Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Becky-Thanks for mail

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 22, 2003, 6:52:31 AM1/22/03
to
Once again, I would like to thank all those who have written
to Beck. She's really enjoying the mail.

And yes, David, she finally remembers who you are. So could
you please burn that picture now?

rl

--
Meaning is what you bring to things, not what
you take from them. Lois McMaster Bujold


Livendive

unread,
Jan 22, 2003, 9:49:25 AM1/22/03
to
Did you print out and give her all the posts from the thread titled "Becky"?
:-)

Blues,
Dave

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:3CvX9.124482$hK4.10...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 22, 2003, 10:02:22 AM1/22/03
to

"Livendive" <live...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:b0mb1m$qrue1$1...@ID-75676.news.dfncis.de...

> Did you print out and give her all the posts from the
thread titled "Becky"?
> :-)

I told her about it, and she asked me to, but if I do, I'll
be forced to take dictation and then transcribe her answer
for each one.

Do I really want to do that? ;)

I'm thinking that when she gets home, she can Google the
thread and by then, it'll be too late to reply. ;) ;)

rl

P.S. She says she is answering (or will answer) everyone who
writes (or has written), but she is a worse procrastinator
than me. Even so, she'll get there.


David Ferree

unread,
Jan 22, 2003, 8:03:03 PM1/22/03
to
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:52:31 GMT, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
<rhonda...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:

>Once again, I would like to thank all those who have written
>to Beck. She's really enjoying the mail.
>
>And yes, David, she finally remembers who you are. So could
>you please burn that picture now?
>
>rl

No. I like it. You don't? Oh, I guess not if you want me to burn
it. And no, other readers, neither of us is naked. At least not in
the picture in question. Rhonda might be naked right now for all I
know.

David

Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 22, 2003, 8:27:45 PM1/22/03
to

"David Ferree" <david...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:fffu2vo8q5ubl2f7l...@4ax.com...

> On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 11:52:31 GMT, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
> <rhonda...@worldnet.att.net> wrote:

> >And yes, David, she finally remembers who you are. So
could
> >you please burn that picture now?

> No. I like it. You don't? Oh, I guess not if you want
me to burn

It's dreadful. And one day I shall have revenge. ;)

> it. And no, other readers, neither of us is naked. At
least not in

Fat chance. It was cold that night.

> the picture in question. Rhonda might be naked right now
for all I
> know.

Ya never know, now do ya?

rl


Rev Jim

unread,
Jan 22, 2003, 9:08:25 PM1/22/03
to

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote
>
> "David Ferree" wrote

>
> > the picture in question. Rhonda might be naked right now
> for all I
> > know.
>
> Ya never know, now do ya?
>
> rl

Real women do.

;-P

Rev


Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 22, 2003, 9:05:37 PM1/22/03
to

"Rev Jim" <isky...@charter.net> wrote in message
news:v2uil4c...@corp.supernews.com...

> Real women do.

It is currently 17 degrees in Skillman, NJ. Now I understand
that the Wisconsin natives have only just begun to put away
their summer clothes, but we know how _they_ are.

OTOH, if you can find a Green Bay Packer to keep me
warm...well...that's another story.

rl

Y'know, Jim, only 10 people are going to understand this.
You see the trouble you get me into?


ynotssor

unread,
Jan 22, 2003, 9:29:42 PM1/22/03
to
"David Ferree" <david...@aol.com> quoted and wrote in message news:fffu2vo8q5ubl2f7l...@4ax.com

>> And yes, David, she finally remembers who you are. So could
>> you please burn that picture now?
>

> No. I like it. You don't? Oh, I guess not if you want me to burn
> it. And no, other readers, neither of us is naked. At least not in
> the picture in question. Rhonda might be naked right now for all I
> know.

Some years ago you had posted a URL to a naked picture of RL, or
IIRC a picture of RL naked.

Is that still on your web site somewhere ?=B^)


tony

--
use hotmail.com for any email replies


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----

Rev Jim

unread,
Jan 22, 2003, 10:18:01 PM1/22/03
to

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote
>
> "Rev Jim" wrote

>
> > Real women do.
>
> It is currently 17 degrees in Skillman, NJ. Now I understand
> that the Wisconsin natives have only just begun to put away
> their summer clothes, but we know how _they_ are.
>

Yep. Time to put away the beer and haul out the red wine too.

