Please move this discussion in mozilla.general and continue it there .
oh my god! Its happened. Nir's been groomed and trained at
the Chris I University of Off Topicism. He's now morphed and
starting to post like him. Perhaps we should call you Chris
II instead.
Then Q should be rename to Chris III, and JoeS should now
become Chris IV.
Or if you want to be like Stanley Marsh 3, we can call you
Chris 2, Chris 3, and Chris 4.
--
Please do not email me for help. Reply to the newsgroup
only. And only click on the Reply button, not the Reply All
or Reply to Author. Thanks!
Peter Potamus & His Magic Flying Balloon:
http://www.toonopedia.com/potamus.htm
if you looked at the names I posted, its just those who take
power trips of censoring, sending out offensive and
threating messages.
>
>> Then Q should be rename to Chris III, and JoeS should
>> now become Chris IV.
>>
>> Or if you want to be like Stanley Marsh 3, we can call
>> you Chris 2, Chris 3, and Chris 4.
>>
>
> Ah! We all know you are quite expert in this game : ...
> > [snipped for basic reasons] > Heavens to Murgatroid >
> Snagglepuss > Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo > Grant . (
> Well , seems like we really need to maintain a database
> :-P )
and your point is what?
> Hippo , if you are still listening :-P , write down your
> name somewhere first , just in case you forget it
> somehow and need to create a new one .
>
Yes yes , that is expected from you . ( Clear sign of paranoia )
>>
>>> Then Q should be rename to Chris III, and JoeS should now become
>>> Chris IV.
>>>
>>> Or if you want to be like Stanley Marsh 3, we can call you Chris
>>> 2, Chris 3, and Chris 4.
>>>
>>
>> Ah! We all know you are quite expert in this game : ...
>>> [snipped for basic reasons] > Heavens to Murgatroid >
>> Snagglepuss > Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo > Grant . ( Well ,
>> seems like we really need to maintain a database :-P )
>
> and your point is what?
Haven't you read last part ? :-P
>> Hippo , if you are still listening :-P , write down your name
>> somewhere first , just in case you forget it somehow and need to
>> create a new one .
>>
BTW , any news about your next alias ? release date ? or still in
alpha/beta/gamma/delta/omega/... testing phase :-P ?
Done. A little short on tolerance aren't we? For my personal
information, edification, and enjoyment; am I to deduce that two is the
limit for OT posts?
Rinaldi
--
How come I can never find an "anal retentive" quip when I want one?
> f/u set mozilla.general
>
> Blinky the Shark wrote:
> I use php for serving up photo albums only. Css is adequate for the rest.
>
> If the log files are local you can; logrotate -f /etc/logrotate.d/httpd
> which (here) compresses the existing logs, creates new ones, and
> restarts the server. Takes about .25 seconds.
Gotcha! Thanks.
--
Blinky RLU 297263
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://blinkynet.net/comp/uip5.html
Sorry , Nor sure what you have meant by 'limit of OT posts' :(
Limit after that your message in that thread will be count as OT ? or
Limit after which you will be asked to move discussion to proper place ?
boy, you sure got a lot to learn about paranoia. Oh thats
right, I forgot, you live in the "black hole of Calcutta",
that explains everything.
I'll assume english is not your native tongue.
What I meant was my post was the second in that subthread which I would
have deemed to be OT; yours, the fourth, was the request to move to
moz*.gen*.
But let's not quibble. The point was made and the desired result
achieved. I guess that I should be grateful there are people who wish
to restore some sense of order to the anarchy of USENET. It does,
however, serve to diminish the spontaneity and camaraderie of the medium.
Rinaldi
--
Better dead than mellow.
Black hole of Kolkata in Park Street !!! Oh ! I forgot I'm taking to a
Peter Potamus the paranoid hippo . opps sorry , with 'Peter Potamus the
Purple Hippo' .
BTW , its Kolkata , not Calcutta anymore :-P
Thanks for making it clear to me
> But let's not quibble. The point was made and the desired result
> achieved.
Thanks for respecting mozilla forum etiquette :)
> I guess that I should be grateful there are people who wish to
> restore some sense of order to the anarchy of USENET.
Thanks for your kind consideration .
> It does, however, serve to diminish the spontaneity and camaraderie
> of the medium.
>
Mozilla forum etiquette is not a problem to camaraderie or spontaneity
until they become problem to m.forum etiquette .
I think even English is not my native language but still I'm able to
make my view clear to you :)
I'll repeat: and your point is what?
Yes, my email address at one point was
Heavens.to...@gmail.com, and I used it for posting.
Thats a well known fact.
Yes I was posting under the name of Snagglepuss in relation
to the above email address. Thats a well known fact.
Yes, I use the name of Peter Potamus the Purple Hippo when
posting. Again, that's a well known fact.
And yes, my name is Grant, and again, it's a well known fact.
Yeah, so! So what?
So, I repeat: and your point is what?
Where i have told that its really a secret fact ?
Peter , are you dreaming ;) ? Wake up , up up up :)
> Yeah, so! So what?
That's make you a well known expert in your poor rename game :-P .
You have already done enough self experiment to prove it .
BTW folks , is there any way we can award Heaven/Snagg/Peter/Grant for
his extraordinary effort :-P ?
> So, I repeat: and your point is what?
>
Same as above.
