28 April 2008
{HRI 20080428-V2.0}
(Version 2.0
on 8 June 2008)
('Three Parts of Love'
inspired by Suzanne)
(suitable for foreign
language students)
(view Summary
by skipping
indentation)
'
Love is the desire to feel the soul of others, with the desire that
those others feel your soul too.
How much you desire to and can feel the soul of others truly,
and
how much you want to and can let those others truly feel your
soul too,
is then, together, 'how much you love others.'
'
And the same applies, regarding others, about others loving you,
isn't it.
Whether others love you too, is thus NOT determined by
you, but by those others,
and by their spiritual condition, how free they are
to show their soul, and how truly they show how
they actually are showing their soul for you to
feel,
which requires someone to naturally have,
as NOT smothered in childhood, but
nurtured by a truly loving upbringing
and school time,
or else, by education about the matter,
which is then necessary, to become again
able
to see and sense and determine, to whom you
CAN
and to whom one actually can not at all show
one's soul, meaning:
not baring those of your feelings that
you would show and give to others,
but sharing those, nevertheless very
true and constructive feelings from
your soul,
by which you would - naturally - face
and oppose Criminal Minds and their
helpers. *(2)(3)(4)
'
'
'
I repeat: Whether others love you too, is thus NOT
determined by you, but by those others - and I beg you, to
please not make that mistake,
lest you turn into a geisha or get caught in
endlessly pleasing one Criminal Mind or many,
or a parents or a teacher, or have otherwise
the misfortune of having Criminal Minds 'in
charge of' part of your life,
"solving their malice" by pleasing or loving
them, *(5)(2)(3)
"because you determine whether these love you or
not, by your own behavior or love for them." *(2)(3)
'
I repeat, whether others love you, is NOT
determined by you, but by those others.
In fact, Criminal Minds - having all
in reverse - and their helpers, WILL
demand of you to "see and feel,"
that "you, by pleasing them sufficiently
or not, determine whether these love
you or not." *(5)(2)
'
'
It FEELS and seems in practice that you do determine,
whether others love you or not:
Most people have quite a 'loving and being loved'
nature AS A QUALITY OF THEIR SOUL,
so when you truly desire to feel the soul of another
and can do so and dare to bare your own soul to
those others too, for others to feel your nature
too, then
they are likely to react very favorably.
(I already gave you an example in 'Definition
of Sanity,' *(2) and you will find, that often
I end an HRI with an example or a suggestion
in that spirit, to you, the reader.)
'
'
'
Love between people
- or Love by someone according to his or her nature, given to
you -
can have a combination of these three Parts (and so, Love can differ
considerably in degree of these Parts being present):
'
1. Strength (volume of feeling, thrilling, encompassing ability,
ability to blast away Bad Energies and keep those away).
'
2. Quality (level of Beauty, Care, Elegance, Sensitivity, it does
include many perceptional abilities,
a level of refined - appropriate and appreciated -
creating and giving and enjoying to receive).
'
3. Durability (tenacity, longevity, true and thus faithful to all
Loved, naturally able to Love many without allowing fixation on
one, not deceived and lured away from those one genuinely Loves,
which are very many).
'
'
'
These Parts of Love,* may ideally be of the same magnitude, in a
person, but these Parts in a Loving person
- his or her Strength of Love, his or her Quality of Love, and
the Durability of his or her Love -
in a real relationship or friendship, in real life, are not of equal
magnitude and may fluctuate greatly, too,
'
You tend to expect, however, that great Strength of someone's Love
for you, also does imply or suggest high Quality of Love for you, and
automatically, inevitably I would think, it gives you the expectation
of Durability.
'
Rather than being 'hooked' by only one of those Parts of Love, given
to you, be it Strength in Love, or be it Quality in Love, or be it
rather Durability in Love,
because the other qualities seem implied already by one being
present,
expectations are of course more accurate, and much more likely
rewarded, true as they are,
when you look at the whole, at all Three Parts of Love.
