On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:04 AM, McTrev <ntcod...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great news. I'm hoping to upgrade a project I'm working on from the > previous release to this one.
> Don't suppose there are a check list of things I need to change or to > be aware of?
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
[mailto:sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Seif Attar Sent: 08 February 2011 12:59 To: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: 1.9.5 Released
I have updated SharpArchContrib to .Net4 and SharpArch 1.9.5, you can get downloads from
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:04 AM, McTrev <ntcod...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great news. I'm hoping to upgrade a project I'm working on from the > previous release to this one.
> Don't suppose there are a check list of things I need to change or to > be aware of?
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "S#arp Architecture" group. To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
[mailto:sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Hinett Sent: 08 February 2011 13:18 To: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: 1.9.5 Released
Great news and good timing for a new project I'm starting today!
Looking forward to the 2.0 release...what additional features will 2.0 have by the way?
Paul
-----Original Message----- From: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com [mailto:sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Seif Attar Sent: 08 February 2011 12:59 To: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: 1.9.5 Released
I have updated SharpArchContrib to .Net4 and SharpArch 1.9.5, you can get downloads from
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:04 AM, McTrev <ntcod...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great news. I'm hoping to upgrade a project I'm working on from the > previous release to this one.
> Don't suppose there are a check list of things I need to change or to > be aware of?
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "S#arp Architecture" group. To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "S#arp Architecture" group. To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Paul Hinett <p...@ukcreativedesigns.com> wrote: > Does the AreaViewEngine not support .cshtml files for the razor view > engine?
> From first looking at the source code, it only seems to be looking for .aspx > files.
> Paul
> -----Original Message----- > From: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > [mailto:sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Hinett > Sent: 08 February 2011 13:18 > To: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > Subject: RE: 1.9.5 Released
> Great news and good timing for a new project I'm starting today!
> Looking forward to the 2.0 release...what additional features will 2.0 have > by the way?
> Paul
> -----Original Message----- > From: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > [mailto:sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Seif Attar > Sent: 08 February 2011 12:59 > To: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: 1.9.5 Released
> I have updated SharpArchContrib to .Net4 and SharpArch 1.9.5, you can get > downloads from
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:04 AM, McTrev <ntcod...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Great news. I'm hoping to upgrade a project I'm working on from the >> previous release to this one.
>> Don't suppose there are a check list of things I need to change or to >> be aware of?
>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups > "S#arp Architecture" group. >> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
[mailto:sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Seif Attar Sent: 08 February 2011 13:33 To: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: 1.9.5 Released
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Paul Hinett <p...@ukcreativedesigns.com> wrote: > Does the AreaViewEngine not support .cshtml files for the razor view > engine?
> From first looking at the source code, it only seems to be looking for > .aspx files.
> Paul
> -----Original Message----- > From: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > [mailto:sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Hinett > Sent: 08 February 2011 13:18 > To: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > Subject: RE: 1.9.5 Released
> Great news and good timing for a new project I'm starting today!
> Looking forward to the 2.0 release...what additional features will 2.0 > have by the way?
> Paul
> -----Original Message----- > From: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > [mailto:sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Seif Attar > Sent: 08 February 2011 12:59 > To: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: 1.9.5 Released
> I have updated SharpArchContrib to .Net4 and SharpArch 1.9.5, you can > get downloads from
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:04 AM, McTrev <ntcod...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Great news. I'm hoping to upgrade a project I'm working on from the >> previous release to this one.
>> Don't suppose there are a check list of things I need to change or to >> be aware of?
>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups > "S#arp Architecture" group. >> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "S#arp Architecture" group. To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 2:04 AM, McTrev <ntcod...@gmail.com> wrote: > Great news. I'm hoping to upgrade a project I'm working on from the > previous release to this one.
> Don't suppose there are a check list of things I need to change or to > be aware of?
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
Paul, I will be the first to admit that we are not fans of the Razor view engine, but you are right, this should be baked into the core. Perhaps we will place an alternate area view engine in the contrib in the meantime and for 2.0 add the razor support.
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Paul Hinett <p...@ukcreativedesigns.com> > wrote: > > Does the AreaViewEngine not support .cshtml files for the razor view > > engine?
> > From first looking at the source code, it only seems to be looking for > > .aspx files.
> > Paul
> > -----Original Message----- > > From: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > > [mailto:sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Paul Hinett > > Sent: 08 February 2011 13:18 > > To: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > > Subject: RE: 1.9.5 Released
> > Great news and good timing for a new project I'm starting today!
> > Looking forward to the 2.0 release...what additional features will 2.0 > > have by the way?
> > Paul
> > -----Original Message----- > > From: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > > [mailto:sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Seif Attar > > Sent: 08 February 2011 12:59 > > To: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > > Subject: Re: 1.9.5 Released
> > I have updated SharpArchContrib to .Net4 and SharpArch 1.9.5, you can > > get downloads from
> > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:04 AM, McTrev <ntcod...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Great news. I'm hoping to upgrade a project I'm working on from the > >> previous release to this one.
> >> Don't suppose there are a check list of things I need to change or to > >> be aware of?
> >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> Groups > > "S#arp Architecture" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to > sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > >> For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "S#arp Architecture" group. > > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > . > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "S#arp Architecture" group. > > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > . > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "S#arp Architecture" group. > > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > . > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
Do you guys still recommend the spark view engine out of the engines available then.I've not really used anything other than the Web Form engine at the moment (which is terrible!!)
