Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
Censorship on sage-support?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  Messages 1 - 25 of 35 - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)   Newer >
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Simon King  
View profile  
 More options Mar 19 2012, 3:58 pm
From: Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:58:20 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 19 2012 3:58 pm
Subject: Censorship on sage-support?
Hi!

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-support/CDP_tmDAs5c was
marked as spam. Then, I and other people confirmed that it is not
spam, and it became visible. But then it was hidden again.

Why is that? Is the host of our discussion lists perhaps automatically
banning certain words, even if people confirm that everything is OK?

Note that banned words can seem quite innocent. For example, consider
the German translation of the word "please": The German word is
spelled in exactly the same way as a rather rude French word -- and
therefore German-speaking yahoo forums do not allow to say "please" in
German!

At http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel/browse_thread/thread/a080d3...
it was suggested to use gmane for reading and posting the Sage
discussion lists. But that is not enough, IMHO. I believe that such
extremely stupid automatic moderation can not be tolerated. So, what
about looking for a different host of our lists? There are too many
sage-related lists anyway...

I am not sure whether the topic is really to be considered sage-flame.
Personally, I think dysfunctional discussion groups are bad for
development, and thus the topic belongs to sage-devel. but "dropping
google" is perhaps a bit too controversial for sage-devel - who
knows?

Cheers,
Simon


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
William Stein  
View profile  
 More options Mar 19 2012, 4:16 pm
From: William Stein <wst...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 13:16:37 -0700
Local: Mon, Mar 19 2012 4:16 pm
Subject: Re: [sage-flame] Censorship on sage-support?

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> wrote:
> Hi!

> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/sage-support/CDP_tmDAs5c was
> marked as spam. Then, I and other people confirmed that it is not
> spam, and it became visible. But then it was hidden again.

I saw your message, looked, and marked it not spam, and now it is not
hidden.  I think because I own the group, this worked.

Your tone above makes it a reasonable post for sage-flame :-)

> Personally, I think dysfunctional discussion groups are bad for
> development, and thus the topic belongs to sage-devel. but "dropping
> google" is perhaps a bit too controversial for sage-devel - who
> knows?

> Cheers,
> Simon

> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sage-flame" group.
> To post to this group, send email to sage-flame@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sage-flame+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-flame?hl=en.

--
William Stein
Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org

 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bill Hart  
View profile  
 More options Mar 19 2012, 4:29 pm
From: Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:29:33 +0000
Local: Mon, Mar 19 2012 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [sage-flame] Censorship on sage-support?
It's very important to understand how these automatic moderation tools
work and how serious they are. For a start, the idea that you can know
why the message is marked as spam is naive. It would defeat the whole
utility of them if you could simply know why your post failed the
moderation test.

I should think there'll very likely be a flag added to your email
account to be stored with various organisations that control such
things. They are of course not public institutions. But they clearly
operate in the interest of the public.

Oh, to be sure, occasionally mail that is not spam is marked as spam,
and who am I to say that your post was actually spam. That's not for
me to judge, but for others.

You can of course appeal the decision of the spam filter, but you'll
need an advocate. These cases can be quite involved, and I shouldn't
expect an easy outcome. Why, I know a man who five years ago had a
post marked as spam, and as yet he hasn't even reached the highest
level of arbitration. I should think it could go on for years. I've
even heard that these things are hopeless. Though I shouldn't lose
hope. Once hope is lost, everything is lost.

Bill.

On 19 March 2012 20:16, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Harald Schilly  
View profile  
 More options Mar 19 2012, 5:03 pm
From: Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:03:28 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Mon, Mar 19 2012 5:03 pm
Subject: Re: Censorship on sage-support?

On Monday, March 19, 2012 8:58:20 PM UTC+1, Simon King wrote:

> Why is that? Is the host of our discussion lists perhaps automatically
> banning certain words, even if people confirm that everything is OK?

what you try to imply or infer is not true, but there is an automatic spam
protection - probably very similar to gmail's spam filter.
but you never ever see those messages, because only we as admins/managers
of the group see them in a special page and we can review them before they
are posted. this also only happens very very rarely.
in this case you are referring to, my only explanation is that someone
marked it as spam.

h


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Simon King  
View profile  
 More options Mar 20 2012, 1:48 am
From: Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 22:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 20 2012 1:48 am
Subject: Re: Censorship on sage-support?
Hi William,

On 19 Mrz., 21:16, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I saw your message, looked, and marked it not spam, and now it is not
> hidden.

For the record: I was not talking about a message of mine, but was
talking about the original message in the thread I cited, which was
from a user called Ravi.

The related thread on sage-devel also had some problems, though. It
was shown that there are 5 messages in the thread, but when one opened
the thread, only two of them were there. So, in contrast to Ravi's
post on sage-support (which could be opened by confirming that one
does want to read a potentially abusive post), three out of five posts
were not available at all. In the meantime, they popped up, though.

Cheers,
Simon


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Simon King  
View profile  
 More options Mar 20 2012, 2:10 am
From: Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 23:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 20 2012 2:10 am
Subject: Re: Censorship on sage-support?
Hi Harald,

On 19 Mrz., 22:03, Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Monday, March 19, 2012 8:58:20 PM UTC+1, Simon King wrote:

> > Why is that? Is the host of our discussion lists perhaps automatically
> > banning certain words, even if people confirm that everything is OK?

> what you try to imply or infer is not true, but there is an automatic spam
> protection - probably very similar to gmail's spam filter.
> but you never ever see those messages

Then we have a different notion of "being marked as spam". What I
meant was: One could see that there was a post (Ravi's question), but
one needed to confirm that one really wants to read it.

> my only explanation is that someone
> marked it as spam.

Reading Ravi's post, I can only guess that that happened unintended.
However: When the post was hidden in the first place, I and others
confirmed that the post was OK; but after a few hours, the post was
hidden AGAIN. In other words, the "accident" happened at least twice
with the same post, which makes me not believe in an accident. Also,
the fact that in the same day in a related thread on sage-devel
several messages were not available at all seems fishy to me.

Anyway. I think concerning changing the platform, one must not forget
the other points: 1) The general look of the new groups is ugly (yes,
one shouldn't argue about taste, and it's painting a bike shed...). 2)
The editor that is part of the new groups is broken -- at least for
me.

On sage-devel, Keshav mentioned that there even is an Emacs mode to
work with Gmane lists - which makes me wonder whether the Sage
notebook could be provided with a way to read and post on the sage-
related lists, with a less broken editor.

Cheers,
Simon


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Simon King  
View profile  
 More options Mar 20 2012, 3:59 am
From: Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 00:59:00 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Censorship on sage-support?
Hi!

On 20 Mrz., 06:48, Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de> wrote:

> On 19 Mrz., 21:16, William Stein <wst...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > I saw your message, looked, and marked it not spam, and now it is not
> > hidden.

> For the record: I was not talking about a message of mine, but was
> talking about the original message in the thread I cited, which was
> from a user called Ravi.

I just saw that the sage-support thread initiated by Ravi is AGAIN
(now for the THIRD TIME at least) hidden. Instead of the thread title,
I read the mesage "Dieses Thema wurde ausgeblendet, weil es als
missbräuchlich gekennzeichnet wurde", which in English means something
like "This topic is hidden, because it was marked as abusive/
improper."

Can the group administrators please find out, *how* it was marked as
abusive? I mean: Was it marked by another user, or was the mark due to
an automatic moderation tool? I think we must not tolerate an
automatic moderation tool doing those decisions - because the
*decision* was abusive, not Ravi's post.

