http://redmonk.net/archives/2008/07/24/web-green-the-open-web-foundation/
--Steve
--
Steve Ivy
http://redmonk.net // http://diso-project.org
This email is: [ ] bloggable [x] ask first [ ] private
There's also the Dare Obasanjo piece and the comments on it,
http://www.25hoursaday.com/weblog/2008/07/26/SomeThoughtsOnTheOpenWebFoundat
ion.aspx
-----Original Message-----
From: David Recordon
http://groups.google.com/group/open-web-discuss/msg/c35df14f1a78caca?hl=en
Sent: Sunday, July 27, 2008 11:08
To: open-web...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Tracking Coverage of the Open Web Foundation Announcement
[ ... including the following compilation of links ...
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/63945.html
http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Linux-and-Open-Source/Open-Web-Foundation-to-Keep-D
ata-Open/
http://www.identitywoman.net/?p=776
http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/07/oscon-open-web-foundation-laun.
html
http://ostatic.com/169545-blog/the-open-web-foundation-is-open-for-business
http://redmonk.net/archives/2008/07/24/web-green-the-open-web-foundation/
http://siliconflorist.com/2008/07/24/open-web-foundation-oscon-2008/
http://joi.ito.com/weblog/2008/07/24/announcing-the.html
http://bobdotnet.wordpress.com/2008/07/24/open-web-foundation-announced-at-o
scon/
http://skypejournal.com/blog/2008/07/open_web_foundation_can_clear.html
http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/open_web_foundation_launches_t.php
http://ajaxian.com/archives/open-web-foundation-david-recordon-at-oscon
http://radar.oreilly.com/2008/07/open-web-foundation.html
http://fastwonderblog.com/2008/07/24/announcing-the-open-web-foundation/
http://daveman692.livejournal.com/338898.html
http://kveton.com/blog/2008/07/24/announcing-the-open-web-foundation/
http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/07/24/open-web-foundation-officially-launches
/
http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2008/07/oscon-open-web-foundation-laun.
html
[end]
Atom was a very good example of community and formal processes working
well together, with the original community AtomEnabled/Pie work
progressing into IETF based on a community vote. IETF then did a good
job of cleaning up the spec, pruning unnecessary bits and getting the
spec wording cleared up, and doing all this in a relatively rapid
amount of time. As the Atom IETF WG was focussed on finalising rather
than developing the spec, there was little real scope for adding in
potential IPR or licensing problems.
S
> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Open Web Foundation Discussion" group.
> To post to this group, send email to open-web...@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to open-web-discu...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/open-web-discuss?hl=en
> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
>
Epeus' epigone (Kevin Marks): 2008-07-28:
http://epeus.blogspot.com/2008/07/here-comes-everybody-tummlers-geishas.html
with a sort of aside to Open Web (becoming pop culture, are we?)
Dione Almaer: 2008-07-28:
http://almaer.com/blog/a-second-look-at-dare-on-the-owf
Dione Almaer: 2008-07-23:
http://almaer.com/blog/the-open-web-foundation-apache-for-the-other-stuff
- previously on this thread - - - - - - - - - - -
Here's one (via Tim O'Reilly): Ben Laurie?
Joe Hodnicki: Law X.0 2008-07-29
http://3lepiphany.typepad.com/3l_epiphany/2008/07/open-web-founda.html
Joe Gregorio: 2008-07-29
http://bitworking.org/news/346/too-inclusive-is-not-a-bug
extending more OWF discussion elements into blogosphere conversation
- added 2008-07-28 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Ah, if only the DoS really were just off-topic posting...