the State of Iowa. It's from public records.
With NO CASE NUMBER??
> I've told you to offer evidence that another person with your
> first and last name who has the same date of birth you claim for
> yourself is the actual person. If you would do so, and the
> information you offer is confirmed, I'll state so and remove the
> information from my sig.
> As of my writing this, there is nothing to indicate you've made
> any effort.
To disprove a case that does not exist?
Of course not!
> You won't because it's either about you, and you can't, or it's
> not and proving it would end one item about which you can claim victim
> status.
G > Did it come from the same place as the
G > information that Kim is a male?
> I told you from where I got the information about your OWI. Are
> you so messed up that you think Iowa would have records about the
> gender of a person who, as far as I know, has never lived in Iowa?
I was thinking they both came from your nether regions.
As is true in every state, a CASE NUMBER
is not an OPTION for court records.
>
>
>
> >> Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
> >> =A0 =A0 =A0 (DOB 05/22/1959)
> >> CRIMINAL COMPLAINT =A0 04/10/1996
> >> =A0 =A0 =A0Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
> >> OTHER CITATION =A0 04/10/1996
> >> =A0 =A0 =A0Comments: CT 2 SPEED
> >> Disposition Status
> >> =A0 =A0 =A0GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
>
> >Pathology again.
>
> What, exactly, does the branch of medical science that studies
> the causes and nature and effects of diseases have to do with
> anything?
You are a compulsive liar and a psychopath.
Case numbers are NOT optional on court cases.
You fictionalized an OWI and falsely presented
it as part of my record.
You ARE Kent Bradley Wills, DOB Jan 8, 1969.
> The definition I use above comes from Dictionary.com. Unless
> you're going to argue the people in charge of the site are wrong,
> you've once again exposed your INABILITY to be honest, except by
> accident or force.
G > Zipperhead has many definitions.
G > Kent picked one definition which is slur on Asians.
KBW > Whereas that's how you meant it, it was correct.
How would you know which definition I meant?
> You waited MONTHS to whine about my quoting your racist rant. Had
> I been in error, you would have made a comment about it very early on.
Kent, This isn't deja vu. We've been through this already.
I posted a link to where I refuted it early on.
Do you think the white supremacist who said
that stuff you quote would deny it now?
If I was that person I would not deny it.
It just doesn't fit the profile for that person.
They take an oath.
Haven't you ever noticed how Davey will not
publicly DENY taking a white
supremacist or nationalist oath?
[...]
G > And funniest of all, Dan Sullivan used the
G > slur on somebody else who is in no way Asian.
KBW > I've seen no such post from Dan.
Did you look? Search Dan's posts for zipperhead.
G > It seems that Dan and I intended the same
G > meaning, meaning somebody is an imbecile.
KBW > I've seen no such post from Dan.
Hands over your eyes, Kent?
G > Is Dan a racist?
KBW > I've seen nothing that would support such a claim.
KBW > Is there a specific reason you're trying to distract from the
KBW > proof of your racial HATE by bringing Dan into the conversation?
Have
KBW > I proved your racism so completely that you're left with no
other
KBW > possible options?
If you proved I am racist for using zipperhead on a non-asian,
then you also proved Dan is a racist for using the same
word and also on a non-asian.
Personally, I just think you are an imbecile.
freedom
On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Dragon's Girl <betty...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>On Oct 29, 4:34=A0am, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:38:21 -0400, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >>>Or is a PT Cruiser a convenient dream for a misfit making false
>> >>>claims?
>>
>> >> =A0 =A0What false claims are you making in regards to the PT Cruiser,=
>> >> Greg?
>>
>> > =A0 =A0It is a little shitbox on 4 wheels and that's no lie. Semi cute=
when it
>> >first came out. It's SO good that this is the last year it will be made=
.
>>
>> =A0 =A0 First, you aren't Greg.
>> =A0 =A0 Second, it's OK as far as vehicles go. There are better, and the=
re
>> are worse.
>> =A0 =A0 That you are unable to afford one doesn't make it as bad as you
>> claim.
>
>I paid much more for my Kia Rio than the PTs are going for around
>here.
>Not terribly expensive cars.
It was a decent "get you around" car for my wife, for miscellaneous errands=
such as shopping, PTA etc. rather than driving a gas-guzzling SUV around.
It did seem to blow fuses a little more than normal during its lifetime
though. We'd gotten to the point of outgrowing it anyway, even before it
became scrapyard material.
In any case, I'd expect we'll now be treated to months of off-topic rants
from Ken (and his mouthpiece Greg) regarding how good or bad the Cruiser
is, or what year they're going to stop making it. Points which aren't even=
being argued....
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals
"[I have] [n]ever had [any] standing in the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer's=
Association or AN Y connection to them."
- --Ken Pangborn in a usenet post on January 1, 2009, denying affiliation
with the TCDLA, to whom he provided bogus educational credentials. His lie=
is disproved here:
http://web.archive.org/web/20060822021821/www.tcdla.com/secure/experts/inde=
x.shtml
"Some photo of some girl without even any documentation on THAT only proves=
that YOU are a PSYCHO! A really STUPID one at that!"
- --Ken Pangborn, admitting to being a "stupid" "psycho" in message-ID
<jOp3l.292$Es4...@nwrddc01.gnilink.net>
"The FACT is that [my mail-order wife Barbara Sanciprian] and I were
introduced in the FORMAL Spanish tradition by mutual friends, and were
married first in Cuba after 2 year courtship."
- --Ken Pangborn, admitting that he began cheating on his wife Peggy on
September 28, 2001, nearly two years before she separated from him
"I'm David Moore and I am insane!"
- --Ken Pangborn posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated, attempting to
claim that his name is David Moore
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
- --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services
**, in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
Keywords: false allegations,sexual abuse,marital rape, date rape, sexual
harassment,child abuse,domestic violence,rape allegations,false allegations=
of child abuse,false rape allegations,false abuse accusations,false
accusations,recovered memories,child sexual abuse,abuse child,sexual
assault,child molestation,reactive attachment disorder,penile
plethysmograph,polygraph,attorneys,divorce,visitation,pedophiles
More-keywords: KRP CONSULTING. False allegations of child abuse, false
abuse accusations, false domestic violence allegations help, false rape
allegations, abuse child, sexual abuse, child sexual abuse, false
allegations, false accusations, recovered memories, sexual assault, child
molestation, child sexual abuse, reactive attachment disorder, penile
plethysmograph, polygraph, trial consulting, jury consulting, jury
selection, jury voire dire, wrongful allegations, false child sexual abuse
allegations. Wrongful child sexual abuse allegations. Domestic Violence.
Rape. Marital rape. Date Rape. Confidence Rape.
Yet-more-keywords: ken pangborn,kenneth pangborn,barbara pangborn,barbara
sanciprian,palm harbor,tampa,attorneys,florida lawyers,florida
attorneys,tampa lawyers,tampa attorneys,trial consultant,trial
consulting,dui,domestic violence,vawa,abuse,3648 cockatoo,new port
richey,ernesto sanciprian,ernesto miguel blanco sanciprian,blanco
sanciprian,bryce carter,holguin,julio aguilar,yudith bacallao,raimundo
cabrera,ana hernandez chi,lixandro cordero,leandis diaz,al faisbuker,wendy
gil,armando capo ramos,george riveron,reinaldo rodriguez,lexis ross,liana
yisell alvarez silveira,madelyn tamayo,manuel toledo,thais valdes
Extra-keywords: Julito Sainz,craig clawson,lia yisell
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQCVAwUBSunvz8Wdjev37kExAQGM8gP/YeaLihPUl3zo6tWqTCwj/cVVNzL4TZI3
FAAhRjN3W8fqYKV4nUGFdWIv3Hy3UxWRG2hrkaR7RHcBtH2SSAcjXKDaimVczUlR
jp0al95wQiEzgad3hMlnI5gbxxbLeJtQ6xob7pF0rwM4I2iyFAGgG/7J65c8+UsK
3zPPPtm2/L4=3D
=3DmZgF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
krp
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>I paid much more for my Kia Rio than the PTs are going for around here.
