Derivation of Einstein E=mc2 and ethics of members: Ajay Sharma
physicsajay
Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, which gives derivation of E=mc2 critically
analyzed. It is confirmed that derivation of E=mc2 is true under
special conditions only. Thus it is extended to dE=Ac2dm This work
is published in international journals after PEER REVIEW and also
presented in international conferences in USA and ENGLAND.
Part I
Unfortunately some members made
hurried comments on the work without even reading what Einstein's Sep
1905 paper. When I replied, then the reply is not attended. Moreover
while raising objections, the members did not disclose their
identities, so that to understand the level of their knowledge in the
subject. It Is not fair in any way. One should try to go to the roots
of the truth. The main misunderstandings were regarding applications of
scope of law of conservation of linear momentum and inadequate
knowledge of Einstein's Sep 1905 derivation.
Also E=mc2 is confirmed in nuclear
reactions, then it does not mean it is also true in all cases
universally. However there are some experimental inconsistencies in
nuclear physics as well. For example it is not confirmed in Chemical
Reactions, due to technical reasons. There are bizarre reactions
involving, creation of universe (WHAT WAS BEFORE BIG BANG) and
astrophysics etc.
Part II
Einstein considered a body emitting light energy, and this energy was
measured by moving observer. Einstein derived L=mc2 under very
conditions e.g when body emits two light waves , of equal energy
emitted in opposite direction.
LIGHT ENERGY IS EMITTED MASS OF BODY DECREASES
Thus Einstein's derived L=mc2 i.e. light energy mass equation and
speculated from here E=mc2. The central equation in this regard is
relativistic light energy equation
l* = l{1 - v/c cos f } /v[1 - v2 /c2] (1)
The link to Einstein's paper is
Einstein's 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
However Einstein's derivation is conceptually valid
when body emits n number of waves, having any magnitude of energy,
emitted at any directions. Under some conditions (which are considered
by Einstein) , Einstein's 29 Sep 105 derivation also predicts
LIGHT ENERGY IS EMITTED MASS OF BODY must INCREASE (increase)
Light energy is emitted mass of body must increase (INCREASE)
Part III
Thus Ajay Sharma put forth
Einstein's Sep 1905 derivation of L=mc2 ( from which he
speculated E=mc2) is true under special conditions only , not in
GENERAL .
The reason is that some results from Einstein's derivation are not
consistent
It is not justified at all, but follows from Einstein's derivation.
Thus mass energy inter conversion equation has been
Thus mass energy equation is derived in an alternate ways
dE=Ac2dm
where is coefficient of proportionality like many others existing
physics. Like all other coefficients of proportionality its value
depends upon experimental conditions. Thus energy emitted by
generalized equation dE=Ac2dm can be less , equal or more than
Emc2.
Ajay Sharma's main work is available at
Sharma June 2004 paper is available
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
For further elaborated discussion link is
https://www.novapublishers.com/catalog/product_info.php?cPath=23_48_324&products_id=4554
Part VI
It would be nice to have healthy discussion on the issue based upon
scientific logics and facts for which requirement is knowledge of
Einstein's Sep 1905 paper and my work. If one discloses his identity
then it will become easier for everyone. The science is refined only
after arguments and discussions.
AJAY SHARMA Sep 10, 2006
Eric Gisse
physicsajay wrote:
> Derivation of Einstein E=mc2 and ethics of members: Ajay Sharma
>
> Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, which gives derivation of E=mc2 critically
> analyzed. It is confirmed that derivation of E=mc2 is true under
> special conditions only. Thus it is extended to dE=Ac2dm This work
> is published in international journals after PEER REVIEW and also
> presented in international conferences in USA and ENGLAND.
Ok.
What journals, what conferences?
[yawn]
physicsajay
Sharma June 2004 paper is available
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
The weblink of the proceedings where work is published can also sent
if required.
AJAY SHARMA
Sam Wormley
Very strange to include a Resume in a Paper.
srp
The word "Resume" here is the French translation of the word "Abstract"
The subsequent text simply is the French translation of the Abstract
that appears at the beginning of the document.
André Michaud
Sam Wormley
Thanks André
Eric Gisse
I ask again:
What journals, what conferences?
>
> AJAY SHARMA
hanson
in message news:CfTMg.180386$1i1.114042@attbi_s72...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/abcdd3ce28e7e24b
> srp wrote:
>> & Sam Wormley a écrit :
>>> & physicsajay wrote:
>>>> & Eric Gisse wrote:
>>>>> & physicsajay wrote:
>>>>>> Dingleberries on Einstein's member
>>> includes a Resume on toilet paper with an asstrack.
Keep it close to your idol's sphincter... ahahaha...
Thanks for the laughs, guys... ahahahanson
>
>
>
was
>>>>>> Derivation of Einstein ....members:
>>> ...include a Resume in a Paper.
>> "Resume" is French for "Abstract"
physicsajay
======Ajay Sharma responds=
I have given you the link along with paper.
I again give the link
http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
This paper is published in journal
Physics Essays
www.physicsessays.com
I will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
USA.
In parts it is published in various others journals.
Conferences.
It has been accepted for presentation over 55 conferences all over the
world
--------------------------------------------few of them--------------
Sharma, A. presented in 19th International Conference on the
Applications of Accelerators in Reserach and Industry , 20-25
August , 2006 Foth Worh Texas, USA
A. Sharma, Abstract Book 38th European Group of Atomic Systems (
Euro physics Conference) Isachia (Naples) Italy (2006) 53.
A. Sharma , Abstract Book , A Century After Einstein Physics 2005 ,
10-14 April 2005 ( Organiser Institute of Physics , Bristol )
University of Wrawick , ENGALND
A. Sharma presented in 5th British gravity Conferences , OXFORD
ENGLAND
A. Sharma, . Proc. Int. Conf. on Computational Methods in
Sciences and Engineering 2003 World Scientific Co. USA ,
(2003) 585.
A. Sharma, Proc. Int. Conf. on Number, Time, Relativity United
Physical Society of Russian Federation, Moscow , (2004) 81
Any thing else let me know. Email physi...@yahoo.com
AJAY SHARMA
Sam Wormley
> ======Ajay Sharma responds=
> I have given you the link along with paper.
> I again give the link
> http://www.burningbrain.org/pdf/ajaysharma_einstein.pdf
>
> This paper is published in journal
> Physics Essays
> www.physicsessays.com
> I will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
> USA.
RED FLAG!
Eric Gisse
"Different points of view will be accepted as long as they are
logically sound and well balanced in their exposition, until the
process of truth searching naturally reaches a stage of a convincing
argument in favour of one point of view or the other. "
So they don't care if is right or wrong, so long as it is "logically
sound". Whatever the hell that means.
> I will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
> USA.
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/adring/
They can't even afford a DOMAIN NAME. Off to an excellent start.
"Galilean Electrodynamics aims to publish high-quality scientific
papers that discuss challenges to accepted orthodoxy in physics,
especially in the realm of relativity theory, both special and general.
In particular, the journal seeks papers arguing that Einstein's
theories are unnecessarily complicated, have been confirmed only in a
narrow sector of physics, lead to logical contradictions, and are
unable to derive results that must be postulated, though they are
derivable by classical methods."
HA HA HA HA HA HA.
Nice choices of journals.
Nobody is ever going to take you seriously for a few reasons:
1) You are published in shitty, shitty journals that nobody with a
brain larger than a apple will read.
2) You obviously are in this to sell your book, not to advance
knowledge. You had your book up for sale long before you were published
anywhere, and the places you got published in do not have any real
scientific standards.
3) Most importantly of all, your work is worthless because it is wrong.
Sam Wormley
RED FLAG!
fp...@rediffmail.com
The journal may be new or old , to start with it is all right. Moreover
it is in record in conferences from USA , England and Europe.
It is true.
Now important thing is to see whether the statement
''Einstein's Sep 1905 paper, which gives derivation of E=mc2 critically
analyzed. It is confirmed that derivation of E=mc2 is true under
special conditions only.
For this we have have to undertand the Einstein's nutty paper ''
is correct.
If it is correct , then it is advancement in science.
Einstein's 27 Sep 1905 paper available at
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/E_mc2/www/
Its title is
DOES THE INERTIA OF A BODY DEPEND
UPON ITS ENERGY-CONTENT?
By A. Einstein September 27, 1905
Then one can really draw conclusions from it.
Sam Wormley
> Sam Wormley wrote:
>> physicsajay wrote:
>>> www.physicsessays.com
>>> I will be published in 2007 Galilean Electrodynamics, Massachusetts,
>>> USA.
>>
>> RED FLAG!
>
> The journal may be new or old , to start with it is all right. Moreover
> it is in record in conferences from USA , England and Europe.
> It is true.
Have you read any of the bullshit papers online at Galilean Electrodynamics?
http://mywebpages.comcast.net/adring/
Give me a blanking break!