Você precisa informar o arquivo database.yml que pretende conversar
com o banco de dados em UTF-8. Para fazer isso adicione encoding: utf8
para o seu banco de dados no database.yml. Deixe-me saber como isso
vai.
Obrigado,
B.
2011/2/23 Edu Mariano <eduma...@bol.com.br>:
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rubyonra...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-ta...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk?hl=en.
>
>
Por favor, pare top postagem
On 23 February 2011 22:42, Bryan Crossland <bacro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Michael Pavling <pav...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Por favor, pare top postagem
>
> "The traditional style was for a long time to post the answer below as much
> of the quoted original as was necessary to understand the reply (bottom or
> inline). Many years later, when email became widespread in business
> communication, it however became a widespread policy to reply above the
> entire original and leave it untouched (and without any prefixes at the
> beginning of each line) below the reply."
This list isn't a business communication - it's a reference resource,
and that "policy" was imposed because one company's email software
that just "did it that way" - irregardless of any user preference.
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style
Read the whole of that article... especially the section on "Choosing
the proper posting style". If after that you still insist on
top-posting, so be it :-/
*shrug*
What "standard"? Which RFC says that there is any "standard"?
> if you .... unnecessarily
> inline quoted it would make this thread:
> http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-talk/browse_thread/thread/6c25db52c2d743aa
> and others like it unreadable.
no... top-posting makes it impossible to maintain a coherent
conversation, and introduces confusion about what replies refer to,
because there's no context.
> I'm done discussing posting styles.
So I guess you *didn't* bother reading the rest of the article you
waved as defence of your position? ... hence my *shrug*
PS You've got a frightfully annoying email client too, which sends
*to* the person, and CCs the group - so further replies go to you, not
the group... :-/