Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Even a monkey can understand that energy is being constantly created and destroyed

7 views
Skip to first unread message

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Oct 10, 2011, 6:44:57 AM10/10/11
to

The Mahabundurr jaiBUNDURR wrote:

> Energy is always getting created and destroyed.


Wow, even the jBm understands this simple thing, which any child can
understand by feeling the warmth of the Sun!
Hope exists for the human race!!!!
Mathematically, energy expended or work done is force multiplied by
distance.
Distance is constant.
Lenonardo da Vinci noted that motive force gets created and destroyed
- naturally.
So, Arindam concludes that energy being proportional to motive force
gets created and destroyed.
Quod Erat Demonstrandum!

Now, throw out the silly law of conservation of energy as a
generality, and use it just for special cases where motion of bodies
from internal forces does not happen.


Cheers, and looking at the stars to find constant creation of energy,
and its destruction in our eyes
Arindam (bin Einstein ban Gandhi) Banerjee


and/or www.mantra.com/jai

unread,
Oct 10, 2011, 12:51:39 PM10/10/11
to
In article <f0456f33-4d6f-427b...@y36g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,
Arindam Banerjee <banerjee...@gmail.com> posted:
>
> . . .

In article <945e26ce-1e2b-4cf9...@p29g2000pra.googlegroups.com>,
baldeagle <forc...@gmail.com> posted:
>
> On Oct 10, 7:20=A0am, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 10, 9:47=A0am, baldeagle <force....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Oct 10, 5:38=A0am, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>>>> On Oct 10, 1:19=A0am, baldeagle <force....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Oct 9, 8:34=A0pm, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Oct 9, 6:05=A0pm, baldeagle <force....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Oct 9, 11:50=A0am, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Oct 9, 11:05=A0am, baldeagle <force....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Oct 9, 7:13=A0am, Arindam Banerjee <adda1...@bigpond.comwrote:
>>>>>>>>> =A0On Oct 7, 12:18=A0am, baldeagle <force....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>>> Why on earth should any Indian doing well in life bother
>>>>>>>>>> about such rankings?
>>
>>>>>>>>> Doing well in life?
>>>>>>>>> Yes. many people do very well...drug trafficking...
>>>>>>>>> human trafficking...exploiting the untouchables...
>>>>>>>>> politicians on the take....crooked businessmen...
>>>>>>>>> They enjoy =A0the best in life...money, women, fast
>>>>>>>>> cars and power....they need no good university
>>>>>>>>> education....
>>
>>>>>>>> You evidently know such types far better than I do, thank goodness!
>>
>>>>>>> I know....you are not a trafficker, a pimp, a high
>>>>>>> caste brahmin, nor a corrupt politician..nor a
>>>>>>> crooked businessman... you don't have the
>>>>>>> brain...nor what it takes to be one.
>>>>>>> You are just a typical Indian....not a good one,
>>>>>>> not a bad one...but just a nobody Indian.
>>
>>>>> . > No, no, I am an Australian of Indian origin. =A0
>>
>>>>> This is even worse...Indians are being treated like
>>>>> pieces of shit in Australia...
>>
>>> .> No Indian I know has been treated like that in Australia. =A0
>>
>>> No ? =A0NO Indian has been subjected to racist treatment
>>> by white in Australia ?
>>
>> See what I wrote above. =A0I wrote "No Indian I know" and NOT "No
>> Indian".
>
> So.,...now you admit the fact that you know 'very little'...
> Do you know..a person who know very little is called ignoramus
>
> Ha ha ha ha ha

Arindam is currently displaying his ignorance in
the following sci.physics thread also:

Energy is always getting created and destroyed

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/67f32a9f01530ca5#

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

Darwin123

unread,
Oct 10, 2011, 1:56:35 PM10/10/11
to
On Oct 10, 6:44 am, Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
Does Noether's Theorem mean anything to you ?-)
Each conservation law is a property that emerges from a symmetry
principle. A given conservation law is only applicable when the system
is invariant to a corresponding transformation.
Conservation of energy is only applicable when the system being
investigated is invariant to a shift in time.
In introductory physics, one is presented with conservation of
energy in macroscopic systems with no atomic sized degrees of freedom.
If there are no frictional forces or irreversible chemical reactions,
the mechanical energy of the macroscopic system is conserved. However,
you will note that Newton's Laws are invariant to time shifts if there
are no frictional forces.
Note that in such a macroscopic system, the laws of physics are
invariant to time. The system can't run down without frictional
forces.
However, real systems have frictional forces. The macroscopic
system changes because of frictions. The temperature of the object
changes with time because of friction. So the state of the system does
vary with time. So conservation of energy is not useful if there are
frictional forces and the temperature of the system is ignored.
In fact, energy is conserved even in a mechanical system with
frictional forces. However, this is because Newton's Laws of mechanics
are invariant to time shifts if all forces between atoms and electrons
are taken into account.
Conservation laws are not "nonsense", whatever that means. Maybe
what you mean is that conservation laws are consequences of underlying
symmetry. It is very useful to know what symmetry principle
corresponds to a particular conservation law. If you pay attention to
a symmetry of the system in question, then the corresponding
conservation law does not seem so mysterious.
I strongly recommend that you look into Noether's theorem before
making another post.

Mobius

unread,
Oct 10, 2011, 6:28:36 PM10/10/11
to
Arindam Banerjee wrote:

- Even a monkey can understand that energy is being constantly created
and destroyed

--------


But you cannot !?

Sorry - just couldn't resist it!

;-)
0 new messages