GOD GLASSES
George Hammond
copyright George Hammond 2009
The central goal of all of Religion is a quest for what
is called (e.g. by the Catholic Church) the BEATIFIC VISION.
It is not my intent to give a crash course in Religion
for scientific heathens, but I will mention that the
scientific basis of God and the phenomenon of Beatific
Vision has been discovered, proven and published in the peer
reviewed academic literature by me (Hammond 2003):
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond/Hammond5s1.html
and is now known to be caused by the Secular Trend in human
growth discovered 100 years ago.
Briefly, Secular Trend data shows that no human being is
fully grown, that is, our phenotypic size has never reached
our genotypic size and is only slowly doing so over a long
historical time. Roughly speaking, the average human being
today is about 20% more or less short of full theoretical
growth.
Since our brains are therefore 20% short of full growth,
it is not surprising that we can only see 80% of full normal
reality..... hence the term BEATIFIC VISION is used to
describe the reality that we WOULD see is we had the other
20% of our brain which is missing!
WHILE IT MAY BE HARD FOR YOU TO BELIEVE, ESPECIALLY IF
YOU ARE AN ATHEIST, THIS PHENOMENON IS THE SCIENTIFIC
EXPLANATION OF "GOD", "RELIGION", "HEAVEN", "MIRACLES" AND
"ANGELS" AND EXPLAINS THE ENTIRE HISTORY OF RELIGION
INCLUDING CHRISTIANITY.
Ok, so the Secular Trend growth deficit of the human
brain causes the world (aka reality) to appear BIGGER AND
FASTER than it actually is-- and it is that fact which
brings us around to the subject of EYEGLASSES.
Most people if they are over 40 develop presbyopia
(farsightedness) and have to start wearing eyeglasses. As
you may have noticed these glasses make things look BIGGER.
On the other hand, half of people who wear eyeglasses are
actually NEARSIGHTED (myopic), and they have to wear glasses
with negative lenses that actually make the world look
SMALLER.
AHA.......!
This tells us immediately that myopic (nearsighted)
people must be a very special breed! For one thing, in the
eternal quest towards finding the Beatific Vision which is
to downsize the world to it's true size and speed, MYOPICS
already have a leg up on the problem.... their glasses just
happen to make the world appear SMALLER!
By the same token, we see that the rest of us who are far
sighted just happen to be the victims of an enormous
historical optical accident... our glasses make the world
appear BIGGER which is moving in exactly the WRONG
DIRECTION vis a vis trying to move us towards the Beatific
Vision.
Anyway, this discovery that myopics wear negative glasses
tells us that myopics are actually one step ahead of the
rest of us insofar as actually being able to see the
Beatific Vision, i.e. actually being able to "see Heaven".
In that regard, we might actually consider myopics to be
living examples of what religion calls "angels". As the
scientific proof of God cited above shows, "angels" are
actually human personality types who have above average
growth (small growth deficits) and are generally elected to
leadership roles, many times as public servants. Teddy
Roosevelt was a famous myopic for instance.
This tells us that myopics are very special people
personality wise. And it turns out that I am not the first
one to discover this. Turns out the psychologists have long
been interested in the connection between myopia and
personality and intelligence. Myopics generally score high
on IQ tests and generally they have likeable and even
popular personalities.
According to my theory of course this is caused by the
fact that they develop psychological dominance because they
live in a Gulliver's Travels type of world where they are
actually surrounded by people who look like midgets..
remember their glasses make everybody look SMALLER than they
actually are.
A Google search of "myopia and personality" immediately
turns up numerous studies, but the one that I think hits the
nail on the head most accurately is one by Swanson:
http://bas.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/45/2/149
and here he finds that myopics make powerful CEO's who favor
high salaries for top executives and tend to be very
commanding, dominant and authoritative. All of this of
course points towards possession of a psychologically
dominant personality.
Ok... so we have now discovered the ADVANTAGE of wearing
NEGATIVE GLASSES.... glasses that make the world look
SAMALLER rather than bigger. And that brings me around to
my own particular case.
I am farsighted, and at age 67 I currently find myself
wearing +2.75 reading glasses nearly all day long. These
glasses have a magnification of about +10%... meaning they
make the world look 10% larger than it actually is. This is
a long way from the Beatific Vision needless to say, and
it's beginning to bother me. A 6' man strolling towards me
appears to be 6' 7" tall... which can be quite intimidating
in some circumstances. Generally speaking 10% magnification
of the world can engender an inferiority complex after
awhile.
So, being a physicist, I got to thinking about a possible
way to make some glasses which would correct my blurry
vision without magnifying the world, and in fact that would
actually MINIFY the world same as myopic glasses. Is this
possible? It turns out it is possible, although not very
convenient or easy.
In the first place, eyeglasses are used to correct
blurred vision. It turns out that the magnification caused
by eyeglasses is entirely ACCIDENTAL. The magnification is
caused by the 15 mm space between your eyes and your
glasses. This is demonstrated by putting on contact lenses
which rest right on the eye and noticing that they
immediately clear up your blurred vision but they produce
VIRTUALLY NO MAGNIFICATION!
This got me to thinking. Suppose a person with 20-20
vision put on positive contact lenses and negative
eyeglasses at the same time. The glasses would cancel out
the contacts so he would maintain clear vision, but since
the glasses magnify while contacts don't.... he would end up
with NEGATIVE MAGNIFICATION the same as myopics have.
In fact, I could do the same thing even though I need
positive correction to begin with. What I could do is go
get fitted for contact lenses to give me clear vision...
then go online and order some of the same contacts but add a
couple of diopters additional strength to the prescription
on the order form, and then buy some negative glasses from
another online source... and voila... I could enjoy the
"Beatific Vision" that the myopic angels already enjoy...
only having suffered with a magnified world for many years,
I could REALLY APPRECIATE IT!
Let me take a second to explain the Physics of all this.
It turns out negative eyeglasses plus positive contact
lenses constitute a "reversed Galilean Telescope". The
magnification of a Galilean telescope is given by F/f where
F and f are the focal length of the positive objective lens
and f is the focal length of the negative eyepiece.
Substituting d=F-f where d is the distance between the
contacts and the eyeglasses we can write the magnification
F/f as:
m=magnification = F/f = 1/(1-d/F) d in mm
this can be put in terms of diopters D, using D=1000/f as:
magnification = 1/(1-Dd) d in meters
for our setup 2=15 mm, and if we use a 6D contact lens, the
magnification will be:
m = 1/(1-.015x6) = 1.1 which is a (minus) 10% magnification
which is about exactly what we looking for.
With this miraculous setup... and bear in mind that I
will probably be the FIRST HUMAN BEING IN HISTORY with
farsighted eyes to actually see what the world looks like to
a myopic, I fully expect to take one small step for me and
one large step for mankind into the BEATIFIC VISION ITSLEF.
Now myopics are already seeing this, but bear in mind
that myopics are born that way and therefore, unlike a
hyperopic like me, they don't know the difference... that's
what an angel is, somebody who is born that way and doesn't
know the difference. As for me, if my scientific theory is
correct, I'm about to be "BORN AGAIN"!
I'll be sure to keep you posted on developments as I go
forward with this plan. And by the way, since I am
volunteering to be the human guinea pig for this experiment
(I hesitate to say Hamster) and this is a pro bono non
profit, humane effort... if there is anyone out there who is
interested in the outcome and could assist me in defraying
the expenses of the contacts and eyeglass equipment...
please contact me at:
For your effort you will receive a written report of the
outcome of the experiment and credit in any publications I
make on the subject. And God bless you too.
Regards, George Hammond M.S. Physics
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
1st mirror site
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
2nd mirror site
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
=======================================
THE SPOG FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=======================================
Uncle Al
>
> GOD GLASSES
>
> copyright George Hammond 2009
>
> The central goal of all of Religion is a quest for what
> is called (e.g. by the Catholic Church) the BEATIFIC VISION.
"The central goal of all of Religion is a quest for" money and
power. Can God make a collection plate so vast that even He cannot
fill it? Sure! ALL OF THEM.
idiot
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/reality.png
1) The halfling faggot god-on-a-stick died for your sins.
2) If you do not sin, Christ died in vain.
3) Get on with it.
Strike a match lit - that is science.
Pray the same match lit a second time - that's faith. We'll wait.
The Crusades, the Inquisition, and Hitler's Pope Pius XII. Northern
Ireland, East Timor. Extermination of 30 million New World indios.
Tens of thousands of reported cases of priestly homosexual
pedophilia. Those is the One True Church spreading the faith.
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/religion.htm
idiot
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
Neil B.
"Uncle Al" <Uncl...@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:4A8FFA94...@hate.spam.net...
Point taken, but I'm not sure about the "faggot" stuff.
Don't forget all those non-religiously motivated Nazis, ethnicity
militants who massacred millions in Rwanda etc, and Communists like
Stalin.
Don Stockbauer
>
> For your effort you will receive a written report of the
> outcome of the experiment and credit in any publications I
> make on the subject. And God bless you too.
>
> Regards, George Hammond M.S. Physics
> ========================================
> GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
> 1st mirror site
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
> 2nd mirror site
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> =======================================
> THE SPOG FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
> ======================================
**********************************************************************
God and The Universe (out to the causal horizon) are identical
concepts.
Skywise
you think that by replying to someone's post that you don't
like and adding that header is going to magically make that
post disappear?
Further, does somehow posting under an 'anonymous' name and
trying hide your identity also supposed to make this work?
What an idiot.
Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
tadchem
> GOD GLASSES
12 DIFFERENT COLLECTIBLES!
NOW AT WAL-MART!
Only $2.99 each
COLLECT THE WHOLE SET!
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
Don Stockbauer
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:38:37 -0700 (PDT), Don Stockbauer
SNAP, SNUP.
Don Stockbauer
IF GOD NEEDS GLASSES, DOESN'T THAT KILL THE WHOLE OMNIPOTENCE THEORY?
George Hammond
[Hammond]
christ..... an actual sign of intelligent life!
The ONLY DIFFERENCE between God and Man is that Man only
sees 80% of reality more or less, while God sees 100% of
reality. In technical terms Man sees a CURVED VERSION of
reality.
It turns out that NEGATIVE eyeglasses actually make a
small step towards "UNCURVING" reality. (positive glasses
actually make it worse).
This explains the peculiar personality of myopics, what
has been dubbed by psychologists as the "myopic
personality"... or what I call the "Teddy Roosevelt
personality". Naturally the psycholgists have never been
able to pinpoint exactly what it is... turns out it isn't a
"personality" trait at all, it is a "growth deficit trait",
namely: Negative glasses downsize the world (uncurve the
world) to a noticeable degree, and this eventually gives the
myopic an "angelic presence" whereby they have an artifical
but real psychological dominence from being one step closer
to the Beatific Vision than the rest of us. Of course they
don't know explicitly know it..they intuitively know it, and
they just have to live with it... "amazing grace" I guess
you could call it. There are 3 times as many farsighted
people as nearsighted by the way. And only 1/3 of them wear
really strong glasses... thus making "myopic angels" kind of
rare.
This means that if I rig some glasses that will allow a
hyperopic (farsighted) person like me to see the reality a
myopic (nearsighted) person sees... I can actually get one
step closer to Heaven... two steps actually because I'm
already one step away from it by wearing positive glasses.
Frankly I can't wait to see it.... all I have to do is go
get fitted for contacts, order some extra strength ones and
then buy some negative glasses to neutralize the extra
magnification and I will wind up with say a minus 7%
(myopic) view of reality.
Maybe if I stop smoking two packs of ciggarettes a day at
7 bucks a pack I can get up the money to actually do this.
I'll keep you posted on progress.
jeff
> In technical terms Man sees a CURVED VERSION of
> reality.
> It turns out that NEGATIVE eyeglasses actually make a
> small step towards "UNCURVING" reality. (positive glasses
> actually make it worse).
Ahhh. So Jozeph Petzval is god. Makes sense now.
--
j
hanson
-------- AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA -----------
----- Science off-shoot from the 3rd Reich --------
-------------------- by --------------------
Gergi/Grodi/Georgi, the Nazi & Arch Anti-Semite, aka
the ungodly Hemorrhoid Hammond "George Hammond"
<Nowh...@notspam.com> who pontificated & wrote:
[edited for brevity, clarity & Grodi's benefit who said]
>
Gergi/Grodi wrote:
GOD "GL" ASSES (copyright George Hammond 2009)
The central goal of all of Religion is a quest for what is
>
It is my intent to crash Religion for scientific heat but I am
Beating off God as was proven by me, Hammond, in 2003:
http://wangodan.googlepages.com/KriminalHammondInferno2.jpg
BEATIFIC VISION WHILE IT MAY BE HARD FOR YOU TO
BELIEVE IS THE SCIENTIFIC EXPLANATION OF "GOD",
make the world look SMALLER in the WRONG DIRECTION.
>
Actually the scientific POOF of God cited above shows "angels"
which according to my theory look SMALLER than they actually
are thru the ADVANTAGE of wearing NEGATIVE GLASSES.
>
||||| I, Hammond am farsighted, and at age 67 I currently
>
So, being a physicist, I got to correct my blurry vision without
magnifying the world that would MINIFY the world entirely and
ACCIDENTALLY produce VIRTUALLY NO MAGNIFICATION
with NEGATIVE MAGNIFICATION ... and voila... I could enjoy
the "Beatific Vision" that the myopic angels APPRECIATE!
>
The Physics of negative eyeglasses plus positive contact
lenses constitute a "reversed Galilean Telescope" with
### m=magnification = F/f = 1/(1-d/F) d in mm ####
With this miraculous setup I will be the FIRST HUMAN BEING
IN HISTORY with BEATIFIC VISION to be "BORN AGAIN"!
>
The ONLY DIFFERENCE between God & Man is that Man only
sees 80% of reality more or less, while God sees 100% of
reality since NEGATIVE eyeglasses are "UNCURVING" reality.
>
|||| This explains my, G. Hammonds, peculiar personality as a
|||| "cerebral growth deficit trait" with "amazing grace" thus
|||| making "myopic angels" kind of rare. I can actually get one
|||| one step away from it by wearing positive glasses.
|||| 7 bucks a pack I can get up the money to actually do this.
>
>
=====================================
Primary site [all corrected for accuracy]
http://webspaced-out.com/hemmies/grodi_hammond
1st Hemorrhoid's mirror site
http://georgi.com/scientific_Poof_of_god
2nd Hemorrhoid's mirror site
http://Poof-of-god.on-the-freehustling.com
GOD=G_uv (an un-godly poof by G_oofy George)
=====================================
=======================================
>
>
Previous fun with Hemmie Hammond:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/8aafb6c2930d6b38
http://tinyurl.com/m8sreg
Thanks for the laughs, Grodi, you Aryian Brown Shirt.
ahahahahaha... ahahahahanson
Don Stockbauer
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:12:08 -0700 (PDT), Don Stockbauer
>
>
>
> <donstockba...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >On Aug 25, 3:44 am, tadchem <tadc...@comcast.net> wrote:
> >> On Aug 22, 3:51 am, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.com> wrote:
>
> >> > GOD GLASSES
>
> >> 12 DIFFERENT COLLECTIBLES!
>
> >> NOW AT WAL-MART!
>
> >> Only $2.99 each
>
> >> COLLECT THE WHOLE SET!
>
> >> Tom Davidson
> >> Richmond, VA
>
> >IF GOD NEEDS GLASSES, DOESN'T THAT KILL THE WHOLE OMNIPOTENCE THEORY?
>
> [Hammond]
> christ..... an actual sign of intelligent life!
Did it just for you, George.
purple
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> X-No-Archive: Yes
>
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:51:45 GMT, "hanson"
> <han...@quick.net> wrote:
>
>> ------------------ ahahahahahaha --------------------
>>
> <snip>
You don't want the fact that some anonymous poster
(you) said nothing to be kept out of the archives?
Now there's a paranoid poster if ever there was one.
Here's all the info you thought you were going to
conceal from the archives:
Subject: Re: GOD GLASSES
From: "<SNIP HECKLER CRAP>" <.@..com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:56:37 -0400
Newsgroups:
sci.optics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,rec.org.mensa
Path:
uni-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!backlog2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!news.giganews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:56:35 -0500
Newsgroups:
sci.optics,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,rec.org.mensa
Message-ID: <2dg895tfdutvh2ig4...@4ax.com>
References: <ra8v85l0fdfp9i8pf...@4ax.com>
<lMTkm.781$5c6...@nwrddc02.gnilink.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.1/32.783
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 8
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace:
sv3-gDx806j32dCCZabsKs/L6l0xhIcZCDiSUUVScbH+53esJJMKBOyjYZkjvbmR3SLSrFbk9OyDRf0PYAR!ctjnyeIO0rMSZhOmdagwDPOX7XulJQZb4GQdi66LvQ40ow/ry6sS6v8TuXAMTp+JLbsU+ds=
X-Complaints-To: ab...@giganews.com
X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.39
Bytes: 1341
Xref: uni-berlin.de sci.optics:105082 sci.physics.relativity:844538
sci.physics:1671980 alt.sci.physics.new-theories:266545 rec.org.mensa:608499
HTH, HAND
hanson
<.@..com> wrote: ----- ahahahahahaha ---------
>>
hanson wrote:
It was funny, wasn't it. Here it is again for your entertainment:
Don Stockbauer
> Hemmie Hammond as "<SNIP HECKLER CRAP>"<.@..com> wrote: ----- ahahahahahaha ---------
>
> hanson wrote:
>
> It was funny, wasn't it. Here it is again for your entertainment:
>
> ------------------ ahahahahahaha --------------------
> -------- AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA -----------
> ----- Science off-shoot from the 3rd Reich --------
> -------------------- by --------------------
> Gergi/Grodi/Georgi, the Nazi & Arch Anti-Semite, aka
> the ungodly Hemorrhoid Hammond "George Hammond"
> GOD=G_uv (an un-godly poof by G_oofy George)
> =====================================
> THE SPOG FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
> http://intense-Bang.jwgh.org/hammorroid-songs
> =======================================
>
>
> Thanks for the laughs, Grodi, you Aryian Brown Shirt.
> ahahahahaha... ahahahahanson
God and The Universe are identical concepts.
purple
> God and The Universe are identical concepts.
How come nobody ever says "The Universe told me to do it"?
hanson
>
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
>
Hemmie Hammond as "<SNIP HECKLER CRAP>"
<.@..com> wrote: ----- ahahahahahaha ---------
>>
hanson wrote:
>
>
------------------ ahahahahahaha --------------------
-------- AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA -----------
----- Science off-shoot from the 3rd Reich --------
-------------------- by --------------------
Gergi/Grodi/Georgi, the Nazi & Arch Anti-Semite, aka
the ungodly Hemorrhoid Hammond "George Hammond"
>
Thanks for the laughs, Grodi, you Aryian Brown Shirt.
ahahahahaha... ahahahahanson
>
God and The Universe are identical concepts.
>
Don it looks like that you are Hemmie Hammond's right
hand man now: See here: <http://tinyurl.com/merwa2>
>
or are you trying to suck up to me since you got that
"Global Brain" indoctrination during your Big House
stint? Did they let you out to peddle some of my friend
Hemmie Hammond's "negative beatific glasses?"
Either way, thanks for the laughs too.... ahahahanson.
Mahipal
Ironically, you just did. Hush, Deep Purple.
Lyrics: http://www.lyricsfreak.com/d/deep+purple/hush_20038799.html
An audio version here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ilz5SxrHA3E
The better original, with drums done just physics perfect, is hear:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R-x7RqRF8Pk
A better deeper more purplish rock song can never be.
Enjo(y)...
--
Mahipal
Hush, hush
I thought I heard her calling my name now
Don Stockbauer
Thank you all for your posts, which help to form the Global Brain.
Don Stockbauer
> "Don, the Con, Stockbauer" <donstockba...@hotmail.com>,
> from library of the Stockade where he is warehoused at, wrote:
>
> "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
>
> Hemmie Hammond as "<SNIP HECKLER CRAP>"<.@..com> wrote: ----- ahahahahahaha ---------
>
> hanson wrote:
>
> It was funny, wasn't it. Here it is again for your benefit:
>
> ------------------ ahahahahahaha --------------------
> -------- AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA -----------
> ----- Science off-shoot from the 3rd Reich --------
> -------------------- by --------------------
> Gergi/Grodi/Georgi, the Nazi & Arch Anti-Semite, aka
> the ungodly Hemorrhoid Hammond "George Hammond"
> GOD=G_uv (an un-godly poof by G_oofy George)
> =====================================
> THE SPOG FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
> http://intense-Bang.jwgh.org/hammorroid-songs
> =======================================
>
> Previous fun with Hemmie Hammond:
> ----- <http://tinyurl.com/m8sreg> ---------
>
> Thanks for the laughs, Grodi, you Aryian Brown Shirt.
> ahahahahaha... ahahahahanson
>
> "Don, the Con, wrote:
> God and The Universe are identical concepts.
>
> hanson wrote:
>
> Don it looks like that you are Hemmie Hammond's right
> hand man now: See here: <http://tinyurl.com/merwa2>
>
> or are you trying to suck up to me since you got that
> "Global Brain" indoctrination during your Big House
> stint? Did they let you out to peddle some of my friend
> Hemmie Hammond's "negative beatific glasses?"
> Either way, thanks for the laughs too.... ahahahanson.
Any time, bud.
hahahahahahahhahahahahhhahahahahahahahahhavala
George Hammond
<protom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Aug 22, 1:59�am, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 03:51:08 -0400, George Hammond
>>
>> <Nowhe...@notspam.com> wrote:
>>
>> � � � � � � � � � � � � �GOD GLASSES
>>
>> Copyright: George Hammond 2009
>> On the other hand, 15% of people who wear eyeglasses are
>> for our setup d=15 mm, and if we use a 6D contact lens, the
>> magnification will be:
>>
>> m = 1/(1-.015x6) = 1.1 which is a (minus) 10% �magnification
>> which is about exactly what we looking for.
>>
>> � �With this miraculous setup... and bear in mind that I
>> will probably be the FIRST HUMAN BEING IN HISTORY with
>> farsighted eyes to actually see what the world looks like to
>> a myopic, I fully expect to take one small step for me and
>> one large step for mankind into the BEATIFIC VISION ITSLEF.
>> � �Now myopics are already seeing this, but bear in mind
>> that myopics are born that way and therefore, unlike a
>> hyperopic like me, they don't know the difference... that's
>> what an angel is, somebody who is born that way and doesn't
>> know the difference. �As for me, if my scientific theory is
>> correct, I'm about to be "BORN AGAIN"!
>>
>> � �I'll be sure to keep you posted on developments as I go
>> forward with this plan. �And by the way, since I am
>> volunteering to be the human guinea pig for this experiment
>> (I hesitate to say Hamster) and this is a pro bono non
>> profit, humane effort... if there is anyone out there who is
>> interested in the outcome and could assist me in defraying
>> the expenses of the contacts and eyeglass equipment...
>> please contact me at:
>>
>> research56621...@hotmail.com
>>
>> For your effort you will receive a written report of the
>> outcome of the experiment and credit in any publications I
>> make on the subject. �And God bless you too.
