It looks like Al Gore is going to need every cent of the $300m war
chest he's amassed for climate persuasion. Americans polled by Gallup
for 'Earth Day' value "traditional", bottom-up environmental issues
such as pollution and conservation as being more worrying than Global
Warming. Remarkably, the level of concern about greenhouse gas
emissions has barely wavered in a generation. Recklessness, or Huck
Finn-style American common sense?
A third of Americans think "Global Warming" is a serious concern - a
figure that's effectively unchanged since 1990, when the question was
first asked. Ominously for the climate doom-mongers, it ranks 10th on
a list of 12 environmental issues. OK, so what are Americans worried
about?
Water pollution issues are three of the top four areas of concern,
with over 80 per cent of people registering serious concern. Waste
contamination comes third, and the loss of natural habitat for
wildlife fifth, with 77 per cent expressing concern. Then there's
rainforests (69 per cent), bio-diversity (68 per cent). Greenhouse
emissions come in 10th - above urban sprawl and acid rain.
And when's the last time you ever heard anyone mention acid rain?
(If you add up the "great deal" and "fair amount" worrywarts, then
Global Warming comes even lower, 11th out of 12th prompted issues).
An Inconvenient Flatline
Maybe Americans don't trust dodgy computer models, on which the
predictions of global catastrophe are based? Or maybe polar bears just
aren't cute enough? Either way, it can't be for lack of "awareness",
as the mass media goes on about little else.
Top down vs Bottom up
But perhaps it shouldn't be surprising that traditional issues which
affect one's children and family, such as pollution and conservation,
are rated as more urgent. Grassroots, bottom-up environmental groups
once built their support on bringing these issues into the media -
before abandoning them in recent years for the "top-down" agenda of
Global Warming. As Gallup shows, the groups have moved away from
reflecting the everyday environmental concerns of citizens, onto an
agenda largely been driven by a handful of scientists, expensively
backed by powerful quangos. Perhaps if you're an NGO, this ensures a
better Darwinian option for funding survival - but is this what
citizens' groups are supposed to be about?
"And this is what it looked like before we built our data center..."
Google gets into the Gaia spirit for Earth Day
Today's climate warrior will have performed a 180 degree turn from
twenty years ago: rainforests are now being felled in the rush to
create biofuels, a strategy which is causing the world's poorest
people to go hungry, and toxic substances banned from the home are
creeping back in. The justification for each move is CO2.
No wonder Greenpeace's co-founder Patrick Moore wrote recently that
"the environmental movement I helped found has lost its objectivity,
morality and humanity." Moore frowns on using the term "environmental"
for the Global Warming campaigners. I can see his point.
Perhaps it's time hear from "traditional" environmentalism for a
change, instead of its successor, the Carbon Cult?
An Inconvenient Flatline
"awareness",as the mass media goes on about little else.
Sod it, let it happen. When all the ice covering Greenland has
melted we can use the land and recycle our cities. Let Florida
go underwater, it's only a retirement home anyway.
No need. Look at the bottom of almost any plastic container and you will
see a triangle with a number inside it.
That number represents the type of plastic the containter is made from.