Dono we still wait for your proof!!! - sci.physics.relativity

Message from discussion Dono we still wait for your proof!!!

Juan R. González-Álvarez

View profile

More options Dec 2 2008, 12:07 pm

Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity

From: "Juan R." González-Álvarez <juanREM...@canonicalscience.com>

Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 18:07:38 +0100 (CET)

Local: Tues, Dec 2 2008 12:07 pm

Subject: Re: Dono we still wait for your proof!!!

  Reply to author
  |
  Forward
  | Print
  | View thread
  | Show original
  | Report this message
  | Find messages by this author
  

Dono wrote on Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:26:51 -0800:

> On Dec 2, 8:22 am, "JuanShito R." González-Álvarez
> <juanREM...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:

>> Sorry to be look so idiotic, you may understand not everyone have the
>> same intelligence,

> You look idiotic because you ARE idiotic, old fart :-)

I already offered you my apologies, and said in my message

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/2a7d43ae271...

that I will copy and paste in the blog your previous derivation in

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/7c1b2697a4e...

Of course, giving you all the credit for it.

What more could I do?

>> In a previous message you replied that when v=0 H =-L. I think that I
>> agree

> Then shut the fuk up !

>> but I still cannot understand how H=L is compatible with H=-L except
>> when L=0.

>> Is that right Dono?

> Old fart, Juan Alvarez Gonzalez

> If u agree that H=pv-L, then, when you make v=0 , what do you get, old
> imbecile?

I start from H=pv-L and making v=0 I get H=-L.

Sorry to look again idiotic, but I have two problems Dono. If you agree
and you have some time to waste with an idiot as me, I will explain them
here.

First, the present result (H = -L) is not the same than the result (H =
L) that you and Eric wrote in the past.

I think I could find the message where you said that (H = L) without the
minus sign you write now. Is that sign unimportant then Dono?

My second problem is that "v" is not the same than "V" in the formulation
given by Eric. I think you can see the message here

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/2a7d43ae271...

It is (L = T - V) and (H = T + V) and doing V = 0 you and Eric obtained

(L = T) and (H = T) or (H = L)

I can understand those are trivial matters for anyone so smart as you,
but I have string difficulties. If you could help me a bit with this
issue I promise that I will not disturb you more Dono.

I did learn the lesson!!

--
http://www.canonicalscience.org/

Reply to author Forward