>>Not terribly expensive cars.
> It was a decent "get you around" car for my wife, for miscellaneous
> errands
> such as shopping, PTA etc. rather than driving a gas-guzzling SUV around.
> It did seem to blow fuses a little more than normal during its lifetime
> though. We'd gotten to the point of outgrowing it anyway, even before it
> became scrapyard material.
>
> In any case, I'd expect we'll now be treated to months of off-topic rants
> from Ken (and his mouthpiece Greg) regarding how good or bad the Cruiser
> is, or what year they're going to stop making it. Points which aren't
> even
> being argued....
Why should we, Davey? The amusing thing is that while you MAY have a PT
Cruiser, most likely an old one, you don't have a wife, and it is likely
your only transportation and YOU were the one who totaled it. We need to
cull out the kernel of truth in your lies. The PT Cruiser was "scrapyard
material" the day it rolled off the assembly line in Mexico. hey fill the
tanks with Corona extra. The funny thing is that as a econobox the gas
mileage is dismal. City driving gets MID TEENS. My Honda CRV - SUV gets 24
mpg in town - and if you aren't racing near 30 on the highway. Yet the
"Cruiser" is barely fast enough to get out of its own way. 0 to 60 time is
measured on a calendar. It would make a nice grocery cart IF it didn't
guzzle so much gas getting there. Chevy has an SUV that gets better mileage
as does Ford. Cars? Chevy has 5 cars with better mileage and FAR more room.
In the Cruiser if you need to fart you need to open the door and point your
ass outside. There wouldn't be room inside. The nicest part of the Cruiser
is all the new friends you make with it. The mechanics at the Chrysler
garage. You get to know ALL of them on a first name basis, their wives and
kids. The car is SO GOOD that this is the last year it will be made. Can you
say OLDSMOBILE? Making fun of the Junker is just amusing given DAVEY BOY'S
past claims of rolling in the dough, heading a fortune 500 Real Estate
empire with 50,000 employs (making fun of the actual boasts) you'd think
that he could afford something a bit more impressive to take buyers around
in to look at his HUGE MANSION properties, maybe a Caddy? I never saw a RE
agent with a shitbox, at least not a successful one. My agent had a Jeep
commander SUV.
I'm not the one who brought the car up. I am just RIDICULING a braggart
(Moore) for the constant line of bullshit.
Kent Wills
<betty...@yahoo.com> wrote:
[...]
>> =A0 =A0 First, you aren't Greg.
>> =A0 =A0 Second, it's OK as far as vehicles go. There are better, and ther=
>e
>> are worse.
>> =A0 =A0 That you are unable to afford one doesn't make it as bad as you
>> claim.
>
>I paid much more for my Kia Rio than the PTs are going for around
>here.
>Not terribly expensive cars.
Which should tell the readers something.
He can't even afford an inexpensive vehicle.
--
"Kent"
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>G > Or is a PT Cruiser a convenient dream
>G > for a misfit making false claims?
>
>KBW > What false claims are you making
>KBW > in regards to the PT Cruiser, Greg?
>
>You tell me, Kent!
If I knew what false claims you had made, I wouldn't have asked
you what they were/are.
Present the false claims you hold that you posted, a win for you,
unless you were lying, another loss for you.
The choice is yours.
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, or proving he's so
stupid he thinks I'm Asian.
MID:<c6bac3f6-7a0e-4bf8-8ddd-d77bccfc6...@p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com>
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.legal/msg/395db830731df54a
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott Hanson, wife beater and child abuser: "Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Greg Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
Message-ID: <35120b16.04011...@posting.google.com>
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story
Kent Wills
<about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote:
[...]
>>> =A0 =A0 That you are unable to afford one doesn't make it as bad as you
>>> claim.
>>
>>I paid much more for my Kia Rio than the PTs are going for around
>>here.
>>Not terribly expensive cars.
>
>It was a decent "get you around" car for my wife, for miscellaneous errands
>such as shopping, PTA etc. rather than driving a gas-guzzling SUV around.
>It did seem to blow fuses a little more than normal during its lifetime
>though. We'd gotten to the point of outgrowing it anyway, even before it
>became scrapyard material.
I think you missed Betty's point.
It's not an expensive vehicle, and still it's too pricey for
Pangborn.
>
>In any case, I'd expect we'll now be treated to months of off-topic rants
>from Ken (and his mouthpiece Greg) regarding how good or bad the Cruiser
>is, or what year they're going to stop making it. Points which aren't even
>being argued....
>
Be kind.
Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The-A-Team made a
mistake. He failed to pay attention to what was being presented.
He does such a lot.
When his errors are pointed out, he really gets upset.
>http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
>criminals
"you are reading Moore's SELECTIVE material that is HIGHLY edited."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn claiming in misc.legal that David Moore can
and does edit Google's Usenet archive.
Message-ID: <n9Sfm.1372$nh2...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
Kent Wills
<about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote:
>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009, Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>On Thu, 29 Oct 2009 04:29:11 -0400, "krp" <kr...@tampabay.rr.com>
>>wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>>>>DAVEY - IF the car is so GREAT - why is 2010 the LAST YEAR it will be
>>>>>made???????????
>>>>
>>>> I never said the car was "GREAT." I said it classified as a light truck.
>>>
>>> And IF it is so good, WHY is this the last year it will be made??????
>>
>> Get off the booze Pangborn. At least until AFTER you've posted
>>to Usenet.
>
>His tirade about the PT Cruiser is quite funny. I have to wonder how much
>time he spent digging up the "facts" he posted, to argue points which
>weren't even remotely in contention.
He made a mistake. He misunderstood what you were presenting.
Pangborn often makes such errors. And not just with you.
>
>My only statements were that my wife totalled our Cruiser, and that I found
>out from our insurance agent that the vehicle actually classifies as a
>light truck. I never made any argument about how "good" the vehicle was,
>or that it was an ideal family vehicle, etc..... in fact, to the contary, I
>believe I mentioned that we'd probably look in another direction for a
>replacement vehicle, considering a new baby and older kids who have
>increasing activities.
>
It's OK as a vehicle. I kind of wish we hadn't bought ours, but
it does what it needs to do; Get us from point A to point B.
It certainly isn't the luxury car Pangborn mistakenly claimed it
is.
>I guess it's a good thing, though....every minute Ken spends researching
>irrelevant informatioin, is one minute he's not out there scamming fathers.
That is a plus.
The down side for Pangborn is that his doing so allows him more
opportunity to prove that he isn't able to understand what he's read.
Further, people can see how often he makes mistakes with fairly
important details.
If I were in need of a trial consultant, I wouldn't want one who
consistently makes mistakes like Kenneth Robert Pangborn.
Since Pangborn claims he doesn't lie, the only possible
explanation is that he keeps making mistakes about the details.
>Perhaps we should get him started again on trying to prove that the
>internet can't be accessed in Cuba,
But he claimed it could be accessed, but ONLY at the HOTELS
(emphasis Pangborn's).
>or one of his other rants....
>
I'd like to see him rant about how GMT and the International Date
Line are the same thing. I wasn't able to see the rant as it
happened, so a replay would be of great interest to me.
>
>
>
>http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
>The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
>criminals
>
"I am insane!"
--Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP Consulting and The A-team,
posting to alt.dads-rights.unmoderated claiming that he was found
legally insane.
krp
> On Fri, 30 Oct 2009 03:11:07 +0100, freedom
> <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> =A0 =A0 That you are unable to afford one doesn't make it as bad as you
>>>> claim.
