Account Options

  1. Sign in
The old Google Groups will be going away soon, but your browser is incompatible with the new version.
Google Groups Home
« Groups Home
new webob release?
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  9 messages - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Thomas G. Willis  
View profile  
 More options May 15 2012, 8:02 am
From: "Thomas G. Willis" <tom.wil...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 05:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, May 15 2012 8:02 am
Subject: new webob release?

What's going on with webob right now?  The docs reference a 1.2b4 with the
new fangled client functionality, but the latest on pypi is 1.2b3.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alex Grönholm  
View profile  
 More options May 15 2012, 8:04 am
From: Alex Grönholm <alex.gronh...@nextday.fi>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:04:02 +0300
Local: Tues, May 15 2012 8:04 am
Subject: Re: [Paste] new webob release?
15.05.2012 15:02, Thomas G. Willis kirjoitti:
> What's going on with webob right now?  The docs reference a 1.2b4 with
> the new fangled client functionality, but the latest on pypi is 1.2b3. --

An even better question is, why is it STILL in beta? Why not just
release a "stable" one and then put the new features in 1.3 or something?


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Thomas G. Willis  
View profile  
 More options May 15 2012, 8:08 am
From: "Thomas G. Willis" <tom.wil...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 05:08:05 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, May 15 2012 8:08 am
Subject: Re: [Paste] new webob release?

Yeah that's a good point too. Though "beta" in this case doesn't really bug
me since webob works just fine.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Alex Grönholm  
View profile  
 More options May 15 2012, 8:43 am
From: Alex Grönholm <alex.gronh...@nextday.fi>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 15:43:35 +0300
Local: Tues, May 15 2012 8:43 am
Subject: Re: [Paste] new webob release?

15.05.2012 15:08, Thomas G. Willis kirjoitti:

> Yeah that's a good point too. Though "beta" in this case doesn't
> really bug me since webob works just fine.

And that is why it bugs ME. If it works fine, why not release it? It
certainly has been in beta long enough.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sergey Schetinin  
View profile  
 More options May 15 2012, 9:27 am
From: Sergey Schetinin <mal...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:27:25 +0300
Local: Tues, May 15 2012 9:27 am
Subject: Re: [Paste] new webob release?
The reason for the betas is that I try to have a couple weeks with no
major changes or additions before the "gold" releases, so that the
code has some time to get tested in the real world by people who use
the betas / RC's. There were some opportunities to make a the 1.2
stable release, but every time I was actually looking at doing that,
there was some ongoing work (webob.static, webob.client etc) or
something like that was merged in just recently, so I didn't feel it's
entirely safe to just make an 1.2 release.

I've made a 1.2rc1 release just now and 1.2 stable should follow in
about a week. I'd love to get coverage back to 100% before that even
if with pragmas, because otherwise future commits can reduce coverage
further and it would easily pass unnoticed.

On 15 May 2012 15:43, Alex Grönholm <alex.gronh...@nextday.fi> wrote:


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Thomas G. Willis  
View profile  
 More options May 15 2012, 11:21 am
From: "Thomas G. Willis" <tom.wil...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 08:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, May 15 2012 11:21 am
Subject: Re: [Paste] new webob release?

Thanks Sergey, last I checked on the HEAD, coverage was 99% at least on
python2.7 and the line not covered I could almost see a pragma no cover
there.

I made webobtoolkit depend on the new client functionality and all my tests
pass.

https://github.com/Batterii/webobtoolkit

Sometime this week I will hopefully have time to try it on appengine. I'll
let you know if I see any issues.


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Chris McDonough  
View profile  
 More options May 15 2012, 12:58 pm
From: Chris McDonough <chr...@plope.com>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 12:58:48 -0400
Local: Tues, May 15 2012 12:58 pm
Subject: Re: [Paste] new webob release?
On 05/15/2012 09:27 AM, Sergey Schetinin wrote:

> The reason for the betas is that I try to have a couple weeks with no
> major changes or additions before the "gold" releases, so that the
> code has some time to get tested in the real world by people who use
> the betas / RC's. There were some opportunities to make a the 1.2
> stable release, but every time I was actually looking at doing that,
> there was some ongoing work (webob.static, webob.client etc) or
> something like that was merged in just recently, so I didn't feel it's
> entirely safe to just make an 1.2 release.

FYI, I recently brought coverage back up, and fixed failing webob.client
tests.  When I did so, I removed non-functional behavior that attempted
to use urllib3.  Not sure if Ian wants to try to readd that before a
final release, or what.

- C


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Sergey Schetinin  
View profile  
 More options May 23 2012, 9:50 am
From: Sergey Schetinin <mal...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 16:50:11 +0300
Local: Wed, May 23 2012 9:50 am
Subject: Re: [Paste] new webob release?
Just pushed a 1.2 release. (Coverage is back at 100% too).

http://pypi.python.org/pypi/WebOb/1.2

Thanks to everyone who contributed!


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
Ian Bicking  
View profile  
 More options May 23 2012, 11:58 am
From: Ian Bicking <i...@ianbicking.org>
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 10:58:19 -0500
Local: Wed, May 23 2012 11:58 am
Subject: Re: [Paste] new webob release?

And thanks to Chris and Sergey for making up for my less-than-complete
tests!


 
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »