Hd Radio Sales - Did I Get The Math Right?
Rfburns
sold so far - and that's probably inflated.
Ok, that amounts to....... $1333.33 spent for each listener - roughly
speaking of course. Did I get the math right? Is that a valid way
of looking at it?.
Now its possible that there are two people listening to the same
radio. OK......That amounts to.....$666.66 per listener.
Help me out here. Doesn't seem too successful to me.
J.R. Stocks. Could you help me on this?
jw
Rfburns
OK. Radiosophy is extending their sale of HD radios through March.
You can buy this fine plastic radio for $89.00 This might help.
jw
IBOCcrock
According to Hipporadio on Radio-Info, who is in the broadcast
industry annd electonic sales, only 130,000 HD radios sold, minus
returns, "trade" purchases, and giveaways - maybe, the true number is
around 50,000 in the hands of radio-geeks and consumers.
IBOCcrock
Jr is too much of a loser to help - perhaps, Stocks could help?
IBOCcrock
Having to be put on "sale" means no sale. Here is a review from Wired
on that piece-of-crap:
"Remember those crappy $15 AM/FM/cassette radios from the 80s? The
HD100 looks just like one and has the sound to match. Basically a
glorified clock radio, it has a chintzy, careless interface with
speakers that spew a tinny unrefined sound. Frankly we'd be happier
keeping our money and sitting in silence."
If you look at my blog down the right hand side, you will quickly
figure out why HD radios are so expensive, yet cheaply made:
IBOCcrock
I'll be generous and give iBiquity 100,000 HD radios. So, there are
about 270,000,000 people, and dropping, that listen to radio. So,
wouldn't that leave $2,700 spent on each listener per HD radio?
RHF
Good Post as long as you put IBOC or HD Radio at the Start of
the Subject-Line of these IBOC / HD Radio Posts : You will not
see me posting to them; except to actually make a Comment.
-wrt- Did I Get The Math Right? : Fuzzy Logic =equals= Fuzzy Math
IBOC : "HD" Radio Sales - Getting The Math Right !
http://groups.google.com/group/hd-radio/msg/a5be3984e6b529e1
The $400M was spent to Try-and-Influence the 300M present
day Analog "Only" AM/FM Radio Listeners in the USA.
Doing-the-Math - For These Listeners would come out to be
about $1.33 for every 'potential' Radio Listener; that could be
"Sold-on-the-Idea" of "HD" Radio -as- Being Something They
Both "Want" {It's New ! :o} and Have-to-Have. {It's Digital ! :o}
$NOTE$ - A $1.33 per Radio Listener per Year with Hourly
and Daily Radio ADZs {PSAs} is : cheap, Cheap. CHEAP !
-note- As soon as Congress / The FCC Mandates All Digital
Mode AM/FM/DS Radios : All the former "HD" Radios ADZs
will be Income-Off-Setting "PSAs" for the Radio Stations.
This is a $-}} = I See Money Big Smile Happy Face $-}}
RF Burns - You are Focused on short-term 'results'.
While the "HD" Radio 'Alliance' is Interested in Long-Term
[Bottom-Line] "Results" over the next Decade for AM/FM Radio.
http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/recent_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1001614953
The "HD" Radio 'Alliance' has the Money and Commitment for
a 5~10 Year Program to Transition the USA to "HD" AM/FM
Radio; plus the Political Resources to Make-It-Happen by an
Act-of-Congress and/or Rulling by the FCC; which I suspect
is coming in the next 3 Years to require that all 'new' Radios
being Built or Imported in to the USA will be All Digital-Mode
AM/FM/DS "HD" Radios with Dual Mode IBOC and a Built-in
Direct-Satellite Interface.
NOTE - The Price Point of these All Digital-Mode AM/FM/DS
"HD" Radios will Drop Annually over a Period of several Years :
[ Using a 1/3 (-33%) Price Reduction per Year ]
$500 for Year # 1 > $335 for Year # 2 > $225 for Year # 3 >
$150 for Year # 4 > $100 for Year # 5
SO - At the End of Five (5) Years the Price of the 'new' All
Digital-Mode AM/FM/DS "HD" Radios will be back at the
present day Price to US Consumers for the old Analog "Only'
AM/FM Radio that has been around for 40 Years.
Read - A Revolution in Audio Content Delivery May Be in the
Making . . . The All Digital Mode AM/FM+DS Radio
http://groups.google.com/group/hd-radio/msg/96a8d6de046fe486
Read - IBOC - The Birth of the All Digital Mode AM/FM/DS Radio . . .
http://groups.google.com/group/hd-radio/msg/962b1c92d4609c30
Read - Will Audio Consumers Want the All Digital Mode
AM/FM/DS Radio ?
http://groups.google.com/group/hd-radio/msg/7f92ac1646c73155
Remember - Just Wishing and Hoping Will Not Stop IBOC
http://groups.google.com/group/hd-radio/msg/73182542b2ab763a
"HD" Radio will require an Active effort by those who love
traditional Analog AM Radio to Stop It . . .
and Honestly I Do Not See That Happening.
it's about iboc 'hd' radio ~ RHF
Hello and Welcome to the "HD Radio" NewsGroup*
* http://groups.google.com/group/hd-radio/
HD RADIO GROUP => http://tinyurl.com/27kwyt
.
- - - the digital divide : i draw the line @ iboc 'hd' radio - - -
.
.
On Mar 1, 7:29 am, Rfburns <jimwilh...@labs.net> wrote:
Was : Hd Radio Sales - Did I Get The Math Right?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/956c74e021a64c1b
-
- Lets see now - 400 Million spent on HD Radio ads and
- 300,000 radios sold so far - and that's probably inflated.
-
- Ok, that amounts to....... $1333.33 spent for each listener
- roughly speaking of course.
-
- Did I get the math right?
- Is that a valid way of looking at it?.
-
- Now its possible that there are two people listening
- to the same radio.
- OK......That amounts to.....$666.66 per listener.
-
- Help me out here.
- Doesn't seem too successful to me.
-
- J.R. Stocks. Could you help me on this?
-
- jw
-
Telamon
<ff26cbbc-2186-40d9...@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
RHF <rhf-new...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> RF Burns,
>
> Good Post as long as you put IBOC or HD Radio at the Start of
> the Subject-Line of these IBOC / HD Radio Posts : You will not
> see me posting to them; except to actually make a Comment.
>
> -wrt- Did I Get The Math Right? : Fuzzy Logic =equals= Fuzzy Math
>
> IBOC : "HD" Radio Sales - Getting The Math Right !
> http://groups.google.com/group
< SNIP >
Get lost google group spammer.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
<88ea4e3e-cc5c-4fb7...@q78g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>,
Rfburns <jimwi...@labs.net> wrote:
You need to look at more than the number of sets sold. You will notice
that the HD sets that are available are:
1. Still first generation. They take a lot power using general purpose
DSP components.
2. These first generation sets are being discounted.
3. Big semiconductor players that have the resources are not developing
optimized chip sets that would reduce the power requirement and improve
performance.
4. As a consequence of #3 you don't see any second generation sets
available.
5. Since the big semiconductor makers have dropped out it is left up to
smaller virtual companies without fabrication facilities to pitch a
business plan to investors to get the money needed for a production run
of parts they designed. These parts may or may not work. If they do we
might see samples this summer. Power draw will still be much larger than
analog sets though and I expect that portable devices will need lithium
batteries.
6. HD needs these second generation sets to grow interest in this mode
of broadcasting. Generally, the only interest I see at all in HD is in
the FM band where public service stations actually fill the secondary
channels with different content.
HD is dying and is likely to be around just a few more years at best
unless something changes the playing field.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
David Eduardo
"Telamon" <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote in message
news:telamon_spamshield-B...@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net...
>
> 5. Since the big semiconductor makers have dropped out it is left up to
> smaller virtual companies without fabrication facilities to pitch a
> business plan to investors to get the money needed for a production run
> of parts they designed. These parts may or may not work. If they do we
> might see samples this summer. Power draw will still be much larger than
> analog sets though and I expect that portable devices will need lithium
> batteries.
Samsung is small?
Telamon
<ff26cbbc-2186-40d9...@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
RHF <rhf-new...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> RF Burns,
>
> Good Post as long as you put IBOC or HD Radio at the Start of
> the Subject-Line of these IBOC / HD Radio Posts : You will not
> see me posting to them; except to actually make a Comment.
>
> -wrt- Did I Get The Math Right? : Fuzzy Logic =equals= Fuzzy Math
>
> IBOC : "HD" Radio Sales - Getting The Math Right !
> http://groups.google.com
< SNIP >
Hey whack job, you don't even know how to reference a thread. RRS is not
a google group. You are a clueless moron telling other people they don't
have something right. Fail to see the irony in this? That would not be a
surprise.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
"David Eduardo" <da...@davideduardo.com> wrote:
Show me where they developed a second generation chip set?
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
David Eduardo
"Telamon" <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote in message
Actually, it is being called third generation. And you saw the magazine
article.
dxAce
David Eduardo wrote:
> "Telamon" <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote in message
> news:telamon_spamshield-4...@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net...
> > In article <sNiyj.6642$Mh2....@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>,
> > "David Eduardo" <da...@davideduardo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Telamon" <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote in message
> >> news:telamon_spamshield-B...@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net...
> >> >
> >> > 5. Since the big semiconductor makers have dropped out it is left up to
> >> > smaller virtual companies without fabrication facilities to pitch a
> >> > business plan to investors to get the money needed for a production run
> >> > of parts they designed. These parts may or may not work. If they do we
> >> > might see samples this summer. Power draw will still be much larger
> >> > than
> >> > analog sets though and I expect that portable devices will need lithium
> >> > batteries.
> >>
> >> Samsung is small?
> >
> > Show me where they developed a second generation chip set?
>
> Actually, it is being called third generation. And you saw the magazine
> article.
Hey, 'Eduardo'... you got so much time on your hands, start scanning those 2200
veries...
dxAce
David Eduardo wrote:
> "Telamon" <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote in message
> news:telamon_spamshield-4...@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net...
> > In article <sNiyj.6642$Mh2....@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>,
> > "David Eduardo" <da...@davideduardo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Telamon" <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote in message
> >> news:telamon_spamshield-B...@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net...
> >> >
> >> > 5. Since the big semiconductor makers have dropped out it is left up to
> >> > smaller virtual companies without fabrication facilities to pitch a
> >> > business plan to investors to get the money needed for a production run
> >> > of parts they designed. These parts may or may not work. If they do we
> >> > might see samples this summer. Power draw will still be much larger
> >> > than
> >> > analog sets though and I expect that portable devices will need lithium
> >> > batteries.
> >>
> >> Samsung is small?
> >
> > Show me where they developed a second generation chip set?
>
> Actually, it is being called third generation. And you saw the magazine
> article.
Was that the article you were supposed to begin typing in the relevent portions
of...?
Rfburns
> "Telamon" <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote in message
Eddie,
Could you explain those sales numbers to me. Is $1333.33 per radio
the correct number?
jw
David Eduardo
"dxAce" <dx...@milestones.com> wrote in message
news:47C9C263...@milestones.com...
No, I will leave the plagiarism to you. Somebody else already did the "fair
usage" post from the article.
Telamon
"David Eduardo" <da...@davideduardo.com> wrote:
> "Telamon" <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote in message
> news:telamon_spamshield-4...@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net...
> > In article <sNiyj.6642$Mh2....@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com>,
> > "David Eduardo" <da...@davideduardo.com> wrote:
> >
> >> "Telamon" <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote in message
> >> news:telamon_spamshield-B...@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net.
> >> ..
> >> >
> >> > 5. Since the big semiconductor makers have dropped out it is left up to
> >> > smaller virtual companies without fabrication facilities to pitch a
> >> > business plan to investors to get the money needed for a production run
> >> > of parts they designed. These parts may or may not work. If they do we
> >> > might see samples this summer. Power draw will still be much larger
> >> > than
> >> > analog sets though and I expect that portable devices will need lithium
> >> > batteries.
> >>
> >> Samsung is small?
> >
> > Show me where they developed a second generation chip set?
>
> Actually, it is being called third generation. And you saw the magazine
> article.
Doesn't look third generation to me. It's first generation going on 2nd
when it happens. It has not happened yet. Now get a clue as there are no
radios with new optimized chip sets because there are no optimized chip
sets to put in them yet. What could your next argument be? That they are
keeping the new radios a secret?
I don't expect marketers to keep details straight. I expect them to
promote ignoring details that do not fit in their outlook.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
"David Eduardo" <da...@davideduardo.com> wrote:
If you can't defend what you post don't bother.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
RHF
<telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> In article
> <ff26cbbc-2186-40d9-bc3d-b6c27fcae...@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>
> RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > RF Burns,
>
> > Good Post as long as you put IBOC or HD Radio at the Start of
> > the Subject-Line of these IBOC / HD Radio Posts : You will not
> > see me posting to them; except to actually make a Comment.
>
> > -wrt- Did I Get The Math Right? : Fuzzy Logic =equals= Fuzzy Math
>
> > IBOC : "HD" Radio Sales - Getting The Math Right !
> >http://groups.google.com/group
- < SNIP >
-
- Get lost google group spammer.
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California
PONG : Telamon - Poluting another On-Topic Thread
with Your Personal Attacks on Me {RHF}
Telamon - In the Name of Google...
I Denouce The Demon Within You !
Get Thee Out Old "Ping-Pong" - Be Gone - Amen ~ RHF
.
David Eduardo
"Telamon" <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote in message
>
> Doesn't look third generation to me. It's first generation going on 2nd
> when it happens. It has not happened yet. Now get a clue as there are no
> radios with new optimized chip sets because there are no optimized chip
> sets to put in them yet. What could your next argument be? That they are
> keeping the new radios a secret?
The chips are shipping. Production samples were given manufacturers at CES
per the Radio World article and per iBiquity updates.
>
> I don't expect marketers to keep details straight. I expect them to
> promote ignoring details that do not fit in their outlook.
You are just upset that the chips are not going to you for approval.
David Eduardo
"Telamon" <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote in message
news:telamon_spamshield->>
>> "fair
>> usage" post from the article.
>
> If you can't defend what you post don't bother.
I told you where a very full article is to be found.
mumbl...@gmail.com
RHF, David Eduardo just showed up in this thread. So, you know what to
do:
1. Stand a foot or so in front of Eduardo
2. Drop to your knees
3. Open your mouth (it'll only need to be open a tiny bit)
4. Suck whatever Eduardo happens to stick in there.
dxAce
David Eduardo wrote:
So, just where can those 2200 'veries' be found?
David Eduardo
two state's worth that I have in Glendale, CA.
dxAce
David Eduardo wrote:
Sure... Well then, perhaps I can meet your sister in Omena?
Not considering of course your statements in the past that they no longer
existed...
dxAce
dxAce wrote:
> David Eduardo wrote:
>
> > "dxAce" <dx...@milestones.com> wrote in message
> > news:47C9D655...@milestones.com...
> > >
> > >
> > > David Eduardo wrote:
> > >
> > >> "Telamon" <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote in message
> > >> news:telamon_spamshield->>
> > >> >> No, I will leave the plagiarism to you. Somebody else already did the
> > >> >> "fair
> > >> >> usage" post from the article.
> > >> >
> > >> > If you can't defend what you post don't bother.
> > >>
> > >> I told you where a very full article is to be found.
> > >
> > > So, just where can those 2200 'veries' be found?
> > >
> > In my sister's basement storage room in a suburb of Cleveland, except for
> > two state's worth that I have in Glendale, CA.
>
> Sure... Well then, perhaps I can meet your sister in Omena?
Or maybe I just drive to Cleveland? I can show her mine, and she can show me
yours?
Such a deal!
dxAce
dxAce wrote:
And if anyone thinks 'Eduardo' is going to take that deal they are confused!
dxAce
dxAce wrote:
And now, ladies and gentlemen, 'Eduardo' will make another round of excuses...
David Eduardo
>
>
> David Eduardo wrote:
>
>> "dxAce" <dx...@milestones.com> wrote in message
>> news:47C9D655...@milestones.com...
>> >
>> >
>> > David Eduardo wrote:
>> >
>> >> "Telamon" <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote in message
>> >> news:telamon_spamshield->>
>> >> >> No, I will leave the plagiarism to you. Somebody else already did
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> "fair
>> >> >> usage" post from the article.
>> >> >
>> >> > If you can't defend what you post don't bother.
>> >>
>> >> I told you where a very full article is to be found.
>> >
>> > So, just where can those 2200 'veries' be found?
>> >
>> In my sister's basement storage room in a suburb of Cleveland, except for
>> two state's worth that I have in Glendale, CA.
>
> Sure... Well then, perhaps I can meet your sister in Omena?
Yeah, drive up in July and August; Fire Lane 8, third house.
>
> Not considering of course your statements in the past that they no longer
> existed...
I too thought that. But all the stuff from my Mother's basement next door
ended up at my sisters. I have no idea if they are complete, but am told the
entire 2-drawer file is there. Why don't you run down and check? You are
much closer than I am.
David
> On Mar 1, 10:29�am, Rfburns <jimwilh...@labs.net> wrote:
>
> > Lets see now - 400 Million spent on HD Radio ads and 300,000 radios
> > sold so far �- and that's probably inflated.
>
> > Ok, that amounts to....... $1333.33 spent for each listener - roughly
> > speaking of course. � Did I get the math right? � Is that a valid way
> > of looking at it?.
>
> > Now its possible that there are two people listening to the same
> > radio. �OK......That amounts to.....$666.66 per listener.
>
> > Help me out here. �Doesn't seem too successful to me.
>
> > J.R. Stocks. �Could you help me on this?
>
>
> According to Hipporadio on Radio-Info, who is in the broadcast
> industry annd electonic sales, only 130,000 HD radios sold, minus
> returns, "trade" purchases, and giveaways - maybe, the true number is
> around 50,000 in the hands of radio-geeks and consumers.
The only people I've read about buying them are station managers &
technophiles.
& check this one out . .
http://groups.google.com/group/hd-radio?hl=en&lnk=srg
Fifteen People as members . . .
Telamon
<d2407159-e52e-4995...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
RHF <rhf-new...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On Mar 1, 11:47 am, Telamon
> <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> > In article
> > <ff26cbbc-2186-40d9-bc3d-b6c27fcae...@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
> >
> > RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > RF Burns,
> >
> > > Good Post as long as you put IBOC or HD Radio at the Start of
> > > the Subject-Line of these IBOC / HD Radio Posts : You will not
> > > see me posting to them; except to actually make a Comment.
> >
> > > -wrt- Did I Get The Math Right? : Fuzzy Logic =equals= Fuzzy Math
> >
> > > IBOC : "HD" Radio Sales - Getting The Math Right !
> > >http://groups.google.com/group
> -
> - < SNIP >
> -
> - Get lost google group spammer.
> -
>
> PONG : Telamon - Poluting another On-Topic Thread
> with Your Personal Attacks on Me {RHF}
>
> Telamon - In the Name of Google...
> I Denouce The Demon Within You !
> Get Thee Out Old "Ping-Pong" - Be Gone - Amen ~ RHF
Time for you to wise up google spammer.
Stop changing the subject line of the thread you moron.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
"David Eduardo" <da...@davideduardo.com> wrote:
> "Telamon" <telamon_s...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote in message
> news:telamon_spamshield-1...@newsclstr03.news.prodigy.net...
> >
> > Doesn't look third generation to me. It's first generation going on 2nd
> > when it happens. It has not happened yet. Now get a clue as there are no
> > radios with new optimized chip sets because there are no optimized chip
> > sets to put in them yet. What could your next argument be? That they are
> > keeping the new radios a secret?
>
> The chips are shipping. Production samples were given manufacturers at CES
> per the Radio World article and per iBiquity updates.
Those are promotional "promises." There are no "chips" shipping.
> >
> > I don't expect marketers to keep details straight. I expect them to
> > promote ignoring details that do not fit in their outlook.
>
> You are just upset that the chips are not going to you for approval.
I don't work for them and I'm not buying them so naturally they are not
looking for my approval so why would i be upset.
I want to borrow some money from you to fabricate a new chip design. I
promise to pay you back when they sell.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
"David Eduardo" <da...@davideduardo.com> wrote:
I have a subscription now but it is the March issue. I also can't save
it as it is a flash document that is saved in the browser cashe that I
dump every time I shut it down. You can't save it as a separate document
like a pdf. Big mistake on their part to force people that want to go
back and read it again to have to keep their browser cashe.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
Telamon
"David Eduardo" <da...@davideduardo.com> wrote:
Yes, and I read the promotional announcements that mean nothing until
they happen.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
RHF
>
> - Show quoted text -
Mumbler,
Alas had you been paying attention : You would know that
d'Eduardo and Myself {RHF} are forever separated by the...
10 mv/m contour ~ RHF
.
Note - d'Eduard Limit's His Thinking To It.
-while- I Live Beyond It : In the Land Where
"HD" Radio Fears To Go !
.
RHF
wrote:
> In article
> <d2407159-e52e-4995-95e5-12c266deb...@e6g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>
>
>
>
>
> RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > On Mar 1, 11:47 am, Telamon
> > <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> > > In article
> > > <ff26cbbc-2186-40d9-bc3d-b6c27fcae...@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>,
>
> > > RHF <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> > > > RF Burns,
>
> > > > Good Post as long as you put IBOC or HD Radio at the Start of
> > > > the Subject-Line of these IBOC / HD Radio Posts : You will not
> > > > see me posting to them; except to actually make a Comment.
>
> > > > -wrt- Did I Get The Math Right? : Fuzzy Logic =equals= Fuzzy Math
>
> > > > IBOC : "HD" Radio Sales - Getting The Math Right !
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group
> > -
> > - < SNIP >
> > -
> > - Get lost google group spammer.
> > -
>
> > PONG : Telamon - Poluting another On-Topic Thread
> > with Your Personal Attacks on Me {RHF}
>
> > Telamon - In the Name of Google...
> > I Denouce The Demon Within You !
> > Get Thee Out Old "Ping-Pong" - Be Gone - Amen ~ RHF
>
> Time for you to wise up google spammer.
>
-
- --
- Telamon
- Ventura, California
Telamon - Then Your Changing The Subject-Line
Back Must Make You a Genius - N O T !
-ps- Teli you are just a 'Pakled' at heart.
PONG : Telamon - In the Name of Google...
I Denouce The Demon Within You !
- Get Thee Out Old "Ping-Pong" - Be Gone - Amen ~ RHF
.
Telamon
<ee6fb162-7830-4f9d...@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com>,
RHF <rhf-new...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> Telamon - Then Your Changing The Subject-Line
> Back Must Make You a Genius - N O T !
> -ps- Teli you are just a 'Pakled' at heart.
>
> PONG : Telamon - In the Name of Google...
> I Denouce The Demon Within You !
> - Get Thee Out Old "Ping-Pong" - Be Gone - Amen ~ RHF
> .
OK you force my hand.
For the last time stop changing the subject line of the thread. You are
disrupting the thread. Now stop it. This is the last request of you I'm
going to make on this to stop disrupting the thread.
--
Telamon
Ventura, California
dxAce
David Eduardo wrote:
Uh-Huh.
RHF
> Lets see now - 400 Million spent on HD Radio ads and 300,000 radios
> sold so far - and that's probably inflated.
>
> Ok, that amounts to....... $1333.33 spent for each listener - roughly
> speaking of course. Did I get the math right? Is that a valid way
> of looking at it?.
>
> Now its possible that there are two people listening to the same
> radio. OK......That amounts to.....$666.66 per listener.
>
> Help me out here. Doesn't seem too successful to me.
>
> J.R. Stocks. Could you help me on this?
>
> jw
RF Burns - Keep-Up the Good Work :o)
Very Good as long as it has : IBOC -or- HD Radio -or- iBiquity
in the Subject-Line : I do not have a problem with any Post
about the iBiquity Digital Corporation's IBOC Broadcast
Scheme for AM/FM "HD" {Digital} Radio in the USA.
newsgroups they are about content ~ RHF
.