Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules! Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules! Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules! Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules! Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules! Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules! Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules! Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules!

Radium

ยังไม่อ่าน,

4 พ.ค. 2549 00:04:314/5/49

ถึง

Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules!

Herb

ยังไม่อ่าน,

4 พ.ค. 2549 01:41:444/5/49

ถึง

On 04.05.2006 05:04 UK Time, Radium wrote:
> Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules!
>
> Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules!
>
> Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules!
>
> Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules!
>
> Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules!

Could you repeat that please? I didn't quite catch it O:-)

And perhaps make your subject line a little longer next time round?

--
Herbert Eppel
www.HETranslation.co.uk

ข้อความถูกลบแล้ว

Ron Hunter

ยังไม่อ่าน,

4 พ.ค. 2549 04:37:144/5/49

ถึง

Radiu

>
> Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules!
>
> Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules!
>
> Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules!
>
> Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules!
>
> Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules!
>
> Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules!
>
> Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules!
>

Thanks for your opinion, but don't you think you overstated your case?
perhaps you would like to tell us (ONCE), what you like better about the
suite, rather than wasting bandwidth with something that does little to
further convincing others of anything but your immaturity, and lack of
consideration?

Canopus

ยังไม่อ่าน,

4 พ.ค. 2549 06:42:064/5/49

ถึง

Ron Hunter on 04/05/2006 wrote:

>Thanks for your opinion, but don't you think you overstated your case?
>perhaps you would like to tell us (ONCE), what you like better about the
>suite, rather than wasting bandwidth with something that does little to
>further convincing others of anything but your immaturity, and lack of
>consideration?

I doubt if he'd get many responses if he did, I'd imagine most people have
already blocked him.

--
Rob

http://www.flickr.com/photos/canopus_archives/

Don Nickell

ยังไม่อ่าน,

4 พ.ค. 2549 08:04:374/5/49

ถึง

Canopus wrote:
> Ron Hunter on 04/05/2006 wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your opinion, but don't you think you overstated your case?
>> perhaps you would like to tell us (ONCE), what you like better about
>> the suite, rather than wasting bandwidth with something that does
>> little to further convincing others of anything but your immaturity,
>> and lack of consideration?
>
> I doubt if he'd get many responses if he did, I'd imagine most people
> have already blocked him.
>

Whether he is no not I feel this is a good indication that this server
is vulnerable to e-mail collection, unlike the old secure NG's. I've
been getting much more trash mail recently so am munging my e-mail
address. :-(

unknown

ยังไม่อ่าน,

4 พ.ค. 2549 11:04:584/5/49

ถึง

On Thu, 04 May 2006 03:37:14 -0500, Ron Hunter <rphu...@charter.net>
wrote:

Immature and inconsiderate people frequently seem to need to let
everyone know it. Good thing that MOST eventually grow up.

Canopus

ยังไม่อ่าน,

4 พ.ค. 2549 14:50:214/5/49

ถึง

You made me think then, had to check what address I was using. I see it's
one of my spammotel addresses which means anyone who tries to spam me with
it I can trace where they got it from. However, no one will be able to as
I just popped along to the spammotel site and noticed I have it filtered
to only allow mail via it from Individual.net in case the admins of their
server need to contact me. If however someone in a newsgroup indicated
they want to mail me I'd just switch off the filter until I received their
mail. Never get spam via newsgroups that way any more :)

--
Rob

http://www.flickr.com/photos/canopus_archives/

Marko Jotic

ยังไม่อ่าน,

4 พ.ค. 2549 14:57:344/5/49

ถึง

all servers are vulnerable to e-mail collection, all you have to do is
subscribe to it and read the posts
the old secure one also led to spams
I can practically count then, e.g. 10 spams per post

--
Marko Jotic
"Common sense is anything but common".
From the notebooks of Lazarus Long. Robert A. Heinlein.
Handmade knives, antique designs, exotic materials at
http://www.knifeforging.com/

elaich

ยังไม่อ่าน,

4 พ.ค. 2549 15:32:304/5/49

ถึง

"Radium" <gluc...@excite.com> wrote in news:1146715471.868224.213100
@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com:

> Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules!

Thanks for proving to all of us that you are a moron.

jbclem

ยังไม่อ่าน,

29 มิ.ย. 2549 19:47:2729/6/49

ถึง

Radium, hey Radium...there goes the bell. Your teacher's calling you...it's nappy time.

"Radium" <gluc...@excite.com> wrote in message
news:1146715471.8...@j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

squaredancer

ยังไม่อ่าน,

30 มิ.ย. 2549 08:24:5630/6/49

ถึง

On 04.05.2006 06:04 am, CET - what odd quirk of fate caused Radium to
generate the following:? :

>< snipped >
>Firefox Stinks! Suite Rules!
>
>
>
seem to have seen that elsewhere!

Good morning, Child!

reg

Wiebe Tijsma

ยังไม่อ่าน,

11 ธ.ค. 2549 07:40:0611/12/49

ถึง

I call shenanigans!