'
Koos Nolst Trenite 'Cause Trinity'
human rights philosopher and poet
'God gave Solomon wisdom
and very great insight,
and a breadth of understanding
as measureless
as the sand on the seashore.'
1 Kings 4:29
'
_________
Footnotes:
(*) This adds to 'The Promised Definition of Friendship,' and
related HRI's:
'The Promised Definition of Friendship' (PDOF)
{HRI 20050327-V3.2.1}
(27 March 2005 - Version 3.2.1 on 16 Aug 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/talk.politics.misc/msg/810f16ae89a3bf43
http://www.geocities.com/plato_world/pdf/HRI_20050327-V2.4.1_Friendship_q1-p5.pdf
See also 'The Canticle of Canticles' by King Solomon,
and
'Leonardo Da Vinci - About Aliens, Dimensions, Consciousness,
Time, And Earth's Past And Future'
{HRI 20040829-V3.5}
(29 August 2004 - Version 3.5 on 19 Oct 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.military.naval/msg/a53f660dfe82afad
(1) 'Definition Of Sanity' DOS
{HRI 20040410-V2.0.1}
(10 April 2004 - Version 2.0.1 on 12 May 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/767aa8ad19019afb
(2) 'The First Law of Human Rights' (FLOHR)
{HRI 20060601-V3.1.2}
(1 June 2006 - Version 3.1.2 on 31 Dec 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.military.naval/msg/7965a2cb5b6384f4
(3) 'Obviously the Second Law Of Human Rights' (SLOHR)
{HRI 20060924-V3.2}
(24 September 2006 - Version 3.2 on 6 Aug 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.military/msg/99647b2379a3baa6
(4) 'Three Anecdotes about Koos Nolst Trenite - Intending others
to be decent to each other - What is 'Zero Tolerance' actually'
{HRI 20060305-V2.3} (ZTA)
(5 March 2006 - Issued 7 Dec 2007 - Version 2.3 on 30 May 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.military.naval/msg/e60b09110e1ad5d6
(5) 'The Rights of Criminal Minds' (RCM)
{HRI 20040108-V1.2.1}
(8 January 2004 - Version 1.2.1 on 9 Aug 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.military/msg/93359b640af83e20
'
__________
References:
'Love On The Bridges Of Holland'
(18 Sept 2002 - Version 2.3 on 5 July 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/nl.politiek/msg/4e3355282ca6682b
'Defining God correctly - and Heaven, and Hell - What is
Monotheism' (DGC)
{HRI 20080406-V4.6}
(6 April 2008 - Version 4.6 on 1 June 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/ed5d350adb56e15a
'Plato On Making Love - And Defining Loneliness'
{HRI 20041114-V2.2.1}
(14 November 2004 - Version 2.2.1 on 28 May 2007)
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.politics.misc/msg/fcb838f7c6a1e346
{HRI 20041114-V2.0-UAA}
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.education/msg/ebdd8f227dd037e2
'A Poem Of Love And Adventure'
{HRI 20020717-V4.1}
(17 July 2002 - Version 4.1 on 27 June 2008)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.military.naval/msg/0fb3eb3116639a22
'
____________
Verification:
http://www.angelfire.com/space/platoworld
Copyright 2008 by Koos Nolst Trenite - human rights philosopher
and poet
This is 'learnware' - it may not be altered, and it is free for
anyone who learns from it and (even if he can not learn from it)
who passes it on unaltered, and with this message included,
to others who might be able to learn from it.
None of my writings may be used, ever, to support any political
or religious or scientific 'agenda,' but only to educate, and to
encourage people to judge un-dominated and for themselves,
about any organizations or individuals.
Send free-of-Envy and free-of-Hate, Beautiful e-mails to:
PlatoWorld at Lycos.com
Love is a tiny bird tweeting in a tree, that smells bad.