Cheers,
Simon


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Harald Schilly  
View profile  
 More options Mar 20 2012, 7:42 am
From: Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 04:42:29 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 20 2012 7:42 am
Subject: Re: Censorship on sage-support?

yes, the editor isn't perfect, but this will improve.
just curious, which version of firefox are you using?

h


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Simon King  
View profile  
 More options Mar 20 2012, 9:11 am
From: Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 06:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 20 2012 9:11 am
Subject: Re: Censorship on sage-support?
Hi Harald,

On 20 Mrz., 12:42, Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com> wrote:

> yes, the editor isn't perfect, but this will improve.

As long as it isn't of the same quality as a *benevolent* human, I
wouldn't like to be subject (i.e., guinea pig) to such automatic
editor.

> just curious, which version of firefox are you using?

In my office (where I am now), it is Iceweasel 3.5.16. At the moment I
can't find out what I have on my laptop.

Cheers,
Simon


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Harald Schilly  
View profile  
 More options Mar 20 2012, 10:46 am
From: Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 07:46:22 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 20 2012 10:46 am
Subject: Re: Censorship on sage-support?

On Tuesday, March 20, 2012 2:11:31 PM UTC+1, Simon King wrote:

> In my office (where I am now), it is Iceweasel 3.5.16.

I don't know it, but i guess it's based on an old firefox, right? I would
recommend you to switch to a browser which is actively supported. On linux
you don't have much to fear, but this is also a security problem :-\

h


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Keshav Kini  
View profile  
 More options Mar 20 2012, 12:51 pm
From: Keshav Kini <keshav.k...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:51:49 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 20 2012 12:51 pm
Subject: Re: Censorship on sage-support?

I doubt it. This is not the beta - the new google groups has now gone live,
on sage-devel at least. It's been around in beta for a good four months,
and I guess they must think that it's now "good enough". I must admit it
was much worse earlier though. All kinds of horrific bugs in the javascript
- middle-click pasting would break it, typing newlines would shrink it to a
negative height, scrolling displaced the box inside another box causing it
to become partially hidden... the list goes on and on. Most of those are
fixed now, but there are still issues, not to mention the slight lag caused
by javascript watching what you type like a hawk. I really wish you could
just disable the rich text editor and use a standard <textarea> which is
pretty much guaranteed to work properly on all browsers. I don't even want
to send HTML emails in the first place. That and the bugginess are what
caused me to decide to move to gmane.

(Simon: see my post on sage-devel about what Gmane is and is not, by the
way.)

-Keshav


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Keshav Kini  
View profile  
 More options Mar 20 2012, 12:54 pm
From: Keshav Kini <keshav.k...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:54:29 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 20 2012 12:54 pm
Subject: Re: Censorship on sage-support?

Iceweasel x.y.z is Firefox x.y.z with branding (i.e. the name, icons,
logos, etc.) changed to something that's freely licensed. The default
branding has some rights reserved by Mozilla. Iceweasel is produced by
Debian. GNU produces something similar called IceCat.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
leif  
View profile  
 More options Mar 20 2012, 4:01 am
From: leif <not.rea...@online.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:01:58 +0100
Local: Tues, Mar 20 2012 4:01 am
Subject: Re: [sage-flame] Re: Censorship on sage-support?

Simon King wrote:
> One could see that there was a post (Ravi's question), but
> one needed to confirm that one really wants to read it.

That was still the case for me yesterday when I tried to look at it.

> Anyway. I think concerning changing the platform, one must not forget
> the other points: 1) The general look of the new groups is ugly

It is.  And it's not only ugly, it's inconvenient, at least for our,
i.e., development purposes, IMHO.

-leif

--
() The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/\ Help Cure HTML E-Mail


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Simon King  
View profile  
 More options Mar 20 2012, 1:49 pm
From: Simon King <simon.k...@uni-jena.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 20 2012 1:49 pm
Subject: Re: Censorship on sage-support?
Hi Keshav,

On 20 Mrz., 17:51, Keshav Kini <keshav.k...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I doubt it. This is not the beta - the new google groups has now gone live,
> on sage-devel at least. It's been around in beta for a good four months,
> and I guess they must think that it's now "good enough". I must admit it
> was much worse earlier though. All kinds of horrific bugs in the javascript
> - middle-click pasting would break it, typing newlines would shrink it to a
> negative height, scrolling displaced the box inside another box causing it
> to become partially hidden...

