Re: Catching a big troll :Juan Alvarez Gonzalez
Dono
<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> snip imbecilities<
Juanshito,
No one reads your whinning in your idiotic blog.
On the other hand, anyone can read you being exposed as a fake here:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/f5bee64f3b044249
Juan R.
It is good that you continue citing your message. I also cite it :-)
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
*Quote:*
And as waited Dono, the troll, finally fell into the trap :-)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/f5bee64f3b044249
Dono reproduced there the same nonsense that he wrote in the past
about Hamiltonians and Lagrangians for special relativity. The same
nonsense that Dono had deleted before could he could be cited in nasty
troll. The same nonsense written also by Eric the crackpot.
Dono
Look here , pathetic old fart:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamiltonian_mechanics#Charged_particle_in_an_electromagnetic_field
Juan R.
> On Dec 12, 9:17 am, "JuanShito R."
>
> <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
>
> > Dono reproduced there the same nonsense that he wrote in the past
> > about Hamiltonians and Lagrangians for special relativity. The same
> > nonsense that Dono had deleted before could he could be cited in nasty
> > troll. The same nonsense written also by Eric the crackpot.
>
> Look here , pathetic old fart:
Your attempts are pathetic :-)
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamiltonian_mechanics#Charged_particle_i...
That is an approximation to the relativistic Hamiltonian given in
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
Troll, *your* Hamiltonian
H = gamma*m0*v^2 + m0c^2/gamma + e*phi – eAv
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/7c1b2697a4e73960
is pure nonsense. You are a PRETENDER. After six month still can solve
this trivial exercise :-)
Dono
<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> snip whinning by pathetic old fart Juanshito<
This is all you can answer, pathetic old fart.
Look at paragraph 1.5, Juanshito imbecile:
http://www-thphys.physics.ox.ac.uk/people/JamesBinney/cmech.pdf
Juan R.
Pathetic old fart. It certifies you are an IGNORANT TROLL.
First the section 1.5 explain that of L = T - V. You and Eric both
were corrected about this in the past
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/08/some-samples-of-usenet-fauna-ii.html
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/08/some-samples-of-usenet-fauna-iii-nasty.html
and your repeated this mistake again in the trap :-)
here
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
and here
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/f5bee64f3b044249
The expression 1.31 in cmech.pdf is only valid for low velocity.
The expression given for electric field is correct. The same
expression given in
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
The expression you wrote is wrong
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/7c1b2697a4e73960
He does not obtain the Hamiltonian. The Hamiltonian is given in
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
The Hamiltonian you wrote is completely wrong
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/7c1b2697a4e73960
You FELL into the trap :-)
After six month still you cannot obtain the Hamiltonian PRETENDER :-)
Juan R.
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
Dono
<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> snip whinning<
Squirm, weasel:
Juanshito, old fart
L=-m0c^2/gamma-e*phi+eAv
where:
B=curl A
E=-@A/@t-grad(phi)
p=gamma*m0*v
H=pv-L=pv+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv=gamma*m0*v^2+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv
Now, answer the question I asked you 6 months ago: derive L. Let's see
you do it, old nutter.
Albertito
wrote:
> Dono fell into the trap :-)
>
> http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
The advantage of a troll, with English being its
native language, is NOT that he could think better
than you, but he can insult you in English better
than you could do :-)
Dono
Squirm, Albertshito weasel:
Juan R.
And by *fifth* time, Dono, have showed to USENET audience that you
have no idea of elementary relativity or mechanics.
Yes, you have been exposed to be the biggest fraud on spr :-)
The blog article has been updated to contain your new nonsense :-)
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
Many thanks troll!
Juan R.
Juan R.
In the past Dono deleted his messages for hiding his mistakes. Now he
cannot because his nonsense is well linked quoted and reproduced.
He has two options:
(i) To recognize that has been exposed as the biggest fraud in spr
and apologize to everyone who he insulted without need and
(ii) Insult to add noise
But no matter how many insults he submits people knows he has been
showed to be an ignorant of relativity, electrodynamics, and
mechanics.
