>> I even deny justly Radio waves can't come from space... didn't you
>> read my theorem that Radio waves need a Medium to... just as rockets
>> they don't work in vacuum of space... sound also need a medium to
>> carry thm.
> You're absolutely right. Electric fields propagate at right angles to
> magnetic fields, and magnetic fields propagate at right angles to
> electric fields. These two mediums fly across the vacuum at c kicking
> each other's ass the whole way.
Of course I am right... thanks Linuxgal... we are all prisoners of the world and the Pan(Hassan) within...
" you cannot take words into space
that is all all all Hassan Misbah
you cannot take woman into space
I repeat you cannot take woman into space
that is all all all Hassan Misbah"
"See my writing silent - across all your skies and boards
The silent writing of space, the writing of Hassan Misbah
Look Look Look!" - Last Words Of Hassan
> On Apr 30, 7:27 pm, Mike Painter<md.pain...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> On 4/30/2012 3:24 PM, Warhol wrote:
>> <snip>
>>>> Well, you could read what the law states.
>>>> You could perform any number of simple experiments mentioned here.
>>>> You could answer the questions I have asked to support your idea.
>>>> I do have one other question which I must ask.
>>>> It has been driving me crazy.
>>>> One of the favored methods for propulsion in some venues is that of a
>>>> man, or cat or rabbit on a boat.
>>>> An electric fan is used to push against the sails and the craft speeds
>>>> off across the water.
>>>> Does this method work?
>>>> If not why not?
>>>> There are also a few perpetual motion machines that should work if you
>>>> re right and the rest of the world is wrong.
>>> I don"t remember to have seen your post??? can you link it again
>> What is the relationship between (air) density and the velocity of a rocket?
>> For all practical purposes if I am on wheeled platform and push against
>> a wall, I move.
>> If I do the same thing to a balloon, the balloon moves.
>>> an electric fan pushing air against a surface, it works, it only depends
>>> from the force of the fan... no problem there... it works for boats or
>>> airplanes and many other applications
>> Your links are not relevant.
>> The person is standing on the deck of the ship and using the fan to push
>> it. Are you saying this will move the ship?
> Is this person named Warhol? Is this Warhol person wearing
> roller skates?
There are no men with balls anymore... I don't see any action. Just misery, anger, bitching and rolling over to take it. What it will take is a good section of young men (some women, sure, but mainly men) between 7-97, who are willing and able to fight to stop this bullshit. The big joke is that so many are fighting for the very government that's destroying freedom and truth. For a measly little paycheck and some benefits they'll go half way around the world to kill strangers but they would never fight for their own freedom and for their own progeny and for their future - RIGHT HERE. Instead of fighting the enemy, they're working for it. Unless this changes, VERY DAMN FAST, they will be fucked.
All the arguing at this point are fish out of water that have not died yet. They are wasting their breath.
> > On Apr 30, 7:27 pm, Mike Painter<md.pain...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >> On 4/30/2012 3:24 PM, Warhol wrote:
> >> <snip>
> >>>> Well, you could read what the law states.
> >>>> You could perform any number of simple experiments mentioned here.
> >>>> You could answer the questions I have asked to support your idea.
> >>>> I do have one other question which I must ask.
> >>>> It has been driving me crazy.
> >>>> One of the favored methods for propulsion in some venues is that of a
> >>>> man, or cat or rabbit on a boat.
> >>>> An electric fan is used to push against the sails and the craft speeds
> >>>> off across the water.
> >>>> Does this method work?
> >>>> If not why not?
> >>>> There are also a few perpetual motion machines that should work if you
> >>>> re right and the rest of the world is wrong.
> >>> I don"t remember to have seen your post??? can you link it again
> >> What is the relationship between (air) density and the velocity of a rocket?
> >> For all practical purposes if I am on wheeled platform and push against
> >> a wall, I move.
> >> If I do the same thing to a balloon, the balloon moves.
> >>> an electric fan pushing air against a surface, it works, it only depends
> >>> from the force of the fan... no problem there... it works for boats or
> >>> airplanes and many other applications
> >> Your links are not relevant.
> >> The person is standing on the deck of the ship and using the fan to push
> >> it. Are you saying this will move the ship?
> > Is this person named Warhol? Is this Warhol person wearing
> > roller skates?
> There are no men with balls anymore... I don't see any action. Just
> misery, anger, bitching and rolling over to take it. What it will take
> is a good section of young men (some women, sure, but mainly men)
> between 7-97, who are willing and able to fight to stop this bullshit.
> The big joke is that so many are fighting for the very government that's
> destroying freedom and truth. For a measly little paycheck and some
> benefits they'll go half way around the world to kill strangers but they
> would never fight for their own freedom and for their own progeny and
> for their future - RIGHT HERE. Instead of fighting the enemy, they're
> working for it. Unless this changes, VERY DAMN FAST, they will be fucked.
> All the arguing at this point are fish out of water that have not died
> yet. They are wasting their breath.
... Over a sidewalk strewn with banana peels, into a dumpster
full of razor blades from the razor blade factory...
> > On 4/30/2012 5:40 PM, Warhol wrote:
> >> Op 1-5-2012 1:27, Mike Painter schreef:
> >>> On 4/30/2012 3:24 PM, Warhol wrote:
> >>> <snip>
> >>>>> Well, you could read what the law states.
> >>>>> You could perform any number of simple experiments mentioned here.
> >>>>> You could answer the questions I have asked to support your idea.
> >>>>> I do have one other question which I must ask.
> >>>>> It has been driving me crazy.
> >>>>> One of the favored methods for propulsion in some venues is that of a
> >>>>> man, or cat or rabbit on a boat.
> >>>>> An electric fan is used to push against the sails and the craft speeds
> >>>>> off across the water.
> >>>>> Does this method work?
> >>>>> If not why not?
> >>>>> There are also a few perpetual motion machines that should work if you
> >>>>> re right and the rest of the world is wrong.
> >>>> I don"t remember to have seen your post??? can you link it again
> >>> What is the relationship between (air) density and the velocity of a
> >>> rocket?
> >>> For all practical purposes if I am on wheeled platform and push against
> >>> a wall, I move.
> >>> If I do the same thing to a balloon, the balloon moves.
> >>>> an electric fan pushing air against a surface, it works, it only
> >>>> depends
> >>>> from the force of the fan... no problem there... it works for boats or
> >>>> airplanes and many other applications
> >>> Your links are not relevant.
> >>> The person is standing on the deck of the ship and using the fan to push
> >>> it. Are you saying this will move the ship?
> >> yes... since the fan makes wind by pushing the air...
> > Then you can add this little example as a test to see if you are right.
> >> air is a liquid, air is a fluid... all gases are Solid liquids...
> > There is another gem to add to the collection.
> > Ice is a solid liquid.
> > "all gases are Solid liquids"
> > THEREFORE ALL GASSES BEHAVE LIKE ICE.
> >> the heaviest gases are on the surface of the earth and the lightest
> >> gases are in the upper layers of our atmosphere... and how higher you
> >> get the less efficient your push will be... at 100 km altitude the
> >> engine would only produce 3% of its initial force by its lift off, not
> >> enough to give it the needed velocity to escape gravity... since there
> >> above the gases are so tin and below very dense...
> > Archimedes principle has nothing to do with the subject.
> ha ha ha... thats what you say... The force is under me... Did
> Archimedes fly to the moon with his bath... hi hi hi...
> >> do it yourself.. and check if you can see any satellite there above
> > There above what?
> > Do you deny geosynchronous satellites?
> > Do you deny those dishes that deliver TV signals?
> I even deny justly Radio waves can't come from space... didn't you read
> my theorem that Radio waves need a Medium to... just as rockets they
> don't work in vacuum of space... sound also need a medium to carry thm.
> yes of course there is nothing up there above... didn't you read the
> thread... they can NOT fly higher than 110 km... so explain me how they
> got all that space junk up there while I say they lie... No way to fly
> in vacuum...
> Now do you have a tv dish pointed to sky??? did you ever have to correct
> your dish??? I too have a Dish already installed more than 30 years...
> and guess what... since the first day until now, I had never to adjust
> my dish... 30 years and that so called satellite didn't change or move
> from position... its looks like a miracle... how is that possible???
Facts are for all to see... Radio waves need a medium which is not found in the emptiness of vacuum space... In space your are off air..; ha ha ha you don't want to argue... of course you have no facts;;;
You can't take words to space... you can't take women to space.. I repeat you can't take women to SPACE... that all all all Hassan Misbah
RADIO-WAVES cannot travel through the empty medium of Space -- All audio and video from Apollo-11, ISS, The Shuttle, satellites are FAKE FAKE FAKE Radio-waves are electromagnetic, and for this, a proper medium of conductibility is needed. On earth this medium is the air. In Space there is no air for the transmission of Radio-waves and thereby no communication from NASA's alleged travels to Space can be established.
The giant cock-tail umbrella Apollo-11 used as antenna is FAKE
All audio & video from ISS & Shuttle are prerecorded and therewith, FAKE also.
Radio-waves work solely and exclusively in air.
Radio-waves do not work underwater where there is no air and cannot work in outer-space where there is no air either, and by that, there is no medium of conductibility for the transmission of Radio-waves.
The Godless men of science are an obstacle to Mankind.
Their science theories are crafty lies to mislead the population from ever achieving the order of their creation, thus, the Priests of NASA maintaining their strangle-hold on their minds control the wealth.
GOD created us that wealth should be dispersed evenly to all and everyone, as you can see this isn't what is happening.
Op Wed, 02 May 2012 13:58:43 +0200, Warhol <mol...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
>RADIO-WAVES cannot travel through the empty medium of Space -- All audio >and video from Apollo-11, ISS, The Shuttle, satellites are FAKE FAKE >FAKE Radio-waves are electromagnetic, and for this, a proper medium of >conductibility is needed. On earth this medium is the air. In Space >there is no air for the transmission of Radio-waves and thereby no >communication from NASA's alleged travels to Space can be established.
Very peculiar that one can sit and watch real-time television coverage
of the earth from circumpolar weather satellites. Showing an entire
hemisphere - which no aircraft can do. Not only that, one can compare
the weather and cloud patterns seen on the TV feed with what one can
see by sticking one's head out of a window. Very, very good and
expensive fakery it has to be. What you cannot explain is why it
needs to be faked - and why several countries are all participating in
this giant fakery. All your assertions carry no more convictions than
the hot flatus emitting from your mouth. Science relies on
replicatable proofs, not loud ignorant denials - which is all you can
do. How do you know space is a vacuum? Oh dear - from satellite
data. Isn't it about time you got a new troll. This one is getting
very long in the tooth despite your incessant recycling of it.
Eugene L Griessel
Cleavage (n): something you can approve of and
look down on at the same time.
> On May 1, 6:36 am, Warhol<mol...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Op 1-5-2012 3:46, Mike Painter schreef:
>>> On 4/30/2012 5:40 PM, Warhol wrote:
>>>> Op 1-5-2012 1:27, Mike Painter schreef:
>>>>> On 4/30/2012 3:24 PM, Warhol wrote:
>>>>> <snip>
>>>>>>> Well, you could read what the law states.
>>>>>>> You could perform any number of simple experiments mentioned here.
>>>>>>> You could answer the questions I have asked to support your idea.
>>>>>>> I do have one other question which I must ask.
>>>>>>> It has been driving me crazy.
>>>>>>> One of the favored methods for propulsion in some venues is that of a
>>>>>>> man, or cat or rabbit on a boat.
>>>>>>> An electric fan is used to push against the sails and the craft speeds
>>>>>>> off across the water.
>>>>>>> Does this method work?
>>>>>>> If not why not?
>>>>>>> There are also a few perpetual motion machines that should work if you
>>>>>>> re right and the rest of the world is wrong.
>>>>>> I don"t remember to have seen your post??? can you link it again
>>>>> What is the relationship between (air) density and the velocity of a
>>>>> rocket?
>>>>> For all practical purposes if I am on wheeled platform and push against
>>>>> a wall, I move.
>>>>> If I do the same thing to a balloon, the balloon moves.
>>>>>> an electric fan pushing air against a surface, it works, it only
>>>>>> depends
>>>>>> from the force of the fan... no problem there... it works for boats or
>>>>>> airplanes and many other applications
>>>>> Your links are not relevant.
>>>>> The person is standing on the deck of the ship and using the fan to push
>>>>> it. Are you saying this will move the ship?
>>>> yes... since the fan makes wind by pushing the air...
>>> Then you can add this little example as a test to see if you are right.
>>>> air is a liquid, air is a fluid... all gases are Solid liquids...
>>> There is another gem to add to the collection.
>>> Ice is a solid liquid.
>>> "all gases are Solid liquids"
>>> THEREFORE ALL GASSES BEHAVE LIKE ICE.
