Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Proof of GOD: The blindness of those convicted by the Holy Spirit.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Jan 7, 2007, 2:03:39 PM1/7/07
to
Behold in amazement how our convicted neighbor is ever seeing but not
perceiving:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/e550cea5cf0396fd?

Let us continue to pray for these folks who have been convicted by the
Holy Spirit for they are in danger of unwisely rebelling and
blaspheming HIM to become satan's sock puppets:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/0deb3630fcc556cf?


Behold how these convicted souls are dying:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/55b9f72abe5705dc?

Clearly they are at a crossroads in their life:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/725921f131c086d5?


May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water so that we
can love our neighbors a little more and LORD Jesus Christ a whole lot
more, dear neighbors, friends, and brethren whom I love
unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love

Meanwhile, HIS brethren have been blessed:

http://MabletonGA.OurLittle.net/DreadNought

... and continue to be blessed:

http://MabletonGA.OurLittle.net/Guarantee

(note: Only those who are blessed by LORD GOD Almighty, Creator of
heaven and earth, will have access to these and other related
OurLittle.net articles per a secure IP database maintained by
TheWellnessFoundation.com)

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 7, 2007, 2:53:18 PM1/7/07
to
Frogbutt <fr...@pamboisinsane.org> wrote:

>"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote in
>news:1168196619....@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:

>You really want that K00k of the Year award, don't you, Chunk?

He calls all his kook awards his "crowns".

Kurt Gavin

unread,
Jan 7, 2007, 3:03:35 PM1/7/07
to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1168196619....@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...

SMC Demon Cabal Flying Rat

unread,
Jan 7, 2007, 3:10:03 PM1/7/07
to
In article <Xns98B1866EEACC0fu...@207.14.116.130>,
fr...@pamboisinsane.org says...

> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote in
> news:1168196619....@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com:
> You really want that K00k of the Year award, don't you, Chunk?
>
>
This year is the clash of teh Titans.

Pambo in full bellow, versus the foaming Chunk.

My money has to go on foams of Chunkiness washing the tinfoil crown from
Pam-O-Lard. No other k00k comes close.

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 7, 2007, 4:09:53 PM1/7/07
to
False prophet Andrew B. Chung spammed:

>Behold in amazement how our convicted neighbor is ever seeing but not
>perceiving:
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/e550cea5cf0396fd?
>
>Let us continue to pray for these folks who have been convicted by the
>Holy Spirit for they are in danger of unwisely rebelling and
>blaspheming HIM to become satan's sock puppets:
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/0deb3630fcc556cf?
>
>
>Behold how these convicted souls are dying:
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/55b9f72abe5705dc?
>
>Clearly they are at a crossroads in their life:
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/725921f131c086d5?

Links to you own words are evidence of nothing, Chung, other than your
penchant for spamming.

SMC Demon Cabal Flying Rat

unread,
Jan 7, 2007, 4:27:48 PM1/7/07
to
In article <070120071409536098%erfc...@usa.net>, erfc...@usa.net
says...
here's a link Chunky could do with looking at

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_deadly_sins#Pride.2FHubris_.28Latin.2
C_superbia.29

not that he will. He's too busy trying on his "crown collection" today
after being arrested last night.

Uncle Clover

unread,
Jan 7, 2007, 4:35:42 PM1/7/07
to
"Poof" of God? Sounds like some gay Christian sects to me...

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Jan 8, 2007, 1:10:13 PM1/8/07
to
Behold in amazement and wonder:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/255532aae5d58459?

"Care to demonstrate where Artie misquoted anything?

Here, use this space: " -- Convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell

"Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven,
either in this age or the age to come." -- demon trying to quote
Matthew 12:32

"Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but
anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either
in this age, or in the age to come." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Matthew
12:32)

Amen.

Simply do a word count comparing the two quotes.

Word count for burning netcabal.com demon: 22

Word count for my LORD: 35

Now you have objective verifiable proof of GOD in HIS having stricken
both you and the burning netcabal.com demon blind.

Laus Deo ! ! ! ! ! ! !

"GOD loves sinners but hates those who choose to be openly sinful." --
Holy Spirit

Amen.

Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water so that we
can love our neighbors a little more and LORD Jesus Christ a whole lot

more, dear neighbor Cary whom I love uncondtionally.

Kurt Gavin

unread,
Jan 8, 2007, 2:21:01 PM1/8/07
to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1168279813.1...@42g2000cwt.googlegroups.com...

> Behold in amazement and wonder:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/255532aae5d58459?
>
> "Care to demonstrate where Artie misquoted anything?
>
> Here, use this space: " -- Convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell
>
> "Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven,
> either in this age or the age to come." -- demon trying to quote
> Matthew 12:32
>
> "Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but
> anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either
> in this age, or in the age to come." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Matthew
> 12:32)

Andi, Poof of Gog, trying to make some sort of convulted point....

LOL


Art Deco

unread,
Jan 8, 2007, 7:07:46 PM1/8/07
to
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:

>Behold in amazement and wonder:
>
>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/255532aae5d58459?
>
>"Care to demonstrate where Artie misquoted anything?
>
>Here, use this space: " -- Convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell
>
>"Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven,
>either in this age or the age to come." -- demon trying to quote
>Matthew 12:32
>
>"Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but
>anyone who speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either
>in this age, or in the age to come." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Matthew
>12:32)
>
>Amen.
>
>Simply do a word count comparing the two quotes.
>
>Word count for burning netcabal.com demon: 22
>
>Word count for my LORD: 35
>
>Now you have objective verifiable proof of GOD in HIS having stricken
>both you and the burning netcabal.com demon blind.

OK, I understand what Chung has been frothing and foaming about, I
inadvertently ended my quotation half a verse too soon. In the
interests of completeness:

<quote>

22 Then they brought him a demon-possessed man who was blind and mute,
and Jesus healed him, so that he could both talk and see. 23 All the
people were astonished and said, "Could this be the Son of David?"

24 But when the Pharisees heard this, they said, "It is only by
Beelzebub, the prince of demons, that this fellow drives out demons."

25 Jesus knew their thoughts and said to them, "Every kingdom divided
against itself will be ruined, and every city or household divided
against itself will not stand. 26 If Satan drives out Satan, he is
divided against himself. How then can his kingdom stand? 27 And if I
drive out demons by Beelzebub, by whom do your people drive them out?
So then, they will be your judges. 28 But if I drive out demons by the
Spirit of God, then the kingdom of God has come upon you.

29 "Or again, how can anyone enter a strong man's house and carry off
his possessions unless he first ties up the strong man? Then he can
rob his house.

30 "He who is not with me is against me, and he who does not gather
with me scatters. 31 And so I tell you, every sin and blasphemy will
be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Holy Spirit will not be
forgiven. 32 Anyone who speaks a word against the Son of Man will be
forgiven, either in this age or the age to come, but anyone who speaks
against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in
the age to come.

33 "Make a tree good and its fruit will be good, or make a tree bad and
its fruit will be bad, for a tree is recognized by its fruit." -- NIV

</quote>

Note that if Chung was able to argue anything in a rational and
coherent manner, I would have caught this before now.

Nevertheless, inclusion of the rest of the phrase changes nothing,
especially the points that Chung runs away from and refuses to address:

1) Demons are fallen angels, not transformed humans. Angels are
spiritual, not flesh-and-blood.

2) From the clear context of Matthew 12:22-32, "blasphemy of the Holy
Spirit" is defined as attributing the miracles of the Messiah to
Beelzebub [Satan].

3) There is nothing here that supports Chung's contention that I'm now
a "demon".

4) Chung's words posted to usenet are not on the same level as
scripture, and they certainly are not inspired, thus laughing at his
posts is not "speaking against the Holy Spirit".

5) There is nothing in this passage about "free will".

6) Starting a new thread and announcing that one's post is "proof" in
the subject line is ludicrous if there is nothing in the body of the
test that supports the assertion.

7) Endlessly citing one's own previous posts as evidence and proof is
ludicrous, for the same reason.

Therefore my original contentions stand unaltered, and unrefuted.

Hey Chung, do you still claim "in the Spirit" that mwphelps is Fred
Phelps son?

[original newsgroups restored, apparently removed in a cowardly act by
Chung]

platothelapdog

unread,
Jan 9, 2007, 1:52:13 AM1/9/07
to

You know what sir, your friggen insane !

The Rev Dr Hugh Jarse NLAHN.

unread,
Jan 9, 2007, 6:52:13 AM1/9/07
to

Art Deco wrote:

<snip>

Chung's antics have nothing to do with scripture, and everything to do
with economic and social desperation. He is touting his fake practice
on the internet in order to try and lever himself out of serious
financial difficulties and a sense of failure in the eyes of his family
and society.

He uses religion, which he with typical perversity tries to deny is
religion, as packaging for his scam because he knows that people who
believe in God are more susceptible, as they already believe in
something that cannot be proved. When he attacks atheists he is just
desperately defending what he sees as his property and his territory.

He is also mentally ill, and has genuine delusions of persecution and a
deeply ingrained belief that his is the only reality in the universe.
This leaves him free to justify anything he says and does. In truth he
has no free will at all.

mikem...@yahoo.com

unread,
Jan 9, 2007, 8:55:59 PM1/9/07
to

I think you are absolutely correct. He seems to be megalomaniacal with
his delusions of omnipotence and omniscience. He alone, in his
delusion, discerns all, redeems all and heals all.

Art Deco wrote:
>>4) Chung's words posted to usenet are not on the same level as
>>scripture, and they certainly are not inspired, thus laughing at his
>>posts is not "speaking against the Holy Spirit".

But, in his mind it is blasphemy of the spirit; you see, perhaps he
thinks he is the Holy Spirit.

mikem...@yahoo.com

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 11:12:51 AM1/12/07
to

Hum... no denial yet.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 11:51:41 AM1/12/07
to
Convicted neighbor Mike (mikemord...@yahoo.com) wrote to himself:
> Convicted neighbor Mike (mikemord...@yahoo.com) wrote:
> > demon HJ wrote:

Your conversing with a demon has caused mental illness manifested by
your writing to yourself.

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://EmoryCardiology.com

Message has been deleted

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 12:56:12 PM1/12/07
to
Meat Plow <me...@meatplow.local> wrote:

>On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:51:41 -0800, Demon Andrew B. Chung Has
>Frothed:

>I realize that the demons in posession of your soul make you think
>irrationally however, following up with an observation is not a
>conversation with one's self.

Only in ChungWorld.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

mikem...@yahoo.com

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 1:57:15 PM1/12/07
to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

If you think that bumping the thread up to get you to respond is
"writing to oneself" and indicative of mental illness speaks very
poorly for you diagnostic abilities and sense of reality Dr. Chung.

You response suggests that you are either
A. A snarky troll. I assign that a low probability
B. Not a medical doctor at all but rather some one who is using the
real Dr. Chung's identity. I assign that a moderate probability
C. Completely loony toony. I assign that a nearly certain probability.

The fact that you do not deny that you believe yourself to be the Holy
Spirit indicates to me that you do believe just that and are then by
definition quite insane.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 2:03:35 PM1/12/07
to
Convicted neighbor Mike (mikemord...@yahoo.com) wrote:
> If you think that bumping the thread up to get you to respond is
> "writing to oneself" and indicative of mental illness speaks very
> poorly for you diagnostic abilities and sense of reality Dr. Chung.

You seem to believe that you are qualified to self-assess whether you
are suffering from any mental illness.

Kali

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 2:23:25 PM1/12/07
to
In <1168628614.7...@l53g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD ach...@emorycardiology.com said:

Fraud.

: > If you think that bumping the thread up to get you to respond is


: > "writing to oneself" and indicative of mental illness speaks very
: > poorly for you diagnostic abilities and sense of reality Dr. Chung.
:
: You seem to believe that you are qualified to self-assess whether you
: are suffering from any mental illness.

Thank God that the authorities know about you.

: Andrew <><


: --
: Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
: http://EmoryCardiology.com

:

Kali
--
"If we knew what it was we were doing, it would not be called
research, would it?"
- Albert Einstein

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 2:24:25 PM1/12/07
to

Whereas you, I assume you are saying by way of contrast, would not dare
presume to be qualified to assess whether you are sane or not?

[helpful hint: a few weeks on a psychiatry rotation no more thus
qualifies you than a surgical rotation would qualify you to
do surgery]

-- cary


Robibnikoff

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 2:53:41 PM1/12/07
to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <ach...@emorycardiology.com> wrote in message
news:1168620700.8...@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...

I see you're still a nym-shifting fuck head.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight!
#1557


mikem...@yahoo.com

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 2:49:49 PM1/12/07
to

So, Dr. Chung, since you bring up the subject, when was your last
psychological examination and what was the result?

Will you answer directly; do you believe that you are the Holy Spirit?
Do you believe the Holy Spirit speaks to you or through you?

Will you stop referring to me as convicted? I find it annoying that
you continue to slander me in that way so you'd best stop.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 3:09:48 PM1/12/07
to
> So, Dr. Chung, since you bring up the subject, when was your last
> psychological examination and what was the result?

My wife is a psychologist. Her assessment is that I suffer from no
delusions. This has been her continued assessment since we first met
more than 20 years ago. Would you like her assessment about you ?

> Will you answer directly; do you believe that you are the Holy Spirit?

Verily, I am not the Holy Spirit.

> Do you believe the Holy Spirit speaks to you or through you?

The Holy Spirit does not speak.

> Will you stop referring to me as convicted?

No.

> I find it annoying that you continue to slander me in that way so you'd best stop.

Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

Andrew <><

mikem...@yahoo.com

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 3:32:49 PM1/12/07
to

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

Clearly I'm getting to you simply by asking direct questions. Surley
that's indicative of something isn't it Dr. Chung?

Your alleged wife would be guilty of malpractice if she made any
assessment of me since she has not examined me and you know that.

Your implication that I have a mental disorder, without having examined
me and without consulting a psychiatrist also constitutes malpractice
and your snarky comments are indicative of a poor attitude for a
physician.

Clearly you are a nasty bitter little man who would be laughable if you
were not so dangerously impressed with your own self proclaimed
importance. At the very least your conduct on Usenet is completely
unbecoming of a professional.

I asked you nicely once to stop slandering me. Continuing to do so with
out documenting what I've been convicted of will only serve to prove
your lack of character.

Demonic Flying Rat Sockpuppet

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 3:36:35 PM1/12/07
to
In article <1168632588....@v45g2000cwv.googlegroups.com>,
ach...@emorycardiology.com says...

> My wife is a psychologist. Her assessment is that I suffer from no
> delusions. This has been her continued assessment since we first met
> more than 20 years ago. Would you like her assessment about you ?
>
are you going to phone her in California? After all that restraining
order means you can't ask her in person

If she gave you an assessment of yourself, it was to keep you happy
whilst she got the hell out of there.

Or is this a new imaginary wife you conjured up? One of Fred Phelps'
daughters?

Don't bother spewing your cut and paste "Prepah the WAY fo teh LAWD!!"
bullshit. We know you are lying. Again.

FR

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 3:44:14 PM1/12/07
to
False prophet Andrew B. Chung spammed:

>Convicted neighbor Mike (mikemord...@yahoo.com) wrote:

Another fine snip-n-run, triple-coward.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 3:51:26 PM1/12/07
to
> Clearly I'm getting to you simply by asking direct questions.

You are projecting.

Your not answering direct questions while requiring others to do so is
the telling hypocrisy that is embarrassing you.

mikem...@yahoo.com

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 4:19:28 PM1/12/07
to

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 4:12:37 PM1/12/07
to

Perhaps you might want to ask Dr. Chung exactly what he means
by "convicted". After all, the only thing he has ever offered
along these lines is a quote from Billy Graham.

And seeing how Dr. Chung's fellow Christians, the Tulsa Phelpses --
regarding whom Dr. Chung has never uttered a single negative word,
though asked repeatedly -- have characterized Billy Graham
as a "LYING WHORE" who preaches a "FAG GOSPEL", and suggested
that "Billy Graham is nothing more than a pimp", aren't your
curious what exactly Billy Graham meant by "convicted", and
why Dr. Chung would quote such a person in the first place?

- cary

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 4:21:46 PM1/12/07
to
False prophet Andrew B. Chung spammed:

>Convicted neighbor (mikemord...@yahoo.com) wrote:

Another snip-n-run, Chung, your usual routine when cornered with
questions you don't want answered.


>
>Your not answering direct questions while requiring others to do so is
>the telling hypocrisy that is embarrassing you.

P -- K -- B

Art Deco

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 4:22:56 PM1/12/07
to

Maybe he borrowed her from Chucknozzle in Jacksonville.

mikem...@yahoo.com

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 4:27:53 PM1/12/07
to

You would have to be an idiot not to see that I did answer -- even
though your question was put in a very nasty way. So I'll put it in
terms that even you will understand.

I have no need or interest in any examination of nay kind from your
estranged wife. If however she is in need of servicing I'd be more
than happy to accommodate her. I'm sure it would be the experience
of a lifetime for her.


You are clearly a nasty little failure and completely full of yourself
with delusions of adequacy.


Dance, Chung, dance.

See you in the funny papers.

mikem...@yahoo.com

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 4:28:22 PM1/12/07
to

You would have to be an idiot not to see that I did answer -- even


though your question was put in a very nasty way. So I'll put it in
terms that even you will understand.

I have no need or interest in any examination of any kind from your

Kurt Gavin

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 4:29:55 PM1/12/07
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love11@dog-droppings

You remind me of a dog seeking an imaginery master.

Quit crapping on usenet.


Kurt Gavin

unread,
Jan 12, 2007, 4:30:27 PM1/12/07
to
Message has been deleted

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Jan 13, 2007, 4:30:06 AM1/13/07
to
> You would have to be an idiot not to see that I did answer -- even
> though your question was put in a very nasty way. So I'll put it in
> terms that even you will understand.
>
> I have no need or interest in any examination of nay kind from your
> estranged wife. If however she is in need of servicing I'd be more
> than happy to accommodate her. I'm sure it would be the experience
> of a lifetime for her.
>
> You are clearly a nasty little failure and completely full of yourself
> with delusions of adequacy.
>
> Dance, Chung, dance.
>
> See you in the funny papers.

Q.E.D.

Clearly you remain convicted by the Holy Spirit:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts

May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water so that we
can love our neighbors a little more and LORD Jesus Christ a whole lot
more, dear neighbor Mike whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love

Meanwhile, HIS brethren have been blessed:

http://MabletonGA.OurLittle.net/DreadNought

... and continue to be blessed:

http://MabletonGA.OurLittle.net/Guarantee

(note: Only those who are blessed by LORD GOD Almighty, Creator of
heaven and earth, will have access to these and other related
OurLittle.net articles per a secure IP database maintained by
TheWellnessFoundation.com)

Kurt Gavin

unread,
Jan 13, 2007, 10:11:07 AM1/13/07
to
You remind me of a dog seeking a non-existent master, leaving jesus turds
all over usenet.

<swat> BAD CHUNKERS


I KILLED YOUR GOD....IT WAS EASY!

unread,
Jan 13, 2007, 11:07:39 AM1/13/07
to
you just cant win chunks.
we are the most powerfull demons of all the universe!
we only use usenet for our communications.
we have utterly destroyed your mind.
your soul belongs to us now.
hahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

p.s.
your wife sucks my cock very nicely.
she's a mighty fine fuck as well.
oh-i fucked her in the ass-seems she was a virgin there-not any more.

SUCK THE COCK OF CHRIST!--Holy Spirit.
go cry in your cardboard box home.
mental midget.


Mark K. Bilbo

unread,
Jan 13, 2007, 11:47:41 AM1/13/07
to
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:09:48 -0800, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:

> My wife is a psychologist.

Didn't she leave you?