Note also how Dono added me 81 votes in a few minutes,
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/a5fa14a7a2693bbf
but still the false votes vanished :-)
The blog article has been updated to contain the new nonsense by
Dono :-)
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
I may thank Dono for the hours of amazing USENET hunt. Dono is without
doubt the best specimen in my collection!
Dono
Juan R.
And you FAILED again Dono, your H continues being completely wrong :-)
I have added your new FAILED attempt in the blog in another update
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
Juan R.
And you FAILED again Dono, your H continues being completely wrong :-)
Dono
<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> On 13 dic, 16:21, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 13, 5:49 am, "JuanShito R."
>
> > <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> > > snip imbecilities<
>
> > Juanshito, old fart
>
> > L=-m0c^2/gamma-e*phi+eAv
>
> > where:
>
> > B=curl A
> > E=-@A/@t-grad(phi)
>
> > p=gamma*m0*v
>
> > H=pv-L=pv+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv=gamma*m0*v^2+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv
>
> > Now, answer the question I asked you 6 months ago: derive L.
> > Let's see you do it, old nutter.
>
> And you FAILED again Dono, your H continues being completely wrong :-)
>
> I have added your new FAILED attempt in the blog in another update
>
> http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
No one reads your shitty blog , Juanshito, old demented fart :-)
Juan R.
Everyone in this newsgroup knows that you are a troll who cannot give
the correct Hamiltonian after six months :-)
I am sorry to say that about 12 visitors a day read the blog.
They already know how to obtain the Hamiltonian, Dono, you still
cannot after six months :-)
Those are localizations of last visitors.
Spain Cangas, Galicia
Italy Rome, Lazio
Italy Rome, Lazio
United Kingdom Buxton, Derbyshire
United States Bethesda, Maryland
United States Deerfield Beach, Florida
Spain Valladolid, Castilla y Leon
United States San Jose, California
Spain Alicante, Comunidad Valenciana
United States Sunnyvale, California
Spain Cocentaina, Comunidad Valenciana
Spain Cocentaina, Comunidad Valenciana
Germany Sankt Augustin, Nordrhein-Westfalen
Spain Cocentaina, Comunidad Valenciana
Italy Firenze, Toscana
Germany Kornwestheim, Baden-Wurttemberg
Australia Sydney, New South Wales
Canada Toronto, Ontario
Switzerland Untergeri, Zug
United States Boston, Massachusetts
France Gif-sur-Yvette, Centre
United States Fort Collins, Colorado
Unknown
United States Kalamazoo, Michigan
Unknown
United States Berkeley, California
United States North Branford, Connecticut
India New Delhi, Delhi
Greece Ionnina, Ioannina
United States Lawrence, Kansas
Unknown
India Bombay, Maharashtra
United States Fountain Valley, California
Korea, Republic of
United States Rock Hill, South Carolina
Indonesia Jakarta, Jawa Barat
United States Lawrence, Kansas
United States North Branford, Connecticut
United States
United States Toledo, Ohio
Do you imagine who is the guy from Canada Toronto, Ontario? Yes your
friend :-)
Regards.
Dono
<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> On 13 dic, 18:00, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Dec 13, 8:41 am, "JuanShito R."
>
> > <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> > > On 13 dic, 16:21, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > > On Dec 13, 5:49 am, "JuanShito R."
>
> > > > <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> > > > > snip imbecilities<
>
> > > > Juanshito, old fart
>
> > > > L=-m0c^2/gamma-e*phi+eAv
>
> > > > where:
>
> > > > B=curl A
> > > > E=-@A/@t-grad(phi)
>
> > > > p=gamma*m0*v
>
> > > > H=pv-L=pv+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv=gamma*m0*v^2+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv
>
Juanshito, old fart
No one gives a shit about the garbage you write in your blog. See if
you can get tratment for your severe deklusions.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/f5bee64f3b044249
PS: have you googled your name lately, moron?
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Juan+Alvarez+Gonzalez&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&oq=
Juan R.
> On Dec 13, 10:54 am, "JuanShito R."
>
> <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> > On 13 dic, 18:00, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Dec 13, 8:41 am, "JuanShito R."
>
> > > <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> > > > On 13 dic, 16:21, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Dec 13, 5:49 am, "JuanShito R."
>
> > > > > <juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> > > > > > snip imbecilities<
>
> > > > > Juanshito, old fart
>
> > > > > L=-m0c^2/gamma-e*phi+eAv
>
> > > > > where:
>
> > > > > B=curl A
> > > > > E=-@A/@t-grad(phi)
>
> > > > > p=gamma*m0*v
>
> > > > > H=pv-L=pv+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv=gamma*m0*v^2+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv
>
> <snip Juanshito's whinning>
>
> Juanshito, old fart
>
> No one gives a shit about the garbage you write in your blog. See if
> you can get tratment for your severe deklusions.
>
I already thank you by that fell into that trap. I also said several
times *your* message is linked in my article
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
and I do *not* need to link to it again.
> PS: have you googled your name lately, moron?
>
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Juan+Alvarez+Gonzalez&btnG=Googl...
And then people reads my messages and goes to my blog, where discover
you are the biggest fraud on the history of SPR :-)
Another question from you, where are the 80+ votes you added me
yesterday? Were deleted by administrators of Groups again?
Dono
<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> On 14 dic, 00:31, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
> > > > > > Juanshito, old fart
>
> > > > > > L=-m0c^2/gamma-e*phi+eAv
>
> > > > > > where:
>
> > > > > > B=curl A
> > > > > > E=-@A/@t-grad(phi)
>
> > > > > > p=gamma*m0*v
>
> > > > > > H=pv-L=pv+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv=gamma*m0*v^2+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv
>
> > <snip Juanshito's whinning>
>
> > Juanshito, old fart
>
> > No one gives a shit about the garbage you write in your blog. See if
> > you can get tratment for your severe deklusions.
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/f5bee64f3b0...
>
> I already thank you by that fell into that trap. I also said several
> times *your* message is linked in my article
>
> http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
>
> and I do *not* need to link to it again.
>
> > PS: have you googled your name lately, moron?
>
> >http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=Juan+Alvarez+Gonzalez&btnG=Googl...
>
Juanshito, old fart
Here it is again:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamiltonian_mechanics#Charged_particle_in_an_electromagnetic_field
Not that you will ever learn, stubborn imbecile :-)
Juan R.
>
> Not that you will ever learn, stubborn imbecile :-)
I already explained to you that Hamiltonian is only valid for
velocities v << c. But after six months you still cannot learn what is
the relativistic Hamiltonian :-)
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
Dono
Here it is again:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamiltonian_mechanics#Charged_particle_i...
Now, for the relativistic Lagrangian and Hamiltonian, read here, old
fart:
L=-m0c^2/gamma-e*phi+eAv
where:
B=curl A
E=-@A/@t-grad(phi)
p=gamma*m0*v
H=pv-L=pv+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv=gamma*m0*v^2+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv
Juan R.
Only a big troll as you can repeat the same mistakes forever...
I already explained to you three or four times before that Hamiltonian
is *only* valid for particle velocities v << c.
> Now, for the relativistic Lagrangian and Hamiltonian, read here, old
> fart:
>
> L=-m0c^2/gamma-e*phi+eAv
> H=pv-L=pv+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv=gamma*m0*v^2+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv
>
As anyone can see, troll, you still cannot obtain the relativistic
Hamiltonian after six months :-)
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
Dono
wrote:
> snip imbecilities<
Juanshito, old fart
Here it is again:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamiltonian_mechanics#Charged_particle_i...
Not that you will ever learn, stubborn imbecile :-)
Now, for the relativistic Lagrangian and Hamiltonian, read here, old
fart:
L=-m0c^2/gamma-e*phi+eAv
where:
B=curl A
E=-@A/@t-grad(phi)
p=gamma*m0*v
H=pv-L=pv+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv=gamma*m0*v^2+m0c^2/gamma+e*phi-eAv
Juan R.
And you show again your ignorance of electrodynamics, relativity and
mechanics :-)
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
Dono
Just because you are an imbecile doesn't mean that you need to prove
it daily, Juanshito:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamiltonian_mechanics#Charged_particle_in_an_electromagnetic_field
Juan R.
The original page was
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&oldid...
and contained the usual non-relativistic Hamiltonian. The recent
modification of the page is pure nonsense :-) PRETENDER
The correct Hamiltonian is given in
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
Juan R.
The original page was
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&oldid...
and contained the usual non-relativistic Hamiltonian. The recent
modification of the page is pure nonsense :-) PRETENDER
The correct Hamiltonian is given in
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
It is interesting that your nonsense was deleted the 16 Dec,
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&action=history
and will be again deleted because you write is pure GARBAGE. I will
update the blog for accounting your trolling in wikipedia KOOK :-)
Juan R.
Your nonsense was deleted the day 16. And will be deleted again
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&action=history
Why do you troll also in the wiki KOOK :-)
Dono
>
You are in imbecile, Juanshito
Read and weep:
http://academic.reed.edu/physics/courses/Physics411/html/411/page2/files/Lecture.10.pdf
Albertito
>
> and will be again deleted because you write is pure GARBAGE. I will
> update the blog for accounting your trolling in wikipedia KOOK :-)
Hi Juan,
Are you claiming that DonoShito troll is editing
and authoring physics stuff in wiki pages :-o?
If that's true, then someone must do something to
forbid an ignorant troll to do that. That troll is
more dangerous than I ever could have imagined!!
Dono
>
> Hi Juan,
> Are you claiming that DonoShito troll is editing
> and authoring physics stuff in wiki pages :-o?
> If that's true, then someone must do something to
> forbid an ignorant troll to do that. That troll is
> more dangerous than I ever could have imagined!!
Albertshito Zotkin
Are you still struggling with your demented formula for the
realtivistic Doppler effect? Are you still trying to falsify it such
that it matches Einstein's formula for arbitrary angle? Take your
time, demented one :-)
Albertito
The only one that falsifies stuff here is a troll
like you. It is more than enough to see how
you have falsified the rating of your last post
to mark "excellent" by 40 fake users!
It is pretty hilarious to see a troll like you
clicking 40 times in his own post to falsified
it with fake rates :-)
Dono
>
> It is pretty hilarious to see a troll like you
> clicking 40 times in his own post to falsified
> it with fake rates :-)
So, Albertshito Zotkin
Are you still working on your fake Doppler formula and on you fake
Ives-Stilwell explanatation?
It is too bad that abortion is illegal in Spain, your mom should have
aborted you. At least they cut off your balls, so there isn't going to
be more retards in your family :-)
Albertito
Dono, or whoever you are, leave my family aside from
this, ok?
You are becoming bolder and rude because you are hidden
under an anonymous name, so you are so "brave", your
insults escape unpunished. Sad entertainment that of yours
Don't bother to reply, you have been killfiled forever.
Dono
>
>
> Don't bother to reply, you have been killfiled forever.
Albertshito,
Why don't you stop posting shit while trying to pass it as science?
When you do that, I'll leave you alone, little shit. :-)
Juan R.
KOOK, that 'Hamiltonian' (eq. 10.32) is an special case of Hamiltonian
given in
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
After 6 months and 8 attempts you still cannot solve that elementary
exercise :-)
Juan R.
If you look to the history of Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&actio...
you can see Dono changed the article and then cited modified Wiki page
in one of his responses.
Look the wiki version of day 15, the wrote the nonsense p = m gamma v
and claimed that
H = (p - eA)^2/2m + ephi is valid for relativistic velocities also.
His nonsensical page was deleted the day 16.
Dono changed it again the day 17 and wrote "the formula is correct,
please don't delete again" but since his formulae is nonsense, was
deleted again day 18. But Dono has changed the wiki *13 times* today.
Of course, Dono continues writting nonsense.
Dono was exposed to be the biggest troll in USENET, after was showed
to be the biggest troll in bloger
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
now he is the biggest troll in Wikipedia also :-)
An update in the blog will account for his recent trolling in
wikipedia and his new nonsensical Hamiltonians. The advantage of
Wikipedia is that vandalism is registered, therefore Dono nonsense
will be always available to link :-)
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
Juan R.
Dono has used that bug ni Groups for years now. He was banned by
administrators in the past
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/08/some-samples-of-usenet-fauna-iii-nasty.html
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
Notice that the fake votes he adds vanish the next day. Look the 81
votes he added me some days ago,
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/a5fa14a7a2693bbf
deleted :-)
Juan R.
TROLL
Dono
wrote:
Juanshito, demented fart
You need to take your medication, you are foaming at the mouth again
and you might chocke in it.
I think they must have castrated you as well, no more retards in your
family, eh?
Strich.9
Dono, medications cannot work for you. You need electroshock
therapy. Not the one for the insane. The one that comes with a
special chair. And it's only a one time session. HA HA HA HA HA.
Dono
>
>
> Dono, medications cannot work for you. You need electroshock
> therapy. Not the one for the insane.
This is how they treat your imbecility at the veteran's hospital, eh?
Strich.9
> snip brainless babble
Hey DoNut, you'll be TOAST :) after sitting in that special chair made
for you...
Headline: DONUT becomes TOAST.
BWAH HA HA HA HA HA
Dono
> On Dec 18, 10:33 am, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > snip brainless babble
>
> Hey DoNut, you'll be TOAST :) after sitting in that special chair made
> for you...
>
hospital. Are both an inmate and a janitor, Ostrich?
Strich.9
Getting pissed DoNUT? I guess since you just pissed your pants :)
Dono
> On Dec 18, 10:51 am, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Dec 18, 7:47 am, "OStrich.9" <strich.9...@gmail.com> wrote:> On Dec 18, 10:33 am, Dono <sa...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > > snip brainless babble
>
> > > Hey DoNut, you'll be TOAST :) after sitting in that special chair made
> > > for you...
>
> > This is DEFINITELY the treatment they use on you at the veteran's
> > hospital. Are both an inmate and a janitor, Ostrich?
>
your head when you go to bad.
Do you moonlight as a janitor? Remember not to use your moth for
cleaning up the latrines. :-)
Strich.9
Scared of the electric chair, inmate DoNut? Don't worry, the
electrodes will burn with you :)
Juan R.
TROLL
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
Do not submit more nonsense to wikipedia, will be deleted again :-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&action=history
Dono
<juanrgonzal...@canonicalscience.com> wrote:
> snip daily trolling<
Strich.9
> wubba wubba wubba
DoNut the troll has a big hole where his brain is supposed to be.
Juan R.
TROLL
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
Do not submit more nonsense to wikipedia, will be deleted again :-)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&action=history
P.S: Why do you continue voting by yourself? Tomorrow your fake votes
Dono
> Do not submit more nonsense to wikipedia, will be deleted again :-)
>
>
I don't think so, Juanshito, old fart
Are you learning new things?
Juan R.
> On Dec 19, 11:09 am, "JuanShito R." <
>
> > Do not submit more nonsense to wikipedia, will be deleted again :-)
>
> >http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&actio...
>
> I don't think so, Juanshito, old fart
It is fine you do not submit more nonsense to wikipedia :-)
> Are you learning new things?
Yes I am learning new nonsensical Hamiltonians from you
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hamiltonian_mechanics&action=history
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/f33c74b77fedf615
P.S: Why do you continue voting by yourself? Tomorrow your fake votes
Juan R.
Blog article has been updated today to contain also Dono trolling in
Wikipedia :-)
http://canonicalscience.blogspot.com/2008/12/catching-big-troll.html