Paul
From: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com [mailto:sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Alec Whittington Sent: 08 February 2011 15:11 To: sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: 1.9.5 Released
We will have an upgrade guide in the next week or so, in the meantime i say just go for it.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "S#arp Architecture" group. To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com <mailto:sharp-architecture%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com> . For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "S#arp Architecture" group. To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
Spark is to be the default (though it is very, very easy to swap out view engines). The great thing about Spark is that it is very easy to implement into any sort of e-mail or PDF templating your system might do.
For Razor this is needlessly complicated, or at least was a couple months ago when I researched it.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Paul Hinett <p...@ukcreativedesigns.com>wrote:
> Do you guys still recommend the spark view engine out of the engines > available then…I’ve not really used anything other than the Web Form engine > at the moment (which is terrible!!)
> Paul
> *From:* sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com [mailto: > sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Alec Whittington > *Sent:* 08 February 2011 15:11
> *To:* sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: 1.9.5 Released
> We will have an upgrade guide in the next week or so, in the meantime i say > just go for it.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
We still recommend Spark and with 2.0 it will be the defacto. I'm starting to work with Razor at work, so I will give some real world feedback as we go forward with it internally.
> Spark is to be the default (though it is very, very easy to swap out view > engines). The great thing about Spark is that it is very easy to implement > into any sort of e-mail or PDF templating your system might do.
> For Razor this is needlessly complicated, or at least was a couple months > ago when I researched it.
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Paul Hinett <p...@ukcreativedesigns.com>wrote:
>> Ok that’s fine.
>> Do you guys still recommend the spark view engine out of the engines >> available then…I’ve not really used anything other than the Web Form engine >> at the moment (which is terrible!!)
>> Paul
>> *From:* sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com [mailto: >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Alec Whittington >> *Sent:* 08 February 2011 15:11
>> *To:* sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com >> *Subject:* Re: 1.9.5 Released
>> We will have an upgrade guide in the next week or so, in the meantime i >> say just go for it.
>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "S#arp Architecture" group. >> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "S#arp Architecture" group. >> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "S#arp Architecture" group. >> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
Having spent the past four weeks working on a project using Razor, I've had my initial views confirmed - it's better than WebForms, but it's a long way off being as nice to work with as Spark.
Jon
On 8 February 2011 15:59, Alec Whittington <alec.whitting...@gmail.com>wrote:
> We still recommend Spark and with 2.0 it will be the defacto. I'm starting > to work with Razor at work, so I will give some real world feedback as we go > forward with it internally.
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:27 AM, geoffrey smith <smith.geoffre...@gmail.com > > wrote:
>> Spark is to be the default (though it is very, very easy to swap out view >> engines). The great thing about Spark is that it is very easy to implement >> into any sort of e-mail or PDF templating your system might do.
>> For Razor this is needlessly complicated, or at least was a couple >> months ago when I researched it.
>> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Paul Hinett <p...@ukcreativedesigns.com>wrote:
>>> Ok that’s fine.
>>> Do you guys still recommend the spark view engine out of the engines >>> available then…I’ve not really used anything other than the Web Form engine >>> at the moment (which is terrible!!)
>>> Paul
>>> *From:* sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com [mailto: >>> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Alec Whittington >>> *Sent:* 08 February 2011 15:11
>>> *To:* sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com >>> *Subject:* Re: 1.9.5 Released
>>> We will have an upgrade guide in the next week or so, in the meantime i >>> say just go for it.
>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "S#arp Architecture" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com >>> . >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "S#arp Architecture" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com >>> . >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
>>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "S#arp Architecture" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com >>> . >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "S#arp Architecture" group. >> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
I should also point out that since I complained about Spark
conflicting with jquery-templates, which is now part of jquery-ui
proper, there's been a few nice workarounds:
> Having spent the past four weeks working on a project using Razor, I've had
> my initial views confirmed - it's better than WebForms, but it's a long way
> off being as nice to work with as Spark.
> Jon
> On 8 February 2011 15:59, Alec Whittington <alec.whitting...@gmail.com>wrote:
> > We still recommend Spark and with 2.0 it will be the defacto. I'm starting
> > to work with Razor at work, so I will give some real world feedback as we go
> > forward with it internally.
> > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:27 AM, geoffrey smith <smith.geoffre...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
> >> Spark is to be the default (though it is very, very easy to swap out view
> >> engines). The great thing about Spark is that it is very easy to implement
> >> into any sort of e-mail or PDF templating your system might do.
> >> For Razor this is needlessly complicated, or at least was a couple
> >> months ago when I researched it.
> >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Paul Hinett <p...@ukcreativedesigns.com>wrote:
> >>> Ok that’s fine.
> >>> Do you guys still recommend the spark view engine out of the engines
> >>> available then…I’ve not really used anything other than the Web Form engine
> >>> at the moment (which is terrible!!)
> >>> Paul
> >>> *From:* sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com [mailto:
> >>> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Alec Whittington
> >>> *Sent:* 08 February 2011 15:11
> >>> *To:* sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> >>> *Subject:* Re: 1.9.5 Released
> >>> We will have an upgrade guide in the next week or so, in the meantime i
> >>> say just go for it.
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> >>> .
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> >>> .
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> >>> --
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> >>> .
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
Question, i'm working on a long term project, and i've been working with a custom version of 1.5. The changes i made was to swap out Castle for StructureMap.
