The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity, alt.sci.physics, sci.math
From: "hanson" <han...@quick.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Jul 2007 18:58:32 GMT
Local: Thurs, Jul 5 2007 2:58 pm
Subject: Re: NASA exposes Apollo Hoax
ahahahahaha... ahahaha... AHAHAHA.... Good one! ...ahaha...
news:Agaji.46394$aS5.2129@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk... > "malibu" John <vega...@accesscomm.ca> wrote in message [hanson] > news:1183656212.984787.292540@d30g2000prg.googlegroups.com... > : Benj <bjac...@iwaynet.net> wrote: > : > Androcles wrote: > : > > I don't need to watch any movie, I was alive and sentient in 1969. > : > > Since then I've watched shuttles launch from Cape Canaveral. Live. > : > > Any idiot that hallucinates a launch is not for real has to be a > : > > complete and total fuckhead. Scepticism is healthy, blind stupidity > : > > is sick. But then, that's just what you are. Sick. > : > > : Benj <bjacoby at iwaynet.net> wrote: > : > "Androcles" calling someone else "sick" THAT is a good one!!! > : > I presume I'm speaking to a government spokesman here, right? > : > That's the way I am too. When I hear about a new idea I never go read > : > the original paper. I'm PROUD that I never read it! I simply point out > : > that the idea is clearly ridiculous and the author must be totally > : > stupid, insane and a complete "fuckhead". Usually that is all the > : > "proof" anyone needs that the new idea should be rejected. Debate? > : > Discussion? We doan need no stinkin' scientific debate! > : > You know, Androcles, I love recess as much as anybody, but you > : > really are a poopy-face! > : > In other words, you DID notice that these are newsgroups given to > : > scientific discussions and not grade school play periods. Right? > : [Malibu] > : No, really, Neil Armstrong in obviously > : near earth orbit at exactly the time he was > : supposedly nearing the moon with the camera > : set up on the opposite side of the capsule and > : the other astronaut duct-taping one side of > : the porthole. "Earthrise, suckers." > : [Andro] > Does the idiot "Benj" wildly imagine he's not on my killfile, > hallucinating I'd read anything he wrote? > Never mind, rhetorical question... ... ahahaha... Andro, that's a "she" and only if she had a uterine inversion and an ovaryal redirection amongst other things that turns a she into a "he", could she be a he... ahahaha... Or, you could label "him" as a cunt... ahahaha... who said to your closest bosom buddy in his River of Shit: == Benj: "Uncle Al, I want to have your love-child!" == ahahaha... ahahahaha.... [Andro] IIRC from the many times this issue was discussed here, the suspicion and consequent conspiracy theories did root in the original BAD quality of pixs from the moon. NASA then went into their sandboxes out in Barstow and REfilmed the scenes to impress the TV audience with a better show. Unfortunately NASA did not acknowledge right away that the TV news pix were reenacted and enhanced... and so the agile mind of the paranoid went into high gear... which is equally great entertainment... And Jacoby woman... don't get uptight now! Just stay tight!... ahaha.. Thanks for the laughs, dudes and dudettes... ahahanson You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||