Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Andrija Puharich Lecture patent and paper on water fuel

367 views
Skip to first unread message

gabydewilde

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 8:21:46 AM12/3/08
to
Lecture
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=393FDFB3027308E9

Dr. Andrija Puharich in 1983, made complex electrical waveforms
resonate water molecules and shatter them. This freed hydrogen and
oxygen, creating a new kind of environment-friendly fuel made of
water. Dr Andrija Puharich reportedly drove his motor home for
hundreds of thousands of miles around North America in the 1970s using
only water as fuel. According to Dr. Puharich the basic cycle of using
water for fuel is described in the following two equations, familiar
to every high school student of Chemistry:
H2O Electrolysis + 249.68 Btu Delta G > H2 + (1/2)O2 per mole of water
(1 mole = 18 gms) (1)

This means that it requires 249.688 Btu of energy (from electricity)
to break water by electrical fission into the gases hydrogen and
oxygen.

H2 and (1/2)O2 + catalyst > H2O - Delta H 302.375 Btu per mole of
water. (2)

This means that 302.375 Btu of energy (heat or electricity) will be
released when the gases, hydrogen and oxygen, combine. The end product
(the exhaust) from this reaction is water. Note that more energy
(under ideal conditions) is released from combining the gases than is
used to free them from water. It is know that under ideal conditions
it is possible to get some 20% more energy out of reaction (2) above,
then it takes to produce the gases of reaction (1) above. Therefore,
if reaction (1) could be carried out at 100% efficiency, the release
of energy from reaction (2) in an optimally efficient engine (such as
a low temperature fuel cell), there would be a net energy profit which
would make the use of water as a fuel an economically feasible source
of energy.

http://knol.google.com/k///1yrf1mzjtxzk5/2#Andrija_Puharich

Official website about Dr. Andrija (Henry) K. Puharich M.D., LL.D.
http://www.puharich.nl/AndrijaLink/andrija_puharich_md_lld.htm

rexresearch.com - article by Dr. Andrija Puharich -Water Decomposition
by AC Electrolysis
http://www.rexresearch.com/puharich/1puhar.htm

Method and Apparatus for Splitting Water Molecules
http://www.google.com/patents?id=luYuAAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230

Patent citations

http://www.google.com/patents?id=1gVfAAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230
Method and apparatus for improving neural preformance in human
subjects by electrotherapy

http://www.google.com/patents?id=pdY0AAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230
Puharich blood storage method

http://www.google.com/patents?id=D-MyAAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230
Electrolysis method for producing hydrogen and oxygen

The Puharich patent is referenced by:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=xhczAAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230
Gas generator voltage control circuit - Stanley Meyer!!

http://www.google.com/patents?id=7LIFAAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230
Apparatus for producing orthohydrogen and/or parahydrogen - Xogen
Power Inc.!!

http://www.google.com/patents?id=qZQKAAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230
Method for producing orthohydrogen and/or parahydrogen - Xogen Power
Inc.!!

http://www.google.com/patents?id=Y_kQAAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230
Hydrogen producing apparatus - Xogen Power Inc.!!

Enjoy,

____________
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/factuurexpress

doug

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 8:54:01 AM12/3/08
to

gabydewilde wrote:

It cannot be carried out at a high efficiency and produce significant
amounts of gas. It is efficient at uselessly low level of hydrogen
production where the electricity and heat together give good numbers.
the problem is the ohmic losses in the water lose efficiency at
higher currents.

the release
> of energy from reaction (2) in an optimally efficient engine (such as
> a low temperature fuel cell),

The fuel cells, particularly low temperature one are not efiecient.

there would be a net energy profit which
> would make the use of water as a fuel an economically feasible source
> of energy.

Well, if you get electrolysis at 50% efficiency and a fuel cell
to get the electricity back at 30% efficiency, you have a net
of 15% efficiency. Why throw away 85% of the electricity?
Why not just use it in the first place and avoid the middle
steps?

gabydewilde

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 9:13:53 AM12/3/08
to
On Dec 3, 2:54 pm, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
> [snip]

Discussion: Is Eeyore A Carbon Industry Shill?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy/browse_frm/thread/69094f8b53050c29/b61d8752e4803705?hl=en#b61d8752e4803705
On Dec 1, 6:52 am, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
> Bret Cahill wrote:
> > ? ? ?
>
> > Bret Cahill
>
> No, why do you ask?

Discussion: But NOBODY is Duplicating Meyer's Work?
http://groups.google.com/group/us.politics/browse_frm/thread/cbe8222b1b5e17f3/8d51d3552ce156b8?hl=en
On Dec 2, 4:54 am, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
> Meyer's work is just electrolysis. Capacitors and such are just
> a diversion to suck in people who have more money than brains.
>

Discussion: Voltage vs Potential
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/4b8ac1325c4b800d?hl=en
On Nov 30, 6:22 pm, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
> knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > It is a "physical force that can be made (very efficiently) to do work
> > without being consumed."
> > Meyer was granted his patents under sec 101 Critical Review FOR
> > PROVING JUST THAT.
>
> Remember that nowhere in any of the sales and fraud literature put out
> by Meyer was there ever a measure of efficiency of his process. Not
> by Meyer, nor by anyone else. There were lots of nice claims about
> "lots" of gas etc, but there are no measurements. This is standard
> procedure for frauds because the truth shows the fraud. Making gas
> from electrolysis is easy to do. Useful energy conversion is impossible.

Discussion: John Keely,Tesla,Irving Langmuir,William Rhodes,Yull
Brown,Daniel Dingle,Stanley Meyer,Dad Garret,Tay-Hee Hau,Andrija
Puharich,Pantone,Bill Williams,Ted Zettergren,Nakamats,Alexander
Rabinovich,L.Bromberg,D.R. Cohn,A. Rabinovich, J. Heywood,Bill
Richardson,MIT,Edirisinghe,Genepax,Stanley Pons,Martin
Fleishmann,Herman Anderson,Xogen,Dennis Klein,Steve Ryan,Bob
Boyce,Carl Cella
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy.hydrogen/browse_frm/thread/8ea9f321c2ba909d?hl=en
On Oct 9, 2:20 am, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
> Meyer is presenting
> something that does not work. All the cranks have their specialties.
> None of the group above is doing anything useful.
>

Lecture
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=393FDFB3027308E9

Dr. Andrija Puharich in 1983, made complex electrical waveforms
resonate water molecules and shatter them. This freed hydrogen and
oxygen, creating a new kind of environment-friendly fuel made of
water. Dr Andrija Puharich reportedly drove his motor home for
hundreds of thousands of miles around North America in the 1970s using
only water as fuel. According to Dr. Puharich the basic cycle of using
water for fuel is described in the following two equations, familiar
to every high school student of Chemistry:
H2O Electrolysis + 249.68 Btu Delta G > H2 + (1/2)O2 per mole of water
(1 mole = 18 gms) (1)

This means that it requires 249.688 Btu of energy (from electricity)
to break water by electrical fission into the gases hydrogen and
oxygen.

H2 and (1/2)O2 + catalyst > H2O - Delta H 302.375 Btu per mole of
water. (2)

This means that 302.375 Btu of energy (heat or electricity) will be
released when the gases, hydrogen and oxygen, combine. The end product
(the exhaust) from this reaction is water. Note that more energy
(under ideal conditions) is released from combining the gases than is
used to free them from water. It is know that under ideal conditions
it is possible to get some 20% more energy out of reaction (2) above,
then it takes to produce the gases of reaction (1) above. Therefore,

if reaction (1) could be carried out at 100% efficiency, the release


of energy from reaction (2) in an optimally efficient engine (such as

a low temperature fuel cell), there would be a net energy profit which


would make the use of water as a fuel an economically feasible source
of energy.

http://knol.google.com/k///1yrf1mzjtxzk5/2#Andrija_Puharich

Official website about Dr. Andrija (Henry) K. Puharich M.D., LL.D.
http://www.puharich.nl/AndrijaLink/andrija_puharich_md_lld.htm

rexresearch.com - article by Dr. Andrija Puharich -Water Decomposition
by AC Electrolysis
http://www.rexresearch.com/puharich/1puhar.htm

Method and Apparatus for Splitting Water Molecules
http://www.google.com/patents?id=luYuAAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230

Patent citations

http://www.google.com/patents?id=1gVfAAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230


Method and apparatus for improving neural preformance in human
subjects by electrotherapy

http://www.google.com/patents?id=pdY0AAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230
Puharich blood storage method

http://www.google.com/patents?id=D-MyAAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230


Electrolysis method for producing hydrogen and oxygen

The Puharich patent is referenced by:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=xhczAAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230


Gas generator voltage control circuit - Stanley Meyer!!

http://www.google.com/patents?id=7LIFAAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230


Apparatus for producing orthohydrogen and/or parahydrogen - Xogen
Power Inc.!!

http://www.google.com/patents?id=qZQKAAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230


Method for producing orthohydrogen and/or parahydrogen - Xogen Power
Inc.!!

http://www.google.com/patents?id=Y_kQAAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230

Don Lancaster

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 11:25:34 AM12/3/08
to
gabydewilde wrote:
> Lecture
> http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=393FDFB3027308E9
>
> Dr. Andrija Puharich in 1983, made complex electrical waveforms
> resonate water molecules and shatter them.