>>
>> Regards, George Hammond M.S. Physics
>> ========================================
>> GEORGE �HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
>> � � � � � � � � � � � Primary sitehttp://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
>> � � � � � � � � � � � 1st mirror site
>> � � �http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
>> � � � � � � � � � � � 2nd mirror site
>> � � �http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
>> =======================================
>> � � �THE SPOG FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
>> � � �http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
>> =======================================
>
>
>[douglas wrote:]
>What is this?!!!!!?
>
[Hammond]
CAUTION
Dear douglas,
You must be posting from either sci.med.vision, s.p.r.,
or sci.philosophy.tech. I must caution you that the
original target post has been posted on over 15 scientific,
philosophical and theological newsgroups plus a few private
moderated forums and Listservs and has attracted a great
deal of interest. Hopefully you are a professional of some
sort.
Some of these groups contain internet hecklers and kooks. I
tried to crosspost groups in equivalence classes... for
instance not many kooks would be expected to hang out on
sci.med.vision so it is grouped with Relativity and
sci.philosophy.tech, to which I have now added sci.optics.
Having said that, I can tell you what this post is NOT:
1. It is not the work of a crank.
2. It is not the work of an incompetent.
3. It is not a troll.
4. It is not a hoax or a fraud
In fact what it is, is a proposal for an entirely feasible
scientific experiment to discover if "myopic sight" will
have a significant and beneficial psychological effect on
the average farsighted person. And the suspicion is that in
some cases at least it might have a dramatic effect.
The author is an M.S. in Physics who has published several
papers of a fundamental nature in Psychometry all of which
have been widely discussed on the Internet newsgroups, the
professional literature, international symposiums and
elsewhere.
If your are a professional in either optics, medical vision,
physics or any field related to the subject matter of the
post, we would appreciate your comments.
douglas
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:46:27 -0700 (PDT), douglas
>
The only thing myopia has going for it is that it allows you to do
well in close-up work. That's it.
George Hammond
<protom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>The only thing myopia has going for it is that it allows you to do
>well in close-up work. That's it.
>
>
[Hammond]
We are talking about eyeglasses.
Are you aware that magnification is an optical accident
caused by eyeglass geometry and has NOTHING to do with
correcting either myopia or hyperopia?
This is proven by the fact that contact lenses will correct
myopia WITHOUT any magnification whatsoever.
Obviously then, whatever psychological effect magnification
has on people it must be the OPPOSITE EFFECT for nearsighted
vs. farsighted.
Do you have anything to say about that issue
which is the entire point of the article posted?
douglas
> On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:50:52 -0700 (PDT), douglas
>
>
> >The only thing myopia has going for it is that it allows you to do
> >well in close-up work. That's it.
>
> [Hammond]
> We are talking about eyeglasses.
>
> Are you aware that magnification is an optical accident
> caused by eyeglass geometry and has NOTHING to do with
> correcting either myopia or hyperopia?
>
> This is proven by the fact that contact lenses will correct
> myopia WITHOUT any magnification whatsoever.
>
> Obviously then, whatever psychological effect magnification
> has on people it must be the OPPOSITE EFFECT for nearsighted
> vs. farsighted.
>
> Do you have anything to say about that issue
> which is the entire point of the article posted?
> ========================================
> GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
> 1st mirror site
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
> 2nd mirror site
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> =======================================
> THE SPOG FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
> =======================================
Um, I'm very aware of that. I am not aware of any psychological effect
of magnification or minification
George Hammond
<protom...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Aug 26, 9:00�pm, George Hammond <Nowhe...@notspam.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:50:52 -0700 (PDT), douglas
>>
>> <protoman2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >The only thing myopia has going for it is that it allows you to do
>> >well in close-up work. That's it.
>>
>> [Hammond]
>> We are talking about eyeglasses.
>>
>> Are you aware that magnification is an optical accident
>> caused by eyeglass geometry and has NOTHING to do with
>> correcting either myopia or hyperopia?
>>
>> This is proven by the fact that contact lenses will correct
>> myopia WITHOUT any magnification whatsoever.
>>
>> Obviously then, whatever psychological effect magnification
>> has on people it must be the OPPOSITE EFFECT for nearsighted
>> vs. farsighted.
>>
>> Do you have anything to say about that issue
>> which is the entire point of the article posted?
>
>[douglas]
>Um, I'm very aware of that. I am not aware of any psychological effect
>of magnification or minification
>
>
[Hammond]
Have you ever read Gulliver's Travels? It's the
autobiography of the man who invented eyeglasses.
While wearing myopic (negative) eyeglasses people looked to
him like "Lilliputians" who were exceeingly small.
While wearing positive glasses all people looked like
"Brobdingnagians" who were exceedingly large looking.
Here is a picture of Gulliver wearing negative lenses being
amazed by how small people look:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Gulliver.jpg
Gulliver later became a psychologist specializing in
inferiority and superiority complexes caused by wearing
eyeglasses.
