Issued Day | 2012 11 10 | Hour | 0 and 12 | UTC
Forecast Day | 2012 11 11 |
Yes that is a forecast.
And no I am not saying the earthquake is only related to a forecast
but that whatever was in the computer as actual data to make that run,
was the root cause of both.
Next time I will try to do better:
11/11/12
5 M. Myanmar
5 M. Myanmar
6.8 M. Myanmar
The same website is showing more of the same for the 14th.
If it is any use the forecast goes out ten days so this looks like
being my first stop on the net until I get the Antarctic chart back in
April.
> Issued Day | 2012 11 10 | Hour | 0 and 12 | UTC
> Forecast Day | 2012 11 11 |
> Yes that is a forecast.
> And no I am not saying the earthquake is only related to a forecast
> but that whatever was in the computer as actual data to make that run,
> was the root cause of both.
> Next time I will try to do better:
> 11/11/12
> 5 M. Myanmar
> 5 M. Myanmar
> 6.8 M. Myanmar
Same day:
4.9 M. OFFSHORE GUATEMALA
4.5 M. OFFSHORE GUATEMALA
4.8 M. OFFSHORE CHIAPAS, MEXICO
6.5 M. OFFSHORE GUATEMALA
> The same website is showing more of the same for the 14th.
> If it is any use the forecast goes out ten days so this looks like
> being my first stop on the net until I get the Antarctic chart back in
> April.
The run of Lows across North America looks to be continuous with
today's Canadian forecast giving more of the same for tomorrow leaving
us with the error in the mix showing up as large ones today.
I'm going to try and find a chart that has more immediacy than these
Thatchersque tarts. The long front across the Atlantic is still
showing on the US chart here:
On Nov 12, 8:37 am, Weatherlawyer <weatherlaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The run of Lows across North America looks to be continuous with
> today's Canadian forecast giving more of the same for tomorrow leaving
> us with the error in the mix showing up as large ones today.
> I'm going to try and find a chart that has more immediacy than these
> Thatchersque tarts. The long front across the Atlantic is still
> showing on the US chart here:
On Nov 14, 1:23 am, Weatherlawyer <weatherlaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> T'as been a good run, so it has so it has.
> But now we are off on another lunar phase:
> 13 Nov 2012. New Moon at 22:08.
> The new spell started with this one:
> 2012/11/13 23:23
> 5.4 M. Tonga.
We still have that line of Lows but an intrusive but nondescript High
is getting in the way on the Canadian map. I could use a few less
miilibars on these isobars:
but I suppose I could always enlarge the screen size with Ctrl&+ then
just take more time. Then again, I could look at all the other bits of
the northern hemisphere linked from there from now until next April.
Nothing desperately obvious showing up on the latest NA EFS. A nice
big cold front is going to do something interesting in the US mid-west
if it hasn't already:
On Nov 16, 9:23 am, Weatherlawyer <weatherlaw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Nothing desperately obvious showing up on the latest NA EFS. A nice
> big cold front is going to do something interesting in the US mid-west
> if it hasn't already:
usually the sudden lack of activity in weather and seismic activity sugggests a significant event or series of significant events.
I haven't acquired online skills for global weather reading so I asked you who has..
the call from the post MIST is authentic from the facts but/and as you suggest tis the season given the prior stepup events socially and politically.
We are seeong a spate of accidents as seismic/weather related events as I track that area.
In the Hazard KY quake with flow going thru the solid area from the coast as I was working into a backflow to SF....I imagine that continues as a potential.
But how relatedto global weather ? I dunno.
I'm beatup at 10 after equipent prep for kayak g dolphin. I shopuld tune in to the total array with failure at the new map system .
back to work after I cook some grits for muh birds
there's a video of an NZ eruption and some Texas mist following the doubling up flow across the New Madrid - New MAH d rid - I was reminded. With an associated tung in check article on drought.
I had 9 birds in for Thanksgiving dinner, the family 6 and 3 tourists.
> There's a video of an NZ eruption and some Texas mist following the doubling up flow across the New Madrid -I was reminded. With an associated tongue in cheek article on drought.
> I had 9 birds in for Thanksgiving dinner, the family 6 and 3 tourists.
You cooked your research?
What are you referring to with a New Zealand region and Texas weather?
If you are referring to weather in one place being of an extreme with
a region of another place featuring what for all I know might be
another strange or relatively strange phenomenon, then that would be
par for the course of volcanic activity, if said activity was also
unusual.
Got frosty just now, ice on roofs and cars. Only an air frost but
these things could mean a small tropical disturbance in the Indian
Ocean or wherever has them in November. That won't happen without its
complementary "significant other".
So..
Anmd no Tonga no wonga.
Ooh, whoops!
Look what I just found:
24th Nov
4.6 M. @ 03:02:44 SOUTH OF THE FIJI ISLANDS <<<
2.8 M. @ 02:58:19 GULF OF ALASKA
3.2 M. @ 02:33:17 PUERTO RICO REGION
5.1 M. @ 01:30:00 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
4.8 M. @ 01:19:27 ANTOFAGASTA, CHILE
2.5 M. @ 00:30:33 OFFSHORE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
23rd Nov
5 M. @ 20:50:48 SOLOMON ISLANDS
5.3 M. @ 20:21:29 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
4.6 M. @ 19:54:13 DOMINICA REGION, LEEWARD ISLANDS
2.5 M. @ 18:44:02 PUERTO RICO REGION
2.7 M. @ 18:32:56 PUERTO RICO REGION
4.6 M. @ 16:37:30 FIJI REGION <<<
> No large earthquake on the 23rd.
> I think there should have been something, going by the depth of the
> Low pressure area off Alaska/Canada yesterday.
> 964 millibars turning into 996 in 12 hours on the NA EFS charts:
> Got frosty just now, ice on roofs and cars. Only an air frost but
> these things could mean a small tropical disturbance in the Indian
> Ocean or wherever has them in November. That won't happen without its
> complementary "significant other".
> So..
> Anmd no Tonga no wonga.
> Ooh, whoops!
> Look what I just found:
> 24th Nov
> 4.6 M. @ 03:02:44 SOUTH OF THE FIJI ISLANDS <<<
> 5.1 M. @ 01:30:00 NEAR THE EAST COAST OF HONSHU, JAPAN
I have spent the largest part of the day watching You Tube videos
instead of doing my job. It's been about 24 hours since the last
biggish quake. So a severe storm is building and another large quake
overdue.
A large deep Low near the east coast and a fairly flaccid yet large
Low on the other side of Canada.
No sign of them maturing into a straight 3 so probably not a single
severe quake. So then maybe 3 or four medium sized ones. (And an
unknown number of them dotted around the globe at that.)
But it's early daze yet. So ...well....
...I don't know.
unrelated...only a video....kinda cool you iknowmout ona field trip n ura lookin over the volcano grounds then a pppppfffffoooomm plume a smoke blows uo out of the ground....
NOW THERE'S FIELD TRIP !
Texans are big time Dude drivers, the highways are excellent for oil trucks, no frost heaves, low shipping on asphalt...there a miles of pool table smooth 140mph swooping corners flowing over hill and dale..
and there are 60 mph zones on 2 lanes roads going straight thru strip mall city WITH STOPLIGHTS ! DIVINITY DELETED
that Texans plow thru fog is noi big surprise...like retarded sticking finger sinto the wall sockets
> I have spent the largest part of the day watching You Tube videos
> instead of doing my job. It's been about 24 hours since the last
> biggish quake. So a severe storm is building and another large quake
> overdue.
> A large deep Low near the east coast and a fairly flaccid yet large
> Low on the other side of Canada.
> No sign of them maturing into a straight 3 so probably not a single
> severe quake. So then maybe 3 or four medium sized ones. (And an
> unknown number of them dotted around the globe at that.)
18:00 on the Australian Antarctic chart gives warning of a large
quake. But there has just been another tropical storm popped up in the
China Seas. That's rated for a Cat 1 in a few days but I think it
could be a 2 or 3 a lot sooner.
The MetOffice show a really deep Low off Canada for Friday. And a lot
of parallel fronts moving west to east before then so multiple whatsit
epicentres of 5 to 6 M. until then.
I'm not quite sure how confounded I am with this:
"25 Tropical Depression TWENTY 14-14 NOV 25 -
26 Tropical Depression TWENTY 25-25 NOV 25 - Active
27 Tropical Depression 26W 26-26 NOV 25 - Active"
"Date: 26-26 NOV 2012
Tropical Depression 26W
ADV LAT LON TIME WIND PR STAT
1 156.80 9.00 11/26/08Z 25 - TROPICAL DEPRESSION"
4.5 M. 20.8 S. 179.2 W. Fijian Triangle.
Totally disregard silly depth of 607.8 theydunos and substitute more
latitude and longitude.
(About the acreage of the first shadow zone should do it.)
That's the end of that:
2012/11/26 05:33
5.5 M. 40.4 N. 90.4 E. Southern Xinjiang.
Looks like a new routine is growing. We just need another Fijian
region to set it up. There are a few days left until the end of this
spell but then it is substantially the same again:
20 Nov. 14:31
28 Nov. 14:46
Actually there are a block of them, all very similar, bracketed by
anticyclonic spells:
Nov 13 22:08
[
Nov 20 14:31
Nov 28 14:46
Dec 6 15:32
Dec 13 08:42
]
Dec 20 05:19
OK. Maybe 6th December isn't that similar but if the Greenland High
situation changes, it could be. They should all have a thundery
nature given to striations and tornadoes.
(That is: Finely balanced, difficult stuff to forecast, playing havoc
with the North Atlantic -and chock full of earthquakes.)
And since the root cause of weather is Cum Sole, von Karman vortices
(not "Coriolis Effect") it IS all based on standing waves.
And they all occur in the middle of the season -so no Antarctic "side"
on the ball for that.
Grand Ole Oprey at its best. They don't get no worse than that. At
least he had the grace to look embarrassed.
Personally I'd have blown the joint. He must have been making just
enough to cover his pharmacist at the time, eh?
And sat up all night thinking of a ditty to cover the next bills?
> Grand Ole Oprey at its best. They don't get no worse than that. At
> least he had the grace to look embarrassed.
> Personally I'd have blown the joint. He must have been making just
> enough to cover his pharmacist at the time, eh?
> And sat up all night thinking of a ditty to cover the next bills?
Hell of a lot better than the most of the crap that passes for music
today. But maybe it takes having some musical skills to appreciate
that.
Brian
-- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