>>>
>>>I paid much more for my Kia Rio than the PTs are going for around
>>>here.
>>>Not terribly expensive cars.
>>
>>It was a decent "get you around" car for my wife, for miscellaneous
>>errands
>>such as shopping, PTA etc. rather than driving a gas-guzzling SUV around.
>>It did seem to blow fuses a little more than normal during its lifetime
>>though. We'd gotten to the point of outgrowing it anyway, even before it
>>became scrapyard material.
>
> I think you missed Betty's point.
> It's not an expensive vehicle, and still it's too pricey for
> Pangborn.
What of a 2008 Honda CRV bought new?
Kent Wills
wrote:
If you can't afford a PT Cruiser, you don't stand a chance of
getting the CRV.
If you're going to claim you own one, you'll need to offer
something in the way of proof.
"(CONTEXT REMOVED AS TO THE BELOW CLAIM)"
Kenneth Robert Pangborn admitting he alters the context of posts
when he replies.
MID FyUom.1363$Jd7....@nwrddc02.gnilink.net
krp
.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>> =A0 =A0 That you are unable to afford one doesn't make it as bad as
>>>>>> you
>>>>>> claim.
>>>>>
>>>>>I paid much more for my Kia Rio than the PTs are going for around
>>>>>here.
>>>>>Not terribly expensive cars.
>>>>
>>>>It was a decent "get you around" car for my wife, for miscellaneous
>>>>errands
>>>>such as shopping, PTA etc. rather than driving a gas-guzzling SUV
>>>>around.
>>>>It did seem to blow fuses a little more than normal during its lifetime
>>>>though. We'd gotten to the point of outgrowing it anyway, even before
>>>>it
>>>>became scrapyard material.
>>>
>>> I think you missed Betty's point.
>>> It's not an expensive vehicle, and still it's too pricey for
>>> Pangborn.
>>
>>What of a 2008 Honda CRV bought new?
>
> If you can't afford a PT Cruiser, you don't stand a chance of
> getting the CRV.
> If you're going to claim you own one, you'll need to offer
> something in the way of proof.
I bought one NEW in 2008. PROOF? There is NO proof that a RETARD like
YOU would understand. Want the original window sticker off it in a scan? A
photo?
Greegor
Maybe he thinks your car should be owned by a protective trust?
I lived the fiasco about Kent's boat registration.
Kent Wills
wrote:
[...]
>>>What of a 2008 Honda CRV bought new?
>>
>> If you can't afford a PT Cruiser, you don't stand a chance of
>> getting the CRV.
>> If you're going to claim you own one, you'll need to offer
>> something in the way of proof.
>
> I bought one NEW in 2008.
What about the one you claimed to have bought in 2009?
Maybe you just made a mistake when you made that claim and you
meant 2008?
>PROOF? There is NO proof that a RETARD like
>YOU would understand. Want the original window sticker off it in a scan? A
>photo?
A photo would be a start. Especially if it shows the vehicle
parked in your driveway or garage.
Of course, that would be evidence, not proof. But with enough
evidence, most would accept a claim being proved.
If you're lying, then you'll offer nothing, just as you've done
each time you've been asked to support any lie you've presented in the
past.
"CPS cases are legal matters. Offering advice IS practicing law
without a license."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn admitting he practices law without a
license in misc.legal
Kent Wills
<gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Kent is arguing about who owns your car?
No.
>Maybe he thinks your car should be owned by a protective trust?
That's an option, if he wants.
>I lived the fiasco about Kent's boat registration.
What fiasco? Do be specific.
krp
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:bc3bda24-9f1a-4a34...@s31g2000yqs.googlegroups.com...
> Kent is arguing about who owns your car?
> Maybe he thinks your car should be owned by a protective trust?
> I lived the fiasco about Kent's boat registration.
He thinks I RENT a house. He is howling because *I* actually "OWN" my house.
The POLACK can't go to the public record OR to his GAY buddy's (Moore)
Website and see there is NO mortgage. Poor confused little POLACK that he
is.