Neil Brooks
Gulliver's Travels?
This is how you "prove" something?
Hmmmm.
Neil Brooks
It should also be noted.....
http://moonflake.wordpress.com/2007/01/26/midweek-cuckoo-george-hammond/
Yup. We have us a new Otis S. Brown.
Lovely.
hanson
"Don, the Con, Stockbauer" <donsto...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
>> "Don, the Con, Stockbauer" <donstockba...@hotmail.com>,
>> from library of the Stockade where he is warehoused at, wrote:
>
>
Hemmie Hammond as "<SNIP HECKLER CRAP>"
<.@..com> wrote: ----- ahahahahahaha ---------
>>
hanson wrote:
It was funny, wasn't it. Here it is again for your benefit:
>
>
------------------ ahahahahahaha --------------------
-------- AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA -----------
----- Science off-shoot from the 3rd Reich --------
-------------------- by --------------------
Gergi/Grodi/Georgi, the Nazi & Arch Anti-Semite, aka
the ungodly Hemorrhoid Hammond "George Hammond"
------------ Don, the Con, wrote-----------
God and The Universe are identical concepts.
>
hanson wrote:
Don it looks like that you are Hemmie Hammond's right
hand man now: See here: <http://tinyurl.com/merwa2>
>
or are you trying to suck up to me since you got that
"Global Brain" indoctrination during your Big House
stint? Did they let you out to peddle some of my friend
Hemmie Hammond's "negative beatific glasses?"
Either way, thanks for the laughs too.... ahahahanson.
>
Don, the Con, wrote:
Any time, bud.
hahahahahahahhahahahahhhahahahahahahahahhavala
>
hanson wrote:
ahahaha.. So, Don you con, now you have attracted the
attention of DHS because of your surreptitious activities
with/in "havala"... Back to the Big house with you, Don!
ahahahaha... ahahahanson
Don Stockbauer
> "Don, the Con, Stockbauer" <donstockba...@hotmail.com> wrote:> hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
> >> "Don, the Con, Stockbauer" <donstockba...@hotmail.com>,
> >> from library of the Stockade where he is warehoused at, wrote:
>
> Hemmie Hammond as "<SNIP HECKLER CRAP>"<.@..com> wrote: ----- ahahahahahaha ---------
>
> hanson wrote:
>
> It was funny, wasn't it. Here it is again for your benefit:
>
> ------------------ ahahahahahaha --------------------
> -------- AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA -----------
> ----- Science off-shoot from the 3rd Reich --------
> -------------------- by --------------------
> Gergi/Grodi/Georgi, the Nazi & Arch Anti-Semite, aka
> the ungodly Hemorrhoid Hammond "George Hammond"
Don Stockbauer
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahailoveyouhansonareyouinarelationship???
hahahahahahahahaa
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
douglas
> 1st mirror site
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
> 2nd mirror site
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> =======================================
> THE SPOG FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
> =======================================
> ========================================
> GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
> 1st mirror site
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
> 2nd mirror site
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> =======================================
> THE SPOG FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
>
> - Show quoted text -
What?!!!?
hanson
< http://tinyurl.com/mxz6uv> for which
"Don, the con Stockbauer" <donsto...@hotmail.com>
plagiarized 66 lines x 80 coll of "ahahaha", hiding this in it:
"hahahahahahailoveyouhansonareyouinarelationship???"
which Don, the con sent a scant 3 minuses after Don, the
con dispatched his 1st premature C&P-only post... ahahaha.
>
hanson wrote:
What is that "hail - ovey" supposed to mean, Don?... ahaha..
Are you a closet Zio?. To boot why I should I tell you whether
I am in a "relationship" or not? What's the con, Don? I take
care of my affairs on the outside & you should to the same
inside your Big House residence, wherein you apparently
do suffer from inmate abuse. Sorry to hear that. Go ACLU!
Till then, thanks for the laughs, Don, you con.... ahahahanson....
I
hanson
>
hanson wrote:
Don, did you get so exited over my post that you
hit the "send"-button too soon?... AHAHAHAHA
>
---- The pen-strokes which so excited Don, the con -----
>
"Don Stockbauer" <donsto...@hotmail.com> wrote
Don Stockbauer
De only Big House I be in, Hanson Boy Band, be de ranch house heah.
You jes run along , little feller. You is bothering me, Go try to
defuse a fusion bomb and have a little "accident". Genral Chilton
will be observing, chuckling to himself.
Blarp.
Eat more pecans.
This post contributes to the formation of the Global Brain; no animals
were harmed during its testing.
hanson
< http://groups.google.com/group/sci.optics/msg/1d66232507efe9a0>
>
"Don, the con, Stockbauer" <donsto...@hotmail.com> in
< http://groups.google.com/group/sci.optics/msg/2dd5ae9ecf3440b8>
with homocide on his mind wrote: "have a little "accident" &.