This is exactly what I observed, too. And I did observe it on two
different machines, namely my laptop (with Firefox 10.0.2 on openSuse
12.1) and the computer in my office (with the version of Iceweasel I
mentioned).

So, the javascript problems are clearly not solved yet, at least for
me.

> I really wish you could
> just disable the rich text editor and use a standard <textarea> which is
> pretty much guaranteed to work properly on all browsers.

+1!

> I don't even want
> to send HTML emails in the first place. That and the bugginess are what
> caused me to decide to move to gmane.

+2!

> (Simon: see my post on sage-devel about what Gmane is and is not, by the
> way.)

Thank you for pointing that out. When reading/posting on sage-support,
I am now using http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.support

One inconvenience of Gmane: AFAIC, there are only two ways to order
the posts, namely (1) like a blog, so that one does not see the
threads sorted by topic, and (2) by thread, where the threads are
ordered by the time of the *first* post.

Hence, in version (2), an answer to an old thread would not appear on
the first screen and would thus be de facto invisible. But apart from
that, I think Gmane would be good for working.

Or perhaps some of you know whether one can Gmane make to sort the
posts by thread, ordered by the time of the *last* post?

Cheers,
Simon


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
leif  
View profile  
 More options Mar 20 2012, 3:55 pm
From: leif <not.rea...@online.de>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:55:51 +0100
Local: Tues, Mar 20 2012 3:55 pm
Subject: Re: [sage-flame] Re: Censorship on sage-support?

Simon King wrote:
> Thank you for pointing that out. When reading/posting on sage-support,
> I am now using http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.support

> One inconvenience of Gmane: AFAIC, there are only two ways to order
> the posts, namely (1) like a blog, so that one does not see the
> threads sorted by topic, and (2) by thread, where the threads are
> ordered by the time of the *first* post.

> Hence, in version (2), an answer to an old thread would not appear on
> the first screen and would thus be de facto invisible. But apart from
> that, I think Gmane would be good for working.

> Or perhaps some of you know whether one can Gmane make to sort the
> posts by thread, ordered by the time of the *last* post?

Well, just take some (threaded) news reader of your choice (there are
plenty) and use NNTP, which should be faster anyway.

There you can switch between different views, hide threads, and order
them by what you want.

Keshav can certainly better recommend some.  You can also use
Thunderbird for newsgroups (i.e., NNTP).

-leif

--
() The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/\ Help Cure HTML E-Mail


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Keshav Kini  
View profile  
 More options Mar 20 2012, 7:27 pm
From: Keshav Kini <keshav.k...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 16:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 20 2012 7:27 pm
Subject: Re: [sage-flame] Re: Censorship on sage-support?

Right, exactly. I would recommend using Gmane through NNTP, which is I
guess its main useful feature. The web interfaces are just conveniences,
especially for linking people to posts - there isn't really such a thing as
an nntp:// link to an individual post since the original specification for
newsgroups assumed that articles would expire and disappear after a
medium-to-short time (Gmane, as an archival service, does not let its
articles expire, of course).

As Gmane was my first exposure to newsgroups, and I happened to be starting
to learn Emacs at the time, I decided to dive in and use Gnus, the
newsreader mode which comes with Emacs. It's pretty nice, IMO. Though you
might not like it if you're not the type to dive into a random Emacs mode
and grapple with its weird key bindings for a little while until you
internalize them. I haven't used any other newsreaders so I can't recommend
anything else either.

-Keshav


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
leif  
View profile  
 More options Mar 20 2012, 7:59 pm
From: leif <not.rea...@online.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 00:59:27 +0100
Local: Tues, Mar 20 2012 7:59 pm
Subject: Re: [sage-flame] Re: Censorship on sage-support?