--
Mark K. Bilbo a.a. #1423
EAC Department of Linguistic Subversion
------------------------------------------------------------
"Being surprised at the fact that the universe is fine tuned
for life is akin to a puddle being surprised at how well it
fits its hole" - Douglas Adams

mikem...@yahoo.com

unread,
Jan 13, 2007, 5:25:47 PM1/13/07
to


No Dr. Chung, you are wrong again.

The God of Odd Statements

unread,
Jan 20, 2007, 5:30:17 PM1/20/07
to
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:46:37 -0700, jitter did most oddly state:
> me...@meatplow.local says...
>> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:56:12 -0700, Art Deco Has Frothed:
>>
>> > Only in ChungWorld.
>>
>> Do people doubt that Andy has flipped his lid?
>
> At the Deco pussy AGAIN, huh. You just can't help yourself, can you? That
> must be some damn fine poontang.
>
> (Remember: You're ignoring me. Do NOT respond to this post.)

Oh, jitter, jitter, jitter. What's your beef with Art Deco? Is it his
failure to observe the sanctity of Xmas Day by not posting much on it?
Is it the way he goes after science k00ks, religion k00ks, and generic
k00ks? Or do you just want his attention to yourself?

FYI: You are fully eligible for all usenet kook awards. You're not
BowTie. You just act a bit like him.

--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; Chung Convict #39
Demon Lord of Confusion
COOSN-029-06-71069
Supreme High Overlord of rec.radio.*
Chuck Lysaght: Tarred & Feathered!

"Fredbot == SameAsB4 == TGOOS

"You are stalking me, even after I thrashed ya." -- PorchMonkey4Life,
a veritable combination of Sherlock Holmes and Doc Savage for the 21st
Century. No, really. Would I lie? MID: <zaUqh.2972$E35.415@trnddc02>

"He unleashes a fecal explosion he time he posts. He uses so many nyms
because he gets beaten so easily and so convincingly in flame wars and
tries to hide behind nyms in the hopes of getting a fresh start. To bad
for him that his lameness keep shining through like a beacon for all
tards (e.g., SameAs$B4, Demon Spawn, Barbara's Pus$y, FredBot,
TGOOS, ......, etc)" -- Monkey-man identifies <jitter> as me, among
others, in broken English, in MID: <Z_Xqh.3167$E35.215@trnddc02>

"Q: What do you call someone in the White House who is honest, caring,
and well-read?
A: A tourist." -- Anonymous

"It would be offly hard for any of you to abuse me on usenet. Really. I
have the advantage. I could easily turn alt.usenet.kooks into a cesspool
of encoded posts. Bringing the noise ratio up so high as to make the
group worthless. Anybody who can code could do this, why nobody has
bothered before now is beyond me. The ultimate spamming engine..
'BAWAHAHA'" -- Dustbin "Outer Filth" K00k's delusions of grandeur
reached new heights, in Message-ID:
<Xns98355D29419...@69.28.186.121>
"Immorality: The morality of those who are having a better time." -- H.
L. Mencken

"Consider that language a moment. 'Purposefully and materially
supported hostilities against the United States' is in the eye of the
beholder, and this administration has proven itself to be astonishingly
impatient with criticism of any kind. The broad powers given to Bush by
this legislation allow him to capture, indefinitely detain, and refuse a
hearing to any American citizen who speaks out against Iraq or any other
part of the so-called 'War on Terror.'

"If you write a letter to the editor attacking Bush, you could be
deemed as purposefully and materially supporting hostilities against the
United States. If you organize or join a public demonstration against
Iraq, or against the administration, the same designation could befall
you. One dark-comedy aspect of the legislation is that senators or House
members who publicly disagree with Bush, criticize him, or organize
investigations into his dealings could be placed under the same
designation. In effect, Congress just gave Bush the power to lock them
up." -- William Rivers Pitt

"It has become clear in recent months that a critical mass of the American
people have seen through the lies of the Bush administration; with the
president's polls at an historic low, growing resistance to the war Iraq,
and the Democrats likely to take back the Congress in mid-term elections,
the Bush administration is on the ropes. And so it is particularly
worrying that President Bush has seen fit, at this juncture to, in effect,
declare himself dictator." -- Frank Morales
http://www.uruknet.biz/?p=m27769&hd=0&size=1&l=e&fark

"No man in History, including JESUS CHRIST, has directly revealed to
the World the SATANIC WEAPON used to enslave mankind -- INTELLECTUAL
THOUGHT!!" -- Ray Karczewski repeatedly proves his words in every post
he makes

Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition

unread,
Jan 20, 2007, 5:33:47 PM1/20/07
to
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:57:15 -0800, mikemordant sat in thee Comfee Chaire,
and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea:

> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>> Convicted neighbor Mike wrote to himself:
> You response suggests that you are either A. A snarky troll.