> OTOH, if you can find a Green Bay Packer to keep me
> warm...well...that's another story.
>

Well, I'm 50 miles from Lambeau Field and always put my own canopy in my own
D-bag....That close enough for ya?

> rl
>
> Y'know, Jim, only 10 people are going to understand this.
> You see the trouble you get me into?
>

Oh, but it's soooo fun when a couple get it, isn't it?

;-P

Rev


Tandmterry

unread,
Jan 22, 2003, 10:38:54 PM1/22/03
to
>From: David Ferree david...@aol.com

>picture in question. Rhonda might be naked right now for all I
>know.

Smile for the camera Rhonda!!!! Will you autograph mine for me...hehehe

Terry

Tandmterry

unread,
Jan 22, 2003, 10:40:24 PM1/22/03
to
>From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" rhonda...@worldnet.att.net

>OTOH, if you can find a Green Bay Packer to keep me
>warm...well...that's another story.

would you settle for a Chicago Bear fan???

Terry

Rev Jim

unread,
Jan 22, 2003, 11:06:24 PM1/22/03
to

"Tandmterry" wrote
> >From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk"

>
> >OTOH, if you can find a Green Bay Packer to keep me
> >warm...well...that's another story.
>
> would you settle for a Chicago Bear fan???
>
> Terry

I knew there was a reason I liked you Terry. We think too much alike.

I've lived here for 32 years. Ya know how hard it is growing up in the heart
of Packer Country, less than an hour from the field, and be a Bear fan?

I said I lived here. Never said I liked the Packers....

Rev


David Ferree

unread,
Jan 22, 2003, 11:56:12 PM1/22/03
to
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 18:29:42 -0800, "ynotssor" <"ynotssor"> wrote:

>"David Ferree" <david...@aol.com> quoted and wrote in message news:fffu2vo8q5ubl2f7l...@4ax.com
>
>>> And yes, David, she finally remembers who you are. So could
>>> you please burn that picture now?
>>
>> No. I like it. You don't? Oh, I guess not if you want me to burn
>> it. And no, other readers, neither of us is naked. At least not in
>> the picture in question. Rhonda might be naked right now for all I
>> know.
>
>Some years ago you had posted a URL to a naked picture of RL, or
>IIRC a picture of RL naked.
>
>Is that still on your web site somewhere ?=B^)
>
>
> tony

Well, my infamous web site went away when my former ISP did. But if I
ever posted a link that promised a naked picture of Rhonda, it had to
be a joke. Are you sure you're not thinking of a link to a naked
picture of Ann Poblenz?

David

ynotssor

unread,
Jan 23, 2003, 12:11:08 AM1/23/03
to
"David Ferree" <david...@aol.com> wrote in message news:q1tu2voqvb64fu8og...@4ax.com

> Well, my infamous web site went away when my former ISP did. But if I
> ever posted a link that promised a naked picture of Rhonda, it had to
> be a joke.

[...]

Could be ... http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=36c6b34a.98007151%40news.ionet.net

David Ferree

unread,
Jan 23, 2003, 12:39:08 AM1/23/03
to
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 21:11:08 -0800, "ynotssor" <"ynotssor"> wrote:

>"David Ferree" <david...@aol.com> wrote in message news:q1tu2voqvb64fu8og...@4ax.com
>
>> Well, my infamous web site went away when my former ISP did. But if I
>> ever posted a link that promised a naked picture of Rhonda, it had to
>> be a joke.
>[...]
>
>Could be ... http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=36c6b34a.98007151%40news.ionet.net
>
>
> tony

Mammories of the way we were. Or, a reminder of the non-atypical
triple switchback reverse double entendre perfectly personal and
totally public type of jokes that came just before more of the same
after they ended. Or something.

David

Peanut4040

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 9:03:23 AM1/26/03
to
> Are you sure you're not thinking of a link to a naked
>picture of Ann Poblenz?
>
>David
>

uhmmm,,, david, fergit Ronda,, yew got a picture of Ann Problenz?

David Ferree

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 10:26:13 AM1/26/03
to

Now Peanut, you know a gentleman never tells. But I do! Yeah,
several. :-)

David

Ofiddle

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 11:15:11 AM1/26/03
to
>>> Are you sure you're not thinking of a link to a naked
>>>picture of Ann Poblenz?
>>>
>>>David
>>>
>>
>>uhmmm,,, david, fergit Ronda,, yew got a picture of Ann Problenz?
>
>Now Peanut, you know a gentleman never tells. But I do! Yeah,
>several. :-)
>
>David
>
>
>

mental note to self: don't ever get naked in this crowd.

JimBo

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 11:25:26 AM1/26/03
to
>Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
>From: ofi...@aol.com (Ofiddle)

>mental note to self: don't ever get naked in this crowd.
>

HEY ! WHOS' GOT THE NEKKID PICS OF BETH ???????????


jim
D-10154
All around nice guy.
Man small... why fall ? Skies call... thats all.

Ofiddle

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 11:47:03 AM1/26/03
to
>>mental note to self: don't ever get naked in this crowd.
>>
>
>HEY ! WHOS' GOT THE NEKKID PICS OF BETH ???????????
>
>
> jim

on the rug, 6 moths old. Still have the same figure!

JimBo

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 11:51:10 AM1/26/03
to
>Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
>From: ofi...@aol.com (Ofiddle)

>>HEY ! WHOS' GOT THE NEKKID PICS OF BETH ???????????


>>
>>
>> jim
>
>on the rug, 6 moths old. Still have the same figure!

Talk is cheap...cough 'em up Beth.

Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 11:59:21 AM1/26/03
to

"JimBo" <sb...@aol.comnooospam> wrote in message
news:20030126115110...@mb-ca.aol.com...

> Talk is cheap...cough 'em up Beth.

Let's see yours, Bozo.


Tom B

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 1:14:52 PM1/26/03
to

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote in message ...

That is what I call living BEYOND the edge.


JimBo

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 1:12:48 PM1/26/03
to
>Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
>From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" rhonda...@worldnet.att.net

>> Talk is cheap...cough 'em up Beth.
>
>Let's see yours, Bozo.
>

Rhonda Lea...you are a sick woman.

Ofiddle

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 1:49:15 PM1/26/03
to
>>Let's see yours, Bozo.
>>
>
>Rhonda Lea...you are a sick woman.

you know, I think that is a GREAT idea. Show me yours, and I'll show you mine!

Tom B

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 2:28:21 PM1/26/03
to

JimBo wrote in message <20030126115110...@mb-ca.aol.com>...

>>Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
>>From: ofi...@aol.com (Ofiddle)
>>on the rug, 6 moths old. Still have the same figure!
>
>Talk is cheap...cough 'em up Beth.

What of yours did Beth swallow there Jimbo?


Joe Walther

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 6:30:29 PM1/26/03
to

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:JtUY9.4053$rq4.4...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...


Walther responds...

Oh Noooooooo, not in public! Now I will have to spend the rest of the month
just trying to get that image out of my mind! There probably won't be enough
Pepto Bismo in the world... oh geezzzzz... I gotta go!

Regards

Walther


Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 7:18:30 PM1/26/03
to

"Joe Walther" wrote in message

> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in message
> > "JimBo" wrote in message

> > > Talk is cheap...cough 'em up Beth.
> >
> > Let's see yours, Bozo.

> Walther responds...
>
> Oh Noooooooo, not in public! Now I will have to spend the
rest of the month
> just trying to get that image out of my mind! There
probably won't be enough
> Pepto Bismo in the world... oh geezzzzz... I gotta go!

Sorry, Joe. But I figure since he's making demands, sauce
for the goose is also sauce for the gander.

The good news is we don't have to look. :)

rl


JimBo

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 7:24:58 PM1/26/03
to
>Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
>From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" rhonda...@worldnet.att.net

>The good news is we don't have to look. :)
>
>rl
>

:o) you wish.

Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 7:37:19 PM1/26/03
to

"JimBo" wrote in message
> >From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk"

> >The good news is we don't have to look. :)

> :o) you wish.

Trust me. I won't look.

rl


Tom B

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 7:48:20 PM1/26/03
to

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote in message ...