Obviously, he did not.


--
Many thanks,

Don Lancaster voice phone: (928)428-4073
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
rss: http://www.tinaja.com/whtnu.xml email: d...@tinaja.com

Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com

doug

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 12:01:55 PM12/3/08
to

gabydewilde wrote:

There are no efficiency measurements here. The amateurs here have
no idea how to do efficiency measurements.

The uselessness of the above process has been pointed out to
you in another post. Ignoring the science and reposting nonsense
will not help your case at all.

Xogen was convicted of stock fraud. They are relatives
of Meyer. Citing other frauds does not help your credibility.


> Enjoy,
>
> ____________
> http://blog.360.yahoo.com/factuurexpress
>

gabydewilde

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 12:25:22 PM12/3/08
to
On Dec 3, 6:01 pm, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
>
> Xogen was convicted of stock fraud. They are relatives
> of Meyer. Citing other frauds does not help your credibility.
>

On Dec 3, 2:54 pm, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:

> [snip]

Discussion: Is Eeyore A Carbon Industry Shill?

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy/browse_frm/thread/69094f8b5...


On Dec 1, 6:52 am, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:

> Bret Cahill wrote:
> > ? ? ?

> > Bret Cahill

> No, why do you ask?

Discussion: But NOBODY is Duplicating Meyer's Work?

http://groups.google.com/group/us.politics/browse_frm/thread/cbe8222b...


On Dec 2, 4:54 am, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:

> Meyer's work is just electrolysis. Capacitors and such are just
> a diversion to suck in people who have more money than brains.

Discussion: Voltage vs Potential
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/4b8ac132...


On Nov 30, 6:22 pm, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:

> knews4u2c...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > It is a "physical force that can be made (very efficiently) to do work
> > without being consumed."
> > Meyer was granted his patents under sec 101 Critical Review FOR
> > PROVING JUST THAT.

> Remember that nowhere in any of the sales and fraud literature put out
> by Meyer was there ever a measure of efficiency of his process. Not
> by Meyer, nor by anyone else. There were lots of nice claims about
> "lots" of gas etc, but there are no measurements. This is standard
> procedure for frauds because the truth shows the fraud. Making gas
> from electrolysis is easy to do. Useful energy conversion is impossible.

Discussion: John Keely,Tesla,Irving Langmuir,William Rhodes,Yull
Brown,Daniel Dingle,Stanley Meyer,Dad Garret,Tay-Hee Hau,Andrija
Puharich,Pantone,Bill Williams,Ted Zettergren,Nakamats,Alexander
Rabinovich,L.Bromberg,D.R. Cohn,A. Rabinovich, J. Heywood,Bill
Richardson,MIT,Edirisinghe,Genepax,Stanley Pons,Martin
Fleishmann,Herman Anderson,Xogen,Dennis Klein,Steve Ryan,Bob
Boyce,Carl Cella

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy.hydrogen/browse_frm/thread/...

Lecture
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=393FDFB3027308E9

http://knol.google.com/k///1yrf1mzjtxzk5/2#Andrija_Puharich

Patent citations

Enjoy,

____________
http://blog.360.yahoo.com/factuurexpress

doug

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 12:30:09 PM12/3/08
to

gabydewilde wrote:

{snip}

gaby thinks that by just reposting things that have been shown
to be wrong that somehow they will become correct. He reposts
frauds and incompetence. He seems to mistake this for science.

gabydewilde

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 12:38:36 PM12/3/08
to
On Dec 3, 6:30 pm, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
> gaby thinks that by just reposting things that have been shown
> to be wrong that somehow they will become correct.  He reposts
> frauds and incompetence.  He seems to mistake this for science.

Dougma cant think - therefor he isn't.

According to Dr. Puharich the basic cycle of using
water for fuel is described in the following two equations, familiar
to every high school student of Chemistry:

H2O Electrolysis + 249.68 Btu Delta G > H2 + (1/2)O2 per mole of water
(1 mole = 18 gms) (1)

This means that it requires 249.688 Btu of energy (from electricity)
to break water by electrical fission into the gases hydrogen and
oxygen.