Keshav Kini wrote:
> Right, exactly. I would recommend using Gmane through NNTP, which is I
> guess its main useful feature. The web interfaces are just conveniences,
> especially for linking people to posts - there isn't really such a thing
> as an nntp:// link to an individual post since the original
> specification for newsgroups assumed that articles would expire and
> disappear after a medium-to-short time (Gmane, as an archival service,
> does not let its articles expire, of course).

Another disadvantage of NNTP or newsreaders (compared to plain e-mail
with IMAP, or a web interface where [or if] you always login) is that
the state is local, i.e., the information which articles or posts you've
already read etc. is bound to each specific newsreader, and to the
machine it is installed on (or the filesystem where your newsreader
keeps its files).

So it's a bit inconvenient if you frequently read the same groups from
different machines; I don't know whether there are clients between which
you could easily synchronize, probably through "the cloud".

You could of course set up your own NNTP server, and e.g. delete already
read articles from it...

-leif

--
() The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/\ Help Cure HTML E-Mail


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Keshav Kini  
View profile  
 More options Mar 20 2012, 8:25 pm
From: Keshav Kini <keshav.k...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Mar 20 2012 8:25 pm
Subject: Re: [sage-flame] Re: Censorship on sage-support?

I guess. I generally try to keep up to date and read articles in
approximately the order they are posted, so it's not as big a deal to me -
if I'm reading from an unfamiliar machine I'll usually just go to google
groups and read the top few topics. And I usually only work on one machine
anyway. But I see how that could be a problem. Gnus records that stuff in
plaintext lisp s-expressions, so you could probably put it under version
control and sling it around if you wanted.

-Keshav


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Harald Schilly  
View profile  
 More options Mar 21 2012, 9:11 am
From: Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 06:11:02 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 21 2012 9:11 am
Subject: Re: [sage-flame] Re: Censorship on sage-support?

On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:59:27 AM UTC+1, leif wrote:

> I don't know whether there are clients between which
> you could easily synchronize, ...

You can use IMAP, right? filter all mails from a group into a folder, there
you can read and answer them.

H


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
leif  
View profile  
 More options Mar 21 2012, 9:28 am
From: leif <not.rea...@online.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:28:29 +0100
Local: Wed, Mar 21 2012 9:28 am
Subject: Re: [sage-flame] Re: Censorship on sage-support?

Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 12:59:27 AM UTC+1, leif wrote:

>     I don't know whether there are clients between which
>     you could easily synchronize, ...

> You can use IMAP, right? filter all mails from a group into a folder,
> there you can read and answer them.

Well, we were talking about NNTP, or newsreaders.

You could probably do that with (e.g.) Thunderbird, since it also
supports NNTP, but you'd have to (manually?) move articles from your
*local* news folder into a (central) folder on the IMAP server.

Don't know how this works if you do that from different clients (i.e.,
move "new" articles you've already read on another machine into the
central folder).

And I wonder if there would remain any advantage of using NNTP instead
of e-mail for reading newsgroups.

One could perhaps rsync the newsreader files which record which articles
one has already read between different machines (rather than putting
them under revision control, as Keshav suggested), but then one of
course has to use the same client, and perhaps versions that do not
differ much.

All in all not that easy (or convenient) at first glance, but there are
probably some experts [elsewhere] around that know better.

-leif

--
() The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/\ Help Cure HTML E-Mail


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Harald Schilly  
View profile  
 More options Mar 21 2012, 11:18 am
From: Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 08:18:18 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 21 2012 11:18 am
Subject: Re: [sage-flame] Re: Censorship on sage-support?

