Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Energy is always getting created and destroyed

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 12:02:16 AM10/9/11
to
As is evidenced by the sun, earth and all other heavenly bodies.

Pressure imbalances from gravitational ties create imbalances
resulting in kinetic and electromagnetic interactions, which create
energy from the formula

e=0.5mVVN(N-k)

manifesting as radiant heat and motion

The former gets lost in space, the latter continues with the pressure
differentials, continuing the heating process endlessly.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

Androcles

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 1:48:45 AM10/9/11
to

"Arindam Banerjee" <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fbe9ddb2-4a9b-48b7...@l30g2000pro.googlegroups.com...

| As is evidenced by the sun, earth and all other heavenly bodies.
|
| Pressure imbalances from gravitational ties create imbalances
| resulting in kinetic and electromagnetic interactions, which create
| energy from the formula
|
| e=0.5mVVN(N-k)

Bullshit.

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 2:16:57 AM10/9/11
to
On Oct 9, 4:48 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics.October.
2011> wrote:
> "Arindam Banerjee" <banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
No, it is supreme sense. Energy is always getting created and
destroyed - the latter is explained off as rise in entropy (an awkward
mathematical concept, awkwardly used as the law of conservation of
energy had to be preserved!) So the Sun is always giving off energy,
without loss of any matter as erroneously supposed. It is size that
does it, and density also matters naturally. The Sun is bigger than
the Earth, so is much hotter.

Cheers,
Arindam (bin Einstein) Banerjee

Androcles

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 2:28:26 AM10/9/11
to

"Arindam Banerjee" <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:be8e2ed8-a463-41a8...@q5g2000pra.googlegroups.com...

On Oct 9, 4:48 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics.October.
2011> wrote:
> "Arindam Banerjee" <banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:fbe9ddb2-4a9b-48b7...@l30g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
> | As is evidenced by the sun, earth and all other heavenly bodies.
> |
> | Pressure imbalances from gravitational ties create imbalances
> | resulting in kinetic and electromagnetic interactions, which create
> | energy from the formula
> |
> | e=0.5mVVN(N-k)
>
> Bullshit.

No, it is supreme sense.

==================================
1) You have not defined your terms.
2) You pulled it out of your arse.

It is fucking BULLSHIT!

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 2:33:25 AM10/9/11
to
On Oct 9, 5:28 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics.October.

2011> wrote:
> "Arindam Banerjee" <banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:be8e2ed8-a463-41a8...@q5g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 9, 4:48 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics.October.
>
> 2011> wrote:
> > "Arindam Banerjee" <banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:fbe9ddb2-4a9b-48b7...@l30g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
> > | As is evidenced by the sun, earth and all other heavenly bodies.
> > |
> > | Pressure imbalances from gravitational ties create imbalances
> > | resulting in kinetic and electromagnetic interactions, which create
> > | energy from the formula
> > |
> > | e=0.5mVVN(N-k)
>
> > Bullshit.
>
> No, it is supreme sense.
> ==================================
> 1) You have not defined your terms.
> 2) You pulled it out of your arse.
>
> It is fucking BULLSHIT!

No, it is supreme sense, and I have talked much of it in earlier posts
in usenet - over the last ten years. Silly for anyone to pretend this
is anything new. Sooner or later, my new physics will become the
standard, and all einsteinians reduced to a howling pack of despicable
thugs.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

Androcles

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 2:57:22 AM10/9/11
to

"Arindam Banerjee" <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2840c958-002d-484d...@r8g2000prh.googlegroups.com...

On Oct 9, 5:28 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics.October.
2011> wrote:
> "Arindam Banerjee" <banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:be8e2ed8-a463-41a8...@q5g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
> On Oct 9, 4:48 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics.October.
>
> 2011> wrote:
> > "Arindam Banerjee" <banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:fbe9ddb2-4a9b-48b7...@l30g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
> > | As is evidenced by the sun, earth and all other heavenly bodies.
> > |
> > | Pressure imbalances from gravitational ties create imbalances
> > | resulting in kinetic and electromagnetic interactions, which create
> > | energy from the formula
> > |
> > | e=0.5mVVN(N-k)
>
> > Bullshit.
>
> No, it is supreme sense.
> ==================================
> 1) You have not defined your terms.
> 2) You pulled it out of your arse.
>
> It is fucking BULLSHIT!

No,
==============
It is fucking bullshit and you are a supreme idiot.

CWatters

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 4:19:04 AM10/9/11
to
On 09/10/2011 07:16, Arindam Banerjee wrote:
> On Oct 9, 4:48 pm, "Androcles"<Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics.October.
> 2011> wrote:
>> "Arindam Banerjee"<banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:fbe9ddb2-4a9b-48b7...@l30g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
>> | As is evidenced by the sun, earth and all other heavenly bodies.
>> |
>> | Pressure imbalances from gravitational ties create imbalances
>> | resulting in kinetic and electromagnetic interactions, which create
>> | energy from the formula
>> |
>> | e=0.5mVVN(N-k)
>>
>> Bullshit.
>
> No, it is supreme sense. Energy is always getting created and
> destroyed - the latter is explained off as rise in entropy (an awkward
> mathematical concept, awkwardly used as the law of conservation of
> energy had to be preserved!) So the Sun is always giving off energy,
> without loss of any matter as erroneously supposed.

So where do the particles in the solar wind come from?

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 8:19:17 AM10/9/11
to
On Oct 9, 5:33 pm, Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Arindam Banerjee- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

On Oct 9, 5:57 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics.October.


2011> wrote:
> "Arindam Banerjee" <banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>

> news:2840c958-002d-484d...@r8g2000prh.googlegroups.com...


> On Oct 9, 5:28 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics.October.
>
>
>
>
>
> 2011> wrote:
> > "Arindam Banerjee" <banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:be8e2ed8-a463-41a8...@q5g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
> > On Oct 9, 4:48 pm, "Androcles" <Headmas...@Hogwarts.physics.October.
>
> > 2011> wrote:
> > > "Arindam Banerjee" <banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:fbe9ddb2-4a9b-48b7...@l30g2000pro.googlegroups.com...
> > > | As is evidenced by the sun, earth and all other heavenly bodies.
> > > |
> > > | Pressure imbalances from gravitational ties create imbalances
> > > | resulting in kinetic and electromagnetic interactions, which create
> > > | energy from the formula
> > > |
> > > | e=0.5mVVN(N-k)
>
> > > Bullshit.
>
> > No, it is supreme sense.
> > ==================================
> > 1) You have not defined your terms.
> > 2) You pulled it out of your arse.
>
> > It is fucking BULLSHIT!
>
> No,

> ==============
> It is fucking bullshit and you are a supreme idiot.

Name-calling is the privilege of supreme losers, so heh-heh to all the
cowardly no-name losers who try petty tricks such as trying to make me
post to their loser sites.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 8:21:54 AM10/9/11
to
On Oct 9, 7:19 pm, CWatters <colin.watt...@NOturnersoakSPAM.plus.com>
wrote:

Not from the loss of matter in the wrong e=mcc equation, at least!!
Huge kinetic interactions on the sun (some internal forces there, due
to gravity and pressure differentials) may force atoms of the Sun off
the sun, despite the gravity. That has nothing to do with the main
point, which is, that the Sun is hot because it is huge. Unlike a
golf ball, which is cold because it is small.

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

G=EMC^2

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 8:32:56 AM10/9/11
to
All energy ends up as heat. TreBert

Sam Wormley

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 9:02:04 AM10/9/11
to
On 10/9/11 7:32 AM, G=EMC^2 wrote:
> All energy ends up as heat. TreBert

The afterglow of the BB is in the microwave part of
the spectrum, Herb.

Androcles

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 9:24:25 AM10/9/11
to

"Arindam Banerjee" <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:9165b9e1-d9ce-4345...@t27g2000prt.googlegroups.com...
===============================================
Making up fucking bullshit is the privilege of supreme idiots, so heh-heh to
all the cowardly moronic idiots like Banerjee who try petty tricks such as
trying to make me believe in their stupid and ridiculous fucking supreme
nonsense they pulled out of their supreme arses.
Jeers, Androcles





Zinnic

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 11:56:00 AM10/9/11
to
On Oct 9, 7:21 am, Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Hi again, it's Smee!
Given that you continue to refuse to define the terms in your formula
"e = 0.5 m V V N(N-k)", and your claim that temperature relates to the
size of "balls", I can only conclude that your crotch and brain are
both in deep-freeze and approaching absolute zero.
Whilst we are in Alice's never-never land. Consider my claim that,
because propagation of neither sound or water waves requires a
medium other than progressive 'disturbances' of air or water, then
propagation of light waves requires no medium other than
electromagnetism. If you promise to nominate me for this, then I
will nominate your formula and your "balls" theory for the "Ignoble
prize"
Regards
Zinnic

Lofty Goat

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 12:11:34 PM10/9/11
to
On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 21:02:16 -0700, Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> As is evidenced by the sun, earth and all other heavenly bodies.

> <snip bafflegab>

The verb you need here is "evinced". It's in the dictionary.

The remainder is almost coherent enough to be wrong. But as an
experiment in writing it is no more successful than that magic trick of
bouncing light around in cones.

Maybe Indians are following the American tradition of not teaching
writing to scientists, or science to writers... and neither to everyone
else. Sad, that.

By the way, have you built a working model of that reactionless,
perpetual motion thingy yet, you know, the one the Times covered?

[sigh]

--
RLW

NoEinstein

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 12:34:52 PM10/9/11
to
On Oct 9, 12:02 am, Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com>
wrote:

Dear Arindam: Energy is NEVER destroyed! Matter is composed of
concentrations of energy that can remain reasonably stable. The only
"seeming" destruction of energy is for such to flow, like in weather
systems on Earth, to areas having a greater concentration. Black
Holes (ZERO gravity!) have the greatest concentration of evaporating
(from a solid) pure energy in the Universe. — NoEinstein —

Sam Wormley

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 12:40:54 PM10/9/11
to
On 10/9/11 11:34 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> Black Holes (ZERO gravity!) have the greatest concentration
> of evaporating (from a solid) pure energy in the Universe.

John Armistead, who admits he's NoEinstein, sticks his feet in
his mouth once again!

jim

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 2:31:36 PM10/9/11
to
On Oct 9, 12:02 am, Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> As is evidenced by the sun, earth and all other heavenly bodies.

Well, you have to understand why scientist claim that energy is not
created,
When the only thing you know about energy is calculus, the people
who
know how logic works discover non Euclidean Geometry anyway.
The people who know how Calculus works discover Set Theory and
Topolgy anyway.
The people who know how thermodynamics works discover
artificial satellites, and orbital solar energy anyway.

The people who know publishing works discover optical networks,
holograms,
and post Xerographic publishing anyway,

The people who know how electrons work, discover lasers, anyway.

The people who know evolution works, discover post-Piltdown DNA,
anyway.

The people who know how plutonium works, discovered transuranium
anyway.

The people who know how

jim

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 6:04:47 PM10/9/11
to

Or, you could really summarize it as:

WWI is why the people who know how Philosophers and their trench
philosophy works, invented ICBMs.
WWII is why the people who know how codes work invented
Artificial Satellites and Stealth Helicopters,
rather than more Roman Numerals for the Euclid wannabee cranks.
The Gulf Wars are why they invented 21st Century Cruise
Missiles , Holograms, and Transuranium for the Isaac Asimov wannabee
crankpots.

Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 7:27:33 PM10/9/11
to
On Oct 9, 11:19 pm, Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com>
> Arindam Banerjee.

heh-heh, puerile bile from the vile is sounder than getting nobels
from the einsteinian goats - one knows thus how assuredly right one
is.
Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee

Androcles

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 7:47:31 PM10/9/11
to

"Arindam Banerjee" <banerjee...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e4e7477c-45cb-405b-9b4d-

509125...@l11g2000prh.googlegroups.com...
===============================================
Making up fucking bullshit is the privilege of supreme idiots, so heh-heh to
all the cowardly moronic idiots like Banerjee who try petty tricks such as
trying to make me believe in their stupid and ridiculous fucking supreme
nonsense they pulled out of their supreme arses.
Sneers and Jeers, Androcles



Arindam Banerjee

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 9:27:50 PM10/9/11
to
On Oct 10, 10:27 am, Arindam Banerjee <banerjeeadda1...@gmail.com>
Seems to me, this Androcles guy is yet another manifestation of the
ubiquitiously iniquitous jBm!!

Note: jBM = jaiBUNDURRmaharaj

and/or www.mantra.com/jai

unread,
Oct 9, 2011, 9:45:00 PM10/9/11
to
In article <4ee181c6-9d00-478e...@y12g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
Arindam Banerjee <adda...@bigpond.com> posted:
>
> . . .

Arindam Banerjee derives false conclusions from false premises:

Forwarded post:

[ Subject: Re: Lots of things...
[ From: "John Yamamoto-Wilson" <johndeletet...@rarebooksinjapan.com>
[ Newsgroups: soc.culture.irish,soc.culture.british,
[ soc.culture.indian...
[ Message-ID: <2sj3qcF1kjp1...@uni-berlin.de>
[ Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004

Arindam Banerjee wrote:

> Out of pure charity, I am replying to your posts, and wasting
> my time accordingly.

Well, since I have no need for your charity and no wish to impose on
your time, I suppose this discussion is at an end.

Let me just comment on one point:

> I rejoice to find you using my own expressions. However, you
> should write "fanatic and fundamentalist freak" or "fanatical
> fundamentalist freak" if you should desire proper self-expression,
> instead of "fanatic fundamentalist freak". A noun does not
> qualify another.

A noun can perfectly well qualify another, as in "table leg", "flight
attendant", "newpaper boy", etc., etc. However, "fanatic" functions
here as an adjective, as it has done in English since at least the
16th century.

Deriving false conclusions from false premises appears to be
something of a forte of yours, and I would be happy to point out the
range and extent of solecisms you fall into, but not if you consider
it a waste of time.

John
http://rarebooksinjapan.com

End of forwarded post

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

jim

unread,
Oct 10, 2011, 4:36:07 PM10/10/11
to

And, not to be left out.
The clowns at GM, are why they invented Topology, Turing Machines,
Atomic Clocks, Lasers, Holograms, Nanotechnology,
Neo-Publishing, Orbital Banking, Software Supercomputers, and
post-Pyramid Economics to fund all this high tech.

0 new messages