Yes yes , I'm d*** sure that you will never get it .
you're right, I don't get it. I don't get things when
people aren't clear in what they're trying to type. Pehaps
your mind is still in Aruba. Yeah, thats probably explain
things.
So, I repeat: and your point is what?
--
My guess come true ;)
reg
> BTW folks , is there any way we can award Heaven/Snagg/Peter/Grant for
> his extraordinary effort :-P ?
>
YES, THERE IS....
send the Spam Cops to the electronical Nirwana - a lot of posters would
be quite happy to see you (them as well) go!
reg
reg
reg
reg
Think again reg ;) , if it somehow comes true then your only apprentice
, peter , will in trouble too :-P
yup, I sure did notice that. Chris 2 is becoming just like
Chris 1 -- almost an exact clone.
yup, you're talking in riddles. Well, what do you expect
from someone who has an infatuation with Hillary Duff!
Peter , are you dreaming again ;) ?
is this not you?:
http://www.blogger.com/profile/02531976498766830537
http://nirmalya-sensharma.blogspot.com/
http://screenshots-of-my-computer.blogspot.com/
it sure sounds like it to me.
Dhus ! you don't understand it again . I'm talking about 'infatuation'
part . where from you get that information or its another guesswork like
'black hole of Kolkata' :-P?
well, it does help if you explain things. As far as I'm
concerned, you're talking in riddles. I can't read your
freakin' mind. As for the black hole:
http://www.answers.com/topic/black-hole-of-calcutta
the term is also a reference to the confinement of Calcutta.
Lots of people and very little space. And don't you live
in Calcutta [or excuse me Kolkata]. Therefore, you live in
the black hole of Calcutta.
--
Taking Wikipedia as reference :
Population density in Kolkata : 64,128/sq mi
["http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kolkata"]
Population density in Black hole : (146 people in 14 by 18 ft area )
["http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Hole_of_Calcutta#The_Holwell_account"])
16,219,173/sq mi
Peter , do you understand the difference ?
Peter , buddy , are you still calculating on population density ;) ?
reg
> reads very much as if the population (or at least, some of it) is very dense
;-)
--
Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with
themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon.
-- Susan Ertz
are you saying that the population is dense -- as in empty
headed or dim-witted? ;-)
http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dense
adjectives 3, 5 and 6 refer!
reg
Peter , do you still having problems with above numbers ;) ? May i
help you
anyway ? You can ask for help ( ;) ) privately . Everyone is welcome to
post to my hotmail id , even paranoids :-P .
I'm not answering your question until you spam mooses answer
mine!
> I'm not answering your question until you spam mooses answer mine!
>
So Peter , until now you seemed not to have any problem to my
questions . And all of sudden ( ;) ) you have decided not to reply
until you get answer in another thread!
And it is your own ( ;) ) decision, right :) ?
DUH!!! Boy, you're really smart today. No, actually I got
a message from Surya telling me to do it.
So you have asked a question to the Sun and you
_believe_ you have got a reply also =-O !!
Peter , seriously speaking ( :-D ) , I'm now too worried
about your present condition . I never thought those simple
calculations can put so much pressure on your brain :-P !!
thats right. Start answering MY questions and I'll start
considering to answer your questions.
which one :-D ? your belief that you got a reply from the Sun :-P or
those numbers left you in stressed condition ;) ?
BTW , are you sure that the message you got from the Sun , was not this
"http://solar-center.stanford.edu/singing/singing.html" :) ?
> Start answering MY questions and I'll start considering to answer
> your questions.
As i have already said , what/who influenced you to take that abrupt
decision especially when you seemed not to have any problem to answer my
questions ?
If you spam mooses aren't going to answer my questions, then
why should I continue answering yours?
Really ! Then who the idiot has actually answered [1] my question [2]
even
you already declared that you will not answer until you get answer [3]
:-P ?
[1]"http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.general/msg/10fe1de7906e4741"
[2]"http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.general/msg/ab8eecf2aa6449aa"
[3]"http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.general/msg/c2b57569e3965148"
You know, Nir, I expected a higher level of maturity from you because of
your position in these groups. Next time you remind someone of being
off topic, remember this thread.
Yes, I know this is the place for OT posting. I hold you, Chris, et al
to a higher standard than I do others.
--
The primary requisite for any new tax law is for it to exempt enough
voters to win the next election.
you just don't get it, do you! I'll type a little slower so
you can follow along easier ;-)
I'm not answering any more of your questions until you spam
mooses answer mine.
> You know, Nir, I expected a higher level of maturity from you because
> of your position in these groups. Next time you remind someone of
> being off topic, remember this thread.
>
> Yes, I know this is the place for OT posting. I hold you, Chris, et
> al to a higher standard than I do others.
>
First thanks for your post .
Rinaldi , You joined these newsgroups before me . Tell me one
thing , how many times you found me reacting in this way . As far i can
remember
once i was about to start flame war[1] and then stopped it as Lee
asked me to keep focus only in providing support . Still then i try to
ignore useless _comments_ and like to do same in future also .
But in my view this discussion or the way of discussion was inevitable.
Someone deserved to know how impolite reply actually feels like ;)
According to my experiences i never able to get reply of _my_ private
mail from him . So the only place left to reply to him is this group .
And this thread is really dead now . At least no more posting from me
. You can relax now :)
--
[1]"http://groups.google.com/group/mozilla.support.thunderbird/msg/05b85a413e26aaa1"