>> > > Talk is cheap...cough 'em up Beth.
>> >
>> > Let's see yours, Bozo.
>
>> Walther responds...
>>
>> Oh Noooooooo, not in public! Now I will have to spend the
>rest of the month
>> just trying to get that image out of my mind! There
>probably won't be enough
>> Pepto Bismo in the world... oh geezzzzz... I gotta go!
>
>Sorry, Joe. But I figure since he's making demands, sauce
>for the goose is also sauce for the gander.
>
>The good news is we don't have to look. :)

It is an unfortunate fact that the human eye is drawn to horror.


JimBo

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 8:12:59 PM1/26/03
to
>Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
>From: "Tom B" nospam...@aol.com_nospam

>It is an unfortunate fact that the human eye is drawn to horror.
>

And that...is exactly why RL will look.

Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 8:24:11 PM1/26/03
to

"JimBo" <sb...@aol.comnooospam> wrote in message
> >Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
> >From: "Tom B" nospam...@aol.com_nospam
>
> >It is an unfortunate fact that the human eye is drawn to
horror.
> >
>
> And that...is exactly why RL will look.

I got cured of that in May 2001. Forever. My horror
receptors are burned out.

My gross-out receptors, on the other hand, are very finely
tuned. And given that I've already spit tea all over this
keyboard (was it you who caused that, Beth? Or was it Karen?
Funny that the really funny stuff always originates with the
women, huh?), the last thing it needs is...well...you get
the idea. ;)

Poor Jimbo.

rl


JimBo

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 8:27:17 PM1/26/03
to
>Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
>From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" rhonda...@worldnet.att.net

>the last thing it needs is...well...you get
>the idea. ;)
>
>Poor Jimbo.

Ya gotta do better than that to smash an egomaniacs ego. Next .

Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 8:34:28 PM1/26/03
to

"JimBo" <sb...@aol.comnooospam> wrote in message

> Ya gotta do better than that to smash an egomaniacs ego.
Next .

<deadpan> You forgot the apostrophe.


JimBo

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 8:40:27 PM1/26/03
to
>Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
>From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" rhonda...@worldnet.att.net

>> Ya gotta do better than that to smash an egomaniacs ego.


>Next .
>
><deadpan> You forgot the apostrophe.
>

ok......perfessor.

Ofiddle

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 8:44:00 PM1/26/03
to
>>Talk is cheap...cough 'em up Beth.
>
>What of yours did Beth swallow there Jimbo?

cough, cough!! car keys, hard to get down, harder to get up!

Ofiddle

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 8:45:06 PM1/26/03
to
>From: "Tom B"

>It is an unfortunate fact that the human eye is drawn to horror.
>
>

Which is why I have always maintained all of my clothes in public. Yea,,,
that's my story, and I'm sticking to it

Ofiddle

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 8:46:03 PM1/26/03
to
>My gross-out receptors, on the other hand, are very finely
>tuned. And given that I've already spit tea all over this
>keyboard

ya gotta learn to SWALLOW sweetie! less mess that way!

Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 8:47:01 PM1/26/03
to

"JimBo" <sb...@aol.comnooospam> wrote in message
news:20030126204027...@mb-fz.aol.com...

> >Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
> >From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" rhonda...@worldnet.att.net
>
> >> Ya gotta do better than that to smash an egomaniacs
ego.
> >Next .
> >
> ><deadpan> You forgot the apostrophe.
> >
>
> ok......perfessor.

You spelled "perfesser" wrong.


JimBo

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 8:50:00 PM1/26/03
to
>Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
>From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk"

>> ok......perfessor.
>
>You spelled "perfesser" wrong.

still aint working.

Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 9:03:07 PM1/26/03
to

"JimBo" <sb...@aol.comnooospam> wrote in message
news:20030126205000...@mb-fz.aol.com...

> >Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
> >From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>
> >> ok......perfessor.
> >
> >You spelled "perfesser" wrong.
>
> still aint working.

Apostrophe.

(Whew! At first I thought you'd let me down, man!)


JimBo

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 9:07:12 PM1/26/03
to
>Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
>From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" rhonda...@worldnet.att.net

>Apostrophe.
>
>(Whew! At first I thought you'd let me down, man!)

that predictable huh ?

Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 9:10:16 PM1/26/03
to

"JimBo" <sb...@aol.comnooospam> wrote in message
news:20030126210712...@mb-fz.aol.com...

> >Apostrophe.
> >
> >(Whew! At first I thought you'd let me down, man!)
>
> that predictable huh ?

Capitalization, comma, extra space. Not to mention that we
had the beginning of a nice cascade and you destroyed it.

rl


JimBo

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 9:15:13 PM1/26/03
to
>Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
>From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" rhonda...@worldnet.att.net

>> that predictable huh ?


>
>Capitalization, comma, extra space. Not to mention that we
>had the beginning of a nice cascade and you destroyed it.
>

gee , thats terrible.

Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 9:29:05 PM1/26/03
to

"JimBo" <sb...@aol.comnooospam> wrote in message
news:20030126211513...@mb-fz.aol.com...

> >Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
> >From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" rhonda...@worldnet.att.net
>
> >> that predictable huh ?
> >
> >Capitalization, comma, extra space. Not to mention that
we
> >had the beginning of a nice cascade and you destroyed it.
> >
>
> gee , thats terrible.

Ah, fergit you! ;)

I'm going to talk to Beth instead about the fine points of
spitting vs. swallowing.

rl


JimBo

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 9:42:42 PM1/26/03
to
>Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
>From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" rhonda...@worldnet.att.net

>> gee , thats terrible.


>
>Ah, fergit you! ;)
>
>I'm going to talk to Beth instead about the fine points of
>spitting vs. swallowing.
>

Please get back to us with all that you learn. :o)

Tandmterry

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 9:49:55 PM1/26/03
to
>From: sb...@aol.comnooospam (JimBo)

>:o) you wish.

OOOOOOOO no we dont!!!!!!!!

Terry

Tandmterry

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 9:52:24 PM1/26/03
to
>From: sb...@aol.comnooospam (JimBo)

>ok......perfessor.

now thats a low blow to RLK!!!!! the woman didn't deserve that!!!!!!!!!

Terry

Tandmterry

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 9:54:44 PM1/26/03
to
>From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" rhonda...@worldnet.att.net

>I'm going to talk to Beth instead about the fine points of
>spitting vs. swallowing.

This thread is getting out of hand! So which is it Rhonda ???

Terry
p & m

Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 10:12:35 PM1/26/03
to

"Tandmterry" <tandm...@aol.comNOSPAM> wrote in message
news:20030126215444...@mb-cm.aol.com...

Depends on who^Hat it is. :)


Jldorman5486

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 10:38:03 PM1/26/03
to
<< >spitting vs. swallowing. >>


<< getting out of hand! >>


TOM!!!! You're not up to your quick witted self this evening! You blew your
cue!

David Ferree

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 10:54:12 PM1/26/03
to
Uh, you don't think Ann will notice her name (sort of) in about a
hundred posts' subject lines, do you?

Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 26, 2003, 11:05:07 PM1/26/03
to

"Jldorman5486" <jldorm...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030126223803...@mb-fk.aol.com...

Just when I think you're a moron, Lana, you show signs of
being a wit. Pick one, willya?


Ofiddle

unread,
Jan 27, 2003, 6:51:22 AM1/27/03
to
>This thread is getting out of hand! So which is it Rhonda ???
>
>Terry
>p & m

Of course it's out of hand, unless that is what you prefer!

Ofiddle

unread,
Jan 27, 2003, 6:50:40 AM1/27/03
to
>>From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk

>>I'm going to talk to Beth instead about the fine points of
>>spitting vs. swallowing.
>>

>Please get back to us with all that you learn. :o)
>
> jim

Maybe she was planning on TEACHING. Oh, you just figure cuz I'm so damn old,
and been around that block so many times that I must KNOW IT ALL. I see how it
is!

Tom B

unread,
Jan 27, 2003, 12:19:39 PM1/27/03
to

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote in message ...

>
>
>I'm going to talk to Beth instead about the fine points of
>spitting vs. swallowing.
>
>rl

If you need someone to practice or demonstrate on, I could be talked into
helping the two of you.

Tom B


Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 27, 2003, 12:45:50 PM1/27/03
to

"Tom B" wrote in

> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote in message ...
> >
> >
> >I'm going to talk to Beth instead about the fine points
of
> >spitting vs. swallowing.

> If you need someone to practice or demonstrate on, I could


be talked into
> helping the two of you.

Indeed, Tom, we do. Thank you so much for your kind offer of
assistance.

"Now, class..."

<turns around, hands Tom a large glass, turns back to
audience>

"Go ahead, Tom..."

<Tom begins to gulp>

"...as I was saying, although hemlock is useful as a remedy
for bronchitis, too large a dosage will...

<Tom attempts to spit>

<sound of chair tipping, body hitting floor>

"Thank you, Tom, for your assistance."

"Next!"


Ofiddle

unread,
Jan 27, 2003, 1:40:57 PM1/27/03
to
But wasn't it nice the way he volunteered? We need to give Tom a big hand for
his assistance with our demonstration...

Livendive

unread,
Jan 27, 2003, 2:13:49 PM1/27/03
to

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhonda...@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message
news:pc0Z9.4934$rq4.4...@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...

You forgot (sic)


Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 27, 2003, 2:42:11 PM1/27/03
to

"Livendive" wrote in message

> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote in message
> > "JimBo" wrote in message

> > > >> Ya gotta do better than that to smash an egomaniacs
> > ego.
> > > >Next .
> > > >
> > > ><deadpan> You forgot the apostrophe.
> > > >
> > >
> > > ok......perfessor.
> >
> > You spelled "perfesser" wrong.
>
> You forgot (sic)

You forgot the period, you sic person, you. ;)


Tom B

unread,
Jan 27, 2003, 5:29:43 PM1/27/03
to

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote in message ...
>"...as I was saying, although hemlock is useful as a remedy
>for bronchitis, too large a dosage will...
>

No luck with that tac Rhonda. Anybody man that has been married 24 years has
survived several attempted poisonings.

Tom B


Jldorman5486

unread,
Jan 27, 2003, 8:23:59 PM1/27/03
to
<< Pick one, willya? >>

Swallow

Jldorman5486

unread,
Jan 27, 2003, 8:28:41 PM1/27/03
to
<< Pick one, willya?>>

I still like the old fashioned way.... concrescence!

Ann Poblenz

unread,
Jan 28, 2003, 12:48:43 PM1/28/03
to
ofi...@aol.com (Ofiddle) wrote in message news:<20030126111511...@mb-ba.aol.com>...
> >>> Are you sure you're not thinking of a link to a naked
> >>>picture of Ann Poblenz?
> >>>
> >>>David
> >>>
> >>
> >>uhmmm,,, david, fergit Ronda,, yew got a picture of Ann Problenz?
> >
> >Now Peanut, you know a gentleman never tells. But I do! Yeah,
> >several. :-)
> >
> >David
> >
> >
> >
>
> mental note to self: don't ever get naked in this crowd.

Never have, never will....
You should know David by now...

btw, David..send me an e-mail so I can get in touch w you..

Ps...glad to see that this ng still can "re-direct" a thread in
hmm...about .1 seconds!
Im proud of y'all!!!
:-)

Ofiddle

unread,
Jan 28, 2003, 1:11:27 PM1/28/03
to
>You should know David by now...
>
>btw, David..send me an e-mail so I can get in touch w you..
>
>Ps...glad to see that this ng still can "re-direct" a thread in
>hmm...about .1 seconds!
>Im proud of y'all!!!
>:-)

>(Ann Poblenz)

and we were wondering how many posts it would take before we would hear from
YOU! You held off remarkably well!

David Ferree

unread,
Jan 28, 2003, 1:25:07 PM1/28/03
to
On 28 Jan 2003 09:48:43 -0800, noshit...@yeahsports.com (Ann
Poblenz) said:

But if I never will, why send you an email? :-)

But that's ok, mission accomplished. Now we know you're still around.

David

Tom B

unread,
Jan 28, 2003, 8:58:40 PM1/28/03
to

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote in message ...

>> the picture in question. Rhonda might be naked right now
>for all I
>> know.
>
>Ya never know, now do ya?
>rl

Yes we do.

Hair curlers, animal house shoes, flannel housecoat, hot water bottle,...


Tom B


Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 28, 2003, 9:31:44 PM1/28/03
to

Well, now we know how you live.

Y'know...I don't own anything on that list. My list would be
t-shirt...and if my feet are cold, socks. Curlers give me a
migraine.

<trying to figure out the hot water bottle>

You worry me, Tom.

rl

--
The whole problem with the world is that fools
and fanatics are always so certain of themselves,
but wiser people so full of doubts. -- Bertrand Russell


Tom B

unread,
Jan 28, 2003, 9:43:36 PM1/28/03
to

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote in message ...

>>>> the picture in question. Rhonda might be naked right
>>>> now
>>> for all I
>>>> know.
>>>
>>> Ya never know, now do ya?
>>> rl
>>
>> Yes we do.
>> Hair curlers, animal house shoes, flannel housecoat, hot
>> water bottle,...
>

>Y'know...I don't own anything on that list. My list would be
>t-shirt...and if my feet are cold, socks. Curlers give me a
>migraine.

Well, it is not like I have a lot of use for hair items now is it?


><trying to figure out the hot water bottle>

It is what old ladies have.

>You worry me, Tom.
>
>rl

Now I have purpose again. :)


Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 28, 2003, 9:58:21 PM1/28/03
to
Tom B wrote:

> It is what old ladies have.

Ah, I see.

So, tell me. What is it that old men have...besides low
testosterone and false memories? ;)

> Now I have purpose again. :)

And what would that be?

Tom B

unread,
Jan 28, 2003, 10:30:35 PM1/28/03
to

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote in message ...
>Tom B wrote:
>
>> It is what old ladies have.

>Ah, I see.
>So, tell me. What is it that old men have...besides low
>testosterone and false memories? ;)

Haven't you heard Rhonda. The key reason balding men have less hair is a
high level of testosterone. As for memories, mine are fine. Have I ever
mentioned Jimbo floats? :)

>> Now I have purpose again. :)
>
>And what would that be?

It is a secret.
>
>--
>The whole problem with the world is that democrats, women,


>and fanatics are always so certain of themselves,

>but wiser people so full of doubts. -- Rhonda Lea>

How true!

Tom B
>


JimBo

unread,
Jan 28, 2003, 10:28:03 PM1/28/03
to
>Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mail

>From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" rhonda...@worldnet.att.net

>So, tell me. What is it that old men have...besides low


>testosterone and false memories? ;)

Tell her Tom....I forgot. :o)

jim
D-10154
All around nice guy.
Man small... why fall ? Skies call... thats all.

Ofiddle

unread,
Jan 29, 2003, 1:52:18 AM1/29/03
to
>>So, tell me. What is it that old men have...besides low
>>testosterone and false memories? ;)
>
>Tell her Tom....I forgot. :o)
>
> jim

Well, you know what they say about old age. There are 2 things that go. The
first one is your memory, and I never can remember that other one.....

Jldorman5486

unread,
Jan 29, 2003, 6:34:24 PM1/29/03
to
<< The key reason balding men have less hair is a
high level of testosterone. >>

The rest of that joke is: "that is why bald men get more head!"

Stephen Rafferty

unread,
Jan 30, 2003, 11:12:23 AM1/30/03
to
in article vVHZ9.67321$i73.16...@twister.neo.rr.com, Tom B at
nospam...@aol.com_nospam wrote on 1/28/03 7:30 PM:

>
> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote in message ...
>> Tom B wrote:
>>
>>> It is what old ladies have.
>
>> Ah, I see.
>> So, tell me. What is it that old men have...besides low
>> testosterone and false memories? ;)
>
> Haven't you heard Rhonda. The key reason balding men have less hair is a
> high level of testosterone.

Let me clear this up. After a certain age the hair simply grows IN and
re-emerges from the ears, nose, and eyebrows. ...simple science and I'm
shocked that you were unaware of this..

sraff

Tom B

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 5:21:04 PM1/31/03
to

JimBo wrote in message <20030126201259...@mb-fz.aol.com>...

>>Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
>>From: "Tom B" nospam...@aol.com_nospam
>
>>It is an unfortunate fact that the human eye is drawn to horror.
>>
>
>And that...is exactly why RL will look.
>
> jim

Not sure why this one appeared again today, but Jimbo, I said the HUMAN eye.


JimBo

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 5:27:19 PM1/31/03
to
>Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
>From: "Tom B" nospam...@aol.com_nospam

>Not sure why this one appeared again today, but Jimbo, I said the HUMAN eye.
>

Well I hugged RL once. She felt pretty human to me. :o)

Tom B

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 6:26:05 PM1/31/03
to

JimBo wrote in message <20030131172719...@mb-mf.aol.com>...

>>Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
>>From: "Tom B" nospam...@aol.com_nospam
>
>>Not sure why this one appeared again today, but Jimbo, I said the HUMAN
eye.
>>
>
>Well I hugged RL once. She felt pretty human to me. :o)
>

She devils can fool you like that.


JimBo

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 6:26:05 PM1/31/03
to
>Subject: Re: Becky-Thanks for mailProblenz?
>From: "Tom B" nospam...@aol.com_nospam

>>Well I hugged RL once. She felt pretty human to me. :o)


>>
>
>She devils can fool you like that.
>

Oh oh.....looks like Rhonda pissed off another one .
You really should try to get out more TommyK.

BVAskydive

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 8:56:21 PM1/31/03
to
>Well I hugged RL once. She felt pretty human to me. :o)
>
> jim

Ditto!

Blue Skies
Billy

Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 9:31:29 PM1/31/03
to
Jimbo wrote

>> Well I hugged RL once. She felt pretty human to me. :o)

And Billy replied

> Ditto!

Well, you guys sure didn't feel like aliens to me...but I
must admit...having hugged Jimbo, I'm pretty sure I'll never
figure out how...

<running>

...he manages to float.

rl


--
The whole problem with the world is that fools


and fanatics are always so certain of themselves,

but wiser people so full of doubts. -- Bertrand Russell


Tandmterry

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 10:30:55 PM1/31/03
to
>From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" rhonda...@worldnet.att.net

>Well, you guys sure didn't feel like aliens to me...but I


>must admit...having hugged Jimbo, I'm pretty sure I'll never
>figure out how...

Come to Chicago and see the difference...hehehe

Terry

Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 10:36:46 PM1/31/03
to
Tandmterry wrote:

The Professor hasn't invited me.

john

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 10:54:57 PM1/31/03
to

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>
> Tandmterry wrote:
>
> >> From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" rhonda...@worldnet.att.net
> >
> >> Well, you guys sure didn't feel like aliens to me...but I
> >> must admit...having hugged Jimbo, I'm pretty sure I'll
> >> never figure out how...
> >
> > Come to Chicago and see the difference...hehehe
>
> The Professor hasn't invited me.
>
> rl
>

Anytime, sweetie pie.

Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 11:11:57 PM1/31/03
to
john wrote:

> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>
>> Tandmterry wrote:

>>> Come to Chicago and see the difference...hehehe
>>
>> The Professor hasn't invited me.

> Anytime, sweetie pie.

Uh oh. Now _I_ need some wiggle room. ;)


john

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 11:16:56 PM1/31/03
to

Sounds good!

Tom B

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 11:27:13 PM1/31/03
to

Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote in message ...

Plenty on his lap Rhonda.

Tom B


john

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 11:24:40 PM1/31/03
to

Tom:
When I need your help to get a date, I'll be
sure to let you know.

Rhonda Lea Kirk

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 11:36:39 PM1/31/03
to
john wrote:
> Tom B wrote:
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote
>>> john wrote:
>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>>> Tandmterry wrote:

>>>>>> Come to Chicago and see the difference...hehehe
>>>>> The Professor hasn't invited me.
>>>> Anytime, sweetie pie.
>>> Uh oh. Now _I_ need some wiggle room. ;)
>> Plenty on his lap Rhonda.

> Tom:
> When I need your help to get a date, I'll be
> sure to let you know.

This is a pretty cascade.

About the date thing, it'll have to be quick. When Becky
gets home and reads what's going on in "her" thread, she's
going to end up back in jail, and I'll be deader than a
doornail.

rl

Rev Jim

unread,
Jan 31, 2003, 11:50:57 PM1/31/03
to

"Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote

> The Professor hasn't invited me.
>
> rl

That's 'cause you spelled it wrong!

;-)

Rev Jim


0 new messages