======= :"You is bothering me"=========
>
hanson wrote:
.... "bothering"...ahahAHAHA... But Don, you con, THAT
is self-inflicted grief you caused for yourself... ahahahaha...
for you running after me, lamenting and trying, as you say, to
"contribute to the formation of the Global Brain" which seems
to include for you to have the last word... ahahahaha..
So, will you still continue to dangle and zappel on my hook?
Thanks for the laughs, Don, you con... ahahaha... ahahahanson
Don Stockbauer
> hanson wrote:
>
> <http://groups.google.com/group/sci.optics/msg/1d66232507efe9a0>
>
> <http://groups.google.com/group/sci.optics/msg/2dd5ae9ecf3440b8>
> with homocide on his mind wrote: "have a little "accident" &.
> ======= :"You is bothering me"=========
>
> hanson wrote:
>
> .... "bothering"...ahahAHAHA... But Don, you con, THAT
> is self-inflicted grief you caused for yourself... ahahahaha...
> for you running after me, lamenting and trying, as you say, to
> "contribute to the formation of the Global Brain" which seems
> to include for you to have the last word... ahahahaha..
> So, will you still continue to dangle and zappel on my hook?
> Thanks for the laughs, Don, you con... ahahaha... ahahahanson
I always have the last word.
purple
BURPPPPPPPP!
hanson
I always have the last word.
>
BURPPPPPPPP! [that's the sound of the global brain]
>
hanson wrote:
AHAHAHAHAHA... ahahahaha... Thanks for playing, guys.
ahahahaha... ahahahahanson
Dr Judy
> Have you ever read Gulliver's Travels? It's the
> autobiography of the man who invented eyeglasses.
Really. I thought it was a piece of satire written by Jonathon Swift
to poke fun at seventeenth and eighteenth century governments and
religions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulliver%27s_Travels#Plot_summary
Judy
douglas
>
> - Show quoted text -
Shall we call him Otis II, or Otis: The Next Generation?
George Hammond
[Hammond]
Intelligent pople are not interested in what people know,
they're interested in what people don't know and
inadvertantly blurt out when they act viciously...our case
in point here being our dear Jonathon.
Of course he thought he was being smart parodying George V
and the Whigs... but the interesting thing is in his blind
overconfidence he divulges his sureptions intuitions about
the visual manifestions of the physical size of people which
is of fundamentl relevance to the (scientific) study of God.
The invention of "Lilliputians" has had a far more lasting
impact on Western psychology and history than any saterical
impact Gulliver's Travels may have had on the 17th century
political scene which is of trivial interst compared to the
historic impact of scientific investigations into the theory
of God.
People are most revealing when they think they are being
smart and act as the dupe of their own desires, doncha know.
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror sites
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
=======================================
HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=======================================
Don Stockbauer
God, were you raised in a barn?
Don Stockbauer
Now run along home, Junior.
Don Stockbauer
douglas
> On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 21:55:51 -0700 (PDT), Dr Judy
>
> Mirror sites
> http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
> http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
> =======================================
> HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
> http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
> =======================================
Dr Judy,
Well, at least he's not actively harming people, unlike Otis...I hope.
Doug
BD
> http://moonflake.wordpress.com/2007/01/26/midweek-cuckoo-george-hammond/
>
> Yup. We have us a new Otis S. Brown.
>
> Lovely.
Well...
Otis, delusional though he may consistently appear, has - to his
credit - generally used good manners in his discourse. This other
fellow, evidenced by the cited web page, has both a definite agenda,
and a really short temper.
Crikey.
George Hammond
[Hammond]
You got that one right Alfie.
========================================
GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
Primary site
http://webspace.webring.com/people/eg/george_hammond
Mirror sites
http://geocities.com/scientific_proof_of_god
http://proof-of-god.freewebsitehosting.com
HAMMOND FOLK SONG by Casey Bennetto
http://interrobang.jwgh.org/songs/hammond.mp3
=======================================
Don Stockbauer
> On Sun, 30 Aug 2009 21:56:06 -0700 (PDT), BD
>
>
>
> <robert.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>http://moonflake.wordpress.com/2007/01/26/midweek-cuckoo-george-hammond/
>
> >> Yup. We have us a new Otis S. Brown.
>
> >> Lovely.
>
> >Well...
>
> >Otis, delusional though he may consistently appear, has - to his
> >credit - generally used good manners in his discourse. This other
> >fellow, evidenced by the cited web page, has both a definite agenda,
> >and a really short temper.
>
> >Crikey.
>
> [Hammond]
> You got that one right Alfie.
> ========================================
> GEORGE HAMMOND'S PROOF OF GOD WEBSITE
>
Pantheism is correct.
From it, SCIENCE = RELIGION