H2 and (1/2)O2 + catalyst > H2O - Delta H 302.375 Btu per mole of
water. (2)

This means that 302.375 Btu of energy (heat or electricity) will be
released when the gases, hydrogen and oxygen, combine. The end product
(the exhaust) from this reaction is water. Note that more energy
(under ideal conditions) is released from combining the gases than is
used to free them from water. It is know that under ideal conditions
it is possible to get some 20% more energy out of reaction (2) above,
then it takes to produce the gases of reaction (1) above. Therefore,
if reaction (1) could be carried out at 100% efficiency, the release
of energy from reaction (2) in an optimally efficient engine (such as
a low temperature fuel cell), there would be a net energy profit which
would make the use of water as a fuel an economically feasible source
of energy.

http://knol.google.com/k///1yrf1mzjtxzk5/2#Andrija_Puharich

See his lecture here:
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=393FDFB3027308E9

No thanx,

doug

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 1:04:16 PM12/3/08
to

gabydewilde wrote:

The above process throws away about 85% of the energy. That is a
stupid thing to do. Just use the electricity for a motor.
You really should at least try to learn some physics.

gabydewilde

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 6:12:22 PM12/3/08
to
On Dec 3, 7:04 pm, doug <x...@xx.com> wrote:
> [snip]

See his lecture here:
http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=393FDFB3027308E9

And do remember the Puharich patent is referenced by no one other than
the world famous inventor Stanley Meyer!!

http://www.google.com/patents?id=xhczAAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230
Gas generator voltage control circuit

To gift a bit moar insight:

http://www.google.com/patents?id=luYuAAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230
ABSTRACT: "Disclosed herein is a new and improved thermodynamic device
to produce hydrogen gas and oxygen gas from ordinary water molecules
or from seawater at normal temperatures and pressure. Also disclosed
is a new and improved method for electrically treating water molecules
to decompose them into hydrogen gas and oxygen gas at efficiency
levels ranging between approximately 80-100%. The evolved hydrogen gas
may be used as a fuel; and the evolved oxygen gas may be used as an
oxidant."

Punarich made his discovery subjecting blood to various frequencies.

This also led to his blood storage innovation.
http://www.google.com/patents?id=pdY0AAAAEBAJ&dq=3726762

And his method and apparatus for improving neural performance in human
subjects by electrotherapy
http://www.google.com/patents?id=1gVfAAAAEBAJ&dq=3563246

He further moar makes reference to inventor: Stephen Horvath from
Australia who's patent is assigned to Beeston Company Limited, Hong
Kong.

Electrolysis method for producing hydrogen and oxygen

http://www.google.com/patents?id=D-MyAAAAEBAJ&dq=4394230
ABSTRACT: "A novel electrolytic cell produces a mixture of highly
ionized hydrogen and oxygen gases by a method combining electrolysis
and radiolysis of an aqueous electrolyte. The electrolyte, which may
be a 25% of potassium hydroxide, is introduced into the cell and is
simultaneously subjected to an electrolysing current and intense
irradiation by electromagnetic radiation of frequency less than
10.^-10 meters."

The Horvath patent in it's turn refers to:

Patent number: 2016442
Filing date: May 11, 1932
Inventor: Alfred Kilgus

PRODUCTION OF GASES BY DECOMPOSITION OP AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTES
http://www.google.com/patents?id=gsNPAAAAEBAJ&dq=2016442

At this time actual experiments are still allowed to be included into
patents even if they provide to go beyond Faraday.

Example 1

" An electrolytic cell as shown in Fig. 1 was filled with a 30 per
cent solution of caustic potash, and a direct voltage of 7.55 volts
was applied to the electrodes, resulting in a current intensity of 10
amperes; the temperature of the electrolyte was kept at 18° C., the
pressure being 740 mms. mercury. The magnetic field was as strong as
feasible between the poles of an electromagnet arranged outside of the
tank a. There were obtained 27.720 litres of gas per hour. On
repeating this experiment under the same conditions, but on omitting
the magnetic field, a voltage of 10.6 volts proved to be necessary to
obtain a current intensity of 10 amperes, and the yield was reduced to
about 24.9000 litres per hour."

Moar amps, less gas.

I love the images here. He explains it all in such simple pictures.

________________
http://knol.google.com/k/gaby-de-wilde/water-fueled-car/1yrf1mzjtxzk5/2

0 new messages