Are there any dependencies on Castle (outside of Castle.Core for NH and Windsor for the SharpArch.Web assembly ?) I'd rather not have to convert IOC usage to upgrade.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:43 AM, gs <smith.geoffre...@gmail.com> wrote: > I should also point out that since I complained about Spark > conflicting with jquery-templates, which is now part of jquery-ui > proper, there's been a few nice workarounds:
> On Feb 8, 10:26 am, Jonathan George <j...@jonathangeorge.co.uk> wrote: > > Having spent the past four weeks working on a project using Razor, I've > had > > my initial views confirmed - it's better than WebForms, but it's a long > way > > off being as nice to work with as Spark.
> > Jon
> > On 8 February 2011 15:59, Alec Whittington <alec.whitting...@gmail.com > >wrote:
> > > We still recommend Spark and with 2.0 it will be the defacto. I'm > starting > > > to work with Razor at work, so I will give some real world feedback as > we go > > > forward with it internally.
> > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:27 AM, geoffrey smith < > smith.geoffre...@gmail.com > > > > wrote:
> > >> Spark is to be the default (though it is very, very easy to swap out > view > > >> engines). The great thing about Spark is that it is very easy to > implement > > >> into any sort of e-mail or PDF templating your system might do.
> > >> For Razor this is needlessly complicated, or at least was a couple > > >> months ago when I researched it.
> > >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Paul Hinett < > p...@ukcreativedesigns.com>wrote:
> > >>> Ok that’s fine.
> > >>> Do you guys still recommend the spark view engine out of the engines > > >>> available then…I’ve not really used anything other than the Web Form > engine > > >>> at the moment (which is terrible!!)
> > >>> -- > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group. > > >>> To post to this group, send email to > sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > > >>> . > > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > >>> For more options, visit this group at > > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > >>> -- > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group. > > >>> To post to this group, send email to > sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > > >>> . > > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > >>> For more options, visit this group at > > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > >>> -- > > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group. > > >>> To post to this group, send email to > sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > > >>> . > > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > >>> For more options, visit this group at > > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > >> -- > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > >> "S#arp Architecture" group. > > >> To post to this group, send email to > sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > >> For more options, visit this group at > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > "S#arp Architecture" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to > sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > > For more options, visit this group at > > >http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
I believe those are still the only ones, but I will need to verify that for you. There are the main dependencies in the template, but sounds like you've got that covered.
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:50 PM, clayton collie <gbo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Question, > i'm working on a long term project, and i've been working with a custom > version of 1.5. The changes i made was to swap out Castle for StructureMap.
> Are there any dependencies on Castle (outside of Castle.Core for NH and > Windsor for the SharpArch.Web assembly ?) I'd rather not have to convert IOC > usage to upgrade.
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:43 AM, gs <smith.geoffre...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I should also point out that since I complained about Spark >> conflicting with jquery-templates, which is now part of jquery-ui >> proper, there's been a few nice workarounds:
>> On Feb 8, 10:26 am, Jonathan George <j...@jonathangeorge.co.uk> wrote: >> > Having spent the past four weeks working on a project using Razor, I've >> had >> > my initial views confirmed - it's better than WebForms, but it's a long >> way >> > off being as nice to work with as Spark.
>> > Jon
>> > On 8 February 2011 15:59, Alec Whittington <alec.whitting...@gmail.com >> >wrote:
>> > > We still recommend Spark and with 2.0 it will be the defacto. I'm >> starting >> > > to work with Razor at work, so I will give some real world feedback as >> we go >> > > forward with it internally.
>> > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:27 AM, geoffrey smith < >> smith.geoffre...@gmail.com >> > > > wrote:
>> > >> Spark is to be the default (though it is very, very easy to swap out >> view >> > >> engines). The great thing about Spark is that it is very easy to >> implement >> > >> into any sort of e-mail or PDF templating your system might do.
>> > >> For Razor this is needlessly complicated, or at least was a couple >> > >> months ago when I researched it.
>> > >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Paul Hinett < >> p...@ukcreativedesigns.com>wrote:
>> > >>> Ok that’s fine.
>> > >>> Do you guys still recommend the spark view engine out of the engines >> > >>> available then…I’ve not really used anything other than the Web Form >> engine >> > >>> at the moment (which is terrible!!)
>> > >>> -- >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group. >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com >> > >>> . >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
>> > >>> -- >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group. >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com >> > >>> . >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
>> > >>> -- >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group. >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com >> > >>> . >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
>> > >> -- >> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > >> "S#arp Architecture" group. >> > >> To post to this group, send email to >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. >> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> > >> For more options, visit this group at >> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
>> > > -- >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups >> > > "S#arp Architecture" group. >> > > To post to this group, send email to >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> > > For more options, visit this group at >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
>> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "S#arp Architecture" group. >> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "S#arp Architecture" group. > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
I have successfully created site using SA1.9.5. I have faced only 2
minor issues.
1. MvcContrib.TestHelper, I had to replaced with MVC 3 version from
MvcContrib site
2. ISessionFactoryKeyProvider, I had to register using
DefaultSessionFactoryKeyProvider in
On Feb 8, 3:52 pm, Alec Whittington <alec.whitting...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I believe those are still the only ones, but I will need to verify that for
> you. There are the main dependencies in the template, but sounds like you've
> got that covered.