On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 2:28:29 PM UTC+1, leif wrote:

> Well, we were talking about NNTP, or newsreaders.

since we are on sage-flame, you get a unpolite "i am not" from me for that.
the basic problem is that some have a problem with reading the lists here.
my suggestion is to
a) turn on email sending
b) use imap to read and post
c) if you don't like the clutter, filter your messages into folders.
d) and yes, imap supports the "\Seen" flag, so it syncs read and delete
states without having to resort to rsync local files like you suggested
*shrug*

h


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
leif  
View profile  
 More options Mar 21 2012, 12:16 pm
From: leif <not.rea...@online.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:16:47 +0100
Local: Wed, Mar 21 2012 12:16 pm
Subject: Re: [sage-flame] Re: Censorship on sage-support?

Harald Schilly wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 2:28:29 PM UTC+1, leif wrote:

>     Well, we were talking about NNTP, or newsreaders.

> since we are on sage-flame, you get a unpolite "i am not" from me for
> that.

B)

Yes, but you were replying to my thoughts on NEWSGROUPS and NNTP!!!1!11!

> the basic problem is that some have a problem with reading the
> lists here. my suggestion is to
> a) turn on email sending
> b) use imap to read and post

That's rather unrelated to moving sage-devel etc. to some other service.
  (Ok, that's another, but closely related thread on sage-devel.)

I guess *most* people ("already") use the e-mail interface, preferably
using an IMAP account, at least if they happen to read their mails (or
the [news]groups / mailing lists) from different
Telekommunikationsendger ten (likewise "Rundfunkempfangsger ten", the
latter not bothering you until Germany takes over Austria again).

> c) if you don't like the clutter, filter your messages into folders.
> d) and yes, imap supports the "\Seen" flag, so it syncs read and delete
> states without having to resort to rsync local files like you suggested
> *shrug*

:-) One should of course automate that.

And again, I was talking about moving articles of an NNTP folder (which
is local) to an IMAP folder (which btw. adds much traffic, depending on
how much you move, and thereby destroys the advantages of NNTP, and
probably significantly grows your volume on the mail server, although
not necessarily more than reading the lists via e-mail anyway).

The latter also of course excludes plain newsreaders from your choice,
which is why I suggested using rsync to synchronize different clients'
data (i.e., that of the same programs installed on different machines).

-leif

--
() The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/\ Help Cure HTML E-Mail


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Harald Schilly  
View profile  
 More options Mar 21 2012, 12:28 pm
From: Harald Schilly <harald.schi...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 09:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Wed, Mar 21 2012 12:28 pm
Subject: Re: [sage-flame] Re: Censorship on sage-support?

thread topic mixup alert!!!

On Wednesday, March 21, 2012 5:16:47 PM UTC+1, leif wrote:

> ... the

> latter not bothering you until Germany takes over Austria again).

i guess you meant to say: all germans follow blindly one insane austrian?
:-P

h


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
leif  
View profile  
 More options Mar 21 2012, 12:44 pm
From: leif <not.rea...@online.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:44:39 +0100
Local: Wed, Mar 21 2012 12:44 pm
Subject: Re: [sage-flame] Re: Censorship on sage-support?

Harald Schilly wrote:
> thread topic mixup alert!!!

Apparently at least sage-flame doesn't [yet] get censored!

-leif

--
() The ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/\ Help Cure HTML E-Mail


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Bill Hart  
View profile  
 More options Mar 21 2012, 3:24 pm
From: Bill Hart <goodwillh...@googlemail.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 19:24:42 +0000
Local: Wed, Mar 21 2012 3:24 pm
Subject: Re: [sage-flame] Censorship on sage-support?

sage-flame is moderated. Posts which score zero flamage points are duly
removed.

I am amazed that my posts about how sage should use git (three years ago)
have not been removed since they are now too serious for this forum.
Admittedly they were mixed with a large quantity of other delirious
comments about python being too slow and the like (we now know this is not
true because Guido said so).

Bill.

sage-flame+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at

http://groups.google.com/group/sage-flame?hl=en.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Messages 1 - 25 of 35   Newer >
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »