Einstein grins at Uncle Al Schwartz
hanson
news:478B90F7...@hate.spam.net...
Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
--- coyly referring to his failed Benzil Chiral XP ---, that
"Both Relativity and quantum field theory are astoundingly
well tested - to 14 significant figures in the latter case. "
>
[hanson]
... ahahaha... So, Al, first the praise and the prize:
At least you tried and that is more than can be said
about all the others who just spread new theories
by pontificating Einstein gedanken XP analogs.
>
For your fanatical efforts you get # 4 "attaboy" like
one each for your other prior failures, starting with
(1) your cockroach repellent that you couldn't sell,
(2) your pound sized gem quality diamonds which
have yet to materialize and
(3) your quartz ball Eotvoes xp that was proxyied
by the Chinese but turned out too left-handed.
>
Now, let us in on WHY your Benzil gig/gag failed.
Don't just hide your efforts.... Reporting sci-failure is
like reporting crimes. -- It has its positive value.
There is no shame in that... only a bit of embarrassment.
But that is due to your characteristic loud-mouthing...
which is highly entertaining.. even if nothing else...
>
... after all you wrote in these and other posts
news:47753AB6...@hate.spam.net...
news:47608C08...@hate.spam.net...
that
::Al:: 2a) General Relativity is falsified ....
::Al:: 2b) perturbative string theory is falsified...
::Al:: 2c) conservation of angular momentum is falsified ...
::Al:: 2e) post-Big Bang inflation may be sourced by a
::Al:: chiral vacuum pseudoscalar background,
::Al:: and it all happens at the founding postulate level without
::Al:: contradicting any observation in any venue at any scale.
::Al:: ... the [Benzil Calorimerty] experiment can do no worse
::Al:: than fail. --- Festivus - for the rest of us.
>
So, keep at it, Al, for the sake of Festivus... ahahaha...
Thanks for the laughs, Al... ahahaha... ahahahanson
>
>
---- Here's were Schwartz was hiding his announcement ----
------ and his disappointment and embarrassment -------
------- under a cloak of curses ----------
>
"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:478B90F7...@hate.spam.net...
>
Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> wrote in message
news:k7jlo3pfsoti8atsd...@4ax.com...
>>> So you see there is little difference in the two approaches.
>>> If BaTh is wrong, then so is SR.
>>> SR however does not take into account the doppler shift
>>> that always occurs in a frame change. SR also requires
>>> fairies to make light speed = c in all frames.
>>> SR is approximate only, requiring that v<<c.
>>
> Uncle Al <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote:
>>[snip crap]
>>Lying bastard.
>>Empirical idiot,
>><http://www.edu-observatory.org/physics-faq/Relativity/SR/experiments.html>
>> Experimental constraints on Special Relativity
>
> Henri Wilson. ASTC,BSc,DSc(T)
> Fucking moron. If Einstein's relativity is so fucking good, why
> the hell are people still trying to find supporting evidence for it?
>
> A. Because it's crap from start to finish...
> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
> Relativists believe that a rotating Sagnac viewed in the rotating
> frame is identical to a nonrotating one viewed from the nonrotating
> frame. Hahahaha! What about all the imaginary effects?
>
Uncle Al <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote:
> Enpirical tests seek falsificaiton, you hopeless jackass. You know
> nothing about science. Both Relativity and quantum field theory are
> astoundingly well tested - to 14 significant figures in the latter
> case. Theory vs. prediction is perfect within experimental error in
> all venues at scales in all cases at all times.
>
> Nothing you have posted in the past decade rises above swamp
> mud. You are an ignorant petulant boring ineducable little boy.
> Fuck you.
>
> Uncle Al
> http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
> (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
> http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
harry
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message
news:h5Qij.7075$Ue3.5542@trnddc07...
> .... "Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in
> news:478B90F7...@hate.spam.net...
>
> Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
> --- coyly referring to his failed Benzil Chiral XP ---, that
[...]
Did Al step on your toes?
Harald
Uncle Al
Uncle Al intellectually kneed its crotch and its testiclettes popped
out its mouth. Rather like Whack-a-Mole except Hanson is clueless.
--
hanson
>
>
AHAHAHAHA... ahahaha... Good one!... ahaha... Why did you crank
yourself, "harry" <harald.vanlin...@epfl.ch>? that you wrote
like a Schwuler in message news:1200393...@sicinfo3.epfl.ch...
>
.... "Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in
news:478B90F7...@hate.spam.net...
>>
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message
news:h5Qij.7075$Ue3.5542@trnddc07...
Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
--- coyly referring to his failed Benzil Chiral XP ---, that
[...]
>
[Der schwule "harry"]
Did Al step on your toes?
Harald
>
AHAHAHA.... ahahaha... Nehh, why should or would he?
But your worries about Al raises the question whether
you, "harry", are rect-Al's bitch, Du armer Warmer, or
whether you are just a common Einstein Dingleberry?
Thanks for the laughs, Flamer Harold... ... ahahahanson
hanson
"Uncle Al"? <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> by writing in your
news:478CE63B...@hate.spam.net...
>
> Gay harry wrote:
>>
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message
news:h5Qij.7075$Ue3.5542@trnddc07...
.... "Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in
news:478B90F7...@hate.spam.net...
Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
--- coyly referring to his failed Benzil Chiral XP ---, that
>>
[Gay harry quibbed]
Did Al step on your toes?
>
Uncle Al intellectually kneed its crotch and its testiclettes popped
out its mouth. Rather like Whack-a-Mole except Hanson is clueless.
>
ahahahaha... You are having one your gay Nazi fantasies again
rect-Al .. or what was it exactly that cranked you so? I did make
compliments to/for and about your "intelectual achievements".
Don't be such an ingrate. It makes you suspect.
Here they are again for your benefit:
>
"Uncle Al's " <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in
news:478B90F7...@hate.spam.net...
>
Re: EXPERIMENTS THAT REFUTE RELATIVITY
--- coyly referring to his failed Benzil Chiral XP ---, that
"Both Relativity and quantum field theory are astoundingly
"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:478B90F7...@hate.spam.net... to
Dr. Henri Wilson" <HW@....> >
[... snip]
Lying bastard. -- Empirical idiot -- Fuck you.
Uncle Al
>
[hanson]
BTW, Al, your expressed yearning to "kneed crotch and testicles"
may be the reason that you still drive an old 1989 Volkswagen Golf,
which you whined about that you must drive the clunker for another
11 years. So, instead of airing your sexual dreams, try to make some
$$$, at you ripe age of 60, from any of your great cyber inventions.
I wish you luck, Schwartz... but most of all... Thanks for the laughs!
ahahahaha.... ahahahahanson
>
>
PS: Oh, not to forget. Let me repeat:
..... let us in on WHY your Benzil gig/gag failed.