>>>> the heaviest gases are on the surface of the earth and the lightest
>>>> gases are in the upper layers of our atmosphere... and how higher you
>>>> get the less efficient your push will be... at 100 km altitude the
>>>> engine would only produce 3% of its initial force by its lift off, not
>>>> enough to give it the needed velocity to escape gravity... since there
>>>> above the gases are so tin and below very dense...
>>> Archimedes principle has nothing to do with the subject.
>> ha ha ha... thats what you say... The force is under me... Did
>> Archimedes fly to the moon with his bath... hi hi hi...
>>>> do it yourself.. and check if you can see any satellite there above
>>> There above what?
>>> Do you deny geosynchronous satellites?
>>> Do you deny those dishes that deliver TV signals?
>> I even deny justly Radio waves can't come from space... didn't you read
>> my theorem that Radio waves need a Medium to... just as rockets they
>> don't work in vacuum of space... sound also need a medium to carry thm.
>> yes of course there is nothing up there above... didn't you read the
>> thread... they can NOT fly higher than 110 km... so explain me how they
>> got all that space junk up there while I say they lie... No way to fly
>> in vacuum...
>> Now do you have a tv dish pointed to sky??? did you ever have to correct
>> your dish??? I too have a Dish already installed more than 30 years...
>> and guess what... since the first day until now, I had never to adjust
>> my dish... 30 years and that so called satellite didn't change or move
>> from position... its looks like a miracle... how is that possible???
> 24 hour geosynchronous orbit?
Can't you read... Rockets & radio waves & Sound will not work in vacuum space... its all Fake fake fake ...
THERE IS NO AETHER!!! Get used to it.
explain us how they get those school buses get there above and remain in position for ever... my analogue Hotbird 1 transmitter is still there transmitting since 1995 or Astra 1A began broadcasting on February 5, 1989. this without ever changing from position... Astra 1 is now retired but still there above if i may believe the deceivers...
Wow! --The limited intellectual capacity of all science followers responding in opposition is a reflection of their mentors who being limited in intelligence offered them the same in kind.
> Actually, very low frequency radio signal can penetrate water. This was
> the system used to send alert signals to US submarines: a 3-letter group
> in Morse code would have ths sub rise to periscope depth, where an
> antenna would be extended to allow contact with SSIX (Submarie Satellte
> Information Exchange), a satellite relay system for messages.
> I have heard messages relayed by satellite. I have heard messages
> bounced off the moon. There is no fakery. You cannot fake the Doppler
> effect on satellite signals, nor can you fake the time delay on
> moonbouce signals.
> WEhave the reams of stunning photos from the Hubble Space Telescope-
> photos that are beyond the ability of current earth-based telescopes to
> make.
> Women have been in space, from cosmonaut Valentina Terishkova to an
> entire Space Shuttle crew. There is no reason women cannot fly as well
> as men.
> The first space mission with a live televison signal was Apollo VII. GO
> and look at the copies of the transmissions. You can't fake microgravity
> for an extended period like that.
> You are an ignoramus. Your eucation is insufficient and out of date. You
> are a menace to yourself and need treatrment.
> --
> "A good march should make a man with a wooden leg want to step out."--
> John Phillip Sousa
You'll have the biggest belly-laugh trying to prove Satellites exist or to prove radio waves traveling vacuum space, ha ha ha ha !
LOL -- The Holy Books written by the Priests of NASA contain very little understanding of Universal physics, :-) , for NASA outer-space has no physics because its void of any physical matter, ;-) !
You can't have physics without physical matter, maybe that's why the Priests of NASA believe in the Big Bang; "nothing suddenly decided to explode itself into something" --- and created 9 perfectly round planets revolving around the SUN held by nothing!
No physics involved in their understanding!
Some day people will use their heads and see the monumental mistakes in most theoretical approach NASA has displayed through-out their existence in understanding of the Universe and mechanical laws of physics.
> > Actually, very low frequency radio signal can penetrate water. This was
> > the system used to send alert signals to US submarines: a 3-letter group
> > in Morse code would have ths sub rise to periscope depth, where an
> > antenna would be extended to allow contact with SSIX (Submarie Satellte
> > Information Exchange), a satellite relay system for messages.
> > I have heard messages relayed by satellite. I have heard messages
> > bounced off the moon. There is no fakery. You cannot fake the Doppler
> > effect on satellite signals, nor can you fake the time delay on
> > moonbouce signals.
> > WEhave the reams of stunning photos from the Hubble Space Telescope-
> > photos that are beyond the ability of current earth-based telescopes to
> > make.
> > Women have been in space, from cosmonaut Valentina Terishkova to an
> > entire Space Shuttle crew. There is no reason women cannot fly as well
> > as men.
> > The first space mission with a live televison signal was Apollo VII. GO
> > and look at the copies of the transmissions. You can't fake microgravity
> > for an extended period like that.
> > You are an ignoramus. Your eucation is insufficient and out of date. You
> > are a menace to yourself and need treatrment.
> > --
> > "A good march should make a man with a wooden leg want to step out."--
> > John Phillip Sousa
> You'll have the biggest belly-laugh trying to prove Satellites exist or
> to prove radio waves traveling vacuum space, ha ha ha ha !
> LOL -- The Holy Books written by the Priests of NASA contain very little
> understanding of Universal physics, :-) , for NASA outer-space has no
> physics because its void of any physical matter, ;-) !
> You can't have physics without physical matter, maybe that's why the
> Priests of NASA believe in the Big Bang; "nothing suddenly decided to
> explode itself into something" --- and created 9 perfectly round planets
> revolving around the SUN held by nothing!
> No physics involved in their understanding!
> Some day people will use their heads and see the monumental mistakes in
> most theoretical approach NASA has displayed through-out their existence
> in understanding of the Universe and mechanical laws of physics.
> The plants are NOT perfectly round, you dumbass.
> Due to rotation they are oblate spheroids . Look at a picture of
> Jupiter.
> Although the variation can't be seen in photographs due to the small
> amounts involved (Around a 25-mile variation) Earth is actualy
> pear-shaped, bulging in the Southern hemisphere.
> We are held in Solar orbit by gravity, just as the moon orbts earth,
> along with thousands of satellites.
> YOU have made the assertion radio waves cannot travel through space. It
> is up to you to provide proof. Altered YouTube videos do not constitute
> proof. Neither do pages written by drooling nutters like you.
> Your turn. Put up or shut up.
> --
> "A good march should make a man with a wooden leg want to step out."--
> John Phillip Sousa
lol we know shit
Really... what do we know?
Only scientists are fool enough to believe they know something!
Ahh, it only goes deeper from here... We 'know' nothing! In actuality, everything we think we know is but a belief taught to us by others. Take a chair for example, We only believe it is a chair because that's what everyone else called it and said it was as we were growing up. What is your name - you think you know? You think it is what you think it is because that was told to you by your parents as you grew up so you adopted it as the norm and led yourself to Believe that is what it is but you don't really know for sure do you, since you didn't name yourself? So again, anything you think you know you don't. It is but a belief that you know but not a true knowing.
The only true knowing is what comes from the heart cause it is your connection to the Source which truly really knows.
> On May 2, 10:01 am, Warhol<mol...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Op 2-5-2012 15:29, Padraigh ProAmerica schreef:
>>> Actually, very low frequency radio signal can penetrate water. This was
>>> the system used to send alert signals to US submarines: a 3-letter group
>>> in Morse code would have ths sub rise to periscope depth, where an
>>> antenna would be extended to allow contact with SSIX (Submarie Satellte
>>> Information Exchange), a satellite relay system for messages.
>>> I have heard messages relayed by satellite. I have heard messages
>>> bounced off the moon. There is no fakery. You cannot fake the Doppler
>>> effect on satellite signals, nor can you fake the time delay on
>>> moonbouce signals.
>>> WEhave the reams of stunning photos from the Hubble Space Telescope-
>>> photos that are beyond the ability of current earth-based telescopes to
>>> make.
>>> Women have been in space, from cosmonaut Valentina Terishkova to an
>>> entire Space Shuttle crew. There is no reason women cannot fly as well
>>> as men.
>>> The first space mission with a live televison signal was Apollo VII. GO
>>> and look at the copies of the transmissions. You can't fake microgravity
>>> for an extended period like that.
>>> You are an ignoramus. Your eucation is insufficient and out of date. You
>>> are a menace to yourself and need treatrment.
>>> --
>>> "A good march should make a man with a wooden leg want to step out."--
>>> John Phillip Sousa
>> You'll have the biggest belly-laugh trying to prove Satellites exist or
>> to prove radio waves traveling vacuum space, ha ha ha ha !