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:50 PM, clayton collie <gbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Question,
> > i'm working on a long term project, and i've been working with a custom
> > version of 1.5. The changes i made was to swap out Castle for StructureMap.
> > Are there any dependencies on Castle (outside of Castle.Core for NH and
> > Windsor for the SharpArch.Web assembly ?) I'd rather not have to convert IOC
> > usage to upgrade.
> > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:43 AM, gs <smith.geoffre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I should also point out that since I complained about Spark
> >> conflicting with jquery-templates, which is now part of jquery-ui
> >> proper, there's been a few nice workarounds:
> >> On Feb 8, 10:26 am, Jonathan George <j...@jonathangeorge.co.uk> wrote:
> >> > Having spent the past four weeks working on a project using Razor, I've
> >> had
> >> > my initial views confirmed - it's better than WebForms, but it's a long
> >> way
> >> > off being as nice to work with as Spark.
> >> > Jon
> >> > On 8 February 2011 15:59, Alec Whittington <alec.whitting...@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >> > > We still recommend Spark and with 2.0 it will be the defacto. I'm
> >> starting
> >> > > to work with Razor at work, so I will give some real world feedback as
> >> we go
> >> > > forward with it internally.
> >> > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:27 AM, geoffrey smith <
> >> smith.geoffre...@gmail.com
> >> > > > wrote:
> >> > >> Spark is to be the default (though it is very, very easy to swap out
> >> view
> >> > >> engines). The great thing about Spark is that it is very easy to
> >> implement
> >> > >> into any sort of e-mail or PDF templating your system might do.
> >> > >> For Razor this is needlessly complicated, or at least was a couple
> >> > >> months ago when I researched it.
> >> > >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Paul Hinett <
> >> p...@ukcreativedesigns.com>wrote:
> >> > >>> Ok that’s fine.
> >> > >>> Do you guys still recommend the spark view engine out of the engines
> >> > >>> available then…I’ve not really used anything other than the Web Form
> >> engine
> >> > >>> at the moment (which is terrible!!)
> >> > >>> --
> >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> Groups
> >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> >> > >>> .
> >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> >> > >>> --
> >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> Groups
> >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> >> > >>> .
> >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> >> > >>> --
> >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> Groups
> >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> >> > >>> .
> >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> >> > >> --
> >> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> Groups
> >> > >> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> >> > >> To post to this group, send email to
> >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> >> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> >> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> >> > > --
> >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >> Groups
> >> > > "S#arp Architecture" group.
> >> > > To post to this group, send email to
> >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> > > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >> > > For more options, visit this group at
> >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> I have successfully created site using SA1.9.5. I have faced only 2
> minor issues.
> 1. MvcContrib.TestHelper, I had to replaced with MVC 3 version from
> MvcContrib site
> 2. ISessionFactoryKeyProvider, I had to register using
> DefaultSessionFactoryKeyProvider in
> On Feb 8, 3:52 pm, Alec Whittington <alec.whitting...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I believe those are still the only ones, but I will need to verify that for
> > you. There are the main dependencies in the template, but sounds like you've
> > got that covered.
> > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:50 PM, clayton collie <gbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Question,
> > > i'm working on a long term project, and i've been working with a custom
> > > version of 1.5. The changes i made was to swap out Castle for StructureMap.
> > > Are there any dependencies on Castle (outside of Castle.Core for NH and
> > > Windsor for the SharpArch.Web assembly ?) I'd rather not have to convert IOC
> > > usage to upgrade.
> > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:43 AM, gs <smith.geoffre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> I should also point out that since I complained about Spark
> > >> conflicting with jquery-templates, which is now part of jquery-ui
> > >> proper, there's been a few nice workarounds:
> > >> On Feb 8, 10:26 am, Jonathan George <j...@jonathangeorge.co.uk> wrote:
> > >> > Having spent the past four weeks working on a project using Razor, I've
> > >> had
> > >> > my initial views confirmed - it's better than WebForms, but it's a long
> > >> way
> > >> > off being as nice to work with as Spark.
> > >> > Jon
> > >> > On 8 February 2011 15:59, Alec Whittington <alec.whitting...@gmail.com
> > >> >wrote:
> > >> > > We still recommend Spark and with 2.0 it will be the defacto. I'm
> > >> starting
> > >> > > to work with Razor at work, so I will give some real world feedback as
> > >> we go
> > >> > > forward with it internally.
> > >> > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:27 AM, geoffrey smith <
> > >> smith.geoffre...@gmail.com
> > >> > > > wrote:
> > >> > >> Spark is to be the default (though it is very, very easy to swap out
> > >> view
> > >> > >> engines). The great thing about Spark is that it is very easy to
> > >> implement
> > >> > >> into any sort of e-mail or PDF templating your system might do.
> > >> > >> For Razor this is needlessly complicated, or at least was a couple
> > >> > >> months ago when I researched it.
> > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Paul Hinett <
> > >> p...@ukcreativedesigns.com>wrote:
> > >> > >>> Ok that’s fine.
> > >> > >>> Do you guys still recommend the spark view engine out of the engines
> > >> > >>> available then…I’ve not really used anything other than the Web Form
> > >> engine
> > >> > >>> at the moment (which is terrible!!)
> > >> > >>> --
> > >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >> Groups
> > >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> > >> > >>> .
> > >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > >> > >>> --
> > >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >> Groups
> > >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> > >> > >>> .
> > >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > >> > >>> --
> > >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >> Groups
> > >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> > >> > >>> .