Hey! _I'm_ the snarky troll around here. No Johnny-Come-Lately like Chung
will ever take that role from me...;-{P}

--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris!
Demon Prince of Absurdity; COOSN-029-06-71069

"And no, I did not have sex with my son. But if I did I certainly
wouldn't tell you. Something so beautiful and precious should be kept
private." -- Kathy L. Mosesian, or possibly not really her, confesses
she may be a liar and committer of incest with her own son, in MID:
<cfcd3f4660694e3a...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>

The reporter asked Colin Powell (or George Bush), "What proof do you
have that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction?"
He replied, "We kept the receipts." -- Bill Hicks

Looney Maroon nominee for August 2006 Johnny D Wentzky foamed:
"You never asked someone who goes into areas of the internet that are
only for adults who has an underage id somehow or another if they are a
cop posing as an underage person online?
I guess lots of people just don't watch dateline or read stories much.
Why don;t you go to pervertedjustice,com and see what they do. They are
awash in their self-proclaimed glory after they lied to membners of the
public.
They are awash in their self-proclaimed glory after they posed as an
underage person and agreed to do all sorts of sex acts wioth adult
males, and they are adults posing as teenager themselves. They make
themsleves into liars by falsely impersonating underage persons and by
not fuilfilling the words they tell the victims online in their chats.
Why don't you read it where they tell these victims of their deceit
about how they have been with grown men and such? Why don't you read it
where they say, "That would be cool." after someone makes an advance
towards an adult who is posing as a teenager? And, where they agree to
meet the person, etc.
Lost control, didn't you?
Is that why you feel as if you need to lie so much now? I see where lots
of these false impersonation games are not sticking. They feel as if
they can lie and then order the victims to get counseling in the
gayblade, governmental, pro-choice tax leech counseling centers. They
are doing nothing more than usury and fraud in many cases." -- Wentzky
almost comes out of the closet as a pedo/ephebophile in MID:
<H%%Eg.28916$Uq1....@bignews6.bellsouth.net>

The Demon Prince of Absurdity

unread,
Jan 20, 2007, 7:48:35 PM1/20/07
to
SameAsB4 wrote:
> Ying la moo.. Did you really think that people wouldn't seeyour
> lameness shine through. You nymmetry practice is going way down hill.
> moomoo la Ying.
>
>

moomoo la moo

unread,
Jan 20, 2007, 8:00:04 PM1/20/07
to
The Demon Prince of Absurdity wrote:

> The God of Odd Statements wrote:
>> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 11:46:37 -0700, jitter did most oddly state:
>>> me...@meatplow.local says...
>>>> On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:56:12 -0700, Art Deco Has Frothed:
>>>>
>>>>> Only in ChungWorld.
>>>> Do people doubt that Andy has flipped his lid?
>>> At the Deco pussy AGAIN, huh. You just can't help yourself, can
>>> you? That
>>> must be some damn fine poontang.
>>>
>>> (Remember: You're ignoring me. Do NOT respond to this post.)
>>
>> Oh, jitter, jitter, jitter. What's your beef with Art Deco? Is it his
>> failure to observe the sanctity of Xmas Day by not posting much on it?
>> Is it the way he goes after science k00ks, religion k00ks, and generic
>> k00ks? Or do you just want his attention to yourself?
>>
>> FYI: You are fully eligible for all usenet kook awards. You're not
>> BowTie. You just act a bit like him.
>>
>
> Speaking of beef, how did your mom's sex change op go?
>
>
0 new messages