>> LOL -- The Holy Books written by the Priests of NASA contain very little
>> understanding of Universal physics, :-) , for NASA outer-space has no
>> physics because its void of any physical matter, ;-) !
>> You can't have physics without physical matter, maybe that's why the
>> Priests of NASA believe in the Big Bang; "nothing suddenly decided to
>> explode itself into something" --- and created 9 perfectly round planets
>> revolving around the SUN held by nothing!
>> No physics involved in their understanding!
>> Some day people will use their heads and see the monumental mistakes in
>> most theoretical approach NASA has displayed through-out their existence
>> in understanding of the Universe and mechanical laws of physics.
>> BTW ... how did you bypass my ignore filter???
> You should try applying said filter to yourself.
>>>> Now do you have a tv dish pointed to sky??? did you ever have to correct
>>>> your dish??? I too have a Dish already installed more than 30 years...
>>>> and guess what... since the first day until now, I had never to adjust
>>>> my dish... 30 years and that so called satellite didn't change or move
>>>> from position... its looks like a miracle... how is that possible???
>>> 24 hour geosynchronous orbit?
>> Can't you read... Rockets& radio waves& Sound will not work in vacuum
>> space... its all Fake fake fake ...
> I've seen you post it any number of times... haven't seen you provide one small bit of proof for your claim.
That's what the Priests of Science say.
Their ignorant, dumb, and completely asinine. people like them are slowing down the progress of mankind;
You are confused and are perpetuating that confusion.
P.S. They reproduce.
Now for those with a little understanding of physics...
Why is it that at times when watching the news you'll see the anchor-person speak with reporters on the field and there is a time-delay before the reporters can hear the anchor-person speak?
Because the transmission is being done by Radio-waves that are traveling in a medium. That medium is the air, or the transmission would have been instantaneous.
This should conclude this subject matter and put to rest anymore doubt by the science Apprentices who have only studied the Holy Books written by the Priests of NASA
> I even deny justly Radio waves can't come from space... didn't you read
> my theorem that Radio waves need a Medium to... just as rockets they
> don't work in vacuum of space... sound also need a medium to carry thm.
> yes of course there is nothing up there above... didn't you read the
> thread... they can NOT fly higher than 110 km... so explain me how they
> got all that space junk up there while I say they lie... No way to fly
> in vacuum...
> Now do you have a tv dish pointed to sky??? did you ever have to correct
> your dish??? I too have a Dish already installed more than 30 years...
> and guess what... since the first day until now, I had never to adjust
> my dish... 30 years and that so called satellite didn't change or move
> from position... its looks like a miracle... how is that possible???
Everybody's dish points to a fixed point in space, her is no miracle, there is a satellite in a geostationary orbit.
And thanks to your explaining that the fan on the boat can push against a sail and move the boat, the answer is simple.
(Surely all but Warhol saw this coming?)
When the rockets get to a point where it is no longer effective to push against air, they turn around, deploy a heat proof plate and push against that to get where they want to go.
The rocket does not need anything but a simple gyroscope to turn around...
HINT TO WARHOL. Why is that statement false if your claim is true?
> Very peculiar that one can sit and watch real-time television coverage
> of the earth from circumpolar weather satellites. Showing an entire
> hemisphere - which no aircraft can do. Not only that, one can compare
> the weather and cloud patterns seen on the TV feed with what one can
> see by sticking one's head out of a window.
Tiny little cameras on tiny invisible balloons. Lots of them, lots and lots of them. Very, very good and
<snip>
Isn't it about time you got a new troll. This one is getting
> very long in the tooth despite your incessant recycling of it.
> Eugene L Griessel
> Cleavage (n): something you can approve of and
> look down on at the same time.
I was about to dump him when the old cartoon of a cartoon character with a fan standing on a boat and blowing against the sail came to mind.
He says it will work so space travel is possible, the blast pushed against a metal "sail"
Now all he has to do is explain how a gyroscope will not turn the craft.
But like a kids toy, he will soon not be any fun to play with.