> > >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > >> > >> --
> > >> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >> Groups
> > >> > >> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > >> > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> > >> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> > >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > >> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > >> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > >> > > --
> > >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > >> Groups
> > >> > > "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > >> > > To post to this group, send email to
> > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> > > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > >> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > >> --
> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > >> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > >> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
You need to add the code below to
ComponentRegistrar.AddGenericRepositoriesTo in the CastleWindsor
namespace of your SharpArchitecture.<APP_NAME>.Web project:
> Can you let me know how to do #2? (ISessionFactoryKeyProvider fix)
> -Kevin
> On Feb 9, 12:36 am, GHS <ghsj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have successfully created site using SA1.9.5. I have faced only 2
> > minor issues.
> > 1. MvcContrib.TestHelper, I had to replaced with MVC 3 version from
> > MvcContrib site
> > 2. ISessionFactoryKeyProvider, I had to register using
> > DefaultSessionFactoryKeyProvider in
> > On Feb 8, 3:52 pm, Alec Whittington <alec.whitting...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > I believe those are still the only ones, but I will need to verify that for
> > > you. There are the main dependencies in the template, but sounds like you've
> > > got that covered.
> > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:50 PM, clayton collie <gbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Question,
> > > > i'm working on a long term project, and i've been working with a custom
> > > > version of 1.5. The changes i made was to swap out Castle for StructureMap.
> > > > Are there any dependencies on Castle (outside of Castle.Core for NH and
> > > > Windsor for the SharpArch.Web assembly ?) I'd rather not have to convert IOC
> > > > usage to upgrade.
> > > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:43 AM, gs <smith.geoffre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> I should also point out that since I complained about Spark
> > > >> conflicting with jquery-templates, which is now part of jquery-ui
> > > >> proper, there's been a few nice workarounds:
> > > >> On Feb 8, 10:26 am, Jonathan George <j...@jonathangeorge.co.uk> wrote:
> > > >> > Having spent the past four weeks working on a project using Razor, I've
> > > >> had
> > > >> > my initial views confirmed - it's better than WebForms, but it's a long
> > > >> way
> > > >> > off being as nice to work with as Spark.
> > > >> > Jon
> > > >> > On 8 February 2011 15:59, Alec Whittington <alec.whitting...@gmail.com
> > > >> >wrote:
> > > >> > > We still recommend Spark and with 2.0 it will be the defacto. I'm
> > > >> starting
> > > >> > > to work with Razor at work, so I will give some real world feedback as
> > > >> we go
> > > >> > > forward with it internally.
> > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:27 AM, geoffrey smith <
> > > >> smith.geoffre...@gmail.com
> > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > >> > >> Spark is to be the default (though it is very, very easy to swap out
> > > >> view
> > > >> > >> engines). The great thing about Spark is that it is very easy to
> > > >> implement
> > > >> > >> into any sort of e-mail or PDF templating your system might do.
> > > >> > >> For Razor this is needlessly complicated, or at least was a couple
> > > >> > >> months ago when I researched it.
> > > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Paul Hinett <
> > > >> p...@ukcreativedesigns.com>wrote:
> > > >> > >>> Ok that’s fine.
> > > >> > >>> Do you guys still recommend the spark view engine out of the engines
> > > >> > >>> available then…I’ve not really used anything other than the Web Form
> > > >> engine
> > > >> > >>> at the moment (which is terrible!!)
> > > >> > >>> --
> > > >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > >> Groups
> > > >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> > > >> > >>> .
> > > >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > > >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > >> > >>> --
> > > >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > >> Groups
> > > >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> > > >> > >>> .
> > > >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > > >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > >> > >>> --
> > > >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > >> Groups
> > > >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> > > >> > >>> .
> > > >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > > >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > >> > >> --
> > > >> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > >> Groups
> > > >> > >> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > >> > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> > > >> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> > >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > >> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > >> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > >> > > --
> > > >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > >> Groups
> > > >> > > "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > >> > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> > > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> > > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > >> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > >> --
> > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > >> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > >> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > > "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
chris.richa...@yellowfeather.co.uk> wrote: > You need to add the code below to > ComponentRegistrar.AddGenericRepositoriesTo in the CastleWindsor > namespace of your SharpArchitecture.<APP_NAME>.Web project:
> On Feb 9, 7:19 am, Kevin Jensen <ke...@kineticmedia.net> wrote: > > Can you let me know how to do #2? (ISessionFactoryKeyProvider fix)
> > -Kevin
> > On Feb 9, 12:36 am, GHS <ghsj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I have successfully created site using SA1.9.5. I have faced only 2 > > > minor issues. > > > 1. MvcContrib.TestHelper, I had to replaced with MVC 3 version from > > > MvcContrib site > > > 2. ISessionFactoryKeyProvider, I had to register using > > > DefaultSessionFactoryKeyProvider in
> > > On Feb 8, 3:52 pm, Alec Whittington <alec.whitting...@gmail.com> > > > wrote:
> > > > I believe those are still the only ones, but I will need to verify > that for > > > > you. There are the main dependencies in the template, but sounds like > you've > > > > got that covered.
> > > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:50 PM, clayton collie <gbo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Question, > > > > > i'm working on a long term project, and i've been working with a > custom > > > > > version of 1.5. The changes i made was to swap out Castle for > StructureMap.