> Conventional radio does not work under water because of the conducting nature of the medium
in your link they say it works 10m, is the maximum depth... lol the sea is deep and space infinite deep
btw I don't talk about matter... water is matter... I am talking about vacuum and in Vacuum there is no medium... the point... your radio transmission won't be propagated beyond the ionosphere... No way... how much you try... you never will be able to send radio signals beyond the ionosphere... there are positive electric charge in the ionosphere and forming Faraday cage around the planet... why doesn't NASA tell this simple things???
The positive ions...
The free electrons in the ionosphere cause radio waves to be refracted (bent) and reflected back to earth.
The Global Faraday Cage... Faraday cage is a cage designed to block the static electric field... a Faraday Cage deflects the electric field.
>> I even deny justly Radio waves can't come from space... didn't you read
>> my theorem that Radio waves need a Medium to... just as rockets they
>> don't work in vacuum of space... sound also need a medium to carry thm.
>> yes of course there is nothing up there above... didn't you read the
>> thread... they can NOT fly higher than 110 km... so explain me how they
>> got all that space junk up there while I say they lie... No way to fly
>> in vacuum...
>> Now do you have a tv dish pointed to sky??? did you ever have to correct
>> your dish??? I too have a Dish already installed more than 30 years...
>> and guess what... since the first day until now, I had never to adjust
>> my dish... 30 years and that so called satellite didn't change or move
>> from position... its looks like a miracle... how is that possible???
> Everybody's dish points to a fixed point in space, her is no miracle,
> there is a satellite in a geostationary orbit.
> And thanks to your explaining that the fan on the boat can push against
> a sail and move the boat, the answer is simple.
> (Surely all but Warhol saw this coming?)
> When the rockets get to a point where it is no longer effective to push
> against air, they turn around, deploy a heat proof plate and push
> against that to get where they want to go.
> The rocket does not need anything but a simple gyroscope to turn around...
> HINT TO WARHOL. Why is that statement false if your claim is true?
> so space travel is possible, the blast pushed against a metal "sail"
GET AN EDUCATION RETARD! GEZZ
No... your rocket will push the metal sail... the logical way is you need to put your rocket upside down... ha ha ha... your rocket pushes against the Sail like a balloon...
and to reply to rest of your post... you are in a Faraday cage and there above there ain't no medium to carry your waves beyond the pond wall... whatever frequency you use...
> Facts are for all to see... Radio waves need a medium which is not found
> in the emptiness of vacuum space... In space your are off air..; ha ha
> ha you don't want to argue... of course you have no facts;;;
> You can't take words to space... you can't take women to space.. I
> repeat you can't take women to SPACE... that all all all Hassan Misbah
> RADIO-WAVES cannot travel through the empty medium of Space -- All audio
> and video from Apollo-11, ISS, The Shuttle, satellites are FAKE FAKE
> FAKE Radio-waves are electromagnetic, and for this, a proper medium of
> conductibility is needed. On earth this medium is the air. In Space
> there is no air for the transmission of Radio-waves and thereby no
> communication from NASA's alleged travels to Space can be established.
> The giant cock-tail umbrella Apollo-11 used as antenna is FAKE
> All audio & video from ISS & Shuttle are prerecorded and therewith, FAKE
> also.
> Radio-waves work solely and exclusively in air.
> Radio-waves do not work underwater where there is no air and cannot work
> in outer-space where there is no air either, and by that, there is no
> medium of conductibility for the transmission of Radio-waves.
> The Godless men of science are an obstacle to Mankind.
> Their science theories are crafty lies to mislead the population from
> ever achieving the order of their creation, thus, the Priests of NASA
> maintaining their strangle-hold on their minds control the wealth.
> GOD created us that wealth should be dispersed evenly to all and
> everyone, as you can see this isn't what is happening.
>> Conventional radio does not work under water because of the conducting
>> nature of the medium
> in your link they say it works 10m, is the maximum depth... lol the sea
> is deep and space infinite deep
> btw I don't talk about matter... water is matter... I am talking about
> vacuum and in Vacuum there is no medium... the point... your radio
> transmission won't be propagated beyond the ionosphere... No way... how
> much you try... you never will be able to send radio signals beyond the
> ionosphere... there are positive electric charge in the ionosphere and
> forming Faraday cage around the planet... why doesn't NASA tell this
> simple things???
> The positive ions...
> The free electrons in the ionosphere cause radio waves to be refracted
> (bent) and reflected back to earth.
> The Global Faraday Cage... Faraday cage is a cage designed to block the
> static electric field... a Faraday Cage deflects the electric field.