> > > > > Are there any dependencies on Castle (outside of Castle.Core for NH > and > > > > > Windsor for the SharpArch.Web assembly ?) I'd rather not have to > convert IOC > > > > > usage to upgrade.
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:43 AM, gs <smith.geoffre...@gmail.com> > wrote:
> > > > >> I should also point out that since I complained about Spark > > > > >> conflicting with jquery-templates, which is now part of jquery-ui > > > > >> proper, there's been a few nice workarounds:
> > > > >> On Feb 8, 10:26 am, Jonathan George <j...@jonathangeorge.co.uk> > wrote: > > > > >> > Having spent the past four weeks working on a project using > Razor, I've > > > > >> had > > > > >> > my initial views confirmed - it's better than WebForms, but it's > a long > > > > >> way > > > > >> > off being as nice to work with as Spark.
> > > > >> > > We still recommend Spark and with 2.0 it will be the defacto. > I'm > > > > >> starting > > > > >> > > to work with Razor at work, so I will give some real world > feedback as > > > > >> we go > > > > >> > > forward with it internally.
> > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:27 AM, geoffrey smith < > > > > >> smith.geoffre...@gmail.com > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > >> Spark is to be the default (though it is very, very easy to > swap out > > > > >> view > > > > >> > >> engines). The great thing about Spark is that it is very easy > to > > > > >> implement > > > > >> > >> into any sort of e-mail or PDF templating your system might > do.
> > > > >> > >> For Razor this is needlessly complicated, or at least was a > couple > > > > >> > >> months ago when I researched it.
> > > > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Paul Hinett < > > > > >> p...@ukcreativedesigns.com>wrote:
> > > > >> > >>> Ok that’s fine.
> > > > >> > >>> Do you guys still recommend the spark view engine out of the > engines > > > > >> > >>> available then…I’ve not really used anything other than the > Web Form > > > > >> engine > > > > >> > >>> at the moment (which is terrible!!)
> > > > >> > >>> -- > > > > >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google > > > > >> Groups > > > > >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group. > > > > >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to > > > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > > > > >> > >>> . > > > > >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > > > >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at > > > > >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > > >> > >>> -- > > > > >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google > > > > >> Groups > > > > >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group. > > > > >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to > > > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > > > > >> > >>> . > > > > >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > > > >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at > > > > >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > > >> > >>> -- > > > > >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google > > > > >> Groups > > > > >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group. > > > > >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to > > > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com > > > > >> > >>> . > > > > >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > > > >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at > > > > >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > > >> > >> -- > > > > >> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google > > > > >> Groups > > > > >> > >> "S#arp Architecture" group. > > > > >> > >> To post to this group, send email to > > > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > > > > >> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > >> > >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > > > >> > >> For more options, visit this group at > > > > >> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > > >> > > -- > > > > >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the > Google > > > > >> Groups > > > > >> > > "S#arp Architecture" group. > > > > >> > > To post to this group, send email to > > > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > > > > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > >> > > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > > > >> > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > > >> -- > > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > > > >> "S#arp Architecture" group. > > > > >> To post to this group, send email to > sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com. > > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > > > >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > > > > >> For more options, visit this group at > > > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> You need to add the code below to
> ComponentRegistrar.AddGenericRepositoriesTo in the CastleWindsor
> namespace of your SharpArchitecture.<APP_NAME>.Web project:
> On Feb 9, 7:19 am, Kevin Jensen <ke...@kineticmedia.net> wrote:
> > Can you let me know how to do #2? (ISessionFactoryKeyProvider fix)
> > -Kevin
> > On Feb 9, 12:36 am, GHS <ghsj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I have successfully created site using SA1.9.5. I have faced only 2
> > > minor issues.
> > > 1. MvcContrib.TestHelper, I had to replaced with MVC 3 version from
> > > MvcContrib site
> > > 2. ISessionFactoryKeyProvider, I had to register using
> > > DefaultSessionFactoryKeyProvider in
> > > On Feb 8, 3:52 pm, Alec Whittington <alec.whitting...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > I believe those are still the only ones, but I will need to verify that for
> > > > you. There are the main dependencies in the template, but sounds like you've
> > > > got that covered.
> > > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:50 PM, clayton collie <gbo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Question,
> > > > > i'm working on a long term project, and i've been working with a custom
> > > > > version of 1.5. The changes i made was to swap out Castle for StructureMap.
> > > > > Are there any dependencies on Castle (outside of Castle.Core for NH and
> > > > > Windsor for the SharpArch.Web assembly ?) I'd rather not have to convert IOC
> > > > > usage to upgrade.
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:43 AM, gs <smith.geoffre...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >> I should also point out that since I complained about Spark
> > > > >> conflicting with jquery-templates, which is now part of jquery-ui
> > > > >> proper, there's been a few nice workarounds:
> > > > >> On Feb 8, 10:26 am, Jonathan George <j...@jonathangeorge.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > >> > Having spent the past four weeks working on a project using Razor, I've
> > > > >> had
> > > > >> > my initial views confirmed - it's better than WebForms, but it's a long
> > > > >> way
> > > > >> > off being as nice to work with as Spark.
> > > > >> > Jon
> > > > >> > On 8 February 2011 15:59, Alec Whittington <alec.whitting...@gmail.com
> > > > >> >wrote:
> > > > >> > > We still recommend Spark and with 2.0 it will be the defacto. I'm
> > > > >> starting
> > > > >> > > to work with Razor at work, so I will give some real world feedback as
> > > > >> we go
> > > > >> > > forward with it internally.
> > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:27 AM, geoffrey smith <
> > > > >> smith.geoffre...@gmail.com
> > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > >> > >> Spark is to be the default (though it is very, very easy to swap out
> > > > >> view
> > > > >> > >> engines). The great thing about Spark is that it is very easy to
> > > > >> implement
> > > > >> > >> into any sort of e-mail or PDF templating your system might do.
> > > > >> > >> For Razor this is needlessly complicated, or at least was a couple
> > > > >> > >> months ago when I researched it.
> > > > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Paul Hinett <
> > > > >> p...@ukcreativedesigns.com>wrote:
> > > > >> > >>> Ok that’s fine.
> > > > >> > >>> Do you guys still recommend the spark view engine out of the engines
> > > > >> > >>> available then…I’ve not really used anything other than the Web Form
> > > > >> engine
> > > > >> > >>> at the moment (which is terrible!!)
> > > > >> > >>> --
> > > > >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > >> Groups
> > > > >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > > >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> > > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> > > > >> > >>> .
> > > > >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > > >> > >>> --
> > > > >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > >> Groups
> > > > >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > > >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> > > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> > > > >> > >>> .
> > > > >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > > >> > >>> --
> > > > >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > >> Groups
> > > > >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > > >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> > > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> > > > >> > >>> .
> > > > >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > > >> > >> --
> > > > >> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > >> Groups
> > > > >> > >> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > > >> > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> > > > >> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > >> > >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > >> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > >> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > > >> > > --
> > > > >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > >> Groups
> > > > >> > > "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > > >> > > To post to this group, send email to
> > > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> > > > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > >> > > sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > >> > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > > >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > > >> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > > >> To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > > > --
> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > > > > "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > > > To post to this group, send email to sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > To
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Chris Richards <
> chris.richa...@yellowfeather.co.uk> wrote:
> > You need to add the code below to
> > ComponentRegistrar.AddGenericRepositoriesTo in the CastleWindsor
> > namespace of your SharpArchitecture.<APP_NAME>.Web project:
> > On Feb 9, 7:19 am, Kevin Jensen <ke...@kineticmedia.net> wrote:
> > > Can you let me know how to do #2? (ISessionFactoryKeyProvider fix)
> > > -Kevin
> > > On Feb 9, 12:36 am, GHS <ghsj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I have successfully created site using SA1.9.5. I have faced only 2
> > > > minor issues.
> > > > 1. MvcContrib.TestHelper, I had to replaced with MVC 3 version from
> > > > MvcContrib site
> > > > 2. ISessionFactoryKeyProvider, I had to register using
> > > > DefaultSessionFactoryKeyProvider in
> > > > On Feb 8, 3:52 pm, Alec Whittington <alec.whitting...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > I believe those are still the only ones, but I will need to verify
> > that for
> > > > > you. There are the main dependencies in the template, but sounds like
> > you've
> > > > > got that covered.
> > > > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:50 PM, clayton collie <gbo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > Question,
> > > > > > i'm working on a long term project, and i've been working with a
> > custom
> > > > > > version of 1.5. The changes i made was to swap out Castle for
> > StructureMap.
> > > > > > Are there any dependencies on Castle (outside of Castle.Core for NH
> > and
> > > > > > Windsor for the SharpArch.Web assembly ?) I'd rather not have to
> > convert IOC
> > > > > > usage to upgrade.
> > > > > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:43 AM, gs <smith.geoffre...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >> I should also point out that since I complained about Spark
> > > > > >> conflicting with jquery-templates, which is now part of jquery-ui
> > > > > >> proper, there's been a few nice workarounds:
> > > > > >> On Feb 8, 10:26 am, Jonathan George <j...@jonathangeorge.co.uk>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >> > Having spent the past four weeks working on a project using
> > Razor, I've
> > > > > >> had
> > > > > >> > my initial views confirmed - it's better than WebForms, but it's
> > a long
> > > > > >> way
> > > > > >> > off being as nice to work with as Spark.
> > > > > >> > > We still recommend Spark and with 2.0 it will be the defacto.
> > I'm
> > > > > >> starting
> > > > > >> > > to work with Razor at work, so I will give some real world
> > feedback as
> > > > > >> we go
> > > > > >> > > forward with it internally.
> > > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:27 AM, geoffrey smith <
> > > > > >> smith.geoffre...@gmail.com
> > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >> > >> Spark is to be the default (though it is very, very easy to
> > swap out
> > > > > >> view
> > > > > >> > >> engines). The great thing about Spark is that it is very easy
> > to
> > > > > >> implement
> > > > > >> > >> into any sort of e-mail or PDF templating your system might
> > do.
> > > > > >> > >> For Razor this is needlessly complicated, or at least was a
> > couple
> > > > > >> > >> months ago when I researched it.
> > > > > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Paul Hinett <
> > > > > >> p...@ukcreativedesigns.com>wrote:
> > > > > >> > >>> Ok that’s fine.
> > > > > >> > >>> Do you guys still recommend the spark view engine out of the
> > engines
> > > > > >> > >>> available then…I’ve not really used anything other than the
> > Web Form
> > > > > >> engine
> > > > > >> > >>> at the moment (which is terrible!!)
> > > > > >> > >>> --
> > > > > >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
> > > > > >> Groups
> > > > > >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > > > >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> > > > > >> > >>> .
> > > > > >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > > > >> > >>> --
> > > > > >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
> > > > > >> Groups
> > > > > >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > > > >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> > > > > >> > >>> .
> > > > > >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > > > >> > >>> --
> > > > > >> > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
> > > > > >> Groups
> > > > > >> > >>> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > > > >> > >>> To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com
> > > > > >> > >>> .
> > > > > >> > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > >> > >>> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > >> > >>> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > >> > >>>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > > > >> > >> --
> > > > > >> > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
> > > > > >> Groups
> > > > > >> > >> "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > > > >> > >> To post to this group, send email to
> > > > > >> sharp-architecture@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > >> > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > > >> > >> sharp-architecture+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> > > > > >> > >> For more options, visit this group at
> > > > > >> > >>http://groups.google.com/group/sharp-architecture?hl=en.
> > > > > >> > > --
> > > > > >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the
> > Google
> > > > > >> Groups
> > > > > >> > > "S#arp Architecture" group.
> > > > > >> > > To post to this group, send
There is no source for it, I usually use the last templify package, make the changes, then have Templify package it up for me. The original package was created from a 1.6.0.0 VS template that we used to distribute.
If you want to make a custom package, I would suggest using the latest package (at whatever point in time you are working from), apply the changes and then use Templify to package it for you. Templify takes a process that used to take at least a couple of nights and condenses it down to a matter of an hour or so (including the time it takes to make the changes that are needed).
chris.richa...@yellowfeather.co.uk> wrote: > Thanks Alec, where is the source for the SharpArch Templify package? > When I made the multi-tenancy updates I couldn't find it on GitHub.
> Chris
> On Feb 9, 3:36 pm, Alec Whittington <alec.whitting...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Chris, > > I'll get this updated tonight and a new release packaged up for it.
> > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Chris Richards <
> > chris.richa...@yellowfeather.co.uk> wrote: > > > You need to add the code below to > > > ComponentRegistrar.AddGenericRepositoriesTo in the CastleWindsor > > > namespace of your SharpArchitecture.<APP_NAME>.Web project:
> > > On Feb 9, 7:19 am, Kevin Jensen <ke...@kineticmedia.net> wrote: > > > > Can you let me know how to do #2? (ISessionFactoryKeyProvider fix)
> > > > -Kevin
> > > > On Feb 9, 12:36 am, GHS <ghsj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I have successfully created site using SA1.9.5. I have faced only 2 > > > > > minor issues. > > > > > 1. MvcContrib.TestHelper, I had to replaced with MVC 3 version from > > > > > MvcContrib site > > > > > 2. ISessionFactoryKeyProvider, I had to register using > > > > > DefaultSessionFactoryKeyProvider in
> > > > > On Feb 8, 3:52 pm, Alec Whittington <alec.whitting...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > I believe those are still the only ones, but I will need to > verify > > > that for > > > > > > you. There are the main dependencies in the template, but sounds > like > > > you've > > > > > > got that covered.
> > > > > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 3:50 PM, clayton collie <gbo...@gmail.com
> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Question, > > > > > > > i'm working on a long term project, and i've been working with > a > > > custom > > > > > > > version of 1.5. The changes i made was to swap out Castle for > > > StructureMap.
> > > > > > > Are there any dependencies on Castle (outside of Castle.Core > for NH > > > and > > > > > > > Windsor for the SharpArch.Web assembly ?) I'd rather not have > to > > > convert IOC > > > > > > > usage to upgrade.
> > > > > > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:43 AM, gs < > smith.geoffre...@gmail.com> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> I should also point out that since I complained about Spark > > > > > > >> conflicting with jquery-templates, which is now part of > jquery-ui > > > > > > >> proper, there's been a few nice workarounds:
> > > > > > >> On Feb 8, 10:26 am, Jonathan George < > j...@jonathangeorge.co.uk> > > > wrote: > > > > > > >> > Having spent the past four weeks working on a project using > > > Razor, I've > > > > > > >> had > > > > > > >> > my initial views confirmed - it's better than WebForms, but > it's > > > a long > > > > > > >> way > > > > > > >> > off being as nice to work with as Spark.
> > > > > > >> > > We still recommend Spark and with 2.0 it will be the > defacto. > > > I'm > > > > > > >> starting > > > > > > >> > > to work with Razor at work, so I will give some real world > > > feedback as > > > > > > >> we go > > > > > > >> > > forward with it internally.
> > > > > > >> > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:27 AM, geoffrey smith < > > > > > > >> smith.geoffre...@gmail.com > > > > > > >> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >> > >> Spark is to be the default (though it is very, very easy > to > > > swap out > > > > > > >> view > > > > > > >> > >> engines). The great thing about Spark is that it is very > easy > > > to > > > > > > >> implement > > > > > > >> > >> into any sort of e-mail or PDF templating your system > might > > > do.
> > > > > > >> > >> For Razor this is needlessly complicated, or at least > was a > > > couple > > > > > > >> > >> months ago when I researched it.
> > > > > > >> > >> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Paul Hinett < > > > > > > >> p...@ukcreativedesigns.com>wrote:
> > > > > > >> > >>> Ok that’s fine.
> > > > > > >> > >>> Do you guys still recommend the spark view engine out of > the > > > engines > > > > > > >> > >>> available then…I’ve not really used anything other than > the > > > Web Form > > > > > > >> engine > > > > > > >> > >>> at